|
2.5 mil and still counting
|
2.5 mil and still counting
wrote: http://time.com/4587158/clinton-lead...million-votes/ ouch! Trump still wins!!!!!!! Ha, Ha.... |
2.5 mil and still counting
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 06:57:20 -0600, #NoDAPL
wrote: http://time.com/4587158/clinton-lead...million-votes/ ouch! Even if she ends up with a 10 million vote margin, it will not make one bit of difference beyond illustrating that Trump does not have overwhelming national popular support. |
2.5 mil and still counting
On 12/2/2016 7:59 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 06:57:20 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: http://time.com/4587158/clinton-lead...million-votes/ ouch! Even if she ends up with a 10 million vote margin, it will not make one bit of difference beyond illustrating that Trump does not have overwhelming national popular support. I've heard the final count is est. around 3 mill. good time article. I think the NYT has a problem with trumpy. They didn't like his meet-and-greet. LOL Journalist don't like to be told what to write. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/01/us...hast.html?_r=0 like i said "new normal" |
2.5 mil and still counting
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 08:08:50 -0600, #NoDAPL
wrote: On 12/2/2016 7:59 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 06:57:20 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: http://time.com/4587158/clinton-lead...million-votes/ ouch! Even if she ends up with a 10 million vote margin, it will not make one bit of difference beyond illustrating that Trump does not have overwhelming national popular support. I've heard the final count is est. around 3 mill. good time article. See my comment above. |
2.5 mil and still counting
On 12/2/2016 8:22 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 08:08:50 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: On 12/2/2016 7:59 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 06:57:20 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: http://time.com/4587158/clinton-lead...million-votes/ ouch! Even if she ends up with a 10 million vote margin, it will not make one bit of difference beyond illustrating that Trump does not have overwhelming national popular support. I've heard the final count is est. around 3 mill. good time article. See my comment above. did u read the article? You Know it's effecting the Trump fragile thought processes. He's already tried to poo poo it on twitter. is it my imagination? seems people comment on what's on their mind when they click my posts? reading adverse? do you guys read at all? |
2.5 mil and still counting
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 08:35:05 -0600, #NoDAPL
wrote: On 12/2/2016 8:22 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 08:08:50 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: On 12/2/2016 7:59 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 06:57:20 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: http://time.com/4587158/clinton-lead...million-votes/ ouch! Even if she ends up with a 10 million vote margin, it will not make one bit of difference beyond illustrating that Trump does not have overwhelming national popular support. I've heard the final count is est. around 3 mill. good time article. See my comment above. did u read the article? You Know it's effecting the Trump fragile thought processes. He's already tried to poo poo it on twitter. Here is a novel idea, if you wish to convey a particular point, why don't you do that instead of hoping others will read the articles you post and divine the same meaning and significance as you? is it my imagination? seems people comment on what's on their mind when they click my posts? reading adverse? do you guys read at all? With all due respect, of course people comment about what's on their minds! If you wish to steer the discourse, you should personally compose a narrative and include that in your post. The artsy fartsy approach of the liberal mind set, expecting others to be mind readers and not presenting your own, cogent and pithy thoughts in your posts is tantamount to setting yourself up for disappointment and scorn. |
2.5 mil and still counting
On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 13:59:49 +0000, Stormin' Norman
wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 06:57:20 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: http://time.com/4587158/clinton-lead...million-votes/ ouch! Even if she ends up with a 10 million vote margin, it will not make one bit of difference beyond illustrating that Trump does not have overwhelming national popular support. No it means Trump does not have "big city" support. Democrats win the welfare vote hands down. When you take money from Peter to pay Paul you will always have Paul's support. |
2.5 mil and still counting
