Free Outlook Express Backup
 

Hi all:

I'v been found a good product name is 'Outlook Express Backup', it is
can easily backup your Outlook Express email database, just a wizard
and it's very easy to use.

you can download the freeware at http://www.staticbackup.com
wow~~~! it's excellent!


Matt.

wrote:

and it's very easy to use.

.... and easy to get just another worm or virus?


Nick
--
Motormodelle / Engine Models
http://www.motor-manufaktur.de
todays SPAMfeed: 

On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 21:53:24 +0200, (Nick Müller)
wrote:

wrote:

and it's very easy to use.

... and easy to get just another worm or virus?

Or it's an address harvester. Anyone using Outhouse Exress is a brick
short of a load, anyway, so they would probably just LOVE this
spamware.

On 11 Jun 2005 07:51:40 -0700, wrote:
Hi all:

I'v been found a good product name is 'Outlook Express Backup', it is
can easily backup your Outlook Express email database, just a wizard
and it's very easy to use.

You do realize that the "I just found" shill technique has been around
for longer than you have, don't you?

you can download the freeware at
wow~~~! it's excellent!

No thanks. Windows has a built-in backup application which is adequate,
and downloading random executables from suspect sources is unwise.
I also notice that it's $39.95 shareware, not free.

And, since I was off noticing things, I can't _help_ but notice that
staticbackup.com is registered to a certen Matthew Lee, which
coincidentally enough is your own name. What, oh what, are the odds of
such a coincidence.

How about you go away, lying spammer, and stay there.

Matt.

If your product was any good, Matt, you wouldn't have to spam and lie to
get people to visit your site.

"Grunty Grogan" wrote:
Anyone using Outhouse Exress is a brick
short of a load, anyway...

I've been using OE for five years now without a problem. You like other
applications, fine, but being snobbish about reflects poorly on yourself.

Jon

Jon Danniken wrote:

I've been using OE for five years now without a problem. You like other
applications, fine, but being snobbish about reflects poorly on yourself.

YMMV. But since I'm posting here, those stupid "latest Microsoft
updates"-eMails rocketed up. Not that they will harm my PC (read Mac),
but OE is potentially a big risk. As I sayd, _Y_MMV!

Nick
--
Motormodelle / Engine Models
http://www.motor-manufaktur.de
todays SPAMfeed: 

"Dave Hinz" wrote in message
...
On 11 Jun 2005 07:51:40 -0700,
wrote:
Hi all:

I'v been found a good product name is 'Outlook Express Backup', it is
can easily backup your Outlook Express email database, just a wizard
and it's very easy to use.

You do realize that the "I just found" shill technique has been around
for longer than you have, don't you?

you can download the freeware at
wow~~~! it's excellent!

No thanks. Windows has a built-in backup application which is adequate,
and downloading random executables from suspect sources is unwise.
I also notice that it's $39.95 shareware, not free.

And, since I was off noticing things, I can't _help_ but notice that
staticbackup.com is registered to a certen Matthew Lee, which
coincidentally enough is your own name. What, oh what, are the odds of
such a coincidence.

How about you go away, lying spammer, and stay there.

Matt.

If your product was any good, Matt, you wouldn't have to spam and lie to
get people to visit your site.


Chuckle!! Good one!

Harold

"Nick Müller" wrote:
Jon Danniken wrote:

I've been using OE for five years now without a problem. You like other
applications, fine, but being snobbish about reflects poorly on
yourself.

YMMV. But since I'm posting here, those stupid "latest Microsoft
updates"-eMails rocketed up. Not that they will harm my PC (read Mac),
but OE is potentially a big risk. As I sayd, _Y_MMV!

Well, that's a function of several different considerations. One being the
fact that posting to usenet brings spam, the other being that most people
are smart enough not to install software from spam, neither of which bear on
the ability of OE to function properly. I believe there used to be an issue
with usenet and mail not having a high enough default security setting, but
it's user-changeable anyway and IIRC had the default behavior changed in an
update some time ago.

Some people don't like the general features of OE, which is a valid point,
but I find it perfectly adequate for my uses. As you said, YMMV. :)

Jon

the other consideration is that you should not put your correct email
address in the "address" or "reply to address" fields of the header when you
post - see for example, how Jon has done it - that helps with spam
dramatically


"Jon Danniken" wrote in message
...
"Nick Müller" wrote:
Jon Danniken wrote:

I've been using OE for five years now without a problem. You like
other
applications, fine, but being snobbish about reflects poorly on
yourself.

YMMV. But since I'm posting here, those stupid "latest Microsoft
updates"-eMails rocketed up. Not that they will harm my PC (read Mac),
but OE is potentially a big risk. As I sayd, _Y_MMV!

Well, that's a function of several different considerations. One being
the
fact that posting to usenet brings spam, the other being that most people
are smart enough not to install software from spam, neither of which bear
on
the ability of OE to function properly. I believe there used to be an
issue
with usenet and mail not having a high enough default security setting,
but
it's user-changeable anyway and IIRC had the default behavior changed in
an
update some time ago.

Some people don't like the general features of OE, which is a valid point,
but I find it perfectly adequate for my uses. As you said, YMMV. :)

Jon

In article 1118582534.9033b4518a5bf45dbb026a428cd5474b@teran ews,
william_b_noble wrote:
the other consideration is that you should not put your correct email
address in the "address" or "reply to address" fields of the header when you
post - see for example, how Jon has done it - that helps with spam
dramatically

It is decades too late for me, so I just do very aggressive
filtering and blocking.

Enjoy,
DoN.

--
Email: | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
(too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
--- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Sadly DoN I'm in the same boat as you.

It's been many decades that my real address has been publicly available, and
for professional reason must stay that in in many places, so .. SpamAssasin
trashs about 3K a day and Spamhaus.org blows off about 1K from known
spammers.. such is life in the 21'st century.

Dave

"DoN. Nichols" wrote in message
...
In article 1118582534.9033b4518a5bf45dbb026a428cd5474b@teran ews,
william_b_noble wrote:
the other consideration is that you should not put your correct email
address in the "address" or "reply to address" fields of the header when
you
post - see for example, how Jon has done it - that helps with spam
dramatically

It is decades too late for me, so I just do very aggressive
filtering and blocking.

Enjoy,
DoN.

--
Email: | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
(too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
--- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 06:22:09 -0700, william_b_noble wrote:
the other consideration is that you should not put your correct email
address in the "address" or "reply to address" fields of the header when you
post - see for example, how Jon has done it - that helps with spam
dramatically

Oh, I dunno, my email address is perfectly valid. I pay spamcop.net 30
bucks a year, and they block 99% of the crap. And, in several years,
only one valid sender has had their mail blocked, and she was including
it as an HTML attachment - which is a user problem more than a filter
problem.

But, if for no other reason, the numerous security problems with OE
should be a good enough reason to avoid it, if you choose to run
Windows.

On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 02:22:26 +0200, (Nick Müller)
wrote:

Jon Danniken wrote:

I've been using OE for five years now without a problem. You like other
applications, fine, but being snobbish about reflects poorly on yourself.

YMMV. But since I'm posting here, those stupid "latest Microsoft
updates"-eMails rocketed up. Not that they will harm my PC (read Mac),
but OE is potentially a big risk. As I sayd, _Y_MMV!

Nick


Its like this..not everyone who plays Russian Roulett winds up with a
bullet in the brain. But enough folks do, to make it obvious that its
a dangerous thing.

Gunner

"Considering the events of recent years,
the world has a long way to go to regain
its credibility and reputation with the US."
unknown

Gunner wrote:

[russian roulett]
But enough folks do, to make it obvious that its
a dangerous thing.

That's pure Darwinism. :-)
See www.darwinawards.com for even better examples!


Nick
--
Motormodelle / Engine Models
http://www.motor-manufaktur.de
todays SPAMfeed: