Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A few rewiring queries
Am currently doing a rewire and have a few questions please...
1. (the main question!). I'm proposing the following circuits - does this plan sound sensible? BTW total floor area is 70m2; CU is a Volex split-load item: http://tinyurl.com/7fe6m (Screwfix 82204). So: Non-RCD protected: a) upstairs lights, 6A MCB, 1.5mm T&E cable b) downstairs lights, 6A MCB, 1.5mm T&E c) linked smoke alarms, 6A MCB, 1.5mm T&E d) downstairs ringmain feeding specifically the oven, fridge-freezer and gas combi boiler, 32A MCD, 2.5mm T&E cable RCD protected: e) upstairs ringmain, 32A MCB, 2.5mm T&E f) downstairs ringmain - all sockets other than those in circuit (d) 32A MCB, 2.5mm T&E g) electric shower, 40A MCB, 10mm T&E I expect circuit (d) to cause most comment?! I don't see the need for a dedicated cooker circuit because I'll be fitting a built-in single oven with 13A plug (plus gas hob), which could be plugged into an ordinary ringmain. OK? 2. I've got some spare 1.0mm red/black cable which I'd like to use up - would there be any issue with me mixing-and-matching 1.0mm and 1.5mm cable within one installation (I don't have enough 1.0mm do do the whole house)? 3. CU is under the stairs, which means that the route for all cables will be running under the stairs, in a straight line, at ~45deg, in the space created behind plasterboard attached to battens on the bottom of the stairs (clear?!.) Now, if the plasterboard were 'ceiling', that arrangement would unequivocably be perfectly OK; however if it were 'wall', it would definitely be unacceptable because the cables would be well within 50mm of the surface. What I'm unclear about is what does a 45-deg-mounted surface count as - ceiling or wall? I think it's ceiling, but I'd like reassurance that some future inspector isn't going to throw a wobbler at it! Not sure what to do if it's unacceptable as it is. Thanks a lot David |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Lobster writes: Am currently doing a rewire and have a few questions please... You haven't said what type of earthing your system is. 1. (the main question!). I'm proposing the following circuits - does this plan sound sensible? BTW total floor area is 70m2; CU is a Volex split-load item: http://tinyurl.com/7fe6m (Screwfix 82204). So: Non-RCD protected: a) upstairs lights, 6A MCB, 1.5mm T&E cable b) downstairs lights, 6A MCB, 1.5mm T&E c) linked smoke alarms, 6A MCB, 1.5mm T&E d) downstairs ringmain feeding specifically the oven, fridge-freezer and gas combi boiler, 32A MCD, 2.5mm T&E cable RCD protected: e) upstairs ringmain, 32A MCB, 2.5mm T&E f) downstairs ringmain - all sockets other than those in circuit (d) 32A MCB, 2.5mm T&E g) electric shower, 40A MCB, 10mm T&E I expect circuit (d) to cause most comment?! I don't see the need for a dedicated cooker circuit because I'll be fitting a built-in single oven with 13A plug (plus gas hob), which could be plugged into an ordinary ringmain. OK? It's fine. Shower probably doesn't need to be RCD protected. Smoke alarm circuits are often 3A MCBs if they're available for your CU. 2. I've got some spare 1.0mm red/black cable which I'd like to use up - would there be any issue with me mixing-and-matching 1.0mm and 1.5mm cable within one installation (I don't have enough 1.0mm do do the whole house)? No problem mixing them providing all your cable is red and black. (Whilst an installation can be mixed, you can't mix old and new colours in the same job.) 3. CU is under the stairs, which means that the route for all cables will be running under the stairs, in a straight line, at ~45deg, in the space created behind plasterboard attached to battens on the bottom of the stairs (clear?!.) Now, if the plasterboard were 'ceiling', that arrangement would unequivocably be perfectly OK; however if it were 'wall', it would definitely be unacceptable because the cables would be well within 50mm of the surface. What I'm unclear about is what does a 45-deg-mounted surface count as - ceiling or wall? I think it's ceiling, but I'd like reassurance that some future inspector isn't going to throw a wobbler at it! Not sure what to do if it's unacceptable as it is. I don't have the regs on me to confirm, but I don't think it makes any difference from the point of view of depth of burying. -- Andrew Gabriel |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Andrew Gabriel wrote:
In article , Lobster writes: Am currently doing a rewire and have a few questions please... Thanks for the replies. You haven't said what type of earthing your system is. At the risk of provoking a "what-the-hell-are-doing-rewiring-for-if-you-don't-know-this-for-chrissakes-get-a-pro-in"-type response, what significance does the earthing system have on the circuit design? In mine, it's provided by the armoured sheath of the main supply cable; have to say I don't know any more than that. Do I need to find out? Thanks David |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Lobster writes: Andrew Gabriel wrote: You haven't said what type of earthing your system is. At the risk of provoking a "what-the-hell-are-doing-rewiring-for-if-you-don't-know-this-for-chrissakes-get-a-pro-in"-type response, what significance does the earthing system have on the circuit design? In mine, it's provided by the armoured sheath of the main supply cable; have to say I don't know any more than that. Do I need to find out? If the system was a TT system with your own earth rod, the use of RCD's would have to be different. -- Andrew Gabriel |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Lobster wrote:
You haven't said what type of earthing your system is. what significance does the earthing system have on the circuit design? Lots. If you don't understand the difference between TT, TN-C, TN-C-S, etc then you really should not be doing the job. In mine, it's provided by the armoured sheath of the main supply cable; have to say I don't know any more than that. Do I need to find out? If you intend to do the re-cabling yourself then your follow-up certificate which will be required may prove to be very expensive. If you've hot-wired the earthing within the installation wrong then it will need to be ripped out and started over. It will be cheaper and easier to do the wiring correctly the first time. Andrew -- Please note that the email address used for posting usenet messages is configured such that my antispam filter will automatically update itself so that the senders email address is flagged as spam. If you do need to contact me please visit my web site and submit an enquiry - http://www.kazmax.co.uk |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Andrew McKay wrote:
Lobster wrote: what significance does the earthing system have on the circuit design? Lots. If you intend to do the re-cabling yourself then your follow-up certificate which will be required may prove to be very expensive. If you've hot-wired the earthing within the installation wrong then it will need to be ripped out and started over. It will be cheaper and easier to do the wiring correctly the first time. OK, I'm listening... What do you mean, hot-wiring the earthing? Of course I'll be doing it properly, and getting it certified afterwards, which is why I posted my circuit design here first for feedback, which I'm pleased to have received. [It's my third full rewire, and my previous checks by a pro came up (1) with very small easily remedied errors and (2)100% OK. Previously I had run my wiring diagram past my pro first, who OK'ed it; I assume that because my earthing plans were OK there was no need for him to go into all the ins and outs of different earthing systems?] Anyway - given the presence of an earthing block next to the CU, connected to the CU, a clamp on the armoured cable, and (now) the incoming gas/water pipes, what influence does this have on the wiring of the ring mains and lighting circuits? They will all be T&E cable, with CPCs wired in to the CU - how would this be affected by different earth systems? Under what circumstances would all the wiring need to be 'ripped out and started over'? Thanks David |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Lobster wrote:
OK, I'm listening... I regret that I can't give you details - this is a DIY group after all. I just know from having got my C&G2381 that earthing (and bonding) is a complex subject. Making assumptions is not a good idea. Andrew -- Please note that the email address used for posting usenet messages is configured such that my antispam filter will automatically update itself so that the senders email address is flagged as spam. If you do need to contact me please visit my web site and submit an enquiry - http://www.kazmax.co.uk |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Lobster wrote:
Anyway - given the presence of an earthing block next to the CU, connected to the CU, a clamp on the armoured cable, and (now) the incoming gas/water pipes, what influence does this have on the wiring of the ring mains and lighting circuits? They will all be T&E cable, with CPCs wired in to the CU - how would this be affected by different earth From the point of view of wiring individual "standard" circuits then there (usually) won't be any difference - the basic construction and testing will be the same. Earth loop impedance testing is good practice for any new circuit since it will establish that you can get the required fault currents to provide the required disconnection times. The sizing of equipotential bonding and other earthing conductors can vary with different earthing schemes. Follow the tables in the On Site Guide and you should be OK. (you get most differences with TT systems) systems? Under what circumstances would all the wiring need to be 'ripped out and started over'? Slightly alarmist wording IMHO. "When wired by a complete muppet with all the wrong cable sizes or following improper cable routes" might be an appropriate answer ;-) -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Lobster wrote: I expect circuit (d) to cause most comment?! I don't see the need for a dedicated cooker circuit because I'll be fitting a built-in single oven with 13A plug (plus gas hob), which could be plugged into an ordinary ringmain. OK? I'd certainly have a separate ring for the kitchen - and also look carefully at the load on that before running the oven from that. Because it's all too easy to exceed the loading. A washing machine can take 13 amps when heating. Also a dishwasher. Drier? A kettle perhaps 10 amps. Already, you're over the nominal 30 amps. Add in a toaster and say grill - let alone your oven, and it's easy to see a possible problem. 2. I've got some spare 1.0mm red/black cable which I'd like to use up - would there be any issue with me mixing-and-matching 1.0mm and 1.5mm cable within one installation (I don't have enough 1.0mm do do the whole house)? None. I'd use 1.5mm for the feeds and the spare 1.0mm for the switch drops. But for 6 amp circuits, 1.0mm is fine anyway. -- *And don't start a sentence with a conjunction * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article , Lobster wrote: I expect circuit (d) to cause most comment?! I don't see the need for a dedicated cooker circuit because I'll be fitting a built-in single oven with 13A plug (plus gas hob), which could be plugged into an ordinary ringmain. OK? I'd certainly have a separate ring for the kitchen - and also look carefully at the load on that before running the oven from that. Because it's all too easy to exceed the loading. A washing machine can take 13 amps when heating. Also a dishwasher. Drier? A kettle perhaps 10 amps. Already, you're over the nominal 30 amps. Add in a toaster and say grill - let alone your oven, and it's easy to see a possible problem. Thanks to you (and Christian) for this advice. I take your point, but do you not think that by pulling the oven out of the downstairs circuit, I've pretty well done the same thing? I mean, all the high-load items you describe above will be on the kitchen circuit, just that I'm calling it a 'downstairs' circuit(!) - in addition to the (dining) kitchen, it will only cover the living room and hall, and I can't see any high-load appliances being used there. Just TV/table lights/hifi/vacuum cleaner, that sort of thing (there will be a gas fire plus gas CH, so really see no likelihood of any electric heaters.) When I looked at having another kitchen circuit, it seemed like overkill having 3 downstairs ringmains for such a small house. Or maybe I should incorporate the living-room and hall circuits into the upstairs ringmain, releasing the 'downstairs' ring just for the kitchen. What do you think? Thanks David |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Lobster wrote:
Dave Plowman (News) wrote: I'd certainly have a separate ring for the kitchen - and also look carefully at the load on that before running the oven from that. ... I mean, all the high-load items you describe above will be on the kitchen circuit, just that I'm calling it a 'downstairs' circuit(!) - in addition to the (dining) kitchen, it will only cover the living room and hall, and I can't see any high-load appliances being used there. ... Or maybe I should incorporate the living-room and hall circuits into the upstairs ringmain, releasing the 'downstairs' ring just for the kitchen. What do you think? You could consider splitting the rings front and back rather than upstairs/downstairs. That way the kitchen shares with the back bedrooms, the lounge with the front bedrooms. As well as giving you two circuits on every floor (so you still have power on every floor without having to run an extension lead up the stairs) it means that the kitchen is shared with rooms which are probably lightly used during the day. If people are in the lounge (and you have eg temporary electric heaters plugged in) they're less likely to be in the bedrooms, but lounge and kitchen/oven use is likely to coincide. Owain |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
(there will be a gas fire plus gas CH, so really see no likelihood of
any electric heaters.) Sorry to come in so slow on this. I've been away for a week. One of the main reasons for the area limits on socket circuits is the fact that they should be designed to provide emergency electric heating requirements. Fixed electric heating should have its own circuits, whilst socket circuits should be capable of running enough thermostatically controlled fan heaters to heat the area, in case the main heating system fails. Christian. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
a) upstairs lights, 6A MCB, 1.5mm T&E cable
OK (although 1mm would be fine and easier to squeeze cables into the terminals). b) downstairs lights, 6A MCB, 1.5mm T&E OK. c) linked smoke alarms, 6A MCB, 1.5mm T&E OK. d) downstairs ringmain feeding specifically the oven, fridge-freezer and gas combi boiler, 32A MCD, 2.5mm T&E cable * See below. RCD protected: e) upstairs ringmain, 32A MCB, 2.5mm T&E OK. f) downstairs ringmain - all sockets other than those in circuit (d) 32A MCB, 2.5mm T&E * See below. g) electric shower, 40A MCB, 10mm T&E OK. The mains issue here is the dispostion and type of the socket circuits. Firstly, I would ensure that the kitchen has at least one general purpose socket circuit entirely to itself in addition to any fixed appliance circuits. Secondly, fixed appliance circuits might be better implemented as radial circuits, due to the unusual loading patterns. For example, when designing my own setup, I had: 1. 32A 2.5mm RCBO (RCD protected) socket ring circuit (includes small oven, but no other fixed appliances) 2. 32A 6.0mm MCB (not RCD protected) radial circuit for washing machine, tumble dryer and dishwasher. 3. 16A 2.5mm MCB (not RCD protected) radial circuit for fridge/freezer. 4. 16A 2.5mm MCB (not RCD protected) radial circuit for central heating (including immersion heater). 5. 32A 2.5mm RCBO (RCD protected) socket ring circuit for all non-kitchen sockets in house (intend to split into 2 when can be bothered). This preexisting circuit used to cover all sockets (including kitchen) in entire house. Christian. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Christian McArdle" wrote in message
t... a) upstairs lights, 6A MCB, 1.5mm T&E cable snip c) linked smoke alarms, 6A MCB, 1.5mm T&E OK. Thought these had to be triple & earth? (though it would be T&E from the CU to the first one). snip -- Richard Sampson mail me at richard at olifant d-ot co do-t uk |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Thought these had to be triple & earth? (though it would be T&E from the
CU to the first one). Correct. The linking cable is usually 3&E, although some systems using T&E and either a radio link or inject a high frequency comms channel onto the main mains signal. Christian. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Lobster" wrote in message ... Am currently doing a rewire and have a few questions please... 1. (the main question!). I'm proposing the following circuits - does this plan sound sensible? BTW total floor area is 70m2; CU is a Volex split-load item: http://tinyurl.com/7fe6m (Screwfix 82204). So: Non-RCD protected: a) upstairs lights, 6A MCB, 1.5mm T&E cable b) downstairs lights, 6A MCB, 1.5mm T&E c) linked smoke alarms, 6A MCB, 1.5mm T&E d) downstairs ringmain feeding specifically the oven, fridge-freezer and gas combi boiler, 32A MCD, 2.5mm T&E cable RCD protected: e) upstairs ringmain, 32A MCB, 2.5mm T&E f) downstairs ringmain - all sockets other than those in circuit (d) 32A MCB, 2.5mm T&E g) electric shower, 40A MCB, 10mm T&E I expect circuit (d) to cause most comment?! I know some people don't like to do it but I'd put the smoke alarms on one of the lighting circuits to give a check on there being power there. This is fine by the regs if you use battery backed up alarms, which I would recommend anyway as they are only a quid or so more expensive. This gives you a spare circuit for future use. I assume the 13A sockets in the kitchen are non RCD protected. Personally I don't like that, especially those above the worktop. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Mike wrote:
"Lobster" wrote in message ... Am currently doing a rewire and have a few questions please... 1. (the main question!). I'm proposing the following circuits - does this plan sound sensible? BTW total floor area is 70m2; CU is a Volex split-load item: http://tinyurl.com/7fe6m (Screwfix 82204). So: Non-RCD protected: a) upstairs lights, 6A MCB, 1.5mm T&E cable b) downstairs lights, 6A MCB, 1.5mm T&E c) linked smoke alarms, 6A MCB, 1.5mm T&E d) downstairs ringmain feeding specifically the oven, fridge-freezer and gas combi boiler, 32A MCD, 2.5mm T&E cable RCD protected: e) upstairs ringmain, 32A MCB, 2.5mm T&E f) downstairs ringmain - all sockets other than those in circuit (d) 32A MCB, 2.5mm T&E g) electric shower, 40A MCB, 10mm T&E I expect circuit (d) to cause most comment?! I know some people don't like to do it but I'd put the smoke alarms on one of the lighting circuits to give a check on there being power there. This is fine by the regs if you use battery backed up alarms, which I would recommend anyway as they are only a quid or so more expensive. This gives you a spare circuit for future use. Yes, I hummed and ha'd a bit over that one. And I will be using battery-backup alarms. Maybe I'll change my mind! I assume the 13A sockets in the kitchen are non RCD protected. Personally I don't like that, especially those above the worktop. No, under the above scheme, the kitchen sockets come under circuit (f), ie RCD-protected: it's just the kitchen items specified in circuit (e) which are not RCD'ed. David |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:17:28 UTC, "Mike" wrote:
I know some people don't like to do it but I'd put the smoke alarms on one of the lighting circuits to give a check on there being power there. Or on a separate circuit, linked to a visible non-maintained emergency light (say, on the stairs). If the power fails, you have light where needed. If the circuit fails, the light comes on and you get a visual indication. -- Bob Eager begin a new life...dump Windows! |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Bob Eager wrote:
Or on a separate circuit, linked to a visible non-maintained emergency light (say, on the stairs). If the power fails, you have light where needed. If the circuit fails, the light comes on and you get a visual indication. Having one of those on the lighting circuit that illuminates the CU is a good plan as well I think. That way you are not groping in the dark to reset a MCB or RCD. -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
John Rumm wrote:
Bob Eager wrote: Or on a separate circuit, linked to a visible non-maintained emergency light (say, on the stairs). If the power fails, you have light where needed. If the circuit fails, the light comes on and you get a visual indication. Having one of those on the lighting circuit that illuminates the CU is a good plan as well I think. That way you are not groping in the dark to reset a MCB or RCD. Specially when you've left the cover off the CU because you're in the middle of something, and somebody trod on it and cracked it so you're waiting on a new cover down the wholesalers as well as a three for the price of two pack of tuits Not that any of us would ever do that, no no no. Owain |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
CH Wiring Queries - Pump Overrun? | UK diy | |||
Hot water cylinder fitting queries | UK diy | |||
Rewiring a ballast. Help needed. | Electronics Repair | |||
Approximate cost of rewiring a 3bed detached house? | UK diy | |||
Earth bonding queries | UK diy |