On 12/2/2016 8:57 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 08:35:05 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: On 12/2/2016 8:22 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 08:08:50 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: On 12/2/2016 7:59 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 06:57:20 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: http://time.com/4587158/clinton-lead...million-votes/ ouch! Even if she ends up with a 10 million vote margin, it will not make one bit of difference beyond illustrating that Trump does not have overwhelming national popular support. I've heard the final count is est. around 3 mill. good time article. See my comment above. did u read the article? You Know it's effecting the Trump fragile thought processes. He's already tried to poo poo it on twitter. Here is a novel idea, if you wish to convey a particular point, why don't you do that instead of hoping others will read the articles you post and divine the same meaning and significance as you? is it my imagination? seems people comment on what's on their mind when they click my posts? reading adverse? do you guys read at all? With all due respect, of course people comment about what's on their minds! If you wish to steer the discourse, you should personally compose a narrative and include that in your post. The artsy fartsy approach of the liberal mind set, expecting others to be mind readers and not presenting your own, cogent and pithy thoughts in your posts is tantamount to setting yourself up for disappointment and scorn. or not. people need to stay informed on their own. I'm giving "some" tools. you want to stay barefoot and preg? go ahead. I'd like people to read and learn and your comments are just fine with me if it gets people to read. I'm not here to entertain. I guess that went over your head.-- https://nodaplsolidarity.org/about/ |
2.5 mil and still counting
On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 10:06:57 -0500, wrote:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 13:59:49 +0000, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 06:57:20 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: http://time.com/4587158/clinton-lead...million-votes/ ouch! Even if she ends up with a 10 million vote margin, it will not make one bit of difference beyond illustrating that Trump does not have overwhelming national popular support. No it means Trump does not have "big city" support. Democrats win the welfare vote hands down. When you take money from Peter to pay Paul you will always have Paul's support. Possibly you can cite a post election demographic study that verifies your assertion? Everything I have seen so far indicates that Clinton voters, in general, had attained higher levels of education and were more affluent than Trump voters. |
2.5 mil and still counting
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 09:11:34 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote:
The artsy fartsy approach of the liberal mind set, expecting others to be mind readers and not presenting your own, cogent and pithy thoughts in your posts is tantamount to setting yourself up for disappointment and scorn. or not. people need to stay informed on their own. I'm giving "some" tools. you want to stay barefoot and preg? go ahead. I'd like people to read and learn and your comments are just fine with me if it gets people to read. I'm not here to entertain. I guess that went over your head.-- https://nodaplsolidarity.org/about/ I get it, you see yourself as a news / propaganda aggregator. You simply post the work product of other people and expect that participants here will draw the same conclusions as you from those stories. If they do not come to the same conclusions as you, it must due to their lack of comprehension and general ignorance. Call me silly, but, IMHO, your posts are deserving of derision if you are too lazy or incapable of formulating and presenting your own thoughts, logic and arguments. |
2.5 mil and still counting
On 12/2/2016 9:26 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 10:06:57 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 13:59:49 +0000, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 06:57:20 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: http://time.com/4587158/clinton-lead...million-votes/ ouch! Even if she ends up with a 10 million vote margin, it will not make one bit of difference beyond illustrating that Trump does not have overwhelming national popular support. No it means Trump does not have "big city" support. Democrats win the welfare vote hands down. When you take money from Peter to pay Paul you will always have Paul's support. Possibly you can cite a post election demographic study that verifies your assertion? Everything I have seen so far indicates that Clinton voters, in general, had attained higher levels of education and were more affluent than Trump voters. educ is hillary has more phds and a slight edge, income is pretty even (more mid class?) Trumps mid class tends to have more $. but that is from a NYT poll. might not mean **** -- https://nodaplsolidarity.org/about/ |
2.5 mil and still counting
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 09:41:54 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote:
On 12/2/2016 9:26 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 10:06:57 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 13:59:49 +0000, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 06:57:20 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: http://time.com/4587158/clinton-lead...million-votes/ ouch! Even if she ends up with a 10 million vote margin, it will not make one bit of difference beyond illustrating that Trump does not have overwhelming national popular support. No it means Trump does not have "big city" support. Democrats win the welfare vote hands down. When you take money from Peter to pay Paul you will always have Paul's support. Possibly you can cite a post election demographic study that verifies your assertion? Everything I have seen so far indicates that Clinton voters, in general, had attained higher levels of education and were more affluent than Trump voters. educ is hillary has more phds and a slight edge, income is pretty even (more mid class?) Trumps mid class tends to have more $. but that is from a NYT poll. might not mean **** Citation? |
2.5 mil and still counting
On 12/2/2016 9:44 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 09:41:54 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: On 12/2/2016 9:26 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 10:06:57 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 13:59:49 +0000, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 06:57:20 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: http://time.com/4587158/clinton-lead...million-votes/ ouch! Even if she ends up with a 10 million vote margin, it will not make one bit of difference beyond illustrating that Trump does not have overwhelming national popular support. No it means Trump does not have "big city" support. Democrats win the welfare vote hands down. When you take money from Peter to pay Paul you will always have Paul's support. Possibly you can cite a post election demographic study that verifies your assertion? Everything I have seen so far indicates that Clinton voters, in general, had attained higher levels of education and were more affluent than Trump voters. educ is hillary has more phds and a slight edge, income is pretty even (more mid class?) Trumps mid class tends to have more $. but that is from a NYT poll. might not mean **** Citation? oh now he wants a link? go fetch. -- https://nodaplsolidarity.org/about/ |
2.5 mil and still counting
On 12/2/2016 10:26 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote:
Everything I have seen so far indicates that Clinton voters, in general, had attained higher levels of education and were more affluent than Trump voters. Bull****! Clinton voters are more effluent than Trump voters. The typical Clinton voter is: - on public assistance, maybe even committing disability fraud - unaware of birth control - has ~6 illegitimate kids from different sperm donors - unemployed and too stupid to do anything useful - unable to use a turn signal when appropriate - can't navigate a traffic circle - has never paid federal income tax |
2.5 mil and still counting
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 09:49:09 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote:
On 12/2/2016 9:44 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 09:41:54 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: On 12/2/2016 9:26 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 10:06:57 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 13:59:49 +0000, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 06:57:20 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: http://time.com/4587158/clinton-lead...million-votes/ ouch! Even if she ends up with a 10 million vote margin, it will not make one bit of difference beyond illustrating that Trump does not have overwhelming national popular support. No it means Trump does not have "big city" support. Democrats win the welfare vote hands down. When you take money from Peter to pay Paul you will always have Paul's support. Possibly you can cite a post election demographic study that verifies your assertion? Everything I have seen so far indicates that Clinton voters, in general, had attained higher levels of education and were more affluent than Trump voters. educ is hillary has more phds and a slight edge, income is pretty even (more mid class?) Trumps mid class tends to have more $. but that is from a NYT poll. might not mean **** Citation? oh now he wants a link? go fetch. Yes, a citation. If you are going to assert something and attribute it to a particular source, it is logical and reasonable to provide a citation so others can determine the veracity of your claims. Without a citation, your assertion is just so much smoke. |
2.5 mil and still counting
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:52:44 -0500, Taxpayer
wrote: On 12/2/2016 10:26 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: Everything I have seen so far indicates that Clinton voters, in general, had attained higher levels of education and were more affluent than Trump voters. Bull****! Clinton voters are more effluent than Trump voters. The typical Clinton voter is: - on public assistance, maybe even committing disability fraud - unaware of birth control - has ~6 illegitimate kids from different sperm donors - unemployed and too stupid to do anything useful - unable to use a turn signal when appropriate - can't navigate a traffic circle - has never paid federal income tax Again, no citation. Was the above from the editorial page of the KKK Crusader newspaper? |
2.5 mil and still counting
On 12/2/2016 9:55 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 09:49:09 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: On 12/2/2016 9:44 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 09:41:54 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: On 12/2/2016 9:26 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 10:06:57 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 13:59:49 +0000, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 06:57:20 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: http://time.com/4587158/clinton-lead...million-votes/ ouch! Even if she ends up with a 10 million vote margin, it will not make one bit of difference beyond illustrating that Trump does not have overwhelming national popular support. No it means Trump does not have "big city" support. Democrats win the welfare vote hands down. When you take money from Peter to pay Paul you will always have Paul's support. Possibly you can cite a post election demographic study that verifies your assertion? Everything I have seen so far indicates that Clinton voters, in general, had attained higher levels of education and were more affluent than Trump voters. educ is hillary has more phds and a slight edge, income is pretty even (more mid class?) Trumps mid class tends to have more $. but that is from a NYT poll. might not mean **** Citation? oh now he wants a link? go fetch. Yes, a citation. If you are going to assert something and attribute it to a particular source, it is logical and reasonable to provide a citation so others can determine the veracity of your claims. Without a citation, your assertion is just so much smoke. well lets see there is this thing called "google". Come on dude. I'm just messin' w/ya. chill -- https://nodaplsolidarity.org/about/ |
2.5 mil and still counting
On 12/2/2016 9:58 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:52:44 -0500, Taxpayer wrote: On 12/2/2016 10:26 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: Everything I have seen so far indicates that Clinton voters, in general, had attained higher levels of education and were more affluent than Trump voters. Bull****! Clinton voters are more effluent than Trump voters. The typical Clinton voter is: - on public assistance, maybe even committing disability fraud - unaware of birth control - has ~6 illegitimate kids from different sperm donors - unemployed and too stupid to do anything useful - unable to use a turn signal when appropriate - can't navigate a traffic circle - has never paid federal income tax Again, no citation. Was the above from the editorial page of the KKK Crusader newspaper? sheet dude. you just got after me for leaving them. i take it you're not in a happy relationship -- https://nodaplsolidarity.org/about/ |
2.5 mil and still counting
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:04:08 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote:
Again, no citation. Was the above from the editorial page of the KKK Crusader newspaper? sheet dude. you just got after me for leaving them. i take it you're not in a happy relationship You are correct about one thing, reading comprehension is certainly a challenge for some in this group..... |
2.5 mil and still counting
On 12/2/2016 6:57 AM, #NoDAPL wrote:
http://time.com/4587158/clinton-lead...million-votes/ ouch! Lots of people live in California... -- Maggie |
2.5 mil and still counting
On 12/2/2016 7:59 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 06:57:20 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: http://time.com/4587158/clinton-lead...million-votes/ ouch! Even if she ends up with a 10 million vote margin, it will not make one bit of difference beyond illustrating that Trump does not have overwhelming national popular support. It means that Trump had support from a majority of states since he won the EC. -- Maggie |
2.5 mil and still counting
On 12/2/2016 10:15 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:04:08 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: Again, no citation. Was the above from the editorial page of the KKK Crusader newspaper? sheet dude. you just got after me for leaving them. i take it you're not in a happy relationship You are correct about one thing, reading comprehension is certainly a challenge for some in this group..... well then reading the article is a good first step for you. don't get all cry baby on me now. look im sorry, pls block me |
2.5 mil and still counting
On 12/2/2016 9:49 AM, #NoDAPL wrote:
On 12/2/2016 9:44 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 09:41:54 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: On 12/2/2016 9:26 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 10:06:57 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 13:59:49 +0000, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 06:57:20 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: http://time.com/4587158/clinton-lead...million-votes/ ouch! Even if she ends up with a 10 million vote margin, it will not make one bit of difference beyond illustrating that Trump does not have overwhelming national popular support. No it means Trump does not have "big city" support. Democrats win the welfare vote hands down. When you take money from Peter to pay Paul you will always have Paul's support. Possibly you can cite a post election demographic study that verifies your assertion? Everything I have seen so far indicates that Clinton voters, in general, had attained higher levels of education and were more affluent than Trump voters. educ is hillary has more phds and a slight edge, income is pretty even (more mid class?) Trumps mid class tends to have more $. but that is from a NYT poll. might not mean **** Citation? oh now he wants a link? go fetch. HAHAHA!! go fetch!! LOL -- Maggie |
2.5 mil and still counting
On 12/2/2016 10:04 AM, #NoDAPL wrote:
On 12/2/2016 9:58 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:52:44 -0500, Taxpayer wrote: On 12/2/2016 10:26 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: Everything I have seen so far indicates that Clinton voters, in general, had attained higher levels of education and were more affluent than Trump voters. Bull****! Clinton voters are more effluent than Trump voters. The typical Clinton voter is: - on public assistance, maybe even committing disability fraud - unaware of birth control - has ~6 illegitimate kids from different sperm donors - unemployed and too stupid to do anything useful - unable to use a turn signal when appropriate - can't navigate a traffic circle - has never paid federal income tax Again, no citation. Was the above from the editorial page of the KKK Crusader newspaper? sheet dude. you just got after me for leaving them. i take it you're not in a happy relationship HAHAAHAH!!! STOP! My side is hurting from laughing!! -- Maggie |
2.5 mil and still counting
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:27:04 -0600, #NoDAPL
wrote: On 12/2/2016 10:15 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:04:08 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: Again, no citation. Was the above from the editorial page of the KKK Crusader newspaper? sheet dