Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was driving by HD and stopped to take a post-purchase look at the
Ridgid bandsaw. One of the reasons I "caved" and bought the Delta was a review that pointed out that the lower door does not work well on the Ridgid. That was quite obvious after handling the Delta; the Ridgid has the motor on top of the stand and in the would-be path of the door. The Delta's arrangement of motor weight tensioning the belt will turn out to be very helpful when I retrofit step pulleys to slow it down. That alone might be reason to buy it over the Ridgid. My biggest dangling concern was that the Ridgid would follow its table saw cousin in having a remarkably better table than the Delta, and that I'd feel like a complete schmuck for buying the wrong thing. While I like the finish on the Ridgid bandsaw's table a little better than the Delta's, I can't say there is all that much of a difference. Both saws are configured as single speed. The Ridgid might have a slightly better stand, but, I would want them in the same room to make a fair comparison. Perhaps just the scars of being a demo unit, the Ridgid struck me as having inferior tracking and tension adjustments relative to the Delta. The bottom line is that I think I came out ok. It is doing wonders with the acrylic, and has been very useful otherwise. As planned, I am (ab)using the Jet as a hacksaw and metal chopsaw, so the single speed problem isn't bothering me much at the moment. As an aside, the more I learn about table saws, the more I like my Ridgid. They have some room to grow on their bandsaw however. I've started making the first of my storage boxes. While not at all necessary, I decided to dovetail it (for practice), and did so "by hand". I cut the tails on the bandsaw, and having chiseled out the first area of waste, I got smart and used the bandsaw to remove most of the remaining waste. It works _really_ well for the tail waste. Then I transferred the lines for the pins and used a Japanese backsaw to make the cuts, and took most of the waste on the bandsaw, removing the rest with a chisel. I have not bothered with tilting the table, and have no desire to keep tilting/untilting it for the various cuts. I might eventually make an angled table to help with the pins, but found the mix of hand and machine sawing to be fairly reasonable for starters. The box won't be anything to write home about, but so far it is on track to turn out reasonably well as hack construction goes. During fitting, I removed a little too much wood on one of the tails. That's no great loss, a lesson learned (now if I just knew _which_ lessong), and I might be able to largely hide it with a shim anyway. The real problem is that I overdid the through dados. Not really expecting the box to work out as well as it has thus far, I didn't bother to draw what I was going to get. Serves me right for doing my own wood design work. Again, some fill blocks and flush cutting will give a reasonable result, and it will certainly protect my ER collets. Bill |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
$200 Harbor Freight Bandsaw Review | Metalworking | |||
FWW bandsaw review unbalanced? | Woodworking |