Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone have a diagram of how a system with 2 pumps and no valves is
wired together to give interlock? Secondly how does pump overrun work if 2 pumps are used (i assume you have to dump into the CH cylinder) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone have a diagram of how a system with 2 pumps and no valves is
wired together to give interlock? Very simple. Wire the programmer output through the appropriate room or cylinder thermostat to the pump. The same connections should also be made to a relay. The Normally Open outputs of the relay should be connected together in parallel and be used to run the boiler interlock. Secondly how does pump overrun work if 2 pumps are used (i assume you have to dump into the CH cylinder) This gets a little more complicated. You basically need the pump overrun output of the boiler to run the hot water pump. However, it is essential that this doesn't end up as a call for heat back at the interlock, or it will never switch off. You also don't want the HWC pump to run when the CH pump is running, or the HWC will overheat. Let's draw a logic diagram: Inputs: HWC = hot water call for heat (from thermostat/programmer) CHC = central heating call for heat (from thermostat/programmer) POR = pump overrun from boiler Output: HWP = Hot water pump CHP = CH pump BIL = boiler interlock (T) = should be impossible or transient condition only HWC CHC POR | HWP CHP BIL 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 0 0 1 | 1 0 0 0 1 0 | 0 1 1 (T) 0 1 1 | 0 1 1 1 0 0 | 1 0 1 (T) 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 1 1 0 | 1 1 1 (T) 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 (Alternative for DHW priority) 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 (T) 1 1 1 | 1 0 1 This gives HWP = HWC OR ( POR AND NOT CHC) CHP = CHC BIL = HWC OR CHC So, connect CHC directly to the CHP pump. BIL is run by paralleled relays from HWC and CHC. HWP is harder, but can be done with a few relays. To be honest, I'd be inclined the run the whole control system in low voltage logic (i.e. 5V 74LS/74HC) and end up in a nice relay for the boiler. But then, it would be simple for someone like me to throw together something on a bit of stripboard with a 7805, a wallwart and a handful of SSI logic chips. Christian. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Christian
McArdle writes Does anyone have a diagram of how a system with 2 pumps and no valves is wired together to give interlock? Very simple. Wire the programmer output through the appropriate room or cylinder thermostat to the pump. The same connections should also be made to a relay. The Normally Open outputs of the relay should be connected together in parallel and be used to run the boiler interlock. Secondly how does pump overrun work if 2 pumps are used (i assume you have to dump into the CH cylinder) This gets a little more complicated. You basically need the pump overrun output of the boiler to run the hot water pump. So where does the heat go if the taps are turned off? Didn't you mean the central heating pump ? -- geoff |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This gets a little more complicated. You basically need the pump overrun
output of the boiler to run the hot water pump. So where does the heat go if the taps are turned off? Didn't you mean the central heating pump ? No, the pump for the hot water primary circuit is more suitable for pump overrun than the central heating circuit. Don't get confused with the DHW secondary, which is isolated from the primary system. Christian. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Christian McArdle
writes This gets a little more complicated. You basically need the pump overrun output of the boiler to run the hot water pump. So where does the heat go if the taps are turned off? Didn't you mean the central heating pump ? No, the pump for the hot water primary circuit is more suitable for pump overrun than the central heating circuit. Don't get confused with the DHW secondary, which is isolated from the primary system. So where are you dumping the heat to if there is no DHW flow ? -- geoff |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
So where are you dumping the heat to if there is no DHW flow ?
The cylinder itself. Although already at a high temperature (i.e. 60C), it still acts as a nice energy dump, especially as the flow temperature rises. Even if the flow temperature rises to 90C (unlikely), thats a nice 30C difference across the heat exchanger and the cylinder won't get appreciably hotter because of 30 seconds of overrun with the burners turned off. Christian. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It can actually all be done with a single relay (with Double pole change
over contacts). I have been working this out over the past few days. Relay coil goes across the CH Pump. Boiler overrun contacts. Boiler overrun live goes to NC contact. Heating Demand Live geos to NO contact. HW Pump Live goes to Common. Boiler control Contacts. Heating Demand Live geos to NC contact. Unswitched Live goes to the NO Contact. Boiler switched Live goes to common. Someone may be able to do an ASCII art version of this, It's beyond me. Christian McArdle wrote: Secondly how does pump overrun work if 2 pumps are used (i assume you have to dump into the CH cylinder) This gets a little more complicated. You basically need the pump overrun output of the boiler to run the hot water pump. However, it is essential that this doesn't end up as a call for heat back at the interlock, or it will never switch off. You also don't want the HWC pump to run when the CH pump is running, or the HWC will overheat. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Boiler overrun contacts.
Boiler overrun live goes to NC contact. Heating Demand Live geos to NO contact. HW Pump Live goes to Common. Boiler control Contacts. Heating Demand Live geos to NC contact. Unswitched Live goes to the NO Contact. Boiler switched Live goes to common. Someone may be able to do an ASCII art version of this, It's beyond me. Yes, I think that works! Inputs to system: CH On = Central heating on (at programmer) HW On = Hot water on (at programmer) POR = Pump output (from boiler) N = Neutral L = Permanent Live Output from system: BCFH = boiler call for heat Pumps: CHP = central heating pump HWP = hot water pump Switchgear: rts = room thermostat cts = cylinder thermostat NO = normally open terminal NC = normally closed terminal C = common terminal /\/\ = relay coil / CH On O---o o-------+--CHP---+---O N rts | | +--/\/\--+ |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Christian
I realised after I'd posted that I left out some detail but you have added it. This is slightly different from my previous "ideal" (number in bracket is the difference), but should still work perfectly. The effect is not to start the hot water pump directly in response to a hot water heating demand. Instead, the system waits until the boiler's pump output is activated, which should happen as the BIL input to the boiler has activated. However the conventional single pump system does that anyway! I bet someone comes up with a system that doesn't use a relay at all, but just changeover thermostat terminals... I think you need a doupble pole switch somewhere to make it work. Can be either thermostat though. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In an earlier contribution to this discussion,
Clive M wrote: Does anyone have a diagram of how a system with 2 pumps and no valves is wired together to give interlock? Secondly how does pump overrun work if 2 pumps are used (i assume you have to dump into the CH cylinder) I don't have an official diagram, but I've just drawn one on the back of an envelope which I think will work. If I describe it, you should be able to replicate it. I will deal with only the live connections, leaving you to put in all the neutrals and earths. On the left is the programmer, with feeds for HW and CH To the right, one above the other, are the cylinder stat and room stat. Both are normally closed switches, opening when the set temperature is reached To the right of these is a mains changeover relay To the far right is the boiler Take a wire from the programmer's HW feed to one side of the cyl stat Connect the other side of the cyl stat to the HW pump and to the NC contact of the relay Take a wire from the programmer's CH feed to one side of the room stat Connect the other side of the room stat to the CH pump, the relay coil, and the NO contact of the relay Connect the relay's Common terminal to the Boiler switched live Connect a permanently live feed to the Boiler permanent live Connect the Boiler Pump terminal to the NC relay contact (and hence to the HW pump) If I am right, this will fire the boiler - plus the appropriate pump whenever either the CH or HW or both are demanding heat, and will shut down when neither is. If the boiler's pump over-run stat operates, the HW pump will run until things cool down. I can see one potential problem with this, which may require a mod to the boiler's internal wiring. On my boiler, the pump outlet is connected to switched live below the boiler stat temp, and to permanent live above the stat temp. My diagram, as it stands, would result in the HW pump running whenever the boiler was on - even if the HW demand was satisfied. Severing t he internal link between switched live and pump would do the trick - only allowing the *boiler* to switch the pump on *above* the stat temp. HTH. -- Cheers, Set Square ______ Please reply to newsgroup. Reply address is invalid. |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Clive M" wrote in
: Does anyone have a diagram of how a system with 2 pumps and no valves is wired together to give interlock? Secondly how does pump overrun work if 2 pumps are used (i assume you have to dump into the CH cylinder) I've considered the Grundfos Pump Plan - seems very advantageously priced at plumbworld ATM, and came up with this doc UPP_Pump_Plan_05_03.pdf but I don't know where from. It contains a wiring diagram. I think they also sell a complete control pack, which I would be tempted to use if I were installing it. I really like the idea, but it's a bit bleeding edge for me...., what happens if one pump fails in a cold snap? mike |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "mike ring" wrote in message 52.50... "Clive M" wrote in : Does anyone have a diagram of how a system with 2 pumps and no valves is wired together to give interlock? Secondly how does pump overrun work if 2 pumps are used (i assume you have to dump into the CH cylinder) I've considered the Grundfos Pump Plan - seems very advantageously priced at plumbworld ATM, and came up with this doc UPP_Pump_Plan_05_03.pdf but I don't know where from. It contains a wiring diagram. I think they also sell a complete control pack, which I would be tempted to use if I were installing it. I really like the idea, but it's a bit bleeding edge for me...., what happens if one pump fails in a cold snap? What happens if a zone valve packs up? |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In an earlier contribution to this discussion, mike ring
wrote: I've considered the Grundfos Pump Plan - seems very advantageously priced at plumbworld ATM, and came up with this doc UPP_Pump_Plan_05_03.pdf but I don't know where from. It contains a wiring diagram. A URL would be *awfully* useful! I really like the idea, but it's a bit bleeding edge for me...., what happens if one pump fails in a cold snap? You lose *either* the HW *or* the CH - as opposed to losing *both* with a conventional one-pump setup! -- Cheers, Set Square |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Set Square" wrote in :
I've considered the Grundfos Pump Plan - seems very advantageously priced at plumbworld ATM, and came up with this doc UPP_Pump_Plan_05_03.pdf but I don't know where from. It contains a wiring diagram. A URL would be *awfully* useful! http://www.centralheating.co.uk/inde...ewFile&id=6551 I hope it works, took ages to find again, I can't find any reference to prevention of flow if only one service is required - if the CH is on ISTM that the pump will pull water through the boiler, but also tend to pull it back through the HW circuit. Otherwise I'm very rempted, the price isn't too outrageous against one pump and a 3port or two two port valves, and it seems more direct. I realise 2 pumps in one casing means quite a lot of replacement for one failure, but I haven't found grundfos pumps bad mike |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In an earlier contribution to this discussion,
mike ring wrote: "Set Square" wrote in : I've considered the Grundfos Pump Plan - seems very advantageously priced at plumbworld ATM, and came up with this doc UPP_Pump_Plan_05_03.pdf but I don't know where from. It contains a wiring diagram. A URL would be *awfully* useful! http://www.centralheating.co.uk/inde...ewFile&id=6551 I hope it works, took ages to find again, I can't find any reference to prevention of flow if only one service is required - if the CH is on ISTM that the pump will pull water through the boiler, but also tend to pull it back through the HW circuit. Otherwise I'm very rempted, the price isn't too outrageous against one pump and a 3port or two two port valves, and it seems more direct. I realise 2 pumps in one casing means quite a lot of replacement for one failure, but I haven't found grundfos pumps bad mike Thanks for the link. Looks interesting! May not be too easy for diy-ers to diagnose if the integrated logic goes wrong. As far as I can see, you still have two water circuits with a common feed from the boiler. I can't see any reason why either pump should induce any flow in the other circuit. However, there is nothing to stop gravity circulation if either circuit decides to do its own thing. -- Cheers, Set Square ______ Please reply to newsgroup. Reply address is invalid. |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Set Square" wrote in
: Thanks for the link. Looks interesting! May not be too easy for diy-ers to diagnose if the integrated logic goes wrong. As far as I can see, you still have two water circuits with a common feed from the boiler. I can't see any reason why either pump should induce any flow in the other circuit. However, there is nothing to stop gravity circulation if either circuit decides to do its own thing. But one pump is fed not only from the boiler but from the other circuit, unless there's something to prevent backward flow, as the are common at the input of both pumps, and at the boiler return which would be at a higher pressure. I admit I don't know for sure, but having sketched it out, I'm more convinced; The gravity bit is the other thing; in the absence of any forced flow, would the hot water cylinder cause a flow through the rads and cool itself down? Of course the maker prolly knows what he's up to - I just wish I knew more before taking the plunge mike |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
mike ring wrote:
I can't find any reference to prevention of flow if only one service is required - if the CH is on ISTM that the pump will pull water through the boiler, but also tend to pull it back through the HW circuit. The pump plan pump has the anti backflow valves built into it. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Central Heating : Wiring Query | UK diy | |||
Tower Wiring Centre for domestic central heating | UK diy | |||
Central Heating - Problem with 3 way valve wiring. | UK diy | |||
Best Isolating valves for Central Heating Pumps?? | UK diy | |||
2 port Vs 3 port central heating valves | UK diy |