Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,138
Default Orthoganol balancing - twinwheel grinders

On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:39:44 -0700, "Bill Noble"
wrote:

if you have a scope, and a strobe, and the speaker "accelerometer", then why
not just "do it right" - make a paint mark on the wheel as an "index", synch
the strobe to the rotational speed and synch the scope and see where the
peak is WRT your accelerometer location and then just add weight at the one
place where it is most effective?


Things are not as simple as they may appear. There will be phase lag
in the accelerometer (speaker with reference mass). In addition, the
grinder on compliant mount is very probably operating well above
resonance (as Jon noted) so the acceleration vector will very probably
lag the location of the imbalance.

Jim's method combines quadrature resolution of the error vector with
trial -and- careful observation to make phase ambiguity irrelevant. No
reference marker sensor needed, don't even need an o'scope.

Brilliant!
  #2   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 943
Default Orthoganol balancing - twinwheel grinders


"Don Foreman" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:39:44 -0700, "Bill Noble"
wrote:

if you have a scope, and a strobe, and the speaker "accelerometer", then
why
not just "do it right" - make a paint mark on the wheel as an "index",
synch
the strobe to the rotational speed and synch the scope and see where the
peak is WRT your accelerometer location and then just add weight at the
one
place where it is most effective?


Things are not as simple as they may appear. There will be phase lag
in the accelerometer (speaker with reference mass). In addition, the
grinder on compliant mount is very probably operating well above
resonance (as Jon noted) so the acceleration vector will very probably
lag the location of the imbalance.

Jim's method combines quadrature resolution of the error vector with
trial -and- careful observation to make phase ambiguity irrelevant. No
reference marker sensor needed, don't even need an o'scope.

Brilliant!


actually, I have sitting right in front of me a very old device called a
"Davey Vibrometer" that is an entirely mechanical (well, it uses electrical
power to light a light bulb) solution to this problem - it is basically a
very sensitive "dial" indicator with a mirror and a beam of light.

(if you can't resist having this, make me an offer I can't refuse - I don't
actually collect tools, but this thing is cool and works) - you can find me
via my web site, wbnoble.com

I believe it was used for exactly this purpose (balancing), but I have never
found anything to confirm that 100%


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Orthoganol balancing - twinwheel grinders [email protected] Metalworking 1 July 31st 09 10:20 PM
Orthoganol balancing - twinwheel grinders [email protected] Metalworking 0 July 31st 09 06:59 PM
die grinders SteveB Metalworking 9 October 3rd 05 03:02 PM
Grinders Colin Jacobs Metalworking 13 March 8th 05 05:15 AM
grinders Vrstull Metalworking 6 December 29th 04 02:39 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 DIYbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about DIY & home improvement"