Boater wrote:

Lets compare the ethics of two presidential pardons. Rich was
pardoned by Clinton after he cheated the USA out of 250 million in
taxes. Later, Rich made campaign contributions to Hillary.
Bush pardons this guy and then finds he contributed $25,000 to the RNC
and rescinds the pardon.
Who is more ethical?
Are Dems even capable of reasoning?


WMDs, Katrina aftermath, destruction of the economy, denial of science,
Terry Schiavo.

No reasoning whatsoever, just bull****, on the GOP side.

Bush does the right thing and Clinton lines his pockets. You are a lot like Terry. She
was brain dead, you are.

W

wrote in message
...
Boater wrote:

Lets compare the ethics of two presidential pardons. Rich was
pardoned by Clinton after he cheated the USA out of 250 million in
taxes. Later, Rich made campaign contributions to Hillary.
Bush pardons this guy and then finds he contributed $25,000 to the RNC
and rescinds the pardon.
Who is more ethical?
Are Dems even capable of reasoning?


WMDs, Katrina aftermath, destruction of the economy, denial of science,
Terry Schiavo.

No reasoning whatsoever, just bull****, on the GOP side.

Bush does the right thing and Clinton lines his pockets. You are a lot
like Terry. She
was brain dead, you are.

W

Well, you went and shot your mouth off way too fast, Bub. You haven't seen
what Bush is going to do when he leaves office. You have the gall to talk
about Clinton lining his pockets and are so stupid to think, or in your
case, didn't think at all that Bush will line his pockets the minute he
leaves the White House. In fact, he's probably already lining up the
paychecks that he'll be cashing the minute he's done as president. As usual
wingers go ahead and criticize others and then their guys go out and do the
same thing but even worse. Mark my words, Bush will become very, very, rich
in no time at all. I wouldn't be surprised if he out does Clinton.

Hawke