On Monday, July 4, 2016 at 6:01:40 PM UTC-4, Leroy N. Soetoro wrote:
http://observer.com/2016/06/the-comi...-over-hillary-
clintons-emailgate/


Three week old copy & paste.

There will be no indictment over emails. That is very clear. Poor judgement? Perhaps. Criminal action? Nope.

The Senate committee has admitted that Clinton is not to blame for Benghazi, but the Republican congress is.

Nothing to see here. Move along.

On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 1:45:26 AM UTC-4, rangerssuck wrote:

There will be no indictment over emails. That is very clear. Poor judgement? Perhaps. Criminal action? Nope.

The Senate committee has admitted that Clinton is not to blame for Benghazi, but the Republican congress is.


I do not think there will be any criminal action with regard to the emails, but believe there would be criminal action if it were someone other that Hillary.

And ultimately Hillary is to blame for Benghazi. It happened on her watch.

Dan

wrote in message
...
On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 1:45:26 AM UTC-4, rangerssuck wrote:

There will be no indictment over emails. That is very clear. Poor
judgement? Perhaps. Criminal action? Nope.

The Senate committee has admitted that Clinton is not to blame for
Benghazi, but the Republican congress is.


I do not think there will be any criminal action with regard to the
emails, but believe there would be criminal action if it were
someone other that Hillary.

And ultimately Hillary is to blame for Benghazi. It happened on her
watch.

Dan

In the Army and at Mitre we were repeatedly warned of the harsh
consequences for mishandling classified material, so much that I
avoided classified projects as much as possible.
http://hotair.com/archives/2016/05/2...s-not-clinton/

The briefer changed his tone when someone asked what security level
justified shooting a would-be thief.

--mCw650c3

"Jim Wilkins" on Tue, 5 Jul 2016 08:13:39 -0400
typed in rec.crafts.metalworking the following:
wrote in message
...
On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 1:45:26 AM UTC-4, rangerssuck wrote:
There will be no indictment over emails. That is very clear. Poor
judgement? Perhaps. Criminal action? Nope.
The Senate committee has admitted that Clinton is not to blame for
Benghazi, but the Republican congress is.
I do not think there will be any criminal action with regard to the
emails, but believe there would be criminal action if it were
someone other that Hillary.
And ultimately Hillary is to blame for Benghazi. It happened on her
watch.
In the Army and at Mitre we were repeatedly warned of the harsh
consequences for mishandling classified material, so much that I
avoided classified projects as much as possible.
http://hotair.com/archives/2016/05/2...s-not-clinton/

The briefer changed his tone when someone asked what security level
justified shooting a would-be thief.

But that was because you were one of the little people, and not
one of the Nobility. The laws which applied to you, do not apply to
such as Hilary.
"Crooked Arrow" Comey merely confirmed that "Corrupt Career
Political Hack" is a redundant expression.
--
pyotr filipivich
"With Age comes Wisdom. Although more often, Age travels alone."