"Gunner Asch" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:00:20 -0700, "." wrote:

On 6/13/2011 3:37 PM, Frank wrote:
On 6/12/2011 8:34 PM, The Henchman wrote:


Can somebody explain?

I'm looking at it in misc.survivalism

A lot of us believe that this nation cannot survive with presidents like
Obama.


that may be true, but we have absolute proof that the nation cannot
survive with republicans in charge. so Obama is by far the better risk

Odd..the US went into the Great Depression with a Democrat in
charge..that lasted from 1929-1940...and it went into the Great
Depression 2 with a Democrat in Charge...2008-

And there is no end in sight.

So once again..you spew buffoonery out your ass.

As usual

Gunner

Gunner, Gunner, Gunner. You expect too much of the man. A flaming liberal.
One who either doesn't read history, or reads it, and forgets the parts that
include the fiascos that happened during the Dem's watch.

Steve

"Steve B" wrote in message
news

"Gunner Asch" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:00:20 -0700, "." wrote:

On 6/13/2011 3:37 PM, Frank wrote:
On 6/12/2011 8:34 PM, The Henchman wrote:


Can somebody explain?

I'm looking at it in misc.survivalism

A lot of us believe that this nation cannot survive with presidents
like
Obama.


that may be true, but we have absolute proof that the nation cannot
survive with republicans in charge. so Obama is by far the better risk

Odd..the US went into the Great Depression with a Democrat in
charge..that lasted from 1929-1940...and it went into the Great
Depression 2 with a Democrat in Charge...2008-

And there is no end in sight.

So once again..you spew buffoonery out your ass.

As usual

Gunner

Gunner, Gunner, Gunner. You expect too much of the man. A flaming
liberal. One who either doesn't read history, or reads it, and forgets the
parts that include the fiascos that happened during the Dem's watch.

Steve

"Read history"? Gunner? You? Jesus.

So, tell us, Steve. Who was the Democrat who was "in charge" in 1929?

Do you think before you type, or is that too much to ask?

--
Ed Huntress

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:50:26 -0700, "Steve B"
wrote:


"Gunner Asch" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:00:20 -0700, "." wrote:

On 6/13/2011 3:37 PM, Frank wrote:
On 6/12/2011 8:34 PM, The Henchman wrote:


Can somebody explain?

I'm looking at it in misc.survivalism

A lot of us believe that this nation cannot survive with presidents like
Obama.


that may be true, but we have absolute proof that the nation cannot
survive with republicans in charge. so Obama is by far the better risk

Odd..the US went into the Great Depression with a Democrat in
charge..that lasted from 1929-1940...and it went into the Great
Depression 2 with a Democrat in Charge...2008-

And there is no end in sight.

So once again..you spew buffoonery out your ass.

As usual

Gunner

Gunner, Gunner, Gunner. You expect too much of the man. A flaming liberal.
One who either doesn't read history, or reads it, and forgets the parts that
include the fiascos that happened during the Dem's watch.

Steve


Opening paragraphs:

"We aren't going to have another financial crash. In fact, nothing
at
all is going to happen. Forecasting the United States economy is
about
as exciting as predicting next quarter's gross domestic product in
1957 Poland. You want to know what's going to happen, comrade? Read
the Five Year Plan. With 40% of US personal income coming from
transfer payments, it's almost nostalgic to call it capitalism.
The so-called American economic recovery won't die, because it's
undead. It was a zombie to begin with. Equity investors during the
past six weeks came to the collective conclusion that the US is not
in
the early phase of an economic recovery, but in the endless middle
of
a structural slump, in the term of Nobel Prize winner Edmund Phelps.
"

read the rest

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_.../MF14Dj05.html

It would leave a mark, if the patient wasn't not quite completely
dead.



Ooh, I like this:

"March 13, 2009, I wrote (at the "Inner Workings" blog on this site,
blog.atimes.net):

It's not about getting a recovery going. That's not going to happen,
not if Martians land in flying saucers with a billion tons of gold to
invest in bank capital. It's about preventing something worse than we
have now, namely screaming, bug-eyed, blood-in-the-streets,
rape-the-crops-and-burn-the-women panic. Zombie not bad. Zombie good.
Zombie better than alternative, which is you dead. Really dead. No
breath, never get live again. Zombie is as good as it gets. You zombie,
you still alive, sort of. You not zombie, you dead. Opposite of zombie
not happy, lively, active. Opposite of zombie is you push daisies up.
The best we can get out of this is a zombie banking system, one that
still pays its debts because it earns enough interest from the toxic
assets left over from the last boom.



--
Maxim 12: A soft answer turneth away wrath.
Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head.