Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
wrote:
In misc.survivalism Boater wrote:

He's unlicensed, apparently. He's not a plumber. Anyone can call
himself or herself a plumber, even someone like you. That doesn't
make him a plumber. Plumbing is a licensed trade.

I once snaked out my toilet. Calling those overpriced asshole
plumbers is to be avoided.

You can rent an industrial snake for less than $75 from your
rent-all center with 100 to 150 feet of snake and clear any problems
you want.


So that is what you and Herring do with each other out in the quiet
woods of that golf course...

You really do need to seek professional help.

When I do, I'll call a *licensed* plumber.

Be careful. If he's in business for himself, working for a living and
paying wages to his hired help.....he is likely a Republican.

Unless he's a gay plumber.

On 2008-10-16, RB wrote:
Be careful. If he's in business for himself, working for a living and
paying wages to his hired help.....he is likely a Republican.

Unless he's a gay plumber.

I think that Larry Craig is a naturaly born plumber, since he likes to
"solicit in toilets".
--
Due to extreme spam originating from Google Groups, and their inattention
to spammers, I and many others block all articles originating
from Google Groups. If you want your postings to be seen by
more readers you will need to find a different means of
posting on Usenet.
http://improve-usenet.org/

Ignoramus10312 wrote:
On 2008-10-16, RB wrote:
Be careful. If he's in business for himself, working for a living and
paying wages to his hired help.....he is likely a Republican.

Unless he's a gay plumber.

I think that Larry Craig is a naturaly born plumber, since he likes to
"solicit in toilets".


Google results for "Gay Democrat" 7.2 Million

Google results for "Gay Republican" 523,000

So if you are a Democrat, you are 14 times as likely to be gay

On 2008-10-16, RB wrote:
Ignoramus10312 wrote:
On 2008-10-16, RB wrote:
Be careful. If he's in business for himself, working for a living and
paying wages to his hired help.....he is likely a Republican.

Unless he's a gay plumber.

I think that Larry Craig is a naturaly born plumber, since he likes to
"solicit in toilets".


Google results for "Gay Democrat" 7.2 Million

Google results for "Gay Republican" 523,000

So if you are a Democrat, you are 14 times as likely to be gay

Yep, quite interesting!

Now how about

"corrupt republican" - 5,470,000
"corrupt democrat" - 3,620,000

--
Due to extreme spam originating from Google Groups, and their inattention
to spammers, I and many others block all articles originating
from Google Groups. If you want your postings to be seen by
more readers you will need to find a different means of
posting on Usenet.
http://improve-usenet.org/

"RB" wrote in message
...
Ignoramus10312 wrote:
On 2008-10-16, RB wrote:
Be careful. If he's in business for himself, working for a living and
paying wages to his hired help.....he is likely a Republican.

Unless he's a gay plumber.

I think that Larry Craig is a naturaly born plumber, since he likes to
"solicit in toilets".


Google results for "Gay Democrat" 7.2 Million

Google results for "Gay Republican" 523,000

So if you are a Democrat, you are 14 times as likely to be gay


No, Gay Republican are 14 times more likely to be still hiding in the
closet!

On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 22:06:54 -0500, the infamous Ignoramus10312
scrawled the following:

On 2008-10-16, RB wrote:
Ignoramus10312 wrote:
On 2008-10-16, RB wrote:
Be careful. If he's in business for himself, working for a living and
paying wages to his hired help.....he is likely a Republican.

Unless he's a gay plumber.

I think that Larry Craig is a naturaly born plumber, since he likes to
"solicit in toilets".


Google results for "Gay Democrat" 7.2 Million

Google results for "Gay Republican" 523,000

So if you are a Democrat, you are 14 times as likely to be gay

Yep, quite interesting!

Now how about

"corrupt republican" - 5,470,000
"corrupt democrat" - 3,620,000

1000:1 odds Ed does NOT come up with "corrupt libertarian" here.

You've shown good proof that our 2-party system is corrupt, though,
Ig.

--
"Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it
exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong
remedy." -- Ernest Benn

"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 22:06:54 -0500, the infamous Ignoramus10312
scrawled the following:

On 2008-10-16, RB wrote:
Ignoramus10312 wrote:
On 2008-10-16, RB wrote:
Be careful. If he's in business for himself, working for a living and
paying wages to his hired help.....he is likely a Republican.

Unless he's a gay plumber.

I think that Larry Craig is a naturaly born plumber, since he likes to
"solicit in toilets".


Google results for "Gay Democrat" 7.2 Million

Google results for "Gay Republican" 523,000

So if you are a Democrat, you are 14 times as likely to be gay

Yep, quite interesting!

Now how about

"corrupt republican" - 5,470,000
"corrupt democrat" - 3,620,000

1000:1 odds Ed does NOT come up with "corrupt libertarian" here.

You've shown good proof that our 2-party system is corrupt, though,
Ig.


"Libertarian" - LOL
Embarassed is more like it.

"Radical conservatives in this country have an interesting time of it, for
when they are not being suppressed or mutilated by Liberals, they are being
ignored or humiliated by a great many of those of the well-fed Right, whose
ignorance and amorality have never been exaggerated for the same reason that
one cannot exaggerate infinity."
Fast-forward half a century, and the old is the new.

Radical conservatives are still having an interesting time of it, though
these days they are being mutilated by fellow "conservatives." The well-fed
Right now cultivates ignorance as a political strategy and humiliates itself
when its brightest sons seek sanctuary in the solitude of personal honor.

The truth few wish to utter is that the GOP has abandoned many
conservatives, who mostly nurse their angst in private. Those chickens we
keep hearing about have indeed come home to roost. Years of pandering to the
extreme wing -- the "kooks" the senior Buckley tried to separate from the
right -- have created a party no longer attentive to its principles.

Instead, as Christopher Buckley pointed out in a blog post on
thedailybeast.com explaining his departure from National Review, eight years
of "conservatism" have brought us "a doubled national debt, ruinous
expansion of entitlement programs, bridges to nowhere, poster boy Jack
Abramoff and an ill-premised, ill-waged war conducted by politicians of
breathtaking arrogance."



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...d=opinionsbox1



JC