Guido wrote:
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:00:21 -0600, "george"
wrote:


"Guido" wrote in message
.. .



The whole thing is riddled with WMD claims if you remove all parts
that have WMD in them you're left with nothing but blah-blah-blah.

BTW no one cares about your blogs.

Nobody cares that you're a moonbat and liar, either. It's so easy to
DESTROY your libby-dem traitor-**** lies with a simple cut and paste.

Here it is:

Public Law 107-243, findings section:

--H.J.Res.114--

H.J.Res.114


One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

Joint Resolution

To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq.

snip old pre-gulf war I stuff

snip more old pre-gulf war I stuff

Whereas the current Iraqi regime has demonstrated its continuing hostility
toward, and willingness to attack, the United States, including by
attempting in 1993 to assassinate former President Bush and by firing on
many thousands of occasions on United States and Coalition Armed Forces
engaged in enforcing the resolutions of the United Nations Security Council;

Well, the later was their full right as the US & the UK were
violating
their airspace and bombing them for about a decade. In point of fact,
unprovoked
acts of war by the US & the UK.

As to the claimed 1993 "attempting in 1993 to assassinate former
President Bush" herr
shrubbie sez assassination is fine.
In the light of all the other lies it's a highly questionable claim
anyway.

Certainly nothing urgent about it ... from 1993 ...

Whereas the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-338) expressed the
sense of Congress that it should be the policy of the United States to
support efforts to remove from power the current Iraqi regime and promote
the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime;

Not very material to any of the claims, is it?
What next? Bomb the Monarchy in the UK? Impose "democracy" (the
neocon kind)
by force on half the world or more?
Have enough cannon fodder & taxes?

Whereas it is in the national security interests of the United States to
restore international peace and security to the Persian Gulf region: Now,
therefore, be it

They had peace before the bombing & invasion.
Now it seems that they have to buy new weapons systems to have
security ....
at gunpoint.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of
America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This joint resolution may be cited as the `Authorization for Use of Military
Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002'."




As I said remove all the WMD references and what you have left is
blah-blah-blah.

Or worse ....
--
Cliff