Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Is the 787 a failure ?
On Friday, January 25, 2013 9:54:55 PM UTC-5, Mr.B1ack wrote:
Strictly speaking, the 787 is not an engineering failure. Like anything complex and new it has a few issues. So far these issues haven't caused any fatalities. Now from a business point of view however ... the plane may indeed be a failure. It's already got a bad reputation. As problems with aircraft CAN be fatal, passengers seem reluctant to fly on them - envisioning themselves burning to death as they plummet from the skies. If enough people won't fly on a 787 then there's no point in airlines HAVING 787s ... and orders will start to be cancelled. Boeing put a LOT of its money and reputation on the line with this plane and - oversold its fantastic wonderfullness - and this could be quite a disaster for that company and the vast number of employees and subcontractors involved. So, I'm gonna offer an idea ... withdraw the aircraft at once and refund all payments and pre-payments. Yes, this IS severe ... but there's a part two involved ... In a year or two, offer a "797" ... which will be essentially the fixed-up debugged 787 with just enough cosmetic differences so it'll seem like a "new" model. This way Boeing gets to use 99% of the money it spent on R&D - ie it doesn't have to throw away the 787, just the name. Furthermore, offer the '797' first in a CARGO variant and let it rack up a ****load of time in this less critical kind of service to prove its a worthy craft. A year later, THEN offer the passenger version - with its "Proven Perfomance" airframe. Yes, it'll set Boeing back ... but it'll save it from destruction. Better late profits than NO profits. OR ... they can just dissolve the company now and merge its remaining assets with Airbus. Easier, but not, IMHO, really the best way to go. It may be the next DC-10, failure as a passenger plane due to bad press, but much usage in the military and the cargo haulers. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
more on that MOT 'failure' | UK diy | |||
CFL Failure | Home Ownership | |||
GM Failure | Metalworking | |||
mcb failure | UK diy | |||
TRV failure | UK diy |