|
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
I'm serious, if this was a meatspace community, the Cliffs would be
ejected by the community. Let's come up with some real-world sanctions/repercussions, get rid of him, and then go after the next a-hole who takes his place. Lets go after this ****er- it's time to draw a line, and when someone crosses that line, get rid of 'em. Make coming here sufficiently painful he stops coming. First step- his real-world contact info. Someone's gotta have it. Dave |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
Dave__67 wrote:
I'm serious, if this was a meatspace community, the Cliffs would be ejected by the community. Let's come up with some real-world sanctions/repercussions, get rid of him, and then go after the next a-hole who takes his place. Lets go after this ****er- it's time to draw a line, and when someone crosses that line, get rid of 'em. Make coming here sufficiently painful he stops coming. I have had "Cliff" killfilled for several years now, and do not see any of his posts. Unfortunately, there are a sufficient number of bozos who incessantly reply to him. I killfill the majority of them as well, but as with the problem in making an idiotproof design, new idiots keep popping up. Jon |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
How does one go about killfilling in RCM? I am using Outlook Exress in Giganews reader.
Bob Swinney "Jon Danniken" wrote in message ... Dave__67 wrote: I'm serious, if this was a meatspace community, the Cliffs would be ejected by the community. Let's come up with some real-world sanctions/repercussions, get rid of him, and then go after the next a-hole who takes his place. Lets go after this ****er- it's time to draw a line, and when someone crosses that line, get rid of 'em. Make coming here sufficiently painful he stops coming. I have had "Cliff" killfilled for several years now, and do not see any of his posts. Unfortunately, there are a sufficient number of bozos who incessantly reply to him. I killfill the majority of them as well, but as with the problem in making an idiotproof design, new idiots keep popping up. Jon |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
"Robert Swinney" wrote in
: How does one go about killfilling in RCM? I am using Outlook Exress in Giganews reader. In OE, right-click on a post by the offensive one, click on Message, click on Block Sender and, then, click on Yes when asked if you want the offender's messages deleted. |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
Avoiding them is no harder than learning to walk through a cow
pasture. jsw |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
Dave__67 wrote:
I'm serious, if this was a meatspace community, the Cliffs would be ejected by the community. Let's come up with some real-world sanctions/repercussions, get rid of him, and then go after the next a-hole who takes his place. Lets go after this ****er- it's time to draw a line, and when someone crosses that line, get rid of 'em. Make coming here sufficiently painful he stops coming. First step- his real-world contact info. Someone's gotta have it. Dave I long ago concluded that "Cliff" is not a real person but is, instead an automaton, a fairly clever computer program that someone has left running. At first I thought that it was a failed experiment in artificial inteligence, but then decided it was a successful experiment in artificial stupidity. |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
"Dave__67" wrote in message ... I'm serious, if this was a meatspace community, the Cliffs would be ejected by the community. Let's come up with some real-world sanctions/repercussions, get rid of him, and then go after the next a-hole who takes his place. Lets go after this ****er- it's time to draw a line, and when someone crosses that line, get rid of 'em. Make coming here sufficiently painful he stops coming. First step- his real-world contact info. Someone's gotta have it. Dave No, the first step is to killfile him and not respond. After that, no further action would be necessary. Same with anyone who posts more on politics than metalworking. Steve |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
"Robert Swinney" wrote in message ... How does one go about killfilling in RCM? I am using Outlook Exress in Giganews reader. On my OE, I have the message line highlighted. Go up to MESSAGE, select the BLOCK SENDER from drop down menu. Select YES when it asks if you want to filter that person. POOF, GONE. But they will probably morph in a short time, so you will have to do it again. I go through, and if someone is questionable, I look to see how many posts they make on actual metalwork. If they don't make any or many, they go. But some guys here know a lot about metalworking, and like to get into the political mud wrestling, too. So it's a judgment call. When someone posts something so stupid or offensive or profane that I know what kind of a person they are, I have a one strike rule, thinking that it's likely that they will never say anything meaningful, and if they ever do, I won't miss much. HTH Steve |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
"Ed Rinehart" wrote in message ... Dave__67 wrote: I'm serious, if this was a meatspace community, the Cliffs would be ejected by the community. Let's come up with some real-world sanctions/repercussions, get rid of him, and then go after the next a-hole who takes his place. Lets go after this ****er- it's time to draw a line, and when someone crosses that line, get rid of 'em. Make coming here sufficiently painful he stops coming. First step- his real-world contact info. Someone's gotta have it. Dave I long ago concluded that "Cliff" is not a real person but is, instead an automaton, a fairly clever computer program that someone has left running. At first I thought that it was a failed experiment in artificial inteligence, but then decided it was a successful experiment in artificial stupidity. My take is that he is a troll without a real life. Steve |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
Thanx, all.
The analogy with "troll" was pretty much on the mark. I'll not do a lot of killfilling but will centainly concentrate on the gross cross-posters when I do. Bob Swinney "Steve B" wrote in message ... "Dave__67" wrote in message ... I'm serious, if this was a meatspace community, the Cliffs would be ejected by the community. Let's come up with some real-world sanctions/repercussions, get rid of him, and then go after the next a-hole who takes his place. Lets go after this ****er- it's time to draw a line, and when someone crosses that line, get rid of 'em. Make coming here sufficiently painful he stops coming. First step- his real-world contact info. Someone's gotta have it. Dave No, the first step is to killfile him and not respond. After that, no further action would be necessary. Same with anyone who posts more on politics than metalworking. Steve |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
I killfile everything crossposted to survivalism, Cliff and a few more
left wing and right wing kooks. My criteria is that the person whom I killfiling has nothing to contribute. It works out fairly well. I cannot killfile crossposts to alt.machines.cnc, for obvious reasons. i |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
In article
, Dave__67 wrote: Lets go after this ****er- it's time to draw a line, and when someone crosses that line, get rid of 'em. Make coming here sufficiently painful he stops coming. All that's required to neutralize _all_ the trolls is to simply ignore all off topic posts. Don't look at them, don't read them, don't respond to agree and stroke the ego of the poster, don't respond to set the poster straight and stroke the ego of the poster. Just let them drop like rocks in a pond that refuses to ripple. NOTHING is more painful to trolls than simply being ignored. -- Cats, coffee, chocolate...vices to live by |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
Robert Swinney wrote:
How does one go about killfilling in RCM? I am using Outlook Exress in Giganews reader. I dunno about the "Giganews reader", but in OE it's (Message Block Sender Yes). Jon |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
"Robert Swinney" wrote in message ... How does one go about killfilling in RCM? I am using Outlook Exress in Giganews reader. Bob Swinney Block Sender is one way but I've come up with a better way that even blocks the idiots who reply to him. Create a filter thusly: Open any post by the offending idiot and copy the From info to the clipboard. Close the post. On the OE main menu - Tools | Message Rules | News Click New. Check boxes "Where from line contains people", "Mark it as read", and "Mark message as watched or ignored". In window #3 Click "contains people" and Add the offenders info. OK. Click "watched or ignored: and select "ignore". OK. Window #4 rename the rule if you want to. OK. OK. Then set your View to "hide read or ignored messages" You will now never see any of the offenders posts nor any post that replies to it. Art |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
"Artemus" wrote in message ... "Robert Swinney" wrote in message ... How does one go about killfilling in RCM? I am using Outlook Exress in Giganews reader. Bob Swinney Block Sender is one way but I've come up with a better way that even blocks the idiots who reply to him. Create a filter thusly: Open any post by the offending idiot and copy the From info to the clipboard. Close the post. On the OE main menu - Tools | Message Rules | News Click New. Check boxes "Where from line contains people", "Mark it as read", and "Mark message as watched or ignored". ** In window #3 Click "contains people" and Add the offenders info. OK. Click "watched or ignored: and select "ignore". OK. Window #4 rename the rule if you want to. OK. OK. Then set your View to "hide read or ignored messages" You will now never see any of the offenders posts nor any post that replies to it. Art I forgot to mention that you can Add multiple douchebags in the step marked ** above. Art |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
On 3/3/2010 9:15 AM, Steve B wrote:
"Robert wrote in message ... How does one go about killfilling in RCM? I am using Outlook Exress in Giganews reader. On my OE, I have the message line highlighted. Go up to MESSAGE, select the BLOCK SENDER from drop down menu. Select YES when it asks if you want to filter that person. POOF, GONE. But they will probably morph in a short time, so you will have to do it again. I go through, and if someone is questionable, I look to see how many posts they make on actual metalwork. If they don't make any or many, they go. But some guys here know a lot about metalworking, and like to get into the political mud wrestling, too. So it's a judgment call. When someone posts something so stupid or offensive or profane that I know what kind of a person they are, I have a one strike rule, thinking that it's likely that they will never say anything meaningful, and if they ever do, I won't miss much. HTH Steve You need to give some thought to how much you would actually have to say if you kept to strictly metalworking topics. Most people here do projects as a hobby, which means they are not doing new things every day and they have long periods when they do little or nothing metal related. If they stuck strictly to metalwork they would make a couple of posts and then go away because they wouldn't have anything else to comment on. If you make all the posts strictly about metalworking do you know how small this newsgroup would be, and do you know how little you would contribute? I bet the majority of your posts have no metalworking content. The truth of the matter is there is not enough metal content to keep everyone interested so the topics go a lot more to current events. I think it adds to the group. A lot of metalworking subjects people post about have no interest except for a few people. You restrict the group to just metalworking and you wind up with a very tiny group. Some people would be happy with that but from the way it is now most would not like that. Hawke |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
No, the first step is to killfile him and not respond. After that, no further action would be necessary. Same with anyone who posts more on politics than metalworking. Steve But you post more on politics than you do on metalworking. Guess what? So do most people and that includes the people bitching right now. Hawke |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
On 2010-03-03, Steve Ackman wrote:
In , on Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:50:45 -0600, Ignoramus27796, lid wrote: I killfile everything crossposted to survivalism, Cliff and a few more left wing and right wing kooks. My criteria is that the person whom I killfiling has nothing to contribute. It works out fairly well. I cannot killfile crossposts to alt.machines.cnc, for obvious reasons. 99% of anything posted to amc PLUS 4 other groups will not be anything you're interested in. Well, _I_ just bought a CNC mill and I do xpost to alt.machines.cnc from time to time. That's why I cannot killfile such crossposts. survivalism is a better filtering criteria. i |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
In article , Hawke wrote:
You need to give some thought to how much you would actually have to say if you kept to strictly metalworking topics. Most people here do projects as a hobby, which means they are not doing new things every day and they have long periods when they do little or nothing metal related. If they stuck strictly to metalwork they would make a couple of posts and then go away because they wouldn't have anything else to comment on. If you make all the posts strictly about metalworking do you know how small this newsgroup would be, and do you know how little you would contribute? While it's true that many people here post about metalworking *and* on non-related topics, there are two regulars here who _almost never_ post anything related to metalworking, whose posts are almost always left-wing political rants of one sort or another -- and whose posts the group would IMHO be better off without. One of those regulars is the subject of this thread. The other one is you. |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
"Jon Danniken" wrote:
Lets go after this *ucker- it's time to draw a line, and when someone crosses that line, get rid of 'em. Make coming here sufficiently painful he stops coming. I have had "Cliff" killfilled for several years now, and do not see any of his posts. Unfortunately, there are a sufficient number of bozos who incessantly reply to him. I killfill the majority of them as well, but as with the problem in making an idiotproof design, new idiots keep popping up. If only they would learn to trim! Wes |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
Ed Rinehart wrote:
I long ago concluded that "Cliff" is not a real person but is, instead an automaton, a fairly clever computer program that someone has left running. At first I thought that it was a failed experiment in artificial inteligence, but then decided it was a successful experiment in artificial stupidity. I concluded "Cliff" is an Eliza program that was given internet access after some demented scientist gained access to the worlds nuclear launch codes and tweeked Eliza just a bit to fit his worldview. No nation state dares shutting it down for fear of the repercussions. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA Wes |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
Hawke wrote:
But you post more on politics than you do on metalworking. Guess what? So do most people and that includes the people bitching right now. What were your recent metalworking projects? Wes |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
|
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
On Mar 3, 6:58*am, Dave__67 wrote:
I'm serious, if this was a meatspace community, the Cliffs would be ejected by the community. Let's come up with some real-world sanctions/repercussions, get rid of him, and then go after the next a-hole who takes his place. Lets go after this ****er- it's time to draw a line, and when someone crosses that line, get rid of 'em. Make coming here sufficiently painful he stops coming. First step- his real-world contact info. Someone's gotta have it. Dave Are you going to take out Gunner too? TMT |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
On Mar 3, 4:36*pm, Hawke wrote:
On 3/3/2010 9:15 AM, Steve B wrote: "Robert *wrote in message ... How does one go about killfilling in RCM? *I am using Outlook Exress in Giganews reader. On my OE, I have the message line highlighted. *Go up to MESSAGE, select the BLOCK SENDER from drop down menu. *Select YES when it asks if you want to filter that person. *POOF, GONE. *But they will probably morph in a short time, so you will have to do it again. I go through, and if someone is questionable, I look to see how many posts they make on actual metalwork. *If they don't make any or many, they go. But some guys here know a lot about metalworking, and like to get into the political mud wrestling, too. *So it's a judgment call. *When someone posts something so stupid or offensive or profane that I know what kind of a person they are, I have a one strike rule, thinking that it's likely that they will never say anything meaningful, and if they ever do, I won't miss much. HTH Steve You need to give some thought to how much you would actually have to say if you kept to strictly metalworking topics. Most people here do projects as a hobby, which means they are not doing new things every day and they have long periods when they do little or nothing metal related. If they stuck strictly to metalwork they would make a couple of posts and then go away because they wouldn't have anything else to comment on. If you make all the posts strictly about metalworking do you know how small this newsgroup would be, and do you know how little you would contribute? I bet the majority of your posts have no metalworking content. The truth of the matter is there is not enough metal content to keep everyone interested so the topics go a lot more to current events. I think it adds to the group. A lot of metalworking subjects people post about have no interest except for a few people. You restrict the group to just metalworking and you wind up with a very tiny group. Some people would be happy with that but from the way it is now most would not like that. Hawke- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hawke is right...Steve is one of the conservatives who rails at any political post that doesn't reflect his values. TMT |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
On Mar 3, 4:39*pm, Hawke wrote:
No, the first step is to killfile him and not respond. *After that, no further action would be necessary. *Same with anyone who posts more on politics than metalworking. Steve But you post more on politics than you do on metalworking. Guess what? So do most people and that includes the people bitching right now. Hawke And they only bitch when the post isn't conservative. TMT |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
On Mar 3, 5:40*pm, (Doug Miller) wrote:
In article , Hawke wrote: You need to give some thought to how much you would actually have to say if you kept to strictly metalworking topics. Most people here do projects as a hobby, which means they are not doing new things every day and they have long periods when they do little or nothing metal related. If they stuck strictly to metalwork they would make a couple of posts and then go away because they wouldn't have anything else to comment on. If you make all the posts strictly about metalworking do you know how small this newsgroup would be, and do you know how little you would contribute? While it's true that many people here post about metalworking *and* on non-related topics, there are two regulars here who _almost never_ post anything related to metalworking, whose posts are almost always left-wing political rants of one sort or another -- and whose posts the group would IMHO be better off without. One of those regulars is the subject of this thread. The other one is you. Damn...I am feeling left out. I demand a recount. TMT |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
"Doug Miller" wrote in message ... In article , Hawke wrote: You need to give some thought to how much you would actually have to say if you kept to strictly metalworking topics. Most people here do projects as a hobby, which means they are not doing new things every day and they have long periods when they do little or nothing metal related. If they stuck strictly to metalwork they would make a couple of posts and then go away because they wouldn't have anything else to comment on. If you make all the posts strictly about metalworking do you know how small this newsgroup would be, and do you know how little you would contribute? While it's true that many people here post about metalworking *and* on non-related topics, there are two regulars here who _almost never_ post anything related to metalworking, whose posts are almost always left-wing political rants of one sort or another -- and whose posts the group would IMHO be better off without. One of those regulars is the subject of this thread. The other one is you. Kudos, Doug. |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
Click "message" at the top. Slide down. Click
"block sender". -- Christopher A. Young Learn more about Jesus www.lds.org .. "Robert Swinney" wrote in message ... How does one go about killfilling in RCM? I am using Outlook Exress in Giganews reader. Bob Swinney |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
On 3/3/2010 4:30 PM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
On Mar 3, 5:40 pm, (Doug Miller) wrote: In , wrote: You need to give some thought to how much you would actually have to say if you kept to strictly metalworking topics. Most people here do projects as a hobby, which means they are not doing new things every day and they have long periods when they do little or nothing metal related. If they stuck strictly to metalwork they would make a couple of posts and then go away because they wouldn't have anything else to comment on. If you make all the posts strictly about metalworking do you know how small this newsgroup would be, and do you know how little you would contribute? While it's true that many people here post about metalworking *and* on non-related topics, there are two regulars here who _almost never_ post anything related to metalworking, whose posts are almost always left-wing political rants of one sort or another -- and whose posts the group would IMHO be better off without. One of those regulars is the subject of this thread. The other one is you. Damn...I am feeling left out. I demand a recount. TMT So do you want to break the news to him or should I? That the truth is the only difference between him and us is the percentage of metal to non metal posts. That's like comparing a whore that works all night to one that has just one trick. They're both whores. But I doubt he'll get the connection so here it is. He's the same as us posting about metal and non metal related topics and the only difference is in quantity. In other words, he's just as guilty of off topic posts as anyone else. He just does it less than some others. But at least he's a hypocrite about it. Hawke |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
On 3/3/2010 4:32 PM, Steve B wrote:
"Doug wrote in message ... In , Hawke wrote: You need to give some thought to how much you would actually have to say if you kept to strictly metalworking topics. Most people here do projects as a hobby, which means they are not doing new things every day and they have long periods when they do little or nothing metal related. If they stuck strictly to metalwork they would make a couple of posts and then go away because they wouldn't have anything else to comment on. If you make all the posts strictly about metalworking do you know how small this newsgroup would be, and do you know how little you would contribute? While it's true that many people here post about metalworking *and* on non-related topics, there are two regulars here who _almost never_ post anything related to metalworking, whose posts are almost always left-wing political rants of one sort or another -- and whose posts the group would IMHO be better off without. One of those regulars is the subject of this thread. The other one is you. Kudos, Doug. Thanks for proving my point, Steve. You just did another off topic post. So did Doug. People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Like you do. Hawke |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
You need to give some thought to how much you would actually have to say if you kept to strictly metalworking topics. Most people here do projects as a hobby, which means they are not doing new things every day and they have long periods when they do little or nothing metal related. If they stuck strictly to metalwork they would make a couple of posts and then go away because they wouldn't have anything else to comment on. If you make all the posts strictly about metalworking do you know how small this newsgroup would be, and do you know how little you would contribute? I bet the majority of your posts have no metalworking content. The truth of the matter is there is not enough metal content to keep everyone interested so the topics go a lot more to current events. I think it adds to the group. A lot of metalworking subjects people post about have no interest except for a few people. You restrict the group to just metalworking and you wind up with a very tiny group. Some people would be happy with that but from the way it is now most would not like that. Hawke- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hawke is right...Steve is one of the conservatives who rails at any political post that doesn't reflect his values. TMT The vast majority of his posts are not metal related either. Which happens to be exactly what he criticizes us for. Hawke |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
On 3/3/2010 3:54 PM, Wes wrote:
wrote: But you post more on politics than you do on metalworking. Guess what? So do most people and that includes the people bitching right now. What were your recent metalworking projects? Wes I just welded a patch panel on my CJ5. Did you want to hear all about it? I didn't think so. Hawke |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
On 2010-03-04, Hawke wrote:
I just welded a patch panel on my CJ5. Did you want to hear all about it? I didn't think so. I would like to hear about that, personally. i |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
Make that double kidos, Doug.
Bob Swinney "Steve B" wrote in message ... "Doug Miller" wrote in message ... In article , Hawke wrote: You need to give some thought to how much you would actually have to say if you kept to strictly metalworking topics. Most people here do projects as a hobby, which means they are not doing new things every day and they have long periods when they do little or nothing metal related. If they stuck strictly to metalwork they would make a couple of posts and then go away because they wouldn't have anything else to comment on. If you make all the posts strictly about metalworking do you know how small this newsgroup would be, and do you know how little you would contribute? While it's true that many people here post about metalworking *and* on non-related topics, there are two regulars here who _almost never_ post anything related to metalworking, whose posts are almost always left-wing political rants of one sort or another -- and whose posts the group would IMHO be better off without. One of those regulars is the subject of this thread. The other one is you. Kudos, Doug. |
Off Topic- Lets get rid of -tards
If everyone stuck to metalworking, only, the group would improve
immensely, since the people who presently leave in disgust when they come here to discuss metalworking would not have reason to leave, and jackasses who never or rarely post about metalworking (roughly two leftards, fifteen or so rightards, plus one or two "how do they even connect to the web"-tards that are more clueless than political) would probably dry up and blow away; or at least limit their output to metalworking when their political crap gets no response whatever, from anyone. In short, if you simply post about metalworking, that's a good thing. If you want to post about politics, there are groups for that, go there, post there, argue there - don't do it here, nobody here will miss your keen political insight, whichever direction you lean, wingnut, or rant. This will never happen, since all the -tards are -tards and can't manage to stop being -tards. But it would be really nice. We should try it. Since this isn't metalworking, I'm going to stop posting in this thread. Everyone else should give it a try, too. -- Cats, coffee, chocolate...vices to live by |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
On 2010-03-03, Robert Swinney wrote:
"Jon Danniken" wrote in message ... [ ... ] I have had "Cliff" killfilled for several years now, and do not see any of his posts. How does one go about killfilling in RCM? I am using Outlook Exress in Giganews reader. It is the same for any usenet newsgroup, and is specific to the newsreader which you are using. Some offer much more powerful killfiling capabilities than others. "Outlook Express" is your newsreader, and "Giganews" is your news server. Unless you were using a web-based interface to the newsgroup, it really would not matter who you use as the news sever, execept that some my be doing a better job of killing off spam before you see it than others. Since what I use is "slrn" on a unix system, I can't tell you how to do it in Outlook Express, which does not run on my systems, but as I understand it, it is far less capable than free programs for Windows like "Agent". I think that you perhaps should look into changing newsreader to one which is recommended as having good killfile capabilities under Windows. (I won't bother suggesting that you change to Linux or some other unix system -- if you were willing to do that, you would have already I suspect. :-) Of course -- you *will* have to learn a different user interface when you switch newsreaders -- but I suspect that you will discover lots of other reasons to like the new one after the switch. Good luck, DoN. -- Email: | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564 (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero --- |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
On 2010-03-03, Steve Ackman wrote:
In , on Wed, 3 Mar 2010 04:58:59 -0800 (PST), Dave__67, wrote: I'm serious, if this was a meatspace community, the Cliffs would be ejected by the community. Just banish him. On one newsreader, for example, you just hit 3 keys. 'k' 'f' enter Or you don't even have to single him out. Just filter all posts crossposted to 4 groups or more. That has the added bonus of getting rid of anyone that responds to the crossposts. *Except* -- when the person responding "helpfully" trims the "Newsgroups: " header to just rec.crafts.metalworking. Then the thread pops up here and I have to individually killfile the "Subject: " header as well. Enjoy, DoN. -- Email: | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564 (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero --- |
On Topic- Lets get rid of Cliff
"DoN. Nichols" wrote in message ... On 2010-03-03, Robert Swinney wrote: "Jon Danniken" wrote in message ... [ ... ] I have had "Cliff" killfilled for several years now, and do not see any of his posts. How does one go about killfilling in RCM? I am using Outlook Exress in Giganews reader. It is the same for any usenet newsgroup, and is specific to the newsreader which you are using. Some offer much more powerful killfiling capabilities than others. "Outlook Express" is your newsreader, and "Giganews" is your news server. Unless you were using a web-based interface to the newsgroup, it really would not matter who you use as the news sever, execept that some my be doing a better job of killing off spam before you see it than others. Since what I use is "slrn" on a unix system, I can't tell you how to do it in Outlook Express, which does not run on my systems, but as I understand it, it is far less capable than free programs for Windows like "Agent". I think that you perhaps should look into changing newsreader to one which is recommended as having good killfile capabilities under Windows. (I won't bother suggesting that you change to Linux or some other unix system -- if you were willing to do that, you would have already I suspect. :-) Of course -- you *will* have to learn a different user interface when you switch newsreaders -- but I suspect that you will discover lots of other reasons to like the new one after the switch. Good luck, DoN. -- Email: | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564 (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero --- |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:13 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter