|
Freezers - still using shit insulation?
On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 20:02:37 -0000, Bob F wrote:
On 1/2/2019 7:45 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:53:48 -0000, Clare Snyder wrote: On Tue, 01 Jan 2019 16:42:21 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: On Tue, 01 Jan 2019 16:19:36 -0000, danny burstein wrote: In "Commander Kinsey" writes: How's about starting off the new year with a resolution to research issues a bit more closely. Like, in this case, how much power those motors are drawing when running today versus 30 years ago. Which has nothing to do with insulation. Bzzt. They're all interconnected. And your rants have nothing to do with reality or thinking. Find a five year old to explain basic thermodynamics to you. A lower power motor does not affect the R value of the insulation. Are you quite mad? Do you really think if you put a more efficient boiler in your house that your house will magically gain better insulation and cool more slowly? It doesn't affect the R value of the insulation but it may addect the run time of the compressor which is your only half-baked clue that your new freezer has no better insulation than your old one. You've made an invalid assumption. Every modern freezer I've seen runs for the same time as older ones, and they cool at the same rate. So clearly the compressor outputs the same cooling, but using less electricity. All well and good, but I can feel the cold escaping from the unit. And I notice the compressor has to keep running just as often as it used to,. So obviously the insulation sux. Oh and also, just have a look at the energy consumption ratings, which vary by a factor of 4 between different models. Looks like a a lot of them are rubbish. You are such a friggin' moron. What I said makes perfect sense, if you disagree, then state why. And you can't even remember your name. Like I changed that by accident. And you call ME a moron.... |
Troll-feeding Senile YANKIETARD Alert!
On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 11:15:12 -0800, Bob F, the notorious troll-feeding
senile Yankietard, blathered again: If. Feed you must him, eh, you useless senile Yank ...and if it's only with one little word! |
Freezers - still using shit insulation?
On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 19:19:25 +0000, Commander Kinsey wrote:
The extra CO2 we've created is still a tiny fraction of what it used to be. Just think about this logically for a moment - before fossil fuels were created, what do you think was creating them? That's right, plants! Plants that were perfectly happy breathing the CO2 rich air! All we're doing is moving the atmosphere back to what it was before fossil fuels were created. We're not magically creating more CO2 that wasn't there before! CO2 levels are 400ppm at the moment and over a hundred years ago, they were exactly the same. A little research shows up 'climate change' as a con job designed to **** the taxpayer over. Those who espouse it should be in jail for serious fraud. -- Leave first - THEN negotiate! |
Freezers - still using shit insulation?
"Cursitor Doom" wrote in message ... On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 19:19:25 +0000, Commander Kinsey wrote: The extra CO2 we've created is still a tiny fraction of what it used to be. Just think about this logically for a moment - before fossil fuels were created, what do you think was creating them? That's right, plants! Plants that were perfectly happy breathing the CO2 rich air! All we're doing is moving the atmosphere back to what it was before fossil fuels were created. We're not magically creating more CO2 that wasn't there before! CO2 levels are 400ppm at the moment Yes. and over a hundred years ago, they were exactly the same. No. https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_res...arbon-dioxide/ |
bullshit, was: Freezers - still using shit insulation?
In Cursitor Doom writes:
On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 19:19:25 +0000, Commander Kinsey wrote: CO2 levels are 400ppm at the moment and over a hundred years ago, they were exactly the same. A little research shows up 'climate change' as a con job designed to **** the taxpayer over. Those who espouse it should be in jail for serious fraud. "400ppm at the moment and over a hundred years ago". Really? REALLY? I'd love to see your cite for this. Unless, of course, in the likely case that you pulled this completely out of your ass. -- __________________________________________________ ___ Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key [to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded] |
Freezers - still using shit insulation?
On Wednesday, January 2, 2019 at 9:40:15 PM UTC-5, dkol wrote:
"Cursitor Doom" wrote in message ... On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 19:19:25 +0000, Commander Kinsey wrote: The extra CO2 we've created is still a tiny fraction of what it used to be. Just think about this logically for a moment - before fossil fuels were created, what do you think was creating them? That's right, plants! Plants that were perfectly happy breathing the CO2 rich air! All we're doing is moving the atmosphere back to what it was before fossil fuels were created. We're not magically creating more CO2 that wasn't there before! CO2 levels are 400ppm at the moment Yes. and over a hundred years ago, they were exactly the same. No. https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_res...arbon-dioxide/ +1 The facts are there, yet the deniers post bs. And this rise in co2, unlike any previous rise, happened in just 100 years, not tens of thousands of years. |
Troll-feeding Senile IDIOT Alert!
On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 02:25:58 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Dumb, another brain
damaged, troll-feeding, senile, idiot, blathered: CO2 levels are 400ppm at the moment and over a hundred years ago, they were exactly the same. A little research shows up 'climate change' as a con job designed to **** the taxpayer over. Those who espouse it should be in jail for serious fraud. Looks like the troll's idiocy has rubbed off on you, Cursitor Dumb. I've always warned you seniles on ahr of the power of his idiocy! LOL |
Freezers - still using shit insulation?
On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 02:25:58 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
wrote: On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 19:19:25 +0000, Commander Kinsey wrote: The extra CO2 we've created is still a tiny fraction of what it used to be. Just think about this logically for a moment - before fossil fuels were created, what do you think was creating them? That's right, plants! Plants that were perfectly happy breathing the CO2 rich air! All we're doing is moving the atmosphere back to what it was before fossil fuels were created. We're not magically creating more CO2 that wasn't there before! CO2 levels are 400ppm at the moment and over a hundred years ago, they were exactly the same. A little research shows up 'climate change' as a con job designed to **** the taxpayer over. Those who espouse it should be in jail for serious fraud. You are an imbecile. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
Freezers - still using shit insulation?
So you can present no facts to show it wrong...
all you have is name calling..noted. Guess that makes you the "imbecile." LOL "Pomegranate *******" wrote in message ... : On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 02:25:58 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom : wrote: : : On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 19:19:25 +0000, Commander Kinsey wrote: : : The extra CO2 we've created is still a tiny fraction of what it used to : be. Just think about this logically for a moment - before fossil fuels : were created, what do you think was creating them? That's right, : plants! Plants that were perfectly happy breathing the CO2 rich air! : All we're doing is moving the atmosphere back to what it was before : fossil fuels were created. We're not magically creating more CO2 that : wasn't there before! : : CO2 levels are 400ppm at the moment and over a hundred years ago, they : were exactly the same. A little research shows up 'climate change' as a : con job designed to **** the taxpayer over. Those who espouse it should : be in jail for serious fraud. : : You are an imbecile. : : --- : This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. : https://www.avast.com/antivirus : |
CO2 levels, was: Freezers - still using shit insulation?
In "..shadow, me & my" writes:
So you can present no facts to show it wrong... all you have is name calling..noted. Guess that makes you the "imbecile." I take it you want a second opinion. Ok. You're a moron, too. -- __________________________________________________ ___ Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key [to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded] |
Freezers - still using shit insulation?
On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 15:29:45 -0500, "..shadow, me & my"
wrote: So you can present no facts to show it wrong... all you have is name calling..noted. Guess that makes you the "imbecile." LOL Plenty of evidence here. https://www.co2.earth/21-co2-past Loads more if you spend a couple of minutes looking. Doom is indeed an imbecile and you are an utter imbecile. "Pomegranate *******" wrote in message .. . : On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 02:25:58 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom : wrote: : : On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 19:19:25 +0000, Commander Kinsey wrote: : : The extra CO2 we've created is still a tiny fraction of what it used to : be. Just think about this logically for a moment - before fossil fuels : were created, what do you think was creating them? That's right, : plants! Plants that were perfectly happy breathing the CO2 rich air! : All we're doing is moving the atmosphere back to what it was before : fossil fuels were created. We're not magically creating more CO2 that : wasn't there before! : : CO2 levels are 400ppm at the moment and over a hundred years ago, they : were exactly the same. A little research shows up 'climate change' as a : con job designed to **** the taxpayer over. Those who espouse it should : be in jail for serious fraud. : : You are an imbecile. : : --- : This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. : https://www.avast.com/antivirus : |
Freezers - still using shit insulation?
On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:32:52 -0000, Pomegranate ******* wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 15:29:45 -0500, "..shadow, me & my" wrote: So you can present no facts to show it wrong... all you have is name calling..noted. Guess that makes you the "imbecile." LOL Plenty of evidence here. https://www.co2.earth/21-co2-past Loads more if you spend a couple of minutes looking. Doom is indeed an imbecile and you are an utter imbecile. Alarmist bull**** assuming something would magically go wrong if we increased CO2 levels to what they were perfectly fine at a long long time ago before fossil fuels were formed. So, more abundant plantlife, sounds good to me. "Pomegranate *******" wrote in message ... : On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 02:25:58 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom : wrote: : : On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 19:19:25 +0000, Commander Kinsey wrote: : : The extra CO2 we've created is still a tiny fraction of what it used to : be. Just think about this logically for a moment - before fossil fuels : were created, what do you think was creating them? That's right, : plants! Plants that were perfectly happy breathing the CO2 rich air! : All we're doing is moving the atmosphere back to what it was before : fossil fuels were created. We're not magically creating more CO2 that : wasn't there before! : : CO2 levels are 400ppm at the moment and over a hundred years ago, they : were exactly the same. A little research shows up 'climate change' as a : con job designed to **** the taxpayer over. Those who espouse it should : be in jail for serious fraud. : : You are an imbecile. : : --- : This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. : https://www.avast.com/antivirus : |
Freezers - still using shit insulation?
On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:46:16 -0000, "Commander Kinsey"
wrote: On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:32:52 -0000, Pomegranate ******* wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 15:29:45 -0500, "..shadow, me & my" wrote: So you can present no facts to show it wrong... all you have is name calling..noted. Guess that makes you the "imbecile." LOL Plenty of evidence here. https://www.co2.earth/21-co2-past Loads more if you spend a couple of minutes looking. Doom is indeed an imbecile and you are an utter imbecile. Alarmist bull**** assuming something would magically go wrong if we increased CO2 levels to what they were perfectly fine at a long long time ago before fossil fuels were formed. So, more abundant plantlife, sounds good to me. You are a complete and utter imbecile. "Pomegranate *******" wrote in message ... : On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 02:25:58 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom : wrote: : : On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 19:19:25 +0000, Commander Kinsey wrote: : : The extra CO2 we've created is still a tiny fraction of what it used to : be. Just think about this logically for a moment - before fossil fuels : were created, what do you think was creating them? That's right, : plants! Plants that were perfectly happy breathing the CO2 rich air! : All we're doing is moving the atmosphere back to what it was before : fossil fuels were created. We're not magically creating more CO2 that : wasn't there before! : : CO2 levels are 400ppm at the moment and over a hundred years ago, they : were exactly the same. A little research shows up 'climate change' as a : con job designed to **** the taxpayer over. Those who espouse it should : be in jail for serious fraud. : : You are an imbecile. : : --- : This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. : https://www.avast.com/antivirus : |
Freezers - still using shit insulation?
On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:46:16 -0000, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:32:52 -0000, Pomegranate ******* wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 15:29:45 -0500, "..shadow, me & my" wrote: So you can present no facts to show it wrong... all you have is name calling..noted. Guess that makes you the "imbecile." LOL Plenty of evidence here. https://www.co2.earth/21-co2-past Loads more if you spend a couple of minutes looking. Doom is indeed an imbecile and you are an utter imbecile. Alarmist bull**** assuming something would magically go wrong if we increased CO2 levels to what they were perfectly fine at a long long time ago before fossil fuels were formed. So, more abundant plantlife, sounds good to me. In fact it's even more absurd when you consider the tiny little increase they worry about - 0.3 to 0.4%, when we used to have 4%! "Pomegranate *******" wrote in message ... : On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 02:25:58 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom : wrote: : : On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 19:19:25 +0000, Commander Kinsey wrote: : : The extra CO2 we've created is still a tiny fraction of what it used to : be. Just think about this logically for a moment - before fossil fuels : were created, what do you think was creating them? That's right, : plants! Plants that were perfectly happy breathing the CO2 rich air! : All we're doing is moving the atmosphere back to what it was before : fossil fuels were created. We're not magically creating more CO2 that : wasn't there before! : : CO2 levels are 400ppm at the moment and over a hundred years ago, they : were exactly the same. A little research shows up 'climate change' as a : con job designed to **** the taxpayer over. Those who espouse it should : be in jail for serious fraud. : : You are an imbecile. : : --- : This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. : https://www.avast.com/antivirus : |
Freezers - still using shit insulation?
On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:54:08 -0000, Pomegranate ******* wrote:
On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:46:16 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:32:52 -0000, Pomegranate ******* wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 15:29:45 -0500, "..shadow, me & my" wrote: So you can present no facts to show it wrong... all you have is name calling..noted. Guess that makes you the "imbecile." LOL Plenty of evidence here. https://www.co2.earth/21-co2-past Loads more if you spend a couple of minutes looking. Doom is indeed an imbecile and you are an utter imbecile. Alarmist bull**** assuming something would magically go wrong if we increased CO2 levels to what they were perfectly fine at a long long time ago before fossil fuels were formed. So, more abundant plantlife, sounds good to me. You are a complete and utter imbecile. Oh look, an uninformed stupid treehugger with no reasoning behind his argument. I gave you mine, now give me yours. "Pomegranate *******" wrote in message ... : On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 02:25:58 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom : wrote: : : On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 19:19:25 +0000, Commander Kinsey wrote: : : The extra CO2 we've created is still a tiny fraction of what it used to : be. Just think about this logically for a moment - before fossil fuels : were created, what do you think was creating them? That's right, : plants! Plants that were perfectly happy breathing the CO2 rich air! : All we're doing is moving the atmosphere back to what it was before : fossil fuels were created. We're not magically creating more CO2 that : wasn't there before! : : CO2 levels are 400ppm at the moment and over a hundred years ago, they : were exactly the same. A little research shows up 'climate change' as a : con job designed to **** the taxpayer over. Those who espouse it should : be in jail for serious fraud. : : You are an imbecile. : : --- : This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. : https://www.avast.com/antivirus : |
Freezers - still using shit insulation?
On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 18:00:58 -0000, "Commander Kinsey"
wrote: On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:54:08 -0000, Pomegranate ******* wrote: On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:46:16 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:32:52 -0000, Pomegranate ******* wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 15:29:45 -0500, "..shadow, me & my" wrote: So you can present no facts to show it wrong... all you have is name calling..noted. Guess that makes you the "imbecile." LOL Plenty of evidence here. https://www.co2.earth/21-co2-past Loads more if you spend a couple of minutes looking. Doom is indeed an imbecile and you are an utter imbecile. Alarmist bull**** assuming something would magically go wrong if we increased CO2 levels to what they were perfectly fine at a long long time ago before fossil fuels were formed. So, more abundant plantlife, sounds good to me. You are a complete and utter imbecile. Oh look, an uninformed stupid treehugger with no reasoning behind his argument. I gave you mine, now give me yours. My argument that you are a complete and utter imbecile is self evident and irrefutable. "Pomegranate *******" wrote in message ... : On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 02:25:58 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom : wrote: : : On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 19:19:25 +0000, Commander Kinsey wrote: : : The extra CO2 we've created is still a tiny fraction of what it used to : be. Just think about this logically for a moment - before fossil fuels : were created, what do you think was creating them? That's right, : plants! Plants that were perfectly happy breathing the CO2 rich air! : All we're doing is moving the atmosphere back to what it was before : fossil fuels were created. We're not magically creating more CO2 that : wasn't there before! : : CO2 levels are 400ppm at the moment and over a hundred years ago, they : were exactly the same. A little research shows up 'climate change' as a : con job designed to **** the taxpayer over. Those who espouse it should : be in jail for serious fraud. : : You are an imbecile. : : --- : This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. : https://www.avast.com/antivirus : |
Freezers - still using shit insulation?
On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 18:15:54 -0000, Pomegranate ******* wrote:
On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 18:00:58 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:54:08 -0000, Pomegranate ******* wrote: On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:46:16 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:32:52 -0000, Pomegranate ******* wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 15:29:45 -0500, "..shadow, me & my" wrote: So you can present no facts to show it wrong... all you have is name calling..noted. Guess that makes you the "imbecile." LOL Plenty of evidence here. https://www.co2.earth/21-co2-past Loads more if you spend a couple of minutes looking. Doom is indeed an imbecile and you are an utter imbecile. Alarmist bull**** assuming something would magically go wrong if we increased CO2 levels to what they were perfectly fine at a long long time ago before fossil fuels were formed. So, more abundant plantlife, sounds good to me. You are a complete and utter imbecile. Oh look, an uninformed stupid treehugger with no reasoning behind his argument. I gave you mine, now give me yours. My argument that you are a complete and utter imbecile is self evident and irrefutable. Still no reasoning behind your beliefs about the climate. You're as stupid as someone who believes in god. "Pomegranate *******" wrote in message ... : On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 02:25:58 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom : wrote: : : On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 19:19:25 +0000, Commander Kinsey wrote: : : The extra CO2 we've created is still a tiny fraction of what it used to : be. Just think about this logically for a moment - before fossil fuels : were created, what do you think was creating them? That's right, : plants! Plants that were perfectly happy breathing the CO2 rich air! : All we're doing is moving the atmosphere back to what it was before : fossil fuels were created. We're not magically creating more CO2 that : wasn't there before! : : CO2 levels are 400ppm at the moment and over a hundred years ago, they : were exactly the same. A little research shows up 'climate change' as a : con job designed to **** the taxpayer over. Those who espouse it should : be in jail for serious fraud. : : You are an imbecile. : : --- : This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. : https://www.avast.com/antivirus : |
Freezers - still using shit insulation?
On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 18:21:57 -0000, "Commander Kinsey"
wrote: On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 18:15:54 -0000, Pomegranate ******* wrote: On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 18:00:58 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:54:08 -0000, Pomegranate ******* wrote: On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:46:16 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:32:52 -0000, Pomegranate ******* wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 15:29:45 -0500, "..shadow, me & my" wrote: So you can present no facts to show it wrong... all you have is name calling..noted. Guess that makes you the "imbecile." LOL Plenty of evidence here. https://www.co2.earth/21-co2-past Loads more if you spend a couple of minutes looking. Doom is indeed an imbecile and you are an utter imbecile. Alarmist bull**** assuming something would magically go wrong if we increased CO2 levels to what they were perfectly fine at a long long time ago before fossil fuels were formed. So, more abundant plantlife, sounds good to me. You are a complete and utter imbecile. Oh look, an uninformed stupid treehugger with no reasoning behind his argument. I gave you mine, now give me yours. My argument that you are a complete and utter imbecile is self evident and irrefutable. Still no reasoning behind your beliefs about the climate. You're as stupid as someone who believes in god. You have no idea of my beliefs about the climate. I merely stated that Doom, shadow and you are imbeciles of varying degree. "Pomegranate *******" wrote in message ... : On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 02:25:58 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom : wrote: : : On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 19:19:25 +0000, Commander Kinsey wrote: : : The extra CO2 we've created is still a tiny fraction of what it used to : be. Just think about this logically for a moment - before fossil fuels : were created, what do you think was creating them? That's right, : plants! Plants that were perfectly happy breathing the CO2 rich air! : All we're doing is moving the atmosphere back to what it was before : fossil fuels were created. We're not magically creating more CO2 that : wasn't there before! : : CO2 levels are 400ppm at the moment and over a hundred years ago, they : were exactly the same. A little research shows up 'climate change' as a : con job designed to **** the taxpayer over. Those who espouse it should : be in jail for serious fraud. : : You are an imbecile. : : --- : This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. : https://www.avast.com/antivirus : |
Freezers - still using shit insulation?
On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 18:00:27 -0000, "Commander Kinsey"
wrote: On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:46:16 -0000, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:32:52 -0000, Pomegranate ******* wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 15:29:45 -0500, "..shadow, me & my" wrote: So you can present no facts to show it wrong... all you have is name calling..noted. Guess that makes you the "imbecile." LOL Plenty of evidence here. https://www.co2.earth/21-co2-past Loads more if you spend a couple of minutes looking. Doom is indeed an imbecile and you are an utter imbecile. Alarmist bull**** assuming something would magically go wrong if we increased CO2 levels to what they were perfectly fine at a long long time ago before fossil fuels were formed. So, more abundant plantlife, sounds good to me. In fact it's even more absurd when you consider the tiny little increase they worry about - 0.3 to 0.4%, when we used to have 4%! Perhaps you'd like to spend some time in a room with 4% CO2. "Pomegranate *******" wrote in message ... : On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 02:25:58 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom : wrote: : : On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 19:19:25 +0000, Commander Kinsey wrote: : : The extra CO2 we've created is still a tiny fraction of what it used to : be. Just think about this logically for a moment - before fossil fuels : were created, what do you think was creating them? That's right, : plants! Plants that were perfectly happy breathing the CO2 rich air! : All we're doing is moving the atmosphere back to what it was before : fossil fuels were created. We're not magically creating more CO2 that : wasn't there before! : : CO2 levels are 400ppm at the moment and over a hundred years ago, they : were exactly the same. A little research shows up 'climate change' as a : con job designed to **** the taxpayer over. Those who espouse it should : be in jail for serious fraud. : : You are an imbecile. : : --- : This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. : https://www.avast.com/antivirus : |
bullshit, was: Freezers - still using shit insulation?
On Thu, 03 Jan 2019 02:48:21 +0000, danny burstein wrote:
"400ppm at the moment and over a hundred years ago". Really? REALLY? I'd love to see your cite for this. Unless, of course, in the likely case that you pulled this completely out of your ass. I have it in hard copy from an actual, physical chemistry book published in 1914; just trying to find it referenced online somewhere for your perusal to make things easier. I don't want to damage the flimsy spine trying to scan the relevant page. If I haven't got back within 10 days, by all means feel free to remind me. -- Leave first - THEN negotiate! |
Freezers - still using shit insulation?
On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 18:49:18 -0000, Pomegranate ******* wrote:
On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 18:21:57 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 18:15:54 -0000, Pomegranate ******* wrote: On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 18:00:58 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:54:08 -0000, Pomegranate ******* wrote: On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:46:16 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:32:52 -0000, Pomegranate ******* wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 15:29:45 -0500, "..shadow, me & my" wrote: So you can present no facts to show it wrong... all you have is name calling..noted. Guess that makes you the "imbecile." LOL Plenty of evidence here. https://www.co2.earth/21-co2-past Loads more if you spend a couple of minutes looking. Doom is indeed an imbecile and you are an utter imbecile. Alarmist bull**** assuming something would magically go wrong if we increased CO2 levels to what they were perfectly fine at a long long time ago before fossil fuels were formed. So, more abundant plantlife, sounds good to me. You are a complete and utter imbecile. Oh look, an uninformed stupid treehugger with no reasoning behind his argument. I gave you mine, now give me yours. My argument that you are a complete and utter imbecile is self evident and irrefutable. Still no reasoning behind your beliefs about the climate. You're as stupid as someone who believes in god. You have no idea of my beliefs about the climate. I merely stated that Doom, shadow and you are imbeciles of varying degree. You gave a link to the co2.earth website, which I assume agrees with you or you wouldn't have posted it. "Pomegranate *******" wrote in message ... : On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 02:25:58 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom : wrote: : : On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 19:19:25 +0000, Commander Kinsey wrote: : : The extra CO2 we've created is still a tiny fraction of what it used to : be. Just think about this logically for a moment - before fossil fuels : were created, what do you think was creating them? That's right, : plants! Plants that were perfectly happy breathing the CO2 rich air! : All we're doing is moving the atmosphere back to what it was before : fossil fuels were created. We're not magically creating more CO2 that : wasn't there before! : : CO2 levels are 400ppm at the moment and over a hundred years ago, they : were exactly the same. A little research shows up 'climate change' as a : con job designed to **** the taxpayer over. Those who espouse it should : be in jail for serious fraud. : : You are an imbecile. : : --- : This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. : https://www.avast.com/antivirus : |
Freezers - still using shit insulation?
On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 18:50:26 -0000, Pomegranate ******* wrote:
On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 18:00:27 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:46:16 -0000, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 17:32:52 -0000, Pomegranate ******* wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 15:29:45 -0500, "..shadow, me & my" wrote: So you can present no facts to show it wrong... all you have is name calling..noted. Guess that makes you the "imbecile." LOL Plenty of evidence here. https://www.co2.earth/21-co2-past Loads more if you spend a couple of minutes looking. Doom is indeed an imbecile and you are an utter imbecile. Alarmist bull**** assuming something would magically go wrong if we increased CO2 levels to what they were perfectly fine at a long long time ago before fossil fuels were formed. So, more abundant plantlife, sounds good to me. In fact it's even more absurd when you consider the tiny little increase they worry about - 0.3 to 0.4%, when we used to have 4%! Perhaps you'd like to spend some time in a room with 4% CO2. Perhaps you'd care to explain how animals lived before fossil fuels were created. Sure, if I went into a room at 4% right now, I'd probably feel drowsy or get a headache. But if it happened over decades, I'd get used to it. "Pomegranate *******" wrote in message ... : On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 02:25:58 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom : wrote: : : On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 19:19:25 +0000, Commander Kinsey wrote: : : The extra CO2 we've created is still a tiny fraction of what it used to : be. Just think about this logically for a moment - before fossil fuels : were created, what do you think was creating them? That's right, : plants! Plants that were perfectly happy breathing the CO2 rich air! : All we're doing is moving the atmosphere back to what it was before : fossil fuels were created. We're not magically creating more CO2 that : wasn't there before! : : CO2 levels are 400ppm at the moment and over a hundred years ago, they : were exactly the same. A little research shows up 'climate change' as a : con job designed to **** the taxpayer over. Those who espouse it should : be in jail for serious fraud. : : You are an imbecile. : : --- : This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. : https://www.avast.com/antivirus : |
Freezers - still using shit insulation?
On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 19:29:36 +0000, Commander Kinsey wrote:
Perhaps you'd care to explain how animals lived before fossil fuels were created. Sure, if I went into a room at 4% right now, I'd probably feel drowsy or get a headache. But if it happened over decades, I'd get used to it. You might or might not. But your decedents would. Eventually. -- Leave first - THEN negotiate! |
Troll-feeding Senile IDIOT Alert!
On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 22:21:56 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Dumb, another brain
damaged, troll-feeding, senile, idiot, blathered: drowsy or get a headache. But if it happened over decades, I'd get used to it. You might or might not. But your decedents would. Eventually. Like I said: the troll's idiocy obviously has rubbed off on you ...rather quickly, I have to say! With other seniles it usually takes a bit longer! BG |
Freezers - still using shit insulation?
On Sat, 05 Jan 2019 22:21:56 -0000, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Fri, 04 Jan 2019 19:29:36 +0000, Commander Kinsey wrote: Perhaps you'd care to explain how animals lived before fossil fuels were created. Sure, if I went into a room at 4% right now, I'd probably feel drowsy or get a headache. But if it happened over decades, I'd get used to it. You might or might not. But your decedents would. Eventually. I don't believe it would take that long. We get used to different temperatures and oxygen levels very quickly, just look up altitude training. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter