AMA flip-flopped on hydroxychloroquine
 

The American Medical Association has been adamantly against hydroxychloroquine as a therapeutic for COVID for the past year. Just a few days
before the presidential election they reversed course, reversing their opposition. Did they suddenly realize HCQ might have benefit in certain
patient groups or were they lying for the past year? How many individuals died as a result of being denied potential lifesaving treatment?

https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...many_died.html

AMA flip-flopped on hydroxychloroquine
 

On Friday, December 18, 2020 at 12:02:49 PM UTC-5, oscar wrote:
The American Medical Association has been adamantly against hydroxychloroquine as a therapeutic for COVID for the past year. Just a few days
before the presidential election they reversed course, reversing their opposition. Did they suddenly realize HCQ might have benefit in certain
patient groups or were they lying for the past year? How many individuals died as a result of being denied potential lifesaving treatment?

https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...many_died.html

No, it didn't:

https://twitter.com/AmerMedicalAssn/status/1339266283536314370?s=20
https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2020-12/nov-s20-resolutions.pdf#page=20
https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2020-11/nov20-ref-comm-e.pdf

American Thinker should think again.

Cindy Hamilton

AMA flip-flopped on hydroxychloroquine
 

On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 10:33:54 -0800 (PST), "
wrote:

On Friday, December 18, 2020 at 12:02:49 PM UTC-5, oscar wrote:
The American Medical Association has been adamantly against hydroxychloroquine as a therapeutic for COVID for the past year. Just a few days
before the presidential election they reversed course, reversing their opposition. Did they suddenly realize HCQ might have benefit in certain
patient groups or were they lying for the past year? How many individuals died as a result of being denied potential lifesaving treatment?

https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...many_died.html

No, it didn't:

https://twitter.com/AmerMedicalAssn/status/1339266283536314370?s=20
https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2020-12/nov-s20-resolutions.pdf#page=20
https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2020-11/nov20-ref-comm-e.pdf

American Thinker should think again.

Cindy Hamilton
Perhaps it should just START thinking - - -

from Wikipedia:

American Thinker is a daily online magazine dealing with American
politics from a conservative viewpoint.[1][2] It was founded in 2003
by Ed Lasky, a Northbrook lawyer, Richard Baehr, a Chicago health-care
consultant, and Thomas Lifson, a Berkeley, California sociologist and
business adviser.[3]

From Huffington Post:

American Stinker

American Thinker is your garden-variety right-wing site for people who
believe Jesus personally hand-delivered the Constitution to the
founding fathers. What sets it apart is that one of its bloggers,
Robert Oscar Lopez, is allegedly gay and claims to have been raised by
two lesbians.


By Walt Hawkins

AMA flip-flopped on hydroxychloroquine
 

On Friday, December 18, 2020 at 1:34:02 PM UTC-5, wrote:
On Friday, December 18, 2020 at 12:02:49 PM UTC-5, oscar wrote:
The American Medical Association has been adamantly against hydroxychloroquine as a therapeutic for COVID for the past year. Just a few days
before the presidential election they reversed course, reversing their opposition. Did they suddenly realize HCQ might have benefit in certain
patient groups or were they lying for the past year? How many individuals died as a result of being denied potential lifesaving treatment?

https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...many_died.html
No, it didn't:

https://twitter.com/AmerMedicalAssn/status/1339266283536314370?s=20
https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2020-12/nov-s20-resolutions.pdf#page=20
https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2020-11/nov20-ref-comm-e.pdf

American Thinker should think again.

Cindy Hamilton

Rush put this story out there too. It's a good example of what's really fake news.

Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh falsely claimed that the American Medical Association rescinded a previous statement and came out in support of hydroxychloroquine, the drug pushed by President Donald Trump for months as a potential treatment for COVID-19.

"Now all of a sudden the AMA (said) €” although very quietly €” that hydroxychloroquine is okay," Limbaugh said Dec. 15, telling his millions of listeners that the groups past statements were meant to hurt Trump. "Its perfectly fine. Go ahead and use it if you want. It can be helpful."

AMA's response:

"In March, AMA urged caution about prescribing hydroxychloroquine off-label to treat #COVID19," the AMA wrote, with a link to Poynters Covering COVID-19 newsletter by Al Tompkins. "Our position remains unchanged. Evidence-based #science & practice must guide these determinations."


Apparently there was a discussion at AMA and a vote recently with the result that their
position remains the same.

AMA flip-flopped on hydroxychloroquine
 

On 12/18/2020 12:01 PM, trader_4 wrote:
On Friday, December 18, 2020 at 1:34:02 PM UTC-5, wrote:
On Friday, December 18, 2020 at 12:02:49 PM UTC-5, oscar wrote:
The American Medical Association has been adamantly against hydroxychloroquine as a therapeutic for COVID for the past year. Just a few days
before the presidential election they reversed course, reversing their opposition. Did they suddenly realize HCQ might have benefit in certain
patient groups or were they lying for the past year? How many individuals died as a result of being denied potential lifesaving treatment?

https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...many_died.html
No, it didn't:

https://twitter.com/AmerMedicalAssn/status/1339266283536314370?s=20
https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2020-12/nov-s20-resolutions.pdf#page=20
https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2020-11/nov20-ref-comm-e.pdf

American Thinker should think again.

Cindy Hamilton

Rush put this story out there too. It's a good example of what's really fake news.

Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh falsely claimed that the American Medical Association rescinded a previous statement and came out in support of hydroxychloroquine, the drug pushed by President Donald Trump for months as a potential treatment for COVID-19.

"Now all of a sudden the AMA (said) €” although very quietly €” that hydroxychloroquine is okay," Limbaugh said Dec. 15, telling his millions of listeners that the groups past statements were meant to hurt Trump. "Its perfectly fine. Go ahead and use it if you want. It can be helpful."

AMA's response:

"In March, AMA urged caution about prescribing hydroxychloroquine off-label to treat #COVID19," the AMA wrote, with a link to Poynters Covering COVID-19 newsletter by Al Tompkins. "Our position remains unchanged. Evidence-based #science & practice must guide these determinations."


Apparently there was a discussion at AMA and a vote recently with the result that their
position remains the same.



To bad the TT's can't check "fake news" before they spread them.

AMA flip-flopped on hydroxychloroquine
 

On Friday, December 18, 2020 at 4:29:17 PM UTC-5, Bob F wrote:
On 12/18/2020 12:01 PM, trader_4 wrote:
On Friday, December 18, 2020 at 1:34:02 PM UTC-5, wrote:
On Friday, December 18, 2020 at 12:02:49 PM UTC-5, oscar wrote:
The American Medical Association has been adamantly against hydroxychloroquine as a therapeutic for COVID for the past year. Just a few days
before the presidential election they reversed course, reversing their opposition. Did they suddenly realize HCQ might have benefit in certain
patient groups or were they lying for the past year? How many individuals died as a result of being denied potential lifesaving treatment?

https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...many_died.html
No, it didn't:

https://twitter.com/AmerMedicalAssn/status/1339266283536314370?s=20
https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2020-12/nov-s20-resolutions.pdf#page=20
https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2020-11/nov20-ref-comm-e.pdf

American Thinker should think again.

Cindy Hamilton

Rush put this story out there too. It's a good example of what's really fake news.

Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh falsely claimed that the American Medical Association rescinded a previous statement and came out in support of hydroxychloroquine, the drug pushed by President Donald Trump for months as a potential treatment for COVID-19.

"Now all of a sudden the AMA (said) €” although very quietly €” that hydroxychloroquine is okay," Limbaugh said Dec. 15, telling his millions of listeners that the groups past statements were meant to hurt Trump. "Its perfectly fine. Go ahead and use it if you want. It can be helpful."

AMA's response:

"In March, AMA urged caution about prescribing hydroxychloroquine off-label to treat #COVID19," the AMA wrote, with a link to Poynters Covering COVID-19 newsletter by Al Tompkins. "Our position remains unchanged. Evidence-based #science & practice must guide these determinations."


Apparently there was a discussion at AMA and a vote recently with the result that their
position remains the same.


To bad the TT's can't check "fake news" before they spread them.

Anybody as gullible as the OP wouldn't think to check.

Cindy Hamilton

AMA flip-flopped on hydroxychloroquine
 

On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 12:02:41 -0500, oscar wrote:

dical Association has been adama

Hi "oscar",

I realize you're just a worthless piece of **** sock puppet of the
highwinds troll whose infantile politics have ruined this newsgroup.

Yet I wish to preserve in the permanent Usenet record this request to ask
you to stop spamming this repair newsgroup with your always infantile off
topic political trolling.

The only people responding are the socks of the same troll, so all you're
accomplishing is you have conversations with your own highwinds socks.

Please stop your infantile spamming of this newsgroup!
Thanks!

AMA flip-flopped on hydroxychloroquine
 

On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 13:53:28 -0500, Clare Snyder wrote:

can Thinker is your garden-variety ri

Hi Clare,

Tell me something.

I realize you have no education to speak of...
o But don't you realize you're talking to sock puppets all the time?

You don't?
o No way?

You're _really_ that stupid, Clare.

You don't even realize the entire conversation is off topic infantile
politics?

Tell me you're not _that_ stupid, Clare.