On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:13:52 -0700 (PDT), RONSERESURPLUS
wrote:

On Apr 21, 6:56?pm, Cliff wrote:
?http://tinyurl.com/3zxhrv

Better Question Cliff, Which DEM-O-RAT are you voting for? Which
socialist ******* or Bitch? LOL Your soo predictable!

Well, I'll vote for Bush again for another four years if at all possible.
Aren't we lucky to have Bush?


RON L

On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:19:20 -0700, wrote:

On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:13:52 -0700 (PDT), RONSERESURPLUS
wrote:

On Apr 21, 6:56?pm, Cliff wrote:
?http://tinyurl.com/3zxhrv

Better Question Cliff, Which DEM-O-RAT are you voting for? Which
socialist ******* or Bitch? LOL Your soo predictable!

Well, I'll vote for Bush again for another four years if at all possible.
Aren't we lucky to have Bush?


RON L


Not really,,,,,but better Bush than those the DemonRats offered up.

We really...really...really need another Reagan.

Gunner


"[L]iberals are afraid to state what they truly believe in, for to do so
would result in even less votes than they currently receive. Their
methodology is to lie about their real agenda in the hopes of regaining
power, at which point they will do whatever they damn well please. The
problem is they have concealed and obfuscated for so long that, as a group,
they themselves are no longer sure of their goals. They are a collection of
wild-eyed splinter groups, all holding a grab-bag of dreams and wishes. Some
want a Socialist, secular-humanist state, others the repeal of the Second
Amendment. Some want same sex/different species marriage, others want voting
rights for trees, fish, coal and bugs. Some want cradle to grave care and
complete subservience to the government nanny state, others want a culture
that walks in lockstep and speaks only with intonations of political
correctness. I view the American liberals in much the same way I view the
competing factions of Islamic
fundamentalists. The latter hate each other to the core, and only join
forces to attack the US or Israel. The former hate themselves to the core,
and only join forces to attack George Bush and conservatives." --Ron Marr

On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:57:07 -0700, Gunner Asch
wrote:

On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:19:20 -0700, wrote:

On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:13:52 -0700 (PDT), RONSERESURPLUS
wrote:

On Apr 21, 6:56?pm, Cliff wrote:
?http://tinyurl.com/3zxhrv

Better Question Cliff, Which DEM-O-RAT are you voting for? Which
socialist ******* or Bitch? LOL Your soo predictable!

Well, I'll vote for Bush again for another four years if at all possible.
Aren't we lucky to have Bush?


RON L


Not really,,,,,but better Bush than those the DemonRats offered up.

We really...really...really need another Reagan.

Gunner


A first term Reagon or a second term Reagon?

Bruce-in-Bangkok
(correct email address for reply)

On Apr 22, 3:57*am, Gunner Asch wrote:
...

Condoleeza

She has -all- the qualifications, Black + Female + Experience

Jim Wilkins wrote in news:238af62a-cd46-49f2-aae5-
:

On Apr 22, 3:57*am, Gunner Asch wrote:
...

Condoleeza

She has -all- the qualifications, Black + Female + Experience


You forgot something that Condi has that Hillary doesn't: Intelligence.

"Jim Wilkins" wrote in message
...
On Apr 22, 3:57 am, Gunner Asch wrote:
....

Condoleeza

She has -all- the qualifications, Black + Female + Experience

All she needs now is the common sense that God gave a grape.

--
Ed Huntress

On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:49:41 +0700, Bruce in Bangkok
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:57:07 -0700, Gunner Asch
wrote:

On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:19:20 -0700, wrote:

On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:13:52 -0700 (PDT), RONSERESURPLUS
wrote:

On Apr 21, 6:56?pm, Cliff wrote:
?http://tinyurl.com/3zxhrv

Better Question Cliff, Which DEM-O-RAT are you voting for? Which
socialist ******* or Bitch? LOL Your soo predictable!

Well, I'll vote for Bush again for another four years if at all possible.
Aren't we lucky to have Bush?


RON L


Not really,,,,,but better Bush than those the DemonRats offered up.

We really...really...really need another Reagan.

Gunner


A first term Reagon or a second term Reagon?

Either would be better than those offered by either party since his
last term.



Bruce-in-Bangkok
(correct email address for reply)

Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional,
illogical liberal minority, and rabidly promoted by an
unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the
proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

"Bruce in Bangkok" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:57:07 -0700, Gunner Asch
wrote:

On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:19:20 -0700, wrote:

On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:13:52 -0700 (PDT), RONSERESURPLUS
wrote:

On Apr 21, 6:56?pm, Cliff wrote:
?http://tinyurl.com/3zxhrv

Better Question Cliff, Which DEM-O-RAT are you voting for? Which
socialist ******* or Bitch? LOL Your soo predictable!

Well, I'll vote for Bush again for another four years if at all
possible.
Aren't we lucky to have Bush?


RON L


Not really,,,,,but better Bush than those the DemonRats offered up.

We really...really...really need another Reagan.

Gunner


A first term Reagon or a second term Reagon?

Bruce-in-Bangkok
(correct email address for reply)

Doesn't matter to guys like him because in their minds Reagan has become
their deity. Despite the facts they have elevated him to the status of
Lincoln, Washington, and FDR. In truth, Reagan was mentally declining for
probably a considerable portion of his time in office. He was taking advice
from Nancy and her astrologer, his subordinates were running around behind
his back doing all sorts of things, and he was unaware of what was going on.
He was clearly too old for the job and was not a good president. Don't try
to tell that to his delusional followers though. Trying to tell them the
facts is like throwing spit wads against a brick wall. They know he's great
and nothing will change their mind....like facts.

Hawke