The Two Inseparable Trolling Resident Sociopaths together again!
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 04:12:00 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic blather -- Another typical retarded conversation between our two village idiots, Birdbrain and Rodent Speed: Birdbrain: "You beat me to it. Plain sex is boring." Senile Rodent: "Then **** the cats. That wont be boring." Birdbrain: "Sell me a de-clawing tool first." Senile Rodent: "Wont help with the teeth." Birdbrain: "They've never gone for me with their mouths." Rodent Speed: "They will if you are stupid enough to try ****ing them." Birdbrain: "No, they always use claws." Rodent Speed: "They wont if you try ****ing them. Try it and see." Message-ID: |
The Two Inseparable Trolling Resident Sociopaths together again!
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 04:06:33 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic blather -- Another typical retarded "conversation" between the two resident idiots: Birdbrain: "But imagine how cool it was to own slaves." Senile Rodent: "Yeah, right. Feed them, clothe them, and fix them when they're broken. After all, you paid good money for them. Then you've got to keep an eye on them all the time." Birdbrain: "Better than having to give them wages on top of that." Senile Rodent: "Specially when they make more slaves for you and produce their own food and clothes." MID: |
Spank!
On 14/04/2021 18:47, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 18:10:15 +0100, Fredxx wrote: On 13/04/2021 17:56, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 16:57:26 +0100, Fredxx wrote: On 13/04/2021 16:47, Commander Kinsey wrote: What an OCD moron.... Dear [made up name, my 4th account I believe], You have received a warning at Parrot Forum - Parrot Owner's Community. Reason: Insulted Other Member(s) Greetings; You have received a one point infraction with ten day expiry. Primary cause: You ignored, belittled, trolled, insulted, and attempted to ridicule me in moderator capacity. You have transgressed paragraphs seven and nine of the Parrot Forum Rules. Perhaps one day you'll take the hint and refrain from insulting another member. I was told off for going slightly off topic.* All I did was point out that conversations tend to do that.* I didn't call him an OCD ****. If you don't regard your insult to be one, then I suggest you reconsider researching the matter of what constitutes an insult to those around you. It's impossible to insult someone.* If I call you a moron and you are a moron, I've stated a fact.* If I call you a moron and you aren't one, then I've lied. So what you are saying is you can't fathom the concept that you can insult someone with a fact. You're getting it now.* If you're short and I call you short, I've just made an observation.* You already knew you were short.* It would be like me telling you it's raining when you're soaking wet, you already knew, no information was passed, I can't have insulted you. No, I've got it ad you haven't. I repeat, "So what you are saying is you can't fathom the concept that you can insult someone with a fact" You are a moron. Both a fact and an insult. Do you recognise these words as an insult? If "yes" then you are a moron. If "no" then you are less of a moron. |
Troll-feeding Senile ASSHOLE Alert!
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 01:12:30 +0100, Fredxx, the notorious, troll-feeding,
senile smartass, blathered again: No, I've got it ad you haven't. I repeat, "So what you are saying is you can't fathom the concept that you can insult someone with a fact" You are a moron. Yeah, but you STILL can't resist his ****, senile moron! LOL |
Spank!
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. |
Spank!
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 01:12:30 +0100, Fredxx wrote:
On 14/04/2021 18:47, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 18:10:15 +0100, Fredxx wrote: On 13/04/2021 17:56, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 16:57:26 +0100, Fredxx wrote: On 13/04/2021 16:47, Commander Kinsey wrote: What an OCD moron.... Dear [made up name, my 4th account I believe], You have received a warning at Parrot Forum - Parrot Owner's Community. Reason: Insulted Other Member(s) Greetings; You have received a one point infraction with ten day expiry. Primary cause: You ignored, belittled, trolled, insulted, and attempted to ridicule me in moderator capacity. You have transgressed paragraphs seven and nine of the Parrot Forum Rules. Perhaps one day you'll take the hint and refrain from insulting another member. I was told off for going slightly off topic. All I did was point out that conversations tend to do that. I didn't call him an OCD ****. If you don't regard your insult to be one, then I suggest you reconsider researching the matter of what constitutes an insult to those around you. It's impossible to insult someone. If I call you a moron and you are a moron, I've stated a fact. If I call you a moron and you aren't one, then I've lied. So what you are saying is you can't fathom the concept that you can insult someone with a fact. You're getting it now. If you're short and I call you short, I've just made an observation. You already knew you were short. It would be like me telling you it's raining when you're soaking wet, you already knew, no information was passed, I can't have insulted you. No, I've got it ad you haven't. I repeat, "So what you are saying is you can't fathom the concept that you can insult someone with a fact" You are a moron. Both a fact and an insult. Do you recognise these words as an insult? If "yes" then you are a moron. If "no" then you are less of a moron. Since I know I'm not a moron, all you've done is lied. Therefore your "insult" has not upset me at all and cannot be called an insult. |
Spank!
"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message ... On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. In some ways it actually helped it dramatically, particularly with quite a few vicars etc with lots of time on their hands choosing to get involved in observational science with plants and geology etc particularly. One of the weirder quirks. Same with Mendel and other plant breeding in monasterys. Yes, Darwin did delay publishing his Origin of Species because he knew what a **** fight that would produce with the religious fundys and some others like Bruno quite literally got burnt at the stake for his science and that presumably had a big effect on others considering doing real science instead of just accepting what their stupid collection of fairy storys had to say about things, but its important to not forget that it happened both ways. |
The Two Inseparable Trolling Resident Sociopaths together again!
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 05:18:19 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic blather -- TYPICAL retarded "conversation" between sociopath Rodent and sociopath Birdbrain from August 26th 2018: Birdbrain: "I have one head but 5 fingers." Senile Rodent: "Obvious lie. You hairy legged cross dressers are so inbred that you all have two heads." Birdbrain: "You're the one that likes hairy legs remember?" Senile Rodent: "The problem isnt the hairy legs, it's the gross inbreeding that produces two headed unemployables like you." Birdbrain: "So why did you mention hairy legs?" Senile Rodent: "Because that's what those who arent actually stupid enough to shave their legs have." Birdbrain: "You only have hairy legs if both of the following are true: 1) You're quite far back on the evolutionary scale. 2) You haven't learned what a razor is for." Senile Rodent: "Only a terminal ****wit or a woman shaves their legs." Birdbrain: "There is literally zero point in having hair all over your body." Senile Rodent: "There is even less point in wasting your time changing what you are born with." MID: |
Spank!
On Apr 15, 2021 at 11:02:15 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
: On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Until a few hundred years ago there was not much of a split. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
Shit, the Git, the Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE!
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:15:17 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again: You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Until a few hundred years ago there was not much of a split. A few years ago the unwashed Scottish troll and ****** wasn't yet around for you to suck him off every time he shows up, you idiotic senile sucker of unwashed troll cock! |
Spank!
On 15/04/2021 19:03, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 01:12:30 +0100, Fredxx wrote: On 14/04/2021 18:47, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 18:10:15 +0100, Fredxx wrote: On 13/04/2021 17:56, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 16:57:26 +0100, Fredxx wrote: On 13/04/2021 16:47, Commander Kinsey wrote: What an OCD moron.... Dear [made up name, my 4th account I believe], You have received a warning at Parrot Forum - Parrot Owner's Community. Reason: Insulted Other Member(s) Greetings; You have received a one point infraction with ten day expiry. Primary cause: You ignored, belittled, trolled, insulted, and attempted to ridicule me in moderator capacity. You have transgressed paragraphs seven and nine of the Parrot Forum Rules. Perhaps one day you'll take the hint and refrain from insulting another member. I was told off for going slightly off topic.* All I did was point out that conversations tend to do that.* I didn't call him an OCD ****. If you don't regard your insult to be one, then I suggest you reconsider researching the matter of what constitutes an insult to those around you. It's impossible to insult someone.* If I call you a moron and you are a moron, I've stated a fact.* If I call you a moron and you aren't one, then I've lied. So what you are saying is you can't fathom the concept that you can insult someone with a fact. You're getting it now.* If you're short and I call you short, I've just made an observation.* You already knew you were short.* It would be like me telling you it's raining when you're soaking wet, you already knew, no information was passed, I can't have insulted you. No, I've got it ad you haven't. I repeat, "So what you are saying is you can't fathom the concept that you can insult someone with a fact" You are a moron. Both a fact and an insult. Do you recognise these words as an insult? If "yes" then you are a moron. If "no" then you are less of a moron. Since I know I'm not a moron, all you've done is lied.* Therefore your "insult" has not upset me at all and cannot be called an insult. Nope, you've just proven you're a moron in denial. |
Spank!
On 04/15/2021 12:02 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Do you know who first formulated the Big Bang theory? Ever here of Gregor Mendel? Blaise Pascal? Quite a few scientists manage to have a foot in both worlds. In general the Catholics seem more flexible than the Protestants, particularly the 'gimme that old time religion' branch. |
Spank!
On Apr 15, 2021 at 7:14:23 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
: On 04/15/2021 12:02 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Do you know who first formulated the Big Bang theory? Ever here of Gregor Mendel? Blaise Pascal? Quite a few scientists manage to have a foot in both worlds. In general the Catholics seem more flexible than the Protestants, particularly the 'gimme that old time religion' branch. In the past the two were heavily tied together... but that is no longer the case. There are still some religious scientists, but scientists tend to be atheist at a higher level than the general public. They also tend to be more liberal, which makes sense given how at least in the US conservatives tend to reject our best evidence. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
Spank!
"rbowman" wrote in message ... On 04/15/2021 12:02 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Do you know who first formulated the Big Bang theory? Ever here of Gregor Mendel? Blaise Pascal? Quite a few scientists manage to have a foot in both worlds. In general the Catholics seem more flexible than the Protestants, Don't recall too many Protestants burning scientific heretics at the stake, quite literally. particularly the 'gimme that old time religion' branch. |
Spank!
On 14/4/21 2:22 am, Rod Speed wrote:
Brian Gaff (Sofa) wrote I hate moderators with a passion Yeah, it does attract control freaks like **** does with flys. But they can get rid of trolling pests lie you - so that's a bonus. -- Xeno Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing. (with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson) |
Troll-feeding Senile ASSHOLE Alert!
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 01:43:41 +0100, Fredxx, the notorious, troll-feeding,
senile smartass, blathered again: Nope, you've just proven you're a moron in denial. Nope, you've just proven that you ARE a notorious sucker of troll cock, senile smartass! |
lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's eternal senile whore!
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:14:23 -0600, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again: You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Do you know who first formulated the Big Bang theory? Ever here of Gregor Mendel? Blaise Pascal? You'd better worry who first formulated the little adage: DON'T FEED THE TROLL, you troll-feeding sick senile asshole! |
More Heavy Trolling by the Senile Octogenarian Nym-Shifting Ozzie Cretin!
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 13:37:25 +1000, Fred, better known as cantankerous
trolling senile geezer Rodent Speed, wrote: FLUSH the trolling senile pest's latest troll**** unread -- Kerr-Mudd,John addressing the auto-contradicting senile cretin: "Auto-contradictor Rod is back! (in the KF)" MID: |
Spank!
"Xeno" wrote in message ... On 14/4/21 2:22 am, Rod Speed wrote: Brian Gaff (Sofa) wrote I hate moderators with a passion Yeah, it does attract control freaks like **** does with flys. But they can get rid of trolling pests lie you Nope, because its so easy to open a new account, you pathetic excuse for a trolling pest. |
More Heavy Trolling by the Senile Octogenarian Nym-Shifting Ozzie Cretin!
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:04:10 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: FLUSH more of the trolling senile asshole's latest troll**** -- Norman Wells addressing trolling senile Rodent: "Ah, the voice of scum speaks." MID: |
Spank!
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:15:17 +0100, Snit wrote:
On Apr 15, 2021 at 11:02:15 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Until a few hundred years ago there was not much of a split. In English please. |
Spank!
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:44:18 +0100, Snit wrote:
On Apr 15, 2021 at 7:14:23 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote : On 04/15/2021 12:02 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Do you know who first formulated the Big Bang theory? Ever here of Gregor Mendel? Blaise Pascal? Quite a few scientists manage to have a foot in both worlds. In general the Catholics seem more flexible than the Protestants, particularly the 'gimme that old time religion' branch. In the past the two were heavily tied together... but that is no longer the case. There are still some religious scientists, but scientists tend to be atheist at a higher level than the general public. They also tend to be more liberal, which makes sense given how at least in the US conservatives tend to reject our best evidence. Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free. |
Spank!
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 10:04:10 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"Xeno" wrote in message ... On 14/4/21 2:22 am, Rod Speed wrote: Brian Gaff (Sofa) wrote I hate moderators with a passion Yeah, it does attract control freaks like **** does with flys. But they can get rid of trolling pests lie you Nope, because its so easy to open a new account, you pathetic excuse for a trolling pest. Rule 7 of one forum I'm on, displayed every time you post (unless you block it with an ad blocker) is "if you're banned from posting, don't create another account". That's just asking for people to do it! Mind you, I don't think it's possible to get banned (apart from a temporary 2 day ban, so I just save up my replies and annoy them more at once) - I've actually had 38 warnings and bans from them, including a message saying "if you don't stop doing that I'll have to warn you again". They really are round the twist. |
Spank!
On Apr 16, 2021 at 11:00:16 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
: On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:44:18 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 15, 2021 at 7:14:23 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote : On 04/15/2021 12:02 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Do you know who first formulated the Big Bang theory? Ever here of Gregor Mendel? Blaise Pascal? Quite a few scientists manage to have a foot in both worlds. In general the Catholics seem more flexible than the Protestants, particularly the 'gimme that old time religion' branch. In the past the two were heavily tied together... but that is no longer the case. There are still some religious scientists, but scientists tend to be atheist at a higher level than the general public. They also tend to be more liberal, which makes sense given how at least in the US conservatives tend to reject our best evidence. Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free. Scientists are liberal because the conservative mindset is to deny evidence. We can see this with COVID, man-made global climate change, research on reduction of abortions, and in some cases even things like evolution. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
Spank!
On Apr 16, 2021 at 10:59:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
: On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:15:17 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 15, 2021 at 11:02:15 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Until a few hundred years ago there was not much of a split. In English please. The two have a history that is tied together. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
Shit, the Git, the Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE!
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:10:05 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again: In English please. The two have a history that is tied together. NOT as tied together as you two perverted freaks are! |
Shit, the Git, the Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE!
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:09:40 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again: Scientists are liberal because the conservative mindset is to deny evidence. We can see this with COVID, What we see is that you CAN'T wean your senile gob away from the unwashed Scottish troll's cock, senile sucker of troll cock! |
Spank!
"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message ... On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:15:17 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 15, 2021 at 11:02:15 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Until a few hundred years ago there was not much of a split. In English please. He means that more than a couple of hundred years ago, most of the science was done by the religious. And some of them like Mendel made tremendous advances in our scientific knowledge. |
Spank!
"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message ... On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:44:18 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 15, 2021 at 7:14:23 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote : On 04/15/2021 12:02 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Do you know who first formulated the Big Bang theory? Ever here of Gregor Mendel? Blaise Pascal? Quite a few scientists manage to have a foot in both worlds. In general the Catholics seem more flexible than the Protestants, particularly the 'gimme that old time religion' branch. In the past the two were heavily tied together... but that is no longer the case. There are still some religious scientists, but scientists tend to be atheist at a higher level than the general public. They also tend to be more liberal, which makes sense given how at least in the US conservatives tend to reject our best evidence. Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free. Plenty of them don't, they work for industry. |
The Two Inseparable Trolling Resident Sociopaths together again!
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 06:54:22 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic blather -- Another typical retarded "conversation" between the two resident idiots: Birdbrain: "But imagine how cool it was to own slaves." Senile Rodent: "Yeah, right. Feed them, clothe them, and fix them when they're broken. After all, you paid good money for them. Then you've got to keep an eye on them all the time." Birdbrain: "Better than having to give them wages on top of that." Senile Rodent: "Specially when they make more slaves for you and produce their own food and clothes." MID: |
The Two Inseparable Trolling Resident Sociopaths together again!
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 06:55:07 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic blather -- Another typical retarded "conversation" between Birdbrain and senile Rodent: Senile Rodent: " Did you ever dig a hole to bury your own ****?" Birdbrain: "I do if there's no flush toilet around." Senile Rodent: "Yeah, I prefer camping like that, off by myself with no dunnys around and have always buried the ****." MID: |
Spank!
On Apr 16, 2021 at 1:55:07 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message ... On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:44:18 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 15, 2021 at 7:14:23 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote : On 04/15/2021 12:02 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Do you know who first formulated the Big Bang theory? Ever here of Gregor Mendel? Blaise Pascal? Quite a few scientists manage to have a foot in both worlds. In general the Catholics seem more flexible than the Protestants, particularly the 'gimme that old time religion' branch. In the past the two were heavily tied together... but that is no longer the case. There are still some religious scientists, but scientists tend to be atheist at a higher level than the general public. They also tend to be more liberal, which makes sense given how at least in the US conservatives tend to reject our best evidence. Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free. Plenty of them don't, they work for industry. Right. But even the ones that work for the petroleum industry stopped their denial of man-made global climate change. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
Spank!
On Apr 16, 2021 at 1:54:22 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message ... On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:15:17 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 15, 2021 at 11:02:15 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Until a few hundred years ago there was not much of a split. In English please. He means that more than a couple of hundred years ago, most of the science was done by the religious. And some of them like Mendel made tremendous advances in our scientific knowledge. Pretty much. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
Spank!
"Snit" wrote in message ... On Apr 16, 2021 at 1:55:07 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote : "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message ... On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:44:18 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 15, 2021 at 7:14:23 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote : On 04/15/2021 12:02 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Do you know who first formulated the Big Bang theory? Ever here of Gregor Mendel? Blaise Pascal? Quite a few scientists manage to have a foot in both worlds. In general the Catholics seem more flexible than the Protestants, particularly the 'gimme that old time religion' branch. In the past the two were heavily tied together... but that is no longer the case. There are still some religious scientists, but scientists tend to be atheist at a higher level than the general public. They also tend to be more liberal, which makes sense given how at least in the US conservatives tend to reject our best evidence. Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free. Plenty of them don't, they work for industry. Right. But even the ones that work for the petroleum industry stopped their denial of man-made global climate change. No they didnt and plenty who do deny man-made global climate change arent paid to do that. |
Spank!
On Apr 16, 2021 at 2:31:09 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
: "Snit" wrote in message ... On Apr 16, 2021 at 1:55:07 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote : "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message ... On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:44:18 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 15, 2021 at 7:14:23 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote : On 04/15/2021 12:02 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Do you know who first formulated the Big Bang theory? Ever here of Gregor Mendel? Blaise Pascal? Quite a few scientists manage to have a foot in both worlds. In general the Catholics seem more flexible than the Protestants, particularly the 'gimme that old time religion' branch. In the past the two were heavily tied together... but that is no longer the case. There are still some religious scientists, but scientists tend to be atheist at a higher level than the general public. They also tend to be more liberal, which makes sense given how at least in the US conservatives tend to reject our best evidence. Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free. Plenty of them don't, they work for industry. Right. But even the ones that work for the petroleum industry stopped their denial of man-made global climate change. No they didnt and plenty who do deny man-made global climate change arent paid to do that. They did drop their denial. Here is their current page on the topic: https://www.api.org/oil-and-natural-...climate-change As far as those who deny it, there are about 70 scientists people point to, many of them dead, and several of whom are not even experts in the field. At this point there is no internationally recognized scientific group that still denies the evidence. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
Spank!
"Snit" wrote in message ... On Apr 16, 2021 at 2:31:09 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote : "Snit" wrote in message ... On Apr 16, 2021 at 1:55:07 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote : "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message ... On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:44:18 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 15, 2021 at 7:14:23 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote : On 04/15/2021 12:02 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Do you know who first formulated the Big Bang theory? Ever here of Gregor Mendel? Blaise Pascal? Quite a few scientists manage to have a foot in both worlds. In general the Catholics seem more flexible than the Protestants, particularly the 'gimme that old time religion' branch. In the past the two were heavily tied together... but that is no longer the case. There are still some religious scientists, but scientists tend to be atheist at a higher level than the general public. They also tend to be more liberal, which makes sense given how at least in the US conservatives tend to reject our best evidence. Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free. Plenty of them don't, they work for industry. Right. But even the ones that work for the petroleum industry stopped their denial of man-made global climate change. No they didnt and plenty who do deny man-made global climate change arent paid to do that. They did drop their denial. Nope, plenty didnt. Here is their current page on the topic: https://www.api.org/oil-and-natural-...climate-change There isnt just one group of them. As far as those who deny it, there are about 70 scientists people point to, many of them dead, and several of whom are not even experts in the field. What matters is the evidence with science, not individuals. At this point there is no internationally recognized scientific group that still denies the evidence. Science isnt about voting. At one time the vast majority of scientists denied free radicals but then the evidence showed that they are real. |
Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 08:09:56 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: They did drop their denial. Nope, plenty didnąt. Yeah, keep showing that troll-feeding senile asshole what he gets for feeding a trolling senile asshole like you, senile Rodent! LMAO -- Website (from 2007) dedicated to the 86-year-old trolling senile cretin from Oz: https://www.pcreview.co.uk/threads/r...d-faq.2973853/ |
Spank!
On Apr 16, 2021 at 3:09:56 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
: Right. But even the ones that work for the petroleum industry stopped their denial of man-made global climate change. No they didnt and plenty who do deny man-made global climate change arent paid to do that. They did drop their denial. Nope, plenty didnt. Here is their current page on the topic: https://www.api.org/oil-and-natural-...climate-change There isnt just one group of them. There are those that still do -- I meant their "scientific" group. Are there others still in denial? As far as those who deny it, there are about 70 scientists people point to, many of them dead, and several of whom are not even experts in the field. What matters is the evidence with science, not individuals. Correct: though the experts will generally side with the evidence (if they did not they would not be the experts!) At this point there is no internationally recognized scientific group that still denies the evidence. Science isnt about voting. At one time the vast majority of scientists denied free radicals but then the evidence showed that they are real. If the evidence showed it then over time the view of most scientists likely changed. It is not like our knowledge does not grow. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
Spank!
Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote Right. But even the ones that work for the petroleum industry stopped their denial of man-made global climate change. No they didnt and plenty who do deny man-made global climate change arent paid to do that. They did drop their denial. Nope, plenty didnt. Here is their current page on the topic: https://www.api.org/oil-and-natural-...climate-change There isnt just one group of them. There are those that still do -- I meant their "scientific" group. Are there others still in denial? Corse there are. As far as those who deny it, there are about 70 scientists people point to, many of them dead, and several of whom are not even experts in the field. What matters is the evidence with science, not individuals. Correct: though the experts will generally side with the evidence (if they did not they would not be the experts!) Problem is that the evidence changes, particularly with the recent less than predicted rate of world temperature change. At this point there is no internationally recognized scientific group that still denies the evidence. Science isnt about voting. At one time the vast majority of scientists denied free radicals but then the evidence showed that they are real. If the evidence showed it then over time the view of most scientists likely changed. It is not like our knowledge does not grow. And thats just as true of purported man made climate change. Its obvious that climate does change, thats obvious from the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the change we have seen is man made. It wasnt that long ago that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling. Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually has on world temperatures, let alone climate change. And its even less clear whether lots more 'renewable' energy will make any useful difference to world climate of whether it makes much more sense to have lots more nukes and dramatically reduce the addition to world CO2 levels and stop wasting fossil fuels on power generation now that it is clear that we are consuming them at a far greater rate than they are being laid down. |
Spank!
On Apr 16, 2021 at 4:10:43 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
: .... What matters is the evidence with science, not individuals. Correct: though the experts will generally side with the evidence (if they did not they would not be the experts!) Problem is that the evidence changes, particularly with the recent less than predicted rate of world temperature change. Do you mean the hand picked specific areas where it was less even as the world beat the predictions? At this point there is no internationally recognized scientific group that still denies the evidence. Science isnt about voting. At one time the vast majority of scientists denied free radicals but then the evidence showed that they are real. If the evidence showed it then over time the view of most scientists likely changed. It is not like our knowledge does not grow. And thats just as true of purported man made climate change. Yes, we keep leaning more. Its obvious that climate does change, thats obvious from the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the change we have seen is man made. The models show it to be between about 95% and 105% if I recall correctly. So, yes, there is some disagreement. It wasnt that long ago that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling. "Never" was neither long ago nor not long ago. It did not happen. Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually has on world temperatures, let alone climate change. We can quibble over exact amounts but there is no question it accounts for a huge percentage of the warming we see. And its even less clear whether lots more 'renewable' energy will make any useful difference to world climate of whether it makes much more sense to have lots more nukes and dramatically reduce the addition to world CO2 levels and stop wasting fossil fuels on power generation now that it is clear that we are consuming them at a far greater rate than they are being laid down. Solar is not perfect but it is a lot less harmful. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter