Here is the latest employment chart from the BLS....

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphoto...34089523_n.jpg

It's interesting to note that more people are gainfully employed today than
during Bush's entire first term.

On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:14:30 -0800, "PrecisionmachinisT"
wrote:

Here is the latest employment chart from the BLS....

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphoto...34089523_n.jpg

It's interesting to note that more people are gainfully employed today than
during Bush's entire first term.

It is also interesting to note that the population has increased
almost 10% but the number of employed has only gone up about 3%.
27,000,000 vs 1,000,000. I wouldn't call that sucess.

On 11/13/2012 12:45 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:14:30 -0800, "PrecisionmachinisT"
wrote:

Here is the latest employment chart from the BLS....

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphoto...34089523_n.jpg

It's interesting to note that more people are gainfully employed today than
during Bush's entire first term.

It is also interesting to note that the population has increased
almost 10% but the number of employed has only gone up about 3%.
27,000,000 vs 1,000,000. I wouldn't call that sucess.


It all depends on what you WANT to believe.

wrote:

On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:14:30 -0800, "PrecisionmachinisT"
wrote:

Here is the latest employment chart from the BLS....

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphoto...34089523_n.jpg

It's interesting to note that more people are gainfully employed today than
during Bush's entire first term.

It is also interesting to note that the population has increased
almost 10% but the number of employed has only gone up about 3%.
27,000,000 vs 1,000,000. I wouldn't call that sucess.

"Gainfully" is another gotcha. More may be employed, but a higher
percentage of them are in low end jobs with non-livable wages. It's only
going to get worse since the damage to the economy has consistently
occurred under administrations left and right for decades.

Subsistence farming - Get ready for it, it's the future...

"Pete C." wrote in message
.com...

wrote:

On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:14:30 -0800, "PrecisionmachinisT"
wrote:

Here is the latest employment chart from the BLS....

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphoto...34089523_n.jpg

It's interesting to note that more people are gainfully employed today
than
during Bush's entire first term.

It is also interesting to note that the population has increased
almost 10% but the number of employed has only gone up about 3%.
27,000,000 vs 1,000,000. I wouldn't call that sucess.

"Gainfully" is another gotcha. More may be employed, but a higher
percentage of them are in low end jobs with non-livable wages. It's only

No, that is not true.

Wages have actually gone up significantly and at a rate of about double
that of inflation,

Want to see the charts ?


going to get worse since the damage to the economy has consistently
occurred under administrations left and right for decades.

Subsistence farming - Get ready for it, it's the future...

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:14:30 -0800, "PrecisionmachinisT"
wrote:

Here is the latest employment chart from the BLS....

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphoto...34089523_n.jpg

It's interesting to note that more people are gainfully employed today
than
during Bush's entire first term.

It is also interesting to note that the population has increased
almost 10% but the number of employed has only gone up about 3%.
27,000,000 vs 1,000,000. I wouldn't call that sucess.

Of course, kindergartners are imminently employable.