Psalm 110 wrote:

Weather consensus says that storms are those structures which take
excess surplus heat from the surface and place it high up above the
densist atmosphere.

Consensus isn't science, it's opinion

filthy pig republicans

Not familiar with that branch of the party.


The EVIDENCE determines what is PROVEN. Statistical evidence has no
politics. It PROVES that the present is dangerously different from the
past.

Everyone agrees on that, the cause is under dispute.


48% MORE strong Hurricanes than the 1960s is SIGNIFICANT. That is not
a trivial number. The closest period which is comparible is the 1950s
with 2% less, but the weak hurricanes in the 50s were 43% less than
the last decade. That means in the 50s most hurricanes grew stronger
leaving fewer weak ones. By next decade, in the 60s, there were fewer
strong ones and more weak ones. The turbulence from the CO2 spike of
WWII was dying away. But a threshhold had been permanently crossed.

There is evidence that hurricane intensity varies on a 30-40 year cycle
back several centuries.


I enjoy the joke. Now get serious. Explain the facts.

11 of 12 most expensive hurricanes for a century since 1989

Inflation?


Republican-Libertarians promoting soviet-style centralized command &
control from the Wall Street Kremlin have been turning wealth into
storm debris since 1989.

You are serious? Republicans cause hurricanes??
hahahahahahahaha

I'll think about that every time an SUV blows past me with a "Don't
blame me, I voted for Gore" sticker.

On 6 Oct 2005 22:15:17 -0700, "David G. Naugler"
wrote:

Gunner

http://tinyurl.com/3p4m5

Bush family values again, eh?
--
Cliff