Table travel specs
Hello all,
Dumb question: is there anything special about the way table travel numbers are measured? I ask because in dimensioning a drawing, I noticed that some of the numbers were getting a little large for my mill. Looking in the manual, I was perhaps going to have to change something; it listed 16-1/8 inches. That sounded short to me, and I in fact measure it somewhere over 19 inches. By that I mean crank it pretty much all the way to one side, then all the way to the other and note the distance between the spots under the spindle. An HF manual for "the same machine" shows a travel just over 19 inches, which matches my experience. Is the 16+ inch number more honest, or is it just wrong? Bill |
Table travel specs
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 05:41:38 GMT, Bill Schwab wrote:
Hello all, Dumb question: is there anything special about the way table travel numbers are measured? I ask because in dimensioning a drawing, I noticed that some of the numbers were getting a little large for my mill. Looking in the manual, I was perhaps going to have to change something; it listed 16-1/8 inches. That sounded short to me, and I in fact measure it somewhere over 19 inches. By that I mean crank it pretty much all the way to one side, then all the way to the other and note the distance between the spots under the spindle. An HF manual for "the same machine" shows a travel just over 19 inches, which matches my experience. Is the 16+ inch number more honest, or is it just wrong? Bill It might relate to the travel that you get with a power feed attached to the table... these have a tendency to gobble up a couple of inches of movement. Mark Rand RTFM |
Table travel specs
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:22:50 +0100, Mark Rand
wrote: On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 05:41:38 GMT, Bill Schwab wrote: Hello all, Dumb question: is there anything special about the way table travel numbers are measured? I ask because in dimensioning a drawing, I noticed that some of the numbers were getting a little large for my mill. Looking in the manual, I was perhaps going to have to change something; it listed 16-1/8 inches. That sounded short to me, and I in fact measure it somewhere over 19 inches. By that I mean crank it pretty much all the way to one side, then all the way to the other and note the distance between the spots under the spindle. An HF manual for "the same machine" shows a travel just over 19 inches, which matches my experience. Is the 16+ inch number more honest, or is it just wrong? Bill It might relate to the travel that you get with a power feed attached to the table... these have a tendency to gobble up a couple of inches of movement. Or written by someone unfamiliar with this form of numbers who doesn't recognize that 6 and 9 are different numbers denoting different quantities. Gerry :-)} London, Canada |
Table travel specs
Mark,
Is the 16+ inch number more honest, or is it just wrong? It might relate to the travel that you get with a power feed attached to the table... these have a tendency to gobble up a couple of inches of movement. Good point - the 19+ is with the feed. The absense of "whatever you do, don't push it that far" replies is encouraging. Thanks! Bill |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter