Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Markets plummet on Republican obstructionism
On Dec 7, 8:07*pm, Hawke wrote:
So you can believe his description of Obama's speech or mine. My view is that I will tell you the truth about it. Limbaugh will tell you what he thinks you should hear so you will hate Obama. That's because he's trying to convince people to follow the republicans and do what is most beneficial to the rich and powerful, which happens to describe Limbaugh. What benefit do I get for telling you what I think is the truth? Nothing. But I still am of a mind that you would sooner believe Limbaugh even though you know he has an agenda he's pushing. Hawke There are a couple of problems with your reasoning. One is that I do not listen to Limbaugh. So obviously I do not sooner believe him. But the main problem with your views is that they are so often factually wrong. I have pointed this out with cites for my remarks, but you keep on winging it. Dan |
#2
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Markets plummet on Republican obstructionism
|
#3
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Markets plummet on Republican obstructionism
On Dec 8, 2:52*pm, Hawke wrote:
I think you don't want to find what I say is true. So what you do is nit pick on a few facts here and there that might have a problem with them but do not make my argument wrong. You discount the real gist of my point because I forgot to cross a T or dot an I. The facts you say I get wrong don't really disqualify what my main point is. But you don't want to accept my argument because of your political views and you find minor flaws so you can reject my whole case. Because you sure aren't showing me clear cases where my facts are completely wrong and thus prove my argument is also wrong. Hawke What I want is for you to look over what you wrote before you post it and fix all those facts that are not really true, see that you have dotted all the i's and crossed all the T's. I just find errors in almost every thing you post , and that makes me think that maybe I am only catching 10 % of the errors. I do not reject or accept your arguments because of what I believe. I just have a problem with wishy washy thinking. If you get the facts right, you will not hear anything from me. But if it is obvious to the most casual observer that you are not being critical in what you post, I will point it out. Dan |
#4
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Markets plummet on Republican obstructionism
On 12/8/2011 1:52 PM, Hawke wrote:
I think you don't want to find what I say is true. So what you do is nit pick on a few facts here and there that might have a problem with them but do not make my argument wrong. You discount the real gist of my point because I forgot to cross a T or dot an I. The facts you say I get wrong don't really disqualify what my main point is. But you don't want to accept my argument because of your political views and you find minor flaws so you can reject my whole case. Because you sure aren't showing me clear cases where my facts are completely wrong and thus prove my argument is also wrong. Hawke The problem is that you have displayed so little credibility, maturity and accumulated wisdom in your typical posts that no one takes you seriously. You come on like a little boy trying to join an adult conversation, but you just don't have enough depth of insight to be able to make a useful contribution, plus you're too petty and obnoxious to even be amusing. You make big noises about your alleged poli sci degree, but all that you show us is that left = good, right(as in, anyone who points out your errors)= bad. You can't even recognize that there are valid political stances other than left/right or that there are people like me far to the left of you who see you for the shallow poseur that you are. Get lost. David |
#5
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Markets plummet on Republican obstructionism
|
#6
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Markets plummet on Republican obstructionism
On 12/8/2011 2:49 PM, David R. Birch wrote:
On 12/8/2011 1:52 PM, Hawke wrote: I think you don't want to find what I say is true. So what you do is nit pick on a few facts here and there that might have a problem with them but do not make my argument wrong. You discount the real gist of my point because I forgot to cross a T or dot an I. The facts you say I get wrong don't really disqualify what my main point is. But you don't want to accept my argument because of your political views and you find minor flaws so you can reject my whole case. Because you sure aren't showing me clear cases where my facts are completely wrong and thus prove my argument is also wrong. Hawke The problem is that you have displayed so little credibility, maturity and accumulated wisdom in your typical posts that no one takes you seriously. You come on like a little boy trying to join an adult conversation, but you just don't have enough depth of insight to be able to make a useful contribution, plus you're too petty and obnoxious to even be amusing. You make big noises about your alleged poli sci degree, but all that you show us is that left = good, right(as in, anyone who points out your errors)= bad. You can't even recognize that there are valid political stances other than left/right or that there are people like me far to the left of you who see you for the shallow poseur that you are. Get lost. David To that I say, not until you do. In addition, I will add that you're trying to come across as a professional academic with such high self esteem that you feel qualified to put yourself in a position to pass judgment on others. You're not! That would be okay, but you are trying to do that to someone who has already had numerous people with Ph.Ds after their names who would not agree with you. So I've passed the approval of people who really are professional academics. So why would you mean anything? To someone like you, who has demonstrated no particularly high level of thinking or writing, I'd say you need a reassessment of your own capabilities. Because it's apparent that your own view of your capabilities far exceeds reality. In other words, you aren't that great even if you tell us you are a hundred times. So run along and see if you can find someone else you can pretend to be superior to. Because you've still got a long way just to even get close to someone like me, let alone pass judgment on me. And you probably are to the left of me, so what does that prove? I'm closer to the middle than you are. So what? If you ask me you're the one who doesn't make much sense. Hawke |
#7
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Markets plummet on Republican obstructionism
On Dec 8, 8:29*pm, Hawke wrote:
If you ever post something where you make an argument of your own instead of just critiquing someone else's, I will do the same for you. Hawke I do not plan on posting anything where I make an argument of my own unless it about metalworking. Dan |
#8
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Markets plummet on Republican obstructionism
On Dec 8, 8:43*pm, Hawke wrote:
That would be okay, but you are trying to do that to someone who has already had numerous people with Ph.Ds after their names who would not agree with you. Hawke Now tell me, did you read what you wrote? Dan |
#9
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Markets plummet on Republican obstructionism
On 12/8/2011 7:43 PM, Hawwke-ptooey wrote:
On 12/8/2011 2:49 PM, David R. Birch wrote: The problem is that you have displayed so little credibility, maturity and accumulated wisdom in your typical posts that no one takes you seriously. You come on like a little boy trying to join an adult conversation, but you just don't have enough depth of insight to be able to make a useful contribution, plus you're too petty and obnoxious to even be amusing. You make big noises about your alleged poli sci degree, but all that you show us is that left = good, right(as in, anyone who points out your errors)= bad. You can't even recognize that there are valid political stances other than left/right or that there are people like me far to the left of you who see you for the shallow poseur that you are. Get lost. David To that I say, not until you do. In addition, I will add that you're trying to come across as a professional academic with such high self esteem that you feel qualified to put yourself in a position to pass judgment on others. You're not! That would be okay, but you are trying to do that to someone who has already had numerous people with Ph.Ds after their names who would not agree with you. So I've passed the approval of people who really are professional academics. So why would you mean anything? To someone like you, who has demonstrated no particularly high level of thinking or writing, I'd say you need a reassessment of your own capabilities. Because it's apparent that your own view of your capabilities far exceeds reality. In other words, you aren't that great even if you tell us you are a hundred times. So run along and see if you can find someone else you can pretend to be superior to. Because you've still got a long way just to even get close to someone like me, let alone pass judgment on me. And you probably are to the left of me, so what does that prove? I'm closer to the middle than you are. So what? If you ask me you're the one who doesn't make much sense. Hawwke-ptooey All that you have written supports what I said about you. Perhaps the best part of it is that you continue to demonstrate that you read and understand neither what you reply to nor what you write. Get lost, loser. David |
#10
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Markets plummet on Republican obstructionism
|
#11
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Markets plummet on Republican obstructionism
On 12/8/2011 8:27 PM, David R. Birch wrote:
On 12/8/2011 7:43 PM, Hawwke-ptooey wrote: On 12/8/2011 2:49 PM, David R. Birch wrote: The problem is that you have displayed so little credibility, maturity and accumulated wisdom in your typical posts that no one takes you seriously. You come on like a little boy trying to join an adult conversation, but you just don't have enough depth of insight to be able to make a useful contribution, plus you're too petty and obnoxious to even be amusing. You make big noises about your alleged poli sci degree, but all that you show us is that left = good, right(as in, anyone who points out your errors)= bad. You can't even recognize that there are valid political stances other than left/right or that there are people like me far to the left of you who see you for the shallow poseur that you are. Get lost. David To that I say, not until you do. In addition, I will add that you're trying to come across as a professional academic with such high self esteem that you feel qualified to put yourself in a position to pass judgment on others. You're not! That would be okay, but you are trying to do that to someone who has already had numerous people with Ph.Ds after their names who would not agree with you. So I've passed the approval of people who really are professional academics. So why would you mean anything? To someone like you, who has demonstrated no particularly high level of thinking or writing, I'd say you need a reassessment of your own capabilities. Because it's apparent that your own view of your capabilities far exceeds reality. In other words, you aren't that great even if you tell us you are a hundred times. So run along and see if you can find someone else you can pretend to be superior to. Because you've still got a long way just to even get close to someone like me, let alone pass judgment on me. And you probably are to the left of me, so what does that prove? I'm closer to the middle than you are. So what? If you ask me you're the one who doesn't make much sense. Hawwke-ptooey All that you have written supports what I said about you. Perhaps the best part of it is that you continue to demonstrate that you read and understand neither what you reply to nor what you write. Get lost, loser. Sometimes simple is all your type can understand so how's about this? Up yours, junior! Hawke |
#12
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Markets plummet on Republican obstructionism
On Dec 9, 6:28*pm, Hawke wrote:
On 12/8/2011 6:29 PM, wrote: On Dec 8, 8:43 pm, *wrote: * *That would be okay, but you are trying to do that to someone who has already had numerous people with Ph.Ds after their names who would not agree with you. Hawke Now tell me, did you read what you wrote? * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Dan Yeah, I did. You took it completely out of context though so it is difficult to tell what it was supposed to mean. So I'll tell you. I've had people with Ph.Ds that I've studied under who had no problem with anything I wrote and actually thought my ability to communicate through the written word is very good. Then I have someone who is just a member of this group saying the opposite. So who should I believe? Him or the people with doctorates? Hawke I copied the sentence as you wrote it. Try diagramming it. What is the subject? What is the Verb? I will bet that when you submitted a paper in college, you read it before giving it to the professor. But here you do not bother to look at what you write before posting it. Dan |
#13
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Markets plummet on Republican obstructionism
On Dec 9, 6:30*pm, Hawke wrote:
Sometimes simple is all your type can understand so how's about this? Up yours, junior! Hawke So you are saying that David R. Birch who claims to be more left that you are is unable to understand complicated things. Do you think that all those on the left are not capable of understanding only simple things? And by extension does that mean only those on the right are capable of understanding complicated ideas? Dan |
#14
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Markets plummet on Republican obstructionism
On 12/9/2011 5:30 PM, Hawwke-ptooey wrote:
On 12/8/2011 8:27 PM, David R. Birch wrote: On 12/8/2011 7:43 PM, Hawwke-ptooey wrote: On 12/8/2011 2:49 PM, David R. Birch wrote: The problem is that you have displayed so little credibility, maturity and accumulated wisdom in your typical posts that no one takes you seriously. You come on like a little boy trying to join an adult conversation, but you just don't have enough depth of insight to be able to make a useful contribution, plus you're too petty and obnoxious to even be amusing. You make big noises about your alleged poli sci degree, but all that you show us is that left = good, right(as in, anyone who points out your errors)= bad. You can't even recognize that there are valid political stances other than left/right or that there are people like me far to the left of you who see you for the shallow poseur that you are. Get lost. David To that I say, not until you do. In addition, I will add that you're trying to come across as a professional academic with such high self esteem that you feel qualified to put yourself in a position to pass judgment on others. You're not! That would be okay, but you are trying to do that to someone who has already had numerous people with Ph.Ds after their names who would not agree with you. So I've passed the approval of people who really are professional academics. So why would you mean anything? To someone like you, who has demonstrated no particularly high level of thinking or writing, I'd say you need a reassessment of your own capabilities. Because it's apparent that your own view of your capabilities far exceeds reality. In other words, you aren't that great even if you tell us you are a hundred times. So run along and see if you can find someone else you can pretend to be superior to. Because you've still got a long way just to even get close to someone like me, let alone pass judgment on me. And you probably are to the left of me, so what does that prove? I'm closer to the middle than you are. So what? If you ask me you're the one who doesn't make much sense. Hawwke-ptooey All that you have written supports what I said about you. Perhaps the best part of it is that you continue to demonstrate that you read and understand neither what you reply to nor what you write. Get lost, loser. Sometimes simple is all your type can understand so how's about this? Up yours, junior! Hawwke-ptooey Junior? How ironic. I'm not the one attempting to disrupt adult conversations with clueless prattle. Once again the shallow poseur shows us how poorly he communicates. David |
#15
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Markets plummet on Republican obstructionism
|
#16
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Markets plummet on Republican obstructionism
On 12/9/2011 8:36 PM, David R. Birch wrote:
To someone like you, who has demonstrated no particularly high level of thinking or writing, I'd say you need a reassessment of your own capabilities. Because it's apparent that your own view of your capabilities far exceeds reality. In other words, you aren't that great even if you tell us you are a hundred times. So run along and see if you can find someone else you can pretend to be superior to. Because you've still got a long way just to even get close to someone like me, let alone pass judgment on me. And you probably are to the left of me, so what does that prove? I'm closer to the middle than you are. So what? If you ask me you're the one who doesn't make much sense. Hawwke-ptooey All that you have written supports what I said about you. Perhaps the best part of it is that you continue to demonstrate that you read and understand neither what you reply to nor what you write. Get lost, loser. Sometimes simple is all your type can understand so how's about this? Up yours, junior! Hawwke-ptooey Junior? How ironic. I'm not the one attempting to disrupt adult conversations with clueless prattle. Once again the shallow poseur shows us how poorly he communicates. David Yeah, right. You going to pretend you didn't get that message either? If you didn't then it's clear who is mentally challenged. I'll give you a clue, it' ain't me. Hawke |
#17
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Markets plummet on Republican obstructionism
On 12/11/2011 12:28 AM, Hawwke-ptooey wrote:
On 12/9/2011 8:36 PM, David R. Birch wrote: To someone like you, who has demonstrated no particularly high level of thinking or writing, I'd say you need a reassessment of your own capabilities. Because it's apparent that your own view of your capabilities far exceeds reality. In other words, you aren't that great even if you tell us you are a hundred times. So run along and see if you can find someone else you can pretend to be superior to. Because you've still got a long way just to even get close to someone like me, let alone pass judgment on me. And you probably are to the left of me, so what does that prove? I'm closer to the middle than you are. So what? If you ask me you're the one who doesn't make much sense. Hawwke-ptooey All that you have written supports what I said about you. Perhaps the best part of it is that you continue to demonstrate that you read and understand neither what you reply to nor what you write. Get lost, loser. Sometimes simple is all your type can understand so how's about this? Up yours, junior! Hawwke-ptooey Junior? How ironic. I'm not the one attempting to disrupt adult conversations with clueless prattle. Once again the shallow poseur shows us how poorly he communicates. David Yeah, right. You going to pretend you didn't get that message either? If you didn't then it's clear who is mentally challenged. I'll give you a clue, it' ain't me. Hawwke-ptooey Which message was that, one of the ones where you showed all how clueless you were or one of the ones where you implied your poli sci BA somehow gave you Special Insight? More and more you are coming across as a teenager posting from his basement "Command Center". Time for you to stop annoying the adults, loser. David |
#18
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Markets plummet on Republican obstructionism
On 12/11/2011 4:44 AM, David R. Birch wrote:
On 12/11/2011 12:28 AM, Hawwke-ptooey wrote: On 12/9/2011 8:36 PM, David R. Birch wrote: To someone like you, who has demonstrated no particularly high level of thinking or writing, I'd say you need a reassessment of your own capabilities. Because it's apparent that your own view of your capabilities far exceeds reality. In other words, you aren't that great even if you tell us you are a hundred times. So run along and see if you can find someone else you can pretend to be superior to. Because you've still got a long way just to even get close to someone like me, let alone pass judgment on me. And you probably are to the left of me, so what does that prove? I'm closer to the middle than you are. So what? If you ask me you're the one who doesn't make much sense. Hawwke-ptooey All that you have written supports what I said about you. Perhaps the best part of it is that you continue to demonstrate that you read and understand neither what you reply to nor what you write. Get lost, loser. Sometimes simple is all your type can understand so how's about this? Up yours, junior! Hawwke-ptooey Junior? How ironic. I'm not the one attempting to disrupt adult conversations with clueless prattle. Once again the shallow poseur shows us how poorly he communicates. David Yeah, right. You going to pretend you didn't get that message either? If you didn't then it's clear who is mentally challenged. I'll give you a clue, it' ain't me. Hawwke-ptooey Which message was that, one of the ones where you showed all how clueless you were or one of the ones where you implied your poli sci BA somehow gave you Special Insight? More and more you are coming across as a teenager posting from his basement "Command Center". Time for you to stop annoying the adults, loser. David I'd say it's time for you to stop acting like you're somebody's Dad telling them to behave. It's not your job. You aren't in a position to pontificate on my posts, that's for sure. I mean, who died and left you boss? Where do you get the idea that you are somehow superior to me in any way? You're dreaming if you think you are better educated or more intelligent than I am. But think whatever you want. The truth doesn't seem that important to you anyway. Hawke |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Survey Transit Optical Plummet | Metalworking | |||
Markets plummet on Republican obstructionism | Metalworking | |||
Markets plummet on Republican obstructionism | Metalworking | |||
Democrats Applauding Their Own Obstructionism | Metalworking |