Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Soldering problem
I was making another clone of my miniature sundials. On this occasion
I thought I would try a few things differently. Amongst others I decided to soft-solder the brass 0.020" foil to the steel substrate. Normally I glue them together with Goop. The soldering went smoothly (except for having to buy a bigger soldering iron). I proceeded to machine the piece in the normal way yesterday and today I put it together: http://www.flickr.com/photos/2768312...in/photostream The etching is a bit raggedy due to high current density (I was also trying a new bath) but otherwise things looked normal until I noticed the fresh rust on the inside of the ring: http://www.flickr.com/photos/2768312...in/photostream I interpret this as caused by the acid-based flux leaking onto the freshly exposed steel. This raises the question of what to do about this in future. Clealy no amount of thorough cleaning will get rid of the flux that is hidden until exposed by turning/boring. Maybe I shall go back to using rosin dissolved in alcohol as flux. Michael Koblic, Campbell River, BC |
#3
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Soldering problem
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 17:25:19 -0800, mike wrote:
[...] Nice work. Thank you. Isn't the dissimilar metal problem gonna pop up sooner or later? Steel is gonna rust. What's the cost differential for making the whole disk out of brass? Sounds like the goop was working?? I have had no problem with the glued pieces even after a relatively long period of time (indoors) and with relatively little surface finish protection (wax or even just Autosol). The dramatic part in this case was the rust appearing in less than 24 hours. The Goop works fine (the *only* glue that would do the job BTW!) but it can take up to 72 hours to cure completely and allow machining. As to the economics of the whole thing it is kind of complex: To get a similar size dial (2.5" diameter, 3/16" thick) the cheapest way would be to buy 2.5" round brass and slice it up. A very rough calculation making all kinds of assumptions about machining losses shows that my way is about 30% cheaper. I use 1" washers so a lot of cutting is already done. I could bring the cost down even further if I could get mild steel disks stamped out but when I tried this (at ridiculous shipping costs) it did not prove to be a free lunch either. I have done many all-steel dials, too, and people seem to like them just as much as the brass ones. However, in the current economy, selling them at prices that would barely cover the costs is proving difficult. Hence I am looking for different methods of making them. It is a slow process :-) Michael Koblic, Campbell River, BC |
#4
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Soldering problem
|
#6
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Soldering problem
On 1/8/2013 2:29, wrote:
I was making another clone of my miniature sundials. On this occasion I thought I would try a few things differently. Amongst others I decided to soft-solder the brass 0.020" foil to the steel substrate. Normally I glue them together with Goop. The soldering went smoothly (except for having to buy a bigger soldering iron). I proceeded to machine the piece in the normal way yesterday and today I put it together: http://www.flickr.com/photos/2768312...in/photostream The etching is a bit raggedy due to high current density (I was also trying a new bath) but otherwise things looked normal until I noticed the fresh rust on the inside of the ring: http://www.flickr.com/photos/2768312...in/photostream I interpret this as caused by the acid-based flux leaking onto the freshly exposed steel. This raises the question of what to do about this in future. Clealy no amount of thorough cleaning will get rid of the flux that is hidden until exposed by turning/boring. Maybe I shall go back to using rosin dissolved in alcohol as flux. Perhaps immerse it in hot citric acid solution for a while at the end to get rid of rust and flux remains. I've noticed citric acid is the wonder cleaning stuff - nonpoisonous, water based, cheap and cleans rust and flux away really well. Works fine for brazing fluxes too. It is the same stuff you use for cleaning your coffee making machine! I even cleaned my WEDM water container with citric acid.. It was all green, rusty and dirty in the beginning with who knows what metal remains on the walls there. Few times of hot citric acid (as hot as water comes from tap, around 60C, and some citric acid to it) and it is the normal clean stainless steel colour on all walls again. Totally amazing! |
#7
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Soldering problem
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 23:41:35 +0200, Kristian Ukkonen
wrote: [...] Perhaps immerse it in hot citric acid solution for a while at the end to get rid of rust and flux remains. I've noticed citric acid is the wonder cleaning stuff - nonpoisonous, water based, cheap and cleans rust and flux away really well. Works fine for brazing fluxes too. It is the same stuff you use for cleaning your coffee making machine! I even cleaned my WEDM water container with citric acid.. It was all green, rusty and dirty in the beginning with who knows what metal remains on the walls there. Few times of hot citric acid (as hot as water comes from tap, around 60C, and some citric acid to it) and it is the normal clean stainless steel colour on all walls again. Totally amazing! No doubt excellent for stainless steel. Unfortunately with mild steel all you are doing is activating the steel surface for further rusting. Michael Koblic, Campbell River, BC |
#8
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Soldering problem
Assuming that you are talking about soft soldering, that is: tin/lead
solders--- The solution that I have used for the last 50+ years is this: Don't use acid based flux. Instead, I use rosin based fluxes or those that are used for electronic component soldering. You probably will need to practice your pre-cleaning a little, as the rosin based flux isn't as chemically active, but it'll work. I know many tinsmiths who use acid based fluxes and then spend a lot of time and care to get rid of the acid afterwards. While I am not a tinsmith in any stretch of the imagination, the rosin core solder works well there, too. And no worry about clean up, even 'tho I do use acetone to clean off the "rosin" that shows. Pete Stanaitis ---------------- |
#9
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Soldering problem
In article ,
wrote: I was making another clone of my miniature sundials. On this occasion I thought I would try a few things differently. Amongst others I decided to soft-solder the brass 0.020" foil to the steel substrate. Normally I glue them together with Goop. The soldering went smoothly (except for having to buy a bigger soldering iron). I proceeded to machine the piece in the normal way yesterday and today I put it together: http://www.flickr.com/photos/2768312...in/photostream The etching is a bit raggedy due to high current density (I was also trying a new bath) but otherwise things looked normal until I noticed the fresh rust on the inside of the ring: http://www.flickr.com/photos/2768312...in/photostream I interpret this as caused by the acid-based flux leaking onto the freshly exposed steel. This raises the question of what to do about this in future. Clealy no amount of thorough cleaning will get rid of the flux that is hidden until exposed by turning/boring. Maybe I shall go back to using rosin dissolved in alcohol as flux. If I understand, you machine after soldering the brass to the steel. I have a lot of trouble believing that the acid flux would penetrate solid mild steel so far that peeling 0.050" off wouldn't solve the problem. Use of rosin flux has been suggested, but that probably won't work very well for steel. The traditional dodge is to tin the steel using acid flux, wash the flux residue off with hot water and bicarbonate of soda, and then solder brass to steel with plumbers flux (intended for soldering copper pipe). Clean the flux off with acetone followed with hot water. I have also soldered cadmium-plated steel by mechanical cleaning followed by soldering with plumbers flux. Joe Gwinn |
#10
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Soldering problem
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 17:58:37 -0500, Joseph Gwinn
wrote: [...] If I understand, you machine after soldering the brass to the steel. I have a lot of trouble believing that the acid flux would penetrate solid mild steel so far that peeling 0.050" off wouldn't solve the problem. Not sure that I understand. Use of rosin flux has been suggested, but that probably won't work very well for steel. The traditional dodge is to tin the steel using acid flux, wash the flux residue off with hot water and bicarbonate of soda, This will remove all the flux that is accessible but not the flux that is underneath the solder. My contention is that this "hidden" flux is then exposed by machining and causes rusting on the freshly exposed metal. One can argue that the cleaning should be repeated after the machining but because of other processes involved this is not feasible. and then solder brass to steel with plumbers flux (intended for soldering copper pipe). Clean the flux off with acetone followed with hot water. My understanding is that vast majority of plumbers' fluxes are acid based, or, to be precise, zinc chloride and ammonium chloride based. Mine certainly is.. Michael Koblic, Campbell River, BC |
#11
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Soldering problem
|
#12
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Soldering problem
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 23:05:38 -0500, Joseph Gwinn
wrote: In article , wrote: On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 17:58:37 -0500, Joseph Gwinn wrote: [...] If I understand, you machine after soldering the brass to the steel. I have a lot of trouble believing that the acid flux would penetrate solid mild steel so far that peeling 0.050" off wouldn't solve the problem. Not sure that I understand. The acid cannot penetrate that far into the metal, so the rusting was from some other cause. Agreed. Said another way, if the acid did penetrate that far, you should change metal suppliers. Use of rosin flux has been suggested, but that probably won't work very well for steel. The traditional dodge is to tin the steel using acid flux, wash the flux residue off with hot water and bicarbonate of soda, This will remove all the flux that is accessible but not the flux that is underneath the solder. My contention is that this "hidden" flux is then exposed by machining and causes rusting on the freshly exposed metal. One can argue that the cleaning should be repeated after the machining but because of other processes involved this is not feasible. There is no flux hidden in the metal to metal interface between solder and steel. The solder displaced the flux, and/or entombed it, preventing access to the air. Agreed again. I contend that machining exposed one of these "entombed" areas. The critical flux residues are elsewhere. That's the reason for the hot water wash and/or neutralizing bath (sodium bicarbonate). This was done after the soldering but before machining. and then solder brass to steel with plumbers flux (intended for soldering copper pipe). Clean the flux off with acetone followed with hot water. My understanding is that vast majority of plumbers' fluxes are acid based, or, to be precise, zinc chloride and ammonium chloride based. Mine certainly is.. That is correct. However, if you look at old copper plumbing, you will see that it doesn't matter. Soldering is a very old technology, having been used by the Sumerians in 3000 BC. It matters if you solder brass to mild steel. Michael Koblic, Campbell River, BC |
#13
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Soldering problem
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:07:53 -0800, wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 23:05:38 -0500, Joseph Gwinn wrote: In article , wrote: On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 17:58:37 -0500, Joseph Gwinn wrote: [...] If I understand, you machine after soldering the brass to the steel. I have a lot of trouble believing that the acid flux would penetrate solid mild steel so far that peeling 0.050" off wouldn't solve the problem. Not sure that I understand. The acid cannot penetrate that far into the metal, so the rusting was from some other cause. Agreed. Said another way, if the acid did penetrate that far, you should change metal suppliers. Use of rosin flux has been suggested, but that probably won't work very well for steel. The traditional dodge is to tin the steel using acid flux, wash the flux residue off with hot water and bicarbonate of soda, This will remove all the flux that is accessible but not the flux that is underneath the solder. My contention is that this "hidden" flux is then exposed by machining and causes rusting on the freshly exposed metal. One can argue that the cleaning should be repeated after the machining but because of other processes involved this is not feasible. There is no flux hidden in the metal to metal interface between solder and steel. The solder displaced the flux, and/or entombed it, preventing access to the air. Agreed again. I contend that machining exposed one of these "entombed" areas. The critical flux residues are elsewhere. That's the reason for the hot water wash and/or neutralizing bath (sodium bicarbonate). This was done after the soldering but before machining. and then solder brass to steel with plumbers flux (intended for soldering copper pipe). Clean the flux off with acetone followed with hot water. My understanding is that vast majority of plumbers' fluxes are acid based, or, to be precise, zinc chloride and ammonium chloride based. Mine certainly is.. That is correct. However, if you look at old copper plumbing, you will see that it doesn't matter. Soldering is a very old technology, having been used by the Sumerians in 3000 BC. It matters if you solder brass to mild steel. Michael Koblic, Campbell River, BC Greetings Michael, I've been reading this thread about your soldering and how you mentioned using rosin flux. I was pretty sure it would work but I tried it any way. Soldering clean steel and brass was easy with plain old rosin core solder. After the first test I applied more solder to each piece, more than needed to join the two pieces, and then used a rag with lard on it to wipe away the excess and just leave a thin coat. Sorta like tinning a copper or steel bowl. I then cleaned off the lard residue with acetone and laid the brass on the steel, heated the stack, and then pressed down with a steel block to squeeze any solder out for the thinnest possible solder line. My little test worked well. Maybe you can use some of the above info. Eric |
#14
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Soldering problem
In article ,
wrote: On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 23:05:38 -0500, Joseph Gwinn wrote: In article , wrote: On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 17:58:37 -0500, Joseph Gwinn wrote: [...] If I understand, you machine after soldering the brass to the steel. I have a lot of trouble believing that the acid flux would penetrate solid mild steel so far that peeling 0.050" off wouldn't solve the problem. Not sure that I understand. The acid cannot penetrate that far into the metal, so the rusting was from some other cause. Agreed. Said another way, if the acid did penetrate that far, you should change metal suppliers. Use of rosin flux has been suggested, but that probably won't work very well for steel. The traditional dodge is to tin the steel using acid flux, wash the flux residue off with hot water and bicarbonate of soda, This will remove all the flux that is accessible but not the flux that is underneath the solder. My contention is that this "hidden" flux is then exposed by machining and causes rusting on the freshly exposed metal. One can argue that the cleaning should be repeated after the machining but because of other processes involved this is not feasible. There is no flux hidden in the metal to metal interface between solder and steel. The solder displaced the flux, and/or entombed it, preventing access to the air. Agreed again. I contend that machining exposed one of these "entombed" areas. The entombed areas are very close to the surface, and with sufficient machining depth the tombs should be removed. The critical flux residues are elsewhere. That's the reason for the hot water wash and/or neutralizing bath (sodium bicarbonate). This was done after the soldering but before machining. OK. That handles the surface. and then solder brass to steel with plumbers flux (intended for soldering copper pipe). Clean the flux off with acetone followed with hot water. My understanding is that vast majority of plumbers' fluxes are acid based, or, to be precise, zinc chloride and ammonium chloride based. Mine certainly is.. That is correct. However, if you look at old copper plumbing, you will see that it doesn't matter. Soldering is a very old technology, having been used by the Sumerians in 3000 BC. It matters if you solder brass to mild steel. Only of the environment supports galvanic corrosion, which may be the case. But this has nothing to do with flux products, which are either entombed (no access to the atmosphere or visibility at the surface) or removed and/or neutralized. Galvanic corrosion can occur if a piece of steel is electrically connected to a piece of brass, by any means. Soldering works, but is not required. Bolting together would work too. Another poster (etpm) said that he was able to solder brass to well-cleaned steel with rosin-core solder; this uses activated rosin (activated flux contains some kind of acid dissolved in the rosin). The end result is brass and steel electrically connected. So, the deeper and long-term problem may not be how to manufacture the brass-steel composite per se, but rather how to control galvanic corrosion in the resulting assembly. Copper or brass or nickel plating of the steel component may be required. Or electrical isolation of the brass and steel components from one another. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galvanic_series Joe Gwinn |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Soldering problem | UK diy | |||
Replacement Soldering Tips for Soldering Station | Electronics Repair | |||
Perculiar soldering iron problem. | UK diy | |||
Perculiar soldering iron problem. | UK diy | |||
Soldering Surface mount capacitor with Radio Shack Soldering iron? | Electronics Repair |