A Very British Response to Terror
 

*New York Times report*

"These moments encapsulated something about Britains calm, defiant
response to the threat of terror. Even as we face an increasing number
of attacks, we are learning to cope with grief, loss and violence in our
own way".

"In the face of this, were choosing vigilance, calm and just a little
bit of humor. And any fear projected on to us will be met with a very
British response: Sarcasm".

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/04/o...l-right-region

We won't be intimidated :-)

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On Monday, June 5, 2017 at 3:40:45 AM UTC-7, Bod wrote:
*New York Times report*

"These moments encapsulated something about Britains calm, defiant
response to the threat of terror. Even as we face an increasing number
of attacks, we are learning to cope with grief, loss and violence in our
own way".

"In the face of this, were choosing vigilance, calm and just a little
bit of humor. And any fear projected on to us will be met with a very
British response: Sarcasm".

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/04/o...l-right-region

We won't be intimidated :-)

x

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 11:40:40 +0100, Bod wrote:

*New York Times report*

"These moments encapsulated something about Britains calm, defiant
response to the threat of terror. Even as we face an increasing number
of attacks, we are learning to cope with grief, loss and violence in our
own way".

"In the face of this, were choosing vigilance, calm and just a little
bit of humor. And any fear projected on to us will be met with a very
British response: Sarcasm".

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/04/o...l-right-region

We won't be intimidated :-)

Translation, we're doing **** all about it, instead of what we should be doing, blowing the **** out of their country.

--
Clair Frisby talking about a jumbo hot dog on Look North said: "There's nothing like a big hot sausage inside you on a cold night like this."

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On 06/05/2017 07:21 AM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:


Translation, we're doing **** all about it, instead of what we should be
doing, blowing the **** out of their country.

It will be interesting to see what May's interpretation of Ya basta! is.

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On 6/5/2017 9:21 AM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 11:40:40 +0100, Bod wrote:

*New York Times report*

"These moments encapsulated something about Britains calm, defiant
response to the threat of terror. Even as we face an increasing number
of attacks, we are learning to cope with grief, loss and violence in our
own way".

"In the face of this, were choosing vigilance, calm and just a little
bit of humor. And any fear projected on to us will be met with a very
British response: Sarcasm".

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/04/o...l-right-region


We won't be intimidated :-)

Translation, we're doing **** all about it, instead of what we should be
doing, blowing the **** out of their country.


First rid yourself of the vermin in your house. Then go clean other houses.

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 19:00:20 +0100, Frank "frank wrote:

On 6/5/2017 9:21 AM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 11:40:40 +0100, Bod wrote:

*New York Times report*

"These moments encapsulated something about Britains calm, defiant
response to the threat of terror. Even as we face an increasing number
of attacks, we are learning to cope with grief, loss and violence in our
own way".

"In the face of this, were choosing vigilance, calm and just a little
bit of humor. And any fear projected on to us will be met with a very
British response: Sarcasm".

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/04/o...l-right-region


We won't be intimidated :-)

Translation, we're doing **** all about it, instead of what we should be
doing, blowing the **** out of their country.


First rid yourself of the vermin in your house. Then go clean other houses.

What?

--
Our parents got divorced when we were kids and it was kind of cool.

We got to go to divorce court with them. It was like a game show. My mom won the house and car. We're all excited. My dad got some luggage.

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 11:40:40 +0100, Bod wrote:

We won't be intimidated :-)

Wrong. The new thing is Run, Hide and Tell. When will you Brit's
decide to Confront, Fight and Kill?

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On 6/5/2017 2:29 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 19:00:20 +0100, Frank "frank wrote:

On 6/5/2017 9:21 AM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 11:40:40 +0100, Bod wrote:

*New York Times report*

"These moments encapsulated something about Britains calm, defiant
response to the threat of terror. Even as we face an increasing number
of attacks, we are learning to cope with grief, loss and violence in
our
own way".

"In the face of this, were choosing vigilance, calm and just a little
bit of humor. And any fear projected on to us will be met with a very
British response: Sarcasm".

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/04/o...l-right-region



We won't be intimidated :-)

Translation, we're doing **** all about it, instead of what we should be
doing, blowing the **** out of their country.


First rid yourself of the vermin in your house. Then go clean other
houses.

What?

Aren't you going to close down all the Mosques where Imams are teaching
hate. You have already been infiltrated. As soon as something occurs
your police know who else is to blame because they have been watching
them. You get rid of all these first, then go after the outside source.

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 19:55:10 +0100, Frank "frank wrote:

On 6/5/2017 2:29 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 19:00:20 +0100, Frank "frank wrote:

On 6/5/2017 9:21 AM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 11:40:40 +0100, Bod wrote:

*New York Times report*

"These moments encapsulated something about Britains calm, defiant
response to the threat of terror. Even as we face an increasing number
of attacks, we are learning to cope with grief, loss and violence in
our
own way".

"In the face of this, were choosing vigilance, calm and just a little
bit of humor. And any fear projected on to us will be met with a very
British response: Sarcasm".

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/04/o...l-right-region



We won't be intimidated :-)

Translation, we're doing **** all about it, instead of what we should be
doing, blowing the **** out of their country.


First rid yourself of the vermin in your house. Then go clean other
houses.

What?

Aren't you going to close down all the Mosques where Imams are teaching
hate. You have already been infiltrated. As soon as something occurs
your police know who else is to blame because they have been watching
them. You get rid of all these first, then go after the outside source.

Both need to be done urgently.

--
A fat girl served me in McDonald's at lunchtime. She said "sorry about the wait". I said, "Don't worry, you'll find a way to lose it eventually"

A Very British Response to Terror
 

Oren wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 11:40:40 +0100, Bod wrote:

We won't be intimidated :-)

Wrong. The new thing is Run, Hide and Tell. When will you Brit's
decide to Confront, Fight and Kill?

Nar, we will have a concert instead of confronting, fighting and killing
these arseholes. And most will love it.
Right up Bod's street it that, little yellow caravan dweller.

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On 6/5/2017 9:21 AM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 11:40:40 +0100, Bod wrote:

*New York Times report*

"These moments encapsulated something about Britains calm, defiant
response to the threat of terror. Even as we face an increasing number
of attacks, we are learning to cope with grief, loss and violence in our
own way".

"In the face of this, were choosing vigilance, calm and just a little
bit of humor. And any fear projected on to us will be met with a very
British response: Sarcasm".

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/04/o...l-right-region


We won't be intimidated :-)

Translation, we're doing **** all about it, instead of what we should be
doing, blowing the **** out of their country.



That was my thought. In other words, it's a pacifist approach and do
**** about it because they are a weak nation. I bet the family of those
who were killed aren't choosing vigilance, staying calm and laughing
with sarcasm.

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On 6/5/2017 6:40 AM, Bod wrote:


We won't be intimidated :-)


ROFLMFAO! Yea, sure you won't. As the list of terrorist attacks grow,
your country will be laughing their asses off with sarcastic humor and
the terrorists will be laughing their asses off at the simplicity of
doing so.

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 22:33:31 +0100, Meanie wrote:

On 6/5/2017 9:21 AM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 11:40:40 +0100, Bod wrote:

*New York Times report*

"These moments encapsulated something about Britains calm, defiant
response to the threat of terror. Even as we face an increasing number
of attacks, we are learning to cope with grief, loss and violence in our
own way".

"In the face of this, were choosing vigilance, calm and just a little
bit of humor. And any fear projected on to us will be met with a very
British response: Sarcasm".

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/04/o...l-right-region


We won't be intimidated :-)

Translation, we're doing **** all about it, instead of what we should be
doing, blowing the **** out of their country.

That was my thought. In other words, it's a pacifist approach and do
**** about it because they are a weak nation. I bet the family of those
who were killed aren't choosing vigilance, staying calm and laughing
with sarcasm.

The only people laughing are the Muslims, at how little we're doing to retaliate. And to think Britain used to have an empire. I'm ashamed to be British.

--
If you lose your keys, attempt to drown yourself in a basin of water. Your life will flash before your eyes. Eventually you'll remember the part where you last had your keys.

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On 6/5/2017 3:59 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 19:55:10 +0100, Frank "frank wrote:

On 6/5/2017 2:29 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 19:00:20 +0100, Frank "frank wrote:

On 6/5/2017 9:21 AM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 11:40:40 +0100, Bod wrote:

*New York Times report*

"These moments encapsulated something about Britains calm, defiant
response to the threat of terror. Even as we face an increasing
number
of attacks, we are learning to cope with grief, loss and violence in
our
own way".

"In the face of this, were choosing vigilance, calm and just a
little
bit of humor. And any fear projected on to us will be met with a very
British response: Sarcasm".

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/04/o...l-right-region




We won't be intimidated :-)

Translation, we're doing **** all about it, instead of what we
should be
doing, blowing the **** out of their country.


First rid yourself of the vermin in your house. Then go clean other
houses.

What?

Aren't you going to close down all the Mosques where Imams are teaching
hate. You have already been infiltrated. As soon as something occurs
your police know who else is to blame because they have been watching
them. You get rid of all these first, then go after the outside source.

Both need to be done urgently.


Apparently European muzzies are worse than the ones that come here.
Also to monitor one suspicious person round the clock costs maybe half
million dollars. Even just extreme vetting for one to get in costs
about $60,000.

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On 6/5/2017 6:18 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 22:33:31 +0100, Meanie wrote:

On 6/5/2017 9:21 AM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 11:40:40 +0100, Bod wrote:

*New York Times report*

"These moments encapsulated something about Britains calm, defiant
response to the threat of terror. Even as we face an increasing number
of attacks, we are learning to cope with grief, loss and violence in
our
own way".

"In the face of this, were choosing vigilance, calm and just a little
bit of humor. And any fear projected on to us will be met with a very
British response: Sarcasm".

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/04/o...l-right-region



We won't be intimidated :-)

Translation, we're doing **** all about it, instead of what we should be
doing, blowing the **** out of their country.

That was my thought. In other words, it's a pacifist approach and do
**** about it because they are a weak nation. I bet the family of those
who were killed aren't choosing vigilance, staying calm and laughing
with sarcasm.

The only people laughing are the Muslims, at how little we're doing to
retaliate. And to think Britain used to have an empire. I'm ashamed
to be British.

Don't forget, you have a lot on your side and we got rid of our muzzie
tutored leader.

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 23:47:06 +0100, Frank "frank wrote:

On 6/5/2017 6:18 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 22:33:31 +0100, Meanie wrote:

On 6/5/2017 9:21 AM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 11:40:40 +0100, Bod wrote:

*New York Times report*

"These moments encapsulated something about Britains calm, defiant
response to the threat of terror. Even as we face an increasing number
of attacks, we are learning to cope with grief, loss and violence in
our
own way".

"In the face of this, were choosing vigilance, calm and just a little
bit of humor. And any fear projected on to us will be met with a very
British response: Sarcasm".

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/04/o...l-right-region



We won't be intimidated :-)

Translation, we're doing **** all about it, instead of what we should be
doing, blowing the **** out of their country.

That was my thought. In other words, it's a pacifist approach and do
**** about it because they are a weak nation. I bet the family of those
who were killed aren't choosing vigilance, staying calm and laughing
with sarcasm.

The only people laughing are the Muslims, at how little we're doing to
retaliate. And to think Britain used to have an empire. I'm ashamed
to be British.

Don't forget, you have a lot on your side and we got rid of our muzzie
tutored leader.

I can't believe you guys voted him in!

--
People are more violently opposed to fur than leather because it's safer to harass rich women than motorcycle gangs.

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On 06/05/2017 04:18 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
The only people laughing are the Muslims, at how little we're doing to
retaliate. And to think Britain used to have an empire. I'm ashamed
to be British.

Two unnecessary wars killed off the best leaving you with Dim from
'Clockwork orange'.

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On 06/05/2017 05:33 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
I can't believe you guys voted him in!

Consider the alternative choices; a senile warmonger followed by a card
carrying member of the 1%. The Republicans would have lost this time
too but Trump blind-sided them. Jeb Milquetoat was supposed to be the
candidate.

A Very British Response to Terror
 

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/04/o...l-right-region




We won't be intimidated :-)

Translation, we're doing **** all about it, instead of what we
should be
doing, blowing the **** out of their country.


First rid yourself of the vermin in your house. Then go clean other
houses.

What?

Aren't you going to close down all the Mosques where Imams are teaching
hate. You have already been infiltrated. As soon as something occurs
your police know who else is to blame because they have been watching
them. You get rid of all these first, then go after the outside source.

Both need to be done urgently.


Apparently European muzzies are worse than the ones that come here.
Also to monitor one suspicious person round the clock costs maybe half
million dollars. Even just extreme vetting for one to get in costs
about $60,000.

You mean that our terrorists do worse than flying planes into
skyscrapers etc and killing 3000 odd people !
Have you forgotten that already?

A Very British Response to Terror
 

The attacks in the US have decreased while they have increased in the
UK. Thus, we are safer than you. Who truly isn't intimidated?


Your perception is wrong, terrorism is up in the UK *and* the USA:

According to two big databases, the number of people who died in terror
attacks in North America and Western Europe rose markedly in 2015,
claiming more than 200 lives. This year, according to one count, it is
on track to be even worse.

But terrorism in the West is rare. In the parts of the world where it is
more common €” deaths in those regions are in the thousands rather than
the dozens €” terror attacks appear to be decreasing.

And as bad as terrorism has been in the West recently, it was worse in
the 1970s and 1980s.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/16/u...-world-no.html

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On 6/6/2017 5:56 AM, Meanie wrote:

Also, we have a president who many simple minded liberals dislike
because he wants to do something about this issue and blatantly says so,
as many citizens back up his ideas. He's not saying we will approach
this with laughter or sarcasm. He, along with many of us are willing to
take drastic approaches.

The attacks in the US have decreased while they have increased in the
UK. Thus, we are safer than you. Who truly isn't intimidated?



+100

--
Maggie

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On 06/06/2017 14:37, Muggles wrote:
On 6/6/2017 5:56 AM, Meanie wrote:

Also, we have a president who many simple minded liberals dislike
because he wants to do something about this issue and blatantly says so,
as many citizens back up his ideas. He's not saying we will approach
this with laughter or sarcasm. He, along with many of us are willing to
take drastic approaches.

The attacks in the US have decreased while they have increased in the
UK. Thus, we are safer than you. Who truly isn't intimidated?



+100

Hmm! Are you sure? You create your own mass shootings. to make up for it.

1,000 mass shootings in 1,260 days.
https://www.theguardian.com ۼ US News ۼ US gun control
14 Jun 2016 - Sunday's attack on the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Florida
was the deadliest mass shooting in American history €“ but there were
five other ...

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 10:43:09 -0600, rbowman wrote:

On 06/06/2017 05:11 AM, Bod wrote:

And as bad as terrorism has been in the West recently, it was worse in
the 1970s and 1980s.

In the '70s and '80s you had an assortment of nutters. In the 21st
century you can describe the source more succinctly.

The biggest terroist threat was when the Brit's showed up at
Lexington and Concord.

Folks had to hide guns & powder. Then fight the limeys again in
'Narleans.

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 09:50:30 -0700 (PDT), trader_4
wrote:

On Tuesday, June 6, 2017 at 12:41:05 PM UTC-4, rbowman wrote:
On 06/06/2017 05:11 AM, Bod wrote:

And as bad as terrorism has been in the West recently, it was worse in
the 1970s and 1980s.

In the '70s and '80s you had an assortment of nutters. In the 21st
century you can describe the source more succinctly.

I'd like to see the basis and metrics for the claim that terrorism was
worse in the 70s and 80s. It certainly was not worse here in the USA.

At the time we were mostly dealing airline highjackers. Dropped a few
off in Havana.

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 21:14:09 +0100, Bod wrote:

I don't get your strange logic. I just don't want nor need one, it's
nothing to do with fear. If anyone needs to carry a deadly weapon on
them, then it is they that have the fear.

Of course not. You have never been around dangerous critters. You
limeys think a sharp stick will poke your eye out while a swamp
creature gobbles you up.

Don't like guns, trust your government to protect you, fine. I'm not
that ****in' dumb. I could take you places and laugh when you ****
your diaper.

I have never encountered people like those.

I rest my case. I have. Some people need killin'.

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On 6/6/2017 11:43 AM, Bod wrote:
On 06/06/2017 14:37, Muggles wrote:
On 6/6/2017 5:56 AM, Meanie wrote:

Also, we have a president who many simple minded liberals dislike
because he wants to do something about this issue and blatantly says so,
as many citizens back up his ideas. He's not saying we will approach
this with laughter or sarcasm. He, along with many of us are willing to
take drastic approaches.

The attacks in the US have decreased while they have increased in the
UK. Thus, we are safer than you. Who truly isn't intimidated?



+100

Hmm! Are you sure? You create your own mass shootings. to make up for it.

1,000 mass shootings in 1,260 days.
https://www.theguardian.com ۼ US News ۼ US gun control
14 Jun 2016 - Sunday's attack on the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Florida
was the deadliest mass shooting in American history €“ but there were
five other ...


LMFAO! Of course a spin attempt to avoid the terrorist facts. Stick to
the topic.

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On 6/6/2017 7:11 AM, Bod wrote:

The attacks in the US have decreased while they have increased in the
UK. Thus, we are safer than you. Who truly isn't intimidated?


Your perception is wrong, terrorism is up in the UK *and* the USA:

According to two big databases, the number of people who died in terror
attacks in North America and Western Europe rose markedly in 2015,
claiming more than 200 lives. This year, according to one count, it is
on track to be even worse.

But terrorism in the West is rare. In the parts of the world where it is
more common €” deaths in those regions are in the thousands rather than
the dozens €” terror attacks appear to be decreasing.

And as bad as terrorism has been in the West recently, it was worse in
the 1970s and 1980s.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/16/u...-world-no.html


How interesting...."according to "two" big databases".... which
ironically aren't provided.

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On 06/06/2017 02:52 PM, Oren wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 09:50:30 -0700 (PDT), trader_4
wrote:

On Tuesday, June 6, 2017 at 12:41:05 PM UTC-4, rbowman wrote:
On 06/06/2017 05:11 AM, Bod wrote:

And as bad as terrorism has been in the West recently, it was worse in
the 1970s and 1980s.

In the '70s and '80s you had an assortment of nutters. In the 21st
century you can describe the source more succinctly.

I'd like to see the basis and metrics for the claim that terrorism was
worse in the 70s and 80s. It certainly was not worse here in the USA.

At the time we were mostly dealing airline highjackers. Dropped a few
off in Havana.


My future wife and I flew out of Memphis in December of '68. The
stewardess came up to us barely able to suppress a fit of giggles. "That
lady three rows in front asked if you're going to hijack the plane to
Cuba. You wouldn't do that, would you?" Long hair, beard, leather jacket
with a peace sign dangling from the pull. Yeah, we were terrorists.
Still have long hair, a beard, and a leather jacket but now I'm a
deplorable.

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On 6/6/2017 5:03 PM, rbowman wrote:
On 06/06/2017 02:52 PM, Oren wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 09:50:30 -0700 (PDT), trader_4
wrote:

On Tuesday, June 6, 2017 at 12:41:05 PM UTC-4, rbowman wrote:
On 06/06/2017 05:11 AM, Bod wrote:

And as bad as terrorism has been in the West recently, it was
worse in
the 1970s and 1980s.

In the '70s and '80s you had an assortment of nutters. In the 21st
century you can describe the source more succinctly.

I'd like to see the basis and metrics for the claim that terrorism was
worse in the 70s and 80s. It certainly was not worse here in the USA.

At the time we were mostly dealing airline highjackers. Dropped a few
off in Havana.


My future wife and I flew out of Memphis in December of '68. The
stewardess came up to us barely able to suppress a fit of giggles.
"That lady three rows in front asked if you're going to hijack the
plane to Cuba. You wouldn't do that, would you?" Long hair, beard,
leather jacket with a peace sign dangling from the pull. Yeah, we were
terrorists. Still have long hair, a beard, and a leather jacket but
now I'm a deplorable.

Black leather ? ARrrrr , how much for the little girrrrrlllllll ...

--

Snag

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On Monday, June 5, 2017 at 9:21:59 AM UTC-4, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

We won't be intimidated :-)

Translation, we're doing **** all about it, instead of what we should be
doing, blowing the **** out of their country.


They should be changing their bull**** immigration policies.

A Very British Response to Terror
 

Don't like guns, trust your government to protect you, fine. I'm not
that ****in' dumb. I could take you places and laugh when you ****
your diaper.

I have never encountered people like those.

I haven't lately now that I have no need to visit the cesspools many
large American cities have become.

I have to go to Memphis Thursday ... lately I've opted for
concealability over firepower when I feel the need to pack . Davis
Industries used to make (might still) a .38 Spl 2-shooter that would fit
nicely in the back pocket of your jeans .

--

Snag


My wife and I spent 3 days in Memphis (without a gun) about 10 years
ago and survived :-)

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On 06/07/2017 12:55 AM, Bod wrote:

Don't like guns, trust your government to protect you, fine. I'm not
that ****in' dumb. I could take you places and laugh when you ****
your diaper.

I have never encountered people like those.

I haven't lately now that I have no need to visit the cesspools many
large American cities have become.

I have to go to Memphis Thursday ... lately I've opted for
concealability over firepower when I feel the need to pack . Davis
Industries used to make (might still) a .38 Spl 2-shooter that would
fit nicely in the back pocket of your jeans .

--

Snag


My wife and I spent 3 days in Memphis (without a gun) about 10 years
ago and survived :-)

If you are white, there are areas of Chicago you wouldn't last 15
minutes. The blacks there are extremely intolerant of white people.

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On 07/06/2017 09:47, Jack wrote:
On 06/07/2017 12:55 AM, Bod wrote:

Don't like guns, trust your government to protect you, fine. I'm not
that ****in' dumb. I could take you places and laugh when you ****
your diaper.

I have never encountered people like those.

I haven't lately now that I have no need to visit the cesspools many
large American cities have become.

I have to go to Memphis Thursday ... lately I've opted for
concealability over firepower when I feel the need to pack . Davis
Industries used to make (might still) a .38 Spl 2-shooter that would
fit nicely in the back pocket of your jeans .

--

Snag


My wife and I spent 3 days in Memphis (without a gun) about 10 years
ago and survived :-)

If you are white, there are areas of Chicago you wouldn't last 15
minutes. The blacks there are extremely intolerant of white people.

So I've heard. Best avoided.

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On 6/6/2017 11:55 PM, Bod wrote:

Don't like guns, trust your government to protect you, fine. I'm not
that ****in' dumb. I could take you places and laugh when you ****
your diaper.

I have never encountered people like those.

I haven't lately now that I have no need to visit the cesspools many
large American cities have become.

I have to go to Memphis Thursday ... lately I've opted for
concealability over firepower when I feel the need to pack . Davis
Industries used to make (might still) a .38 Spl 2-shooter that would
fit nicely in the back pocket of your jeans .

--

Snag


My wife and I spent 3 days in Memphis (without a gun) about 10 years
ago and survived :-)

Our house in Memphis (that our son and his family live in) is in an
area that tourists don't go ... not the worst area but bad enough . You
were probably on/near Beale Street and the downtown area , which sees
about six times the police presence of the average neighborhood . Gotta
protect them tourons and their dollars .

--

Snag

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On 07/06/2017 12:41, Terry Coombs wrote:
On 6/6/2017 11:55 PM, Bod wrote:

Don't like guns, trust your government to protect you, fine. I'm not
that ****in' dumb. I could take you places and laugh when you ****
your diaper.

I have never encountered people like those.

I haven't lately now that I have no need to visit the cesspools many
large American cities have become.

I have to go to Memphis Thursday ... lately I've opted for
concealability over firepower when I feel the need to pack . Davis
Industries used to make (might still) a .38 Spl 2-shooter that would
fit nicely in the back pocket of your jeans .

--

Snag


My wife and I spent 3 days in Memphis (without a gun) about 10 years
ago and survived :-)

Our house in Memphis (that our son and his family live in) is in an
area that tourists don't go ... not the worst area but bad enough . You
were probably on/near Beale Street and the downtown area , which sees
about six times the police presence of the average neighborhood . Gotta
protect them tourons and their dollars .

--

Snag

We didn't even get to Beale street, my wife wasn't feeling well at the
time, so we didn't go there. We just hung around in and near the
Heartbreak hotel.

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On 6/7/2017 6:46 AM, Bod wrote:
On 07/06/2017 12:41, Terry Coombs wrote:
On 6/6/2017 11:55 PM, Bod wrote:

Don't like guns, trust your government to protect you, fine. I'm
not
that ****in' dumb. I could take you places and laugh when you ****
your diaper.

I have never encountered people like those.

I haven't lately now that I have no need to visit the cesspools
many large American cities have become.

I have to go to Memphis Thursday ... lately I've opted for
concealability over firepower when I feel the need to pack . Davis
Industries used to make (might still) a .38 Spl 2-shooter that
would fit nicely in the back pocket of your jeans .

--

Snag


My wife and I spent 3 days in Memphis (without a gun) about 10
years ago and survived :-)

Our house in Memphis (that our son and his family live in) is in
an area that tourists don't go ... not the worst area but bad enough
. You were probably on/near Beale Street and the downtown area ,
which sees about six times the police presence of the average
neighborhood . Gotta protect them tourons and their dollars .

--

Snag

We didn't even get to Beale street, my wife wasn't feeling well at the
time, so we didn't go there. We just hung around in and near the
Heartbreak hotel.

You just made my point . I have had more than one experience where
being armed has changed the outcome of a situation . I've never had to
draw a weapon , just the fact that it was there changed the potential
predator's mind .

--

Snag

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On 07/06/2017 13:26, Terry Coombs wrote:
On 6/7/2017 6:46 AM, Bod wrote:
On 07/06/2017 12:41, Terry Coombs wrote:
On 6/6/2017 11:55 PM, Bod wrote:

Don't like guns, trust your government to protect you, fine. I'm
not
that ****in' dumb. I could take you places and laugh when you ****
your diaper.

I have never encountered people like those.

I haven't lately now that I have no need to visit the cesspools
many large American cities have become.

I have to go to Memphis Thursday ... lately I've opted for
concealability over firepower when I feel the need to pack . Davis
Industries used to make (might still) a .38 Spl 2-shooter that
would fit nicely in the back pocket of your jeans .

--

Snag


My wife and I spent 3 days in Memphis (without a gun) about 10
years ago and survived :-)

Our house in Memphis (that our son and his family live in) is in
an area that tourists don't go ... not the worst area but bad enough
. You were probably on/near Beale Street and the downtown area ,
which sees about six times the police presence of the average
neighborhood . Gotta protect them tourons and their dollars .

--

Snag

We didn't even get to Beale street, my wife wasn't feeling well at the
time, so we didn't go there. We just hung around in and near the
Heartbreak hotel.

You just made my point . I have had more than one experience where
being armed has changed the outcome of a situation . I've never had to
draw a weapon , just the fact that it was there changed the potential
predator's mind .

--

Snag

Ok.

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On 06/07/2017 02:57 AM, Bod wrote:
On 07/06/2017 09:47, Jack wrote:
On 06/07/2017 12:55 AM, Bod wrote:

Don't like guns, trust your government to protect you, fine. I'm not
that ****in' dumb. I could take you places and laugh when you ****
your diaper.

I have never encountered people like those.

I haven't lately now that I have no need to visit the cesspools
many large American cities have become.

I have to go to Memphis Thursday ... lately I've opted for
concealability over firepower when I feel the need to pack . Davis
Industries used to make (might still) a .38 Spl 2-shooter that would
fit nicely in the back pocket of your jeans .

--

Snag


My wife and I spent 3 days in Memphis (without a gun) about 10 years
ago and survived :-)

If you are white, there are areas of Chicago you wouldn't last 15
minutes. The blacks there are extremely intolerant of white people.

So I've heard. Best avoided.

Memphis is the same. Go to Graceland. See the Pyramid. Don't stray from
the tourist areas. The first time I was in Chicago, around 1973, the
hotel clerk said 'Enjoy your stay. Just don't go south of Roosevelt
Road.' I wanted to visit a friend at the University, which is a little
enclave south of Jungleland, so I had to traverse it.

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On 06/07/2017 05:41 AM, Terry Coombs wrote:
On 6/6/2017 11:55 PM, Bod wrote:

Don't like guns, trust your government to protect you, fine. I'm not
that ****in' dumb. I could take you places and laugh when you ****
your diaper.

I have never encountered people like those.

I haven't lately now that I have no need to visit the cesspools many
large American cities have become.

I have to go to Memphis Thursday ... lately I've opted for
concealability over firepower when I feel the need to pack . Davis
Industries used to make (might still) a .38 Spl 2-shooter that would
fit nicely in the back pocket of your jeans .

--

Snag


My wife and I spent 3 days in Memphis (without a gun) about 10 years
ago and survived :-)

Our house in Memphis (that our son and his family live in) is in an
area that tourists don't go ... not the worst area but bad enough . You
were probably on/near Beale Street and the downtown area , which sees
about six times the police presence of the average neighborhood . Gotta
protect them tourons and their dollars .

I don't know how it is post-Katrina but NO was the same deal. Enjoy the
French Quarter. Don't wander outside the cordon.

A Very British Response to Terror
 

On 07/06/2017 14:35, rbowman wrote:
On 06/07/2017 02:57 AM, Bod wrote:
On 07/06/2017 09:47, Jack wrote:
On 06/07/2017 12:55 AM, Bod wrote:

Don't like guns, trust your government to protect you, fine. I'm
not
that ****in' dumb. I could take you places and laugh when you ****
your diaper.

I have never encountered people like those.

I haven't lately now that I have no need to visit the cesspools
many large American cities have become.

I have to go to Memphis Thursday ... lately I've opted for
concealability over firepower when I feel the need to pack . Davis
Industries used to make (might still) a .38 Spl 2-shooter that would
fit nicely in the back pocket of your jeans .

--

Snag


My wife and I spent 3 days in Memphis (without a gun) about 10 years
ago and survived :-)

If you are white, there are areas of Chicago you wouldn't last 15
minutes. The blacks there are extremely intolerant of white people.

So I've heard. Best avoided.

Memphis is the same. Go to Graceland. See the Pyramid. Don't stray from
the tourist areas. The first time I was in Chicago, around 1973, the
hotel clerk said 'Enjoy your stay. Just don't go south of Roosevelt
Road.' I wanted to visit a friend at the University, which is a little
enclave south of Jungleland, so I had to traverse it.

Lol.