Is there any public library of G-codes
I would like to know if there is a website, that is a public
repository of G codes. Say, G-code to make an AK-47 receiver, or some other common household items or naked woman sculptures like on youtube. Sort of like CPAN for perl modules. |
Is there any public library of G-codes
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 08:15:44 -0500, Ignoramus12838
wrote: I would like to know if there is a website, that is a public repository of G codes. Say, G-code to make an AK-47 receiver, or some other common household items or naked woman sculptures like on youtube. Sort of like CPAN for perl modules. First of all...you have to determine which of several hundred G-codes you need.......G-codes that run a Fadal, will not necessarily run a Makino, and so forth. And the sequence and order they will run on. OmniTurns will run a ****load of commands on a single line. "Sometimes." Others require a line for each command. And so forth. G-code is a generic name for a particular type of programming..but its not a graven in stone language like...say...High Mandarin, or British English (London) As for libraries...there are a few out there..but for such things as AK parts...most folks are going to be very very circumscript with access to them. Gunner One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that, in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid. Gunner Asch |
Is there any public library of G-codes
On 2010-07-15, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 08:15:44 -0500, Ignoramus12838 wrote: I would like to know if there is a website, that is a public repository of G codes. Say, G-code to make an AK-47 receiver, or some other common household items or naked woman sculptures like on youtube. Sort of like CPAN for perl modules. First of all...you have to determine which of several hundred G-codes you need.......G-codes that run a Fadal, will not necessarily run a Makino, and so forth. And the sequence and order they will run on. OmniTurns will run a ****load of commands on a single line. "Sometimes." Others require a line for each command. And so forth. G-code is a generic name for a particular type of programming..but its not a graven in stone language like...say...High Mandarin, or British English (London) As for libraries...there are a few out there..but for such things as AK parts...most folks are going to be very very circumscript with access to them. Certainly if I develop G code for an AK receiver, I will post it publicly on my website. i |
Is there any public library of G-codes
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:08:06 -0500, Ignoramus12838
wrote: On 2010-07-15, Gunner Asch wrote: On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 08:15:44 -0500, Ignoramus12838 wrote: I would like to know if there is a website, that is a public repository of G codes. Say, G-code to make an AK-47 receiver, or some other common household items or naked woman sculptures like on youtube. Sort of like CPAN for perl modules. First of all...you have to determine which of several hundred G-codes you need.......G-codes that run a Fadal, will not necessarily run a Makino, and so forth. And the sequence and order they will run on. OmniTurns will run a ****load of commands on a single line. "Sometimes." Others require a line for each command. And so forth. G-code is a generic name for a particular type of programming..but its not a graven in stone language like...say...High Mandarin, or British English (London) As for libraries...there are a few out there..but for such things as AK parts...most folks are going to be very very circumscript with access to them. Certainly if I develop G code for an AK receiver, I will post it publicly on my website. i Many many people will be interested. Including the BATF. Gunner One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that, in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid. Gunner Asch |
Is there any public library of G-codes
On 2010-07-15, Gunner Asch wrote:
Many many people will be interested. Including the BATF. Well, this is speech, so I cannot see how it could be illegal. i |
Is there any public library of G-codes
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:57:45 -0500, Ignoramus12838
wrote: On 2010-07-15, Gunner Asch wrote: Many many people will be interested. Including the BATF. Well, this is speech, so I cannot see how it could be illegal. i You have to be very, very careful dealing with anything (even indirectly) to do with arms, nuclear, and space, including documents in any form- that kind of speech is NOT free. |
Is there any public library of G-codes
On 2010-07-15, Spehro Pefhany wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:57:45 -0500, Ignoramus12838 wrote: On 2010-07-15, Gunner Asch wrote: Many many people will be interested. Including the BATF. Well, this is speech, so I cannot see how it could be illegal. i You have to be very, very careful dealing with anything (even indirectly) to do with arms, nuclear, and space, including documents in any form- that kind of speech is NOT free. Well, maybe you can find some specific US law, that disallows posting G codes for receivers, then I would be open to changing my mind. i |
Is there any public library of G-codes
Gunner Asch fired this volley in
: Many many people will be interested. Including the BATF. nah... not even a little. They don't care if you make a receiver, no matter who you are. They care if you make full-auto weapons. They care a LOT if you sell it or use it without the appropriate licensing. LLoyd |
Is there any public library of G-codes
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:57:45 -0500, Ignoramus12838
wrote: On 2010-07-15, Gunner Asch wrote: Many many people will be interested. Including the BATF. Well, this is speech, so I cannot see how it could be illegal. i Oh..its certainly not illegal! However..manufacture of variations of the AK is seriously frowned on by certain governmental agencies..including those in your state. Even though manufacturing one in semi auto, for personal use..is very very legal visa vis Federal Law. There are by now...many many thousands of prints for ARs on the net..but the first guys who posted them..were watched like a hawk for years. The prints for Stens and whatnot are readily availble all over the internet, so Im sure many many thousands of smiths, home builders and so forth would love to have a set of prints for the AK! Im glad you are willing to be a pioneer! Gunner One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that, in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid. Gunner Asch |
Is there any public library of G-codes
Ignoramus12838 wrote:
I would like to know if there is a website, that is a public repository of G codes. Say, G-code to make an AK-47 receiver, or some other common household items or naked woman sculptures like on youtube. Sort of like CPAN for perl modules. Google "AK 47 receiver flats" and you will find kits that sell a flat plate with all the holes in them. Then you have to bend and weld/rivet. You could reverse engineer a flat. If you find a drawing with dimensions of a flat, please post a link. Wes -- "Additionally as a security officer, I carry a gun to protect government officials but my life isn't worth protecting at home in their eyes." Dick Anthony Heller |
Is there any public library of G-codes
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:27:02 -0400, Wes
wrote: Ignoramus12838 wrote: I would like to know if there is a website, that is a public repository of G codes. Say, G-code to make an AK-47 receiver, or some other common household items or naked woman sculptures like on youtube. Sort of like CPAN for perl modules. Google "AK 47 receiver flats" and you will find kits that sell a flat plate with all the holes in them. Then you have to bend and weld/rivet. You could reverse engineer a flat. If you find a drawing with dimensions of a flat, please post a link. Wes The AKs came in two versions..Milled and sheetmetal. Much like the SKS. The sheetmetal versions..shrug..work as intended. All one needs is a finger break and some time. The milled versions... http://www.ak-47.us/AK-47Receivers.php One assumes you can still read Russian? http://rapidshare.com/files/76776603...sian_.pdf.html http://talks.guns.ru/ http://www.weaponryonline.com/Downlo...y-ratingA.html http://www.filecrop.com/Ak47-blueprints.html http://www.weaponscombat.com/firearm...cad-files.html http://www.scribd.com/doc/24712405/A...iver-Blueprint As I indicated...there are sources out there that wont get you looked at in your state...... Gunner Gunner One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that, in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid. Gunner Asch |
Is there any public library of G-codes
On 2010-07-15, Lloyd E. Sponenburgh lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:
Gunner Asch fired this volley in : Many many people will be interested. Including the BATF. nah... not even a little. They don't care if you make a receiver, no matter who you are. They care if you make full-auto weapons. They care a LOT if you sell it or use it without the appropriate licensing. correct. i |
Is there any public library of G-codes
Ignoramus12838 wrote:
On 2010-07-15, Lloyd E. Sponenburgh lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote: Gunner Asch fired this volley in : Many many people will be interested. Including the BATF. nah... not even a little. They don't care if you make a receiver, no matter who you are. They care if you make full-auto weapons. They care a LOT if you sell it or use it without the appropriate licensing. correct. i I'm gonna call BS on this one. If you develop your own code, then it's yours. Develop your own intellectual property? -- Richard Lamb |
Is there any public library of G-codes
On 2010-07-15, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:27:02 -0400, Wes wrote: Ignoramus12838 wrote: I would like to know if there is a website, that is a public repository of G codes. Say, G-code to make an AK-47 receiver, or some other common household items or naked woman sculptures like on youtube. Sort of like CPAN for perl modules. Google "AK 47 receiver flats" and you will find kits that sell a flat plate with all the holes in them. Then you have to bend and weld/rivet. You could reverse engineer a flat. If you find a drawing with dimensions of a flat, please post a link. Wes The AKs came in two versions..Milled and sheetmetal. Much like the SKS. The sheetmetal versions..shrug..work as intended. All one needs is a finger break and some time. The milled versions... http://www.ak-47.us/AK-47Receivers.php One assumes you can still read Russian? http://rapidshare.com/files/76776603...sian_.pdf.html this is a depot level repair manual. Very handy to have. http://talks.guns.ru/ http://www.weaponryonline.com/Downlo...y-ratingA.html the links do not work http://www.filecrop.com/Ak47-blueprints.html this looks extremely promising http://www.weaponscombat.com/firearm...cad-files.html http://www.scribd.com/doc/24712405/A...iver-Blueprint This is great. thanks i As I indicated...there are sources out there that wont get you looked at in your state...... Gunner Gunner One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that, in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid. Gunner Asch |
Is there any public library of G-codes
cavelamb fired this volley in
m: I'm gonna call BS on this one. Which? Your quotation included both stances. Are you saying that it's BS that ATF would care, or that they would not? I infer that you mean "BS" against the case that ATF would care. LLoyd |
Is there any public library of G-codes
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:23:18 -0500, Ignoramus12838
wrote: On 2010-07-15, Gunner Asch wrote: On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:27:02 -0400, Wes wrote: Ignoramus12838 wrote: I would like to know if there is a website, that is a public repository of G codes. Say, G-code to make an AK-47 receiver, or some other common household items or naked woman sculptures like on youtube. Sort of like CPAN for perl modules. Google "AK 47 receiver flats" and you will find kits that sell a flat plate with all the holes in them. Then you have to bend and weld/rivet. You could reverse engineer a flat. If you find a drawing with dimensions of a flat, please post a link. Wes The AKs came in two versions..Milled and sheetmetal. Much like the SKS. The sheetmetal versions..shrug..work as intended. All one needs is a finger break and some time. The milled versions... http://www.ak-47.us/AK-47Receivers.php One assumes you can still read Russian? http://rapidshare.com/files/76776603...sian_.pdf.html this is a depot level repair manual. Very handy to have. http://talks.guns.ru/ http://www.weaponryonline.com/Downlo...y-ratingA.html the links do not work http://www.filecrop.com/Ak47-blueprints.html this looks extremely promising http://www.weaponscombat.com/firearm...cad-files.html http://www.scribd.com/doc/24712405/A...iver-Blueprint This is great. thanks Za vashe zdarovie And yes..I know what I just said..... G Gunner i As I indicated...there are sources out there that wont get you looked at in your state...... Gunner Gunner One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that, in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid. Gunner Asch One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that, in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid. Gunner Asch |
Is there any public library of G-codes
Lloyd E. Sponenburgh wrote:
cavelamb fired this volley in m: I'm gonna call BS on this one. Which? Your quotation included both stances. Are you saying that it's BS that ATF would care, or that they would not? I infer that you mean "BS" against the case that ATF would care. LLoyd No. It's about who owns the rights to intellectual property... -- Richard Lamb |
Is there any public library of G-codes
On 2010-07-16, cavelamb wrote:
Ignoramus12838 wrote: On 2010-07-15, Lloyd E. Sponenburgh lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote: Gunner Asch fired this volley in : Many many people will be interested. Including the BATF. nah... not even a little. They don't care if you make a receiver, no matter who you are. They care if you make full-auto weapons. They care a LOT if you sell it or use it without the appropriate licensing. correct. i I'm gonna call BS on this one. If you develop your own code, then it's yours. Develop your own intellectual property? Well, yes, the code is mine, but I choose to share it with the world. I would release the code under the GNU Free Documentation License. i |
Is there any public library of G-codes
On 2010-07-16, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:23:18 -0500, Ignoramus12838 wrote: On 2010-07-15, Gunner Asch wrote: On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:27:02 -0400, Wes wrote: Ignoramus12838 wrote: I would like to know if there is a website, that is a public repository of G codes. Say, G-code to make an AK-47 receiver, or some other common household items or naked woman sculptures like on youtube. Sort of like CPAN for perl modules. Google "AK 47 receiver flats" and you will find kits that sell a flat plate with all the holes in them. Then you have to bend and weld/rivet. You could reverse engineer a flat. If you find a drawing with dimensions of a flat, please post a link. Wes The AKs came in two versions..Milled and sheetmetal. Much like the SKS. The sheetmetal versions..shrug..work as intended. All one needs is a finger break and some time. The milled versions... http://www.ak-47.us/AK-47Receivers.php One assumes you can still read Russian? http://rapidshare.com/files/76776603...sian_.pdf.html this is a depot level repair manual. Very handy to have. http://talks.guns.ru/ http://www.weaponryonline.com/Downlo...y-ratingA.html the links do not work http://www.filecrop.com/Ak47-blueprints.html this looks extremely promising http://www.weaponscombat.com/firearm...cad-files.html http://www.scribd.com/doc/24712405/A...iver-Blueprint This is great. thanks Za vashe zdarovie And yes..I know what I just said..... G Awesome. i Gunner i As I indicated...there are sources out there that wont get you looked at in your state...... Gunner Gunner One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that, in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid. Gunner Asch One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that, in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid. Gunner Asch |
Is there any public library of G-codes
Ignoramus12838 wrote:
On 2010-07-16, cavelamb wrote: Ignoramus12838 wrote: On 2010-07-15, Lloyd E. Sponenburgh lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote: Gunner Asch fired this volley in : Many many people will be interested. Including the BATF. nah... not even a little. They don't care if you make a receiver, no matter who you are. They care if you make full-auto weapons. They care a LOT if you sell it or use it without the appropriate licensing. correct. i I'm gonna call BS on this one. If you develop your own code, then it's yours. Develop your own intellectual property? Well, yes, the code is mine, but I choose to share it with the world. I would release the code under the GNU Free Documentation License. i Some people seem to think that this would be an actionable action - because it's for a gun. But there is no freaking way you can turn out an AK-47 as cheap or as accurate as those already on the free market. There is such a HUGE difference between carving out one weapon - even if it's PERFECT, as opposed to turning out a thousand a day. Given time to perfect you codes - iterations count - MAYbe. But production is what matters to ATF. Not a single hand made (even by G-code) weapon... |
Is there any public library of G-codes
As I indicated...there are sources out there that wont get you looked at in your state...... Just curious, "the kid" and i were looking at ar10 and 15 lowers. We said, we can make that. the only hard part is the magazine pocket and we own a wire EDM to burn that out. Surely, others have seen this and acted, any big deal? Are the drawings already out there? That would be the biggest job. karl |
Is there any public library of G-codes
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:38:26 -0500, the renowned Ignoramus12838
wrote: On 2010-07-15, Spehro Pefhany wrote: On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:57:45 -0500, Ignoramus12838 wrote: On 2010-07-15, Gunner Asch wrote: Many many people will be interested. Including the BATF. Well, this is speech, so I cannot see how it could be illegal. i You have to be very, very careful dealing with anything (even indirectly) to do with arms, nuclear, and space, including documents in any form- that kind of speech is NOT free. Well, maybe you can find some specific US law, that disallows posting G codes for receivers, then I would be open to changing my mind. i Read the ITAR regulations, which are rather broad in scope. Posting is equivalent to exporting, probably even if the computer system is only accessible from within the US. I do not take my work laptop on any overseas flights. Best regards, Spehro Pefhany -- "it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward" Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com |
Is there any public library of G-codes
On 2010-07-16, Spehro Pefhany wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:38:26 -0500, the renowned Ignoramus12838 wrote: On 2010-07-15, Spehro Pefhany wrote: On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:57:45 -0500, Ignoramus12838 wrote: On 2010-07-15, Gunner Asch wrote: Many many people will be interested. Including the BATF. Well, this is speech, so I cannot see how it could be illegal. i You have to be very, very careful dealing with anything (even indirectly) to do with arms, nuclear, and space, including documents in any form- that kind of speech is NOT free. Well, maybe you can find some specific US law, that disallows posting G codes for receivers, then I would be open to changing my mind. i Read the ITAR regulations, which are rather broad in scope. Posting is equivalent to exporting, probably even if the computer system is only accessible from within the US. I do not take my work laptop on any overseas flights. Maybe you can read ITAR regulations since you are the one claiming it to be illegal. AK-47 is not even a US weapons system and its specifications are a matter of common knowledge. ITAR is obsolete and products covered by it, such as encryption systems, are publicly available worldwide. i |
Is there any public library of G-codes
On 7/15/2010 3:08 PM, Ignoramus12838 wrote:
On 2010-07-15, Gunner wrote: On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 08:15:44 -0500, Ignoramus12838 wrote: I would like to know if there is a website, that is a public repository of G codes. Say, G-code to make an AK-47 receiver, or some other common household items or naked woman sculptures like on youtube. Sort of like CPAN for perl modules. First of all...you have to determine which of several hundred G-codes you need.......G-codes that run a Fadal, will not necessarily run a Makino, and so forth. And the sequence and order they will run on. OmniTurns will run a ****load of commands on a single line. "Sometimes." Others require a line for each command. And so forth. G-code is a generic name for a particular type of programming..but its not a graven in stone language like...say...High Mandarin, or British English (London) As for libraries...there are a few out there..but for such things as AK parts...most folks are going to be very very circumscript with access to them. Certainly if I develop G code for an AK receiver, I will post it publicly on my website. i The 3D CAD file would be more useful. The problem with word address programs (those that use G codes, M codes, etc.) is that about 1/2 of the codes are common, like G00 and M03, another 1/4 are done differently on different controls, like radii and drilling cycles, and the last 1/4 is specific to the control manufacturer. I worked briefly for Traub before they were bought by Index and the Traub version of word address was so elegant that I felt I could make the tool do anything. But... those programs would never run on a Hardinge with a Fanuc control. David |
Is there any public library of G-codes
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 20:47:26 -0500, cavelamb
wrote: But there is no freaking way you can turn out an AK-47 as cheap or as accurate as those already on the free market. Hardly true. Gunner One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that, in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid. Gunner Asch |
Is there any public library of G-codes
Maybe this will help.
http://www.cncguns.com/ "Ignoramus12838" wrote in message ... I would like to know if there is a website, that is a public repository of G codes. Say, G-code to make an AK-47 receiver, or some other common household items or naked woman sculptures like on youtube. Sort of like CPAN for perl modules. |
Is there any public library of G-codes
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 21:19:31 -0500, "Karl Townsend"
wrote: As I indicated...there are sources out there that wont get you looked at in your state...... Just curious, "the kid" and i were looking at ar10 and 15 lowers. We said, we can make that. the only hard part is the magazine pocket and we own a wire EDM to burn that out. Surely, others have seen this and acted, any big deal? Are the drawings already out there? That would be the biggest job. karl The prints are everywhere. As are the instructions... http://www.tele.com/articles/build-ar15.html http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=3&f=4&t=226782 Now for those who only have a mill and a lathe.... and live in a state like California where AR-s are basically banned....There is a website out there somewhere where a guy machined from scratch..blocks of 6061=T6 and built an AR lower from scratch. It appeared to be quite easy to do as well. In california..there are several ******* requirements when one tries to owns an AR..the biggest hurdle is its pistol grip or the detachable magazine.. Hence I dont own any ARs Ill admit to. M1As...Mini14s and so forth..they are ok. But my favorite toy..STG58..FN-FAL..is also banned in California Gunner One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that, in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid. Gunner Asch |
Is there any public library of G-codes
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 21:54:47 -0500, Ignoramus12838
wrote: On 2010-07-16, Spehro Pefhany wrote: On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:38:26 -0500, the renowned Ignoramus12838 wrote: On 2010-07-15, Spehro Pefhany wrote: On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:57:45 -0500, Ignoramus12838 wrote: On 2010-07-15, Gunner Asch wrote: Many many people will be interested. Including the BATF. Well, this is speech, so I cannot see how it could be illegal. i You have to be very, very careful dealing with anything (even indirectly) to do with arms, nuclear, and space, including documents in any form- that kind of speech is NOT free. Well, maybe you can find some specific US law, that disallows posting G codes for receivers, then I would be open to changing my mind. i Read the ITAR regulations, which are rather broad in scope. Posting is equivalent to exporting, probably even if the computer system is only accessible from within the US. I do not take my work laptop on any overseas flights. Maybe you can read ITAR regulations since you are the one claiming it to be illegal. AK-47 is not even a US weapons system and its specifications are a matter of common knowledge. ITAR is obsolete and products covered by it, such as encryption systems, are publicly available worldwide. i But has ITAR been removed? Gunner One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that, in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid. Gunner Asch |
Is there any public library of G-codes
On 2010-07-16, Bob La Londe wrote:
Maybe this will help. http://www.cncguns.com/ Wow, this is just outright awesome. i "Ignoramus12838" wrote in message ... I would like to know if there is a website, that is a public repository of G codes. Say, G-code to make an AK-47 receiver, or some other common household items or naked woman sculptures like on youtube. Sort of like CPAN for perl modules. |
Is there any public library of G-codes
On 2010-07-16, Gunner Asch wrote: The prints are everywhere. As are the instructions... http://www.tele.com/articles/build-ar15.html http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=3&f=4&t=226782 Now for those who only have a mill and a lathe.... and live in a state like California where AR-s are basically banned....There is a website out there somewhere where a guy machined from scratch..blocks of 6061=T6 and built an AR lower from scratch. It appeared to be quite easy to do as well. In california..there are several ******* requirements when one tries to owns an AR..the biggest hurdle is its pistol grip But if you make your own rifle, you can call it GA-15 or whatever you like, right? i or the detachable magazine.. Hence I dont own any ARs Ill admit to. M1As...Mini14s and so forth..they are ok. But my favorite toy..STG58..FN-FAL..is also banned in California Gunner One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that, in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid. Gunner Asch |
Is there any public library of G-codes
Spehro Pefhany wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:38:26 -0500, the renowned Ignoramus12838 wrote: On 2010-07-15, Spehro Pefhany wrote: On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:57:45 -0500, Ignoramus12838 wrote: On 2010-07-15, Gunner Asch wrote: Many many people will be interested. Including the BATF. Well, this is speech, so I cannot see how it could be illegal. i You have to be very, very careful dealing with anything (even indirectly) to do with arms, nuclear, and space, including documents in any form- that kind of speech is NOT free. Well, maybe you can find some specific US law, that disallows posting G codes for receivers, then I would be open to changing my mind. i Read the ITAR regulations, which are rather broad in scope. Posting is equivalent to exporting, probably even if the computer system is only accessible from within the US. I do not take my work laptop on any overseas flights. Best regards, Spehro Pefhany Sounds like China... -- Richard Lamb |
Is there any public library of G-codes
Gunner Asch wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 20:47:26 -0500, cavelamb wrote: But there is no freaking way you can turn out an AK-47 as cheap or as accurate as those already on the free market. Hardly true. Gunner No. ABSOLUTEly true. A hand made thing will ALWAYS be more expensive - man hours, materials for RETRYS, Trying to get "perfect" parts to fit... GIMME a break, Guns. YOU know this. -- Richard Lamb |
Is there any public library of G-codes
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 23:46:20 -0500, Ignoramus12838
wrote: On 2010-07-16, Gunner Asch wrote: The prints are everywhere. As are the instructions... http://www.tele.com/articles/build-ar15.html http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=3&f=4&t=226782 Now for those who only have a mill and a lathe.... and live in a state like California where AR-s are basically banned....There is a website out there somewhere where a guy machined from scratch..blocks of 6061=T6 and built an AR lower from scratch. It appeared to be quite easy to do as well. In california..there are several ******* requirements when one tries to owns an AR..the biggest hurdle is its pistol grip But if you make your own rifle, you can call it GA-15 or whatever you like, right? Kinda sorta. There are some issues with local cops who dont know **** about the gun laws in California. Most of them in the LA area of course. The ones around here tend to be shooters anyways and even if they have doubts..tend to tell you to put it away so they cant ask questions about it. "California The 2000 Assault Weapons ban in the state of California sparked a renewed interest in the AR-15 rifle. It is estimated that some 400,000 California Legal AR-15s are in existence in that state, with another 100,000 added each year.[19] There are three ways to get a legal AR-15 in California: 1. Registered Assault Weapon: If you owned the rifle before Jan 1, 2000 and registered it with the state, you have a Registered Assault Weapon (RAW) under CA law. No new registrations are permitted. RAW rifles can have combinations of features which are prohibited in unregistered rifles. 2. Fixed Magazine Rifle: This style of rifle is made by combining an AR-15 upper receiver with an AR-15 lower receiver which has not been specifically banned by name, and which has a fixed 10-round (maximum) magazine. In such a configuration, the rifleman could add otherwise prohibited features such as a telescoping stock and pistol grip. The magazine is not detachable, so to load the rifle the shooter must either "top load" or use a magazine lock. To top-load, the shooter pulls the rear takedown pin, hinges the upper receiver on the front pivot pin, and loads the now exposed magazine. Several devices are available on the market which replace the magazine release button with an inset pin that requires the use of a special tool to activate the magazine release. 3. Featureless Rifle: If a rifle has none of the prohibited features (pistol grip, telescoping or folding stock, flash hider, grenade/flare launcher, forward pistol grip), the rifle may be used with legally-owned large capacity magazines. There are several products available on the market to configure featureless rifles. Special grips are available which prevent the thumb from going behind it as would be the case with a pistol grip configuration. They are therefore not a prohibited wrap-around style grip. Separate buffer tubes to contain the recoil spring and buffer assembly may also be used in conjunction with special stocks without prohibited grips or stock adapters which attach to the pistol grip mount. Most AR-15 manufacturers now make lower receivers which qualify as "Off-List" Lowers (OLL) in the state of CA." Shooting some of the pistol grip-less rifles can be an utter pain in the ass. So most guys build a rifle using the not easily detachable magazine release and a fixed butt stock. They also have on hand tucked neatly and invisibly away..the replacement standard magazine release for when the **** hits the fan and they actually wont be worried about anyting other than staying alive. Shrug Gunner i or the detachable magazine.. Hence I dont own any ARs Ill admit to. M1As...Mini14s and so forth..they are ok. But my favorite toy..STG58..FN-FAL..is also banned in California Gunner One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that, in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid. Gunner Asch One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that, in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid. Gunner Asch |
Is there any public library of G-codes
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 00:15:23 -0500, cavelamb
wrote: Gunner Asch wrote: On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 20:47:26 -0500, cavelamb wrote: But there is no freaking way you can turn out an AK-47 as cheap or as accurate as those already on the free market. Hardly true. Gunner No. ABSOLUTEly true. A hand made thing will ALWAYS be more expensive - man hours, materials for RETRYS, Trying to get "perfect" parts to fit... GIMME a break, Guns. YOU know this. Expensive in time yes..but not in cash. And yes..one can build one far more accurate than an issue one. IF you know what you are doing and have the tools. Quite frankly...while the common thought is "time is money"..under many circumstances...there is no relationship. If you are unemployed and have absolutely nothing to do..how much money does 20 hours of labor cost you out in the shop? Gunner One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that, in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid. Gunner Asch |
Is there any public library of G-codes
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 21:54:47 -0500, the renowned Ignoramus12838
wrote: On 2010-07-16, Spehro Pefhany wrote: On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:38:26 -0500, the renowned Ignoramus12838 wrote: On 2010-07-15, Spehro Pefhany wrote: On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:57:45 -0500, Ignoramus12838 wrote: On 2010-07-15, Gunner Asch wrote: Many many people will be interested. Including the BATF. Well, this is speech, so I cannot see how it could be illegal. i You have to be very, very careful dealing with anything (even indirectly) to do with arms, nuclear, and space, including documents in any form- that kind of speech is NOT free. Well, maybe you can find some specific US law, that disallows posting G codes for receivers, then I would be open to changing my mind. i Read the ITAR regulations, which are rather broad in scope. Posting is equivalent to exporting, probably even if the computer system is only accessible from within the US. I do not take my work laptop on any overseas flights. Maybe you can read ITAR regulations since you are the one claiming it to be illegal. AK-47 is not even a US weapons system AFAIUI, ALL firearms are on the US munitions list (under Category 1). http://www.pmddtc.state.gov/dtrade/d...structions.pdf http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text...1.13.64.0.32.2 Note that it's not inherently illegal, just illegal to do without asking (and receiving) permission in advance, like most such things. and its specifications are a matter of common knowledge. Since when did regulations have to make sense? I agree the personal risk is probably very low in this case, but I don't think the G-codes are already public domain which is the only explicit exclusion. ITAR is obsolete and products covered by it, such as encryption systems, are publicly available worldwide. Well, I agree. It's certainly hurting US manufacturers. We have to keep even the spec sheets and pinouts for some products under lock and key and they *do* come and inspect our security, and our stuff is nothing to do with military products, just really high tech instrumentation that has to be used in aircraft worldwide. Buy a similar product from a French or Russian company and the problems go away. I'm sure they're delighted, the US stuff is generally cheaper and about as good, so otherwise it would be preferred. In fact if the European item is imported to the US, the US government may not allow it leave! Having gone to seminars etc. I can actually see where they are coming from-- if data was used to produce items that were then used to kill civilans, US or NATO soldiers in job lots.. but it's gotten silly. Despite the silliness, the potential penalties are severe though.. and it would be foolish to trust government folks with that kind of power over one, IMHO. Did you ever subscribe to Foreign Affairs? There was a good article on ITAR reform late last year: http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articl...osing-controls Best regards, Spehro Pefhany -- "it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward" Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com |
The Law and G-Codes for an AK47 was Is there any public library of G-codes
Ignoramus12838 on Thu, 15 Jul
2010 21:54:47 -0500 typed in rec.crafts.metalworking the following: You have to be very, very careful dealing with anything (even indirectly) to do with arms, nuclear, and space, including documents in any form- that kind of speech is NOT free. Well, maybe you can find some specific US law, that disallows posting G codes for receivers, then I would be open to changing my mind. Read the ITAR regulations, which are rather broad in scope. Posting is equivalent to exporting, probably even if the computer system is only accessible from within the US. I do not take my work laptop on any overseas flights. Maybe you can read ITAR regulations since you are the one claiming it to be illegal. AK-47 is not even a US weapons system and its specifications are a matter of common knowledge. ITAR is obsolete and products covered by it, such as encryption systems, are publicly available worldwide. A law may be old, it may be out dated (e.G., The Mining Act of 1872), it may even be obsolete - but it is still the law. Just because the existence of a the AK-47 is nie universal, and kids in the NW Territories of Pakistan are making them with screwdrivers and nail files, does not mean that you can legally manufacture one in your own shop (Unless you are a felon and live in California, in which case the 9th Circuit ruled that the restrictions do not apply - interesting application of the Interstate Commerce clause.). And just because encryption systems are available world wide proves 'nothing' - they were distributed despite and in defiance of the law. (That includes PGP, et alia.) You post the G-codes for an AK-47, even one which is a semi-automatic version, and the BATFE will descend upon you like a horde of parasites, because they are a dangerous as they are clueless. And they will arrest you for violation of the act, and it will be up to you to convince a jury of your peers (if your peers include those who can't get out of jury duty) that you did, in fact, not violate the law you violated by posting the G-Codes. Secondly, what a good government might not do, has no relationship with what a bad government will do. And bad governments have been known to attempt to suppress further publication of technologies mentioned in works of fiction. Barak Obama is correct at least this once: the easiest thing for a bureaucrat to do is nothing: To forbid. In this era of reduced revenue, be aware that after the BATFE raids your shop, they will bring along OSHA, EPA, FAA, PTA, PETA, SEC, FCC, the Patient Office, NAALCP, MIC KEY MOU SE, CPS, HSS, HUD, the IRS, and Ralph the Wonder Fink, to make sure you are in compliance with every law, regulation and interpretation, whim and desire of government (Or NGO) employees. My advice: keep your passport and cash stashed off site where you can get at them, assuming you make bail. Gluck pyotr -- pyotr filipivich We will drink no whiskey before its nine. It's eight fifty eight. Close enough! |
Is there any public library of G-codes
Gunner Asch on Fri, 16 Jul 2010 00:38:07 -0700
typed in rec.crafts.metalworking the following: GIMME a break, Guns. YOU know this. Expensive in time yes..but not in cash. And yes..one can build one far more accurate than an issue one. IF you know what you are doing and have the tools. Quite frankly...while the common thought is "time is money"..under many circumstances...there is no relationship. Time is money is a constant. You either have a lot of one, or the other. If you are unemployed and have absolutely nothing to do..how much money does 20 hours of labor cost you out in the shop? Right now, I have the time, but not the money. Worse - no shop, so I can't turn some of that time into money. tschus pyotr -- pyotr filipivich We will drink no whiskey before its nine. It's eight fifty eight. Close enough! |
The Law and G-Codes for an AK47 was Is there any public libraryof G-codes
On 2010-07-16, pyotr filipivich wrote:
A law may be old, it may be out dated (e.G., The Mining Act of 1872), it may even be obsolete - but it is still the law. Just because the existence of a the AK-47 is nie universal, and kids in the NW Territories of Pakistan are making them with screwdrivers and nail files, does not mean that you can legally manufacture one in your own It is legal to manufacture any gun that is legal to have in your state. shop (Unless you are a felon and live in California, in which case the 9th Circuit ruled that the restrictions do not apply - interesting application of the Interstate Commerce clause.). And just because encryption systems are available world wide proves 'nothing' - they were distributed despite and in defiance of the law. (That includes PGP, et alia.) You post the G-codes for an AK-47, even one which is a semi-automatic version, and the BATFE will descend upon you like a horde of parasites, because they are a dangerous as they are clueless. I smell bull****. And they will arrest you for violation of the act, and it will be up to you to convince a jury of your peers (if your peers include those who can't get out of jury duty) that you did, in fact, not violate the law you violated by posting the G-Codes. I smell even more bull****. I would not even dare to guess out of where you pulled it. Check out http://www.cncguns.com/downloads.html, they offer drawings of many popular gun models. Secondly, what a good government might not do, has no relationship with what a bad government will do. And bad governments have been known to attempt to suppress further publication of technologies mentioned in works of fiction. Barak Obama is correct at least this once: the easiest thing for a bureaucrat to do is nothing: To forbid. In this era of reduced revenue, be aware that after the BATFE raids your shop, they will bring along OSHA, EPA, FAA, PTA, PETA, SEC, FCC, the Patient Office, NAALCP, MIC KEY MOU SE, CPS, HSS, HUD, the IRS, and Ralph the Wonder Fink, to make sure you are in compliance with every law, regulation and interpretation, whim and desire of government (Or NGO) employees. My advice: keep your passport and cash stashed off site where you can get at them, assuming you make bail. Time to go back to reality. i |
Is there any public library of G-codes
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:38:26 -0500, Ignoramus12838
wrote the following: On 2010-07-15, Spehro Pefhany wrote: On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:57:45 -0500, Ignoramus12838 wrote: On 2010-07-15, Gunner Asch wrote: Many many people will be interested. Including the BATF. Well, this is speech, so I cannot see how it could be illegal. i You have to be very, very careful dealing with anything (even indirectly) to do with arms, nuclear, and space, including documents in any form- that kind of speech is NOT free. Well, maybe you can find some specific US law, that disallows posting G codes for receivers, then I would be open to changing my mind. Ask 'em yourself, Ig. www.atf.gov Just ask "Will you arrest me and send me to prison for the rest of my life if I create and display, to the public, the G-code for using CNC milling machines to create a receiver for the AK-47 automatic rifle?" If you use the term "assault rifle" they'll understand better. I believe they're just a bit down on those things. The email would do two things immediately. It would answer your question and it would put you on the DHS watch list for potential terrorists living in the USA. If you're lucky, they won't arrest you for thinking it, but be prepared for a visit and tour of all your properties by armed men from one alphabet organization or another. You (we) may have already made the list by A) posting here and/or B) posting that statement. -- EXPLETIVE: A balm, usually applied verbally in hindsight, which somehow eases those pains and indignities following our every deficiency in foresight. |
The Law and G-Codes for an AK47 was Is there any public library of G-codes
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:58:58 -0700, pyotr filipivich
wrote: Ignoramus12838 on Thu, 15 Jul 2010 21:54:47 -0500 typed in rec.crafts.metalworking the following: You have to be very, very careful dealing with anything (even indirectly) to do with arms, nuclear, and space, including documents in any form- that kind of speech is NOT free. Well, maybe you can find some specific US law, that disallows posting G codes for receivers, then I would be open to changing my mind. Read the ITAR regulations, which are rather broad in scope. Posting is equivalent to exporting, probably even if the computer system is only accessible from within the US. I do not take my work laptop on any overseas flights. Maybe you can read ITAR regulations since you are the one claiming it to be illegal. AK-47 is not even a US weapons system and its specifications are a matter of common knowledge. ITAR is obsolete and products covered by it, such as encryption systems, are publicly available worldwide. A law may be old, it may be out dated (e.G., The Mining Act of 1872), it may even be obsolete - but it is still the law. Just because the existence of a the AK-47 is nie universal, and kids in the NW Territories of Pakistan are making them with screwdrivers and nail files, does not mean that you can legally manufacture one in your own shop (Unless you are a felon and live in California, in which case the 9th Circuit ruled that the restrictions do not apply - interesting application of the Interstate Commerce clause.). And just because encryption systems are available world wide proves 'nothing' - they were distributed despite and in defiance of the law. (That includes PGP, et alia.) You post the G-codes for an AK-47, even one which is a semi-automatic version, and the BATFE will descend upon you like a horde of parasites, because they are a dangerous as they are clueless. And they will arrest you for violation of the act, and it will be up to you to convince a jury of your peers (if your peers include those who can't get out of jury duty) that you did, in fact, not violate the law you violated by posting the G-Codes. Secondly, what a good government might not do, has no relationship with what a bad government will do. And bad governments have been known to attempt to suppress further publication of technologies mentioned in works of fiction. Barak Obama is correct at least this once: the easiest thing for a bureaucrat to do is nothing: To forbid. In this era of reduced revenue, be aware that after the BATFE raids your shop, they will bring along OSHA, EPA, FAA, PTA, PETA, SEC, FCC, the Patient Office, NAALCP, MIC KEY MOU SE, CPS, HSS, HUD, the IRS, and Ralph the Wonder Fink, to make sure you are in compliance with every law, regulation and interpretation, whim and desire of government (Or NGO) employees. My advice: keep your passport and cash stashed off site where you can get at them, assuming you make bail. Gluck pyotr Very well stated. Gunner One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that, in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid. Gunner Asch |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:38 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter