Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think I've figured out a big piece of the mystery of what I
generically called chatter in the "Clausing 5914 Chatter ..." threads. Tightening the lathe dovetails up helped a great deal, and is a good idea in general, but didn't really solve the problem. It came to me in the shower Wednesday morning - self-feeding would explain just about everything seen, and that if one reverses something, the sign of the mechanical feedback loop can be reversed. Now the feedback is positive, yielding the vicious loop that causes visible tilting, flake chips, and breakage. By contrast, negative feedback causes stability. The key experiment was to try face grooving a 2.125" diameter 6061 aluminum slug held in the 4-jaw chuck, and using the BXA-6 toolholder with the huge overhang (~5" from cutting edge to toolpost center) but with the tool bit held upsidedown and the lathe running in reverse. Running backwards cases the self-feeding effect to change sign, becoming a self-unloading effect as the toolpost tilts away from the workpiece, reducing the bite of the tool bit. Now I can peel very thin chips off the plate while face grooving, although it is still necessary to use the back gear, and there was mucho squealing. I did it dry, with too much overhang, and without properly shaping the tool bit. But it worked anyway. The difference is night-and-day. So I now think it was the tendency to self-feed that caused all the problems, even if the self-feeding effect wasn't so powerful as to cause visible tilting of the toolpost. The squealing will go away with a stiffer method of holding the tool bit, and perhaps a better-shaped bit. This also applies to parting off, and specifically explains why using an upsidedown blade coming towards the back of the workpiece, or coming from the front with the lathe running backwards, works. (BXA-7R) I never really believed the theory that better chip removal was why upsidedown cutoff blades worked better, because I had problems even when there were no chip wads to be found and the groove sidewalls were clean. Actually, the galloping chatter tended to throw thick flake chips far and wide, so they were everywhere but in the groove. To summarize, there are two elements that are necessary for face grooving, trepanning, and parting off on the Clausing 5914 lathe: Use the back gear (for tortional rigidity), and use an upsidedown tool bit (for stability). As for use of a coaxial boring bar to hold a grooving/trepanning toolbit, it turns out to be a common method. I found it mentioned in US Patent 5,640,890 as prior art to be improved upon. The patentee is trepanning stainless steel hydraulic hose fittings in production, and needed a method that worked in a screw machine of some kind. Joe Gwinn |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Chatter while parting off. | Metalworking | |||
Parting off | Metalworking | |||
Thanks for all the plumbing help--some parting notes.. | Metalworking | |||
Parting (toolsteel?) | Metalworking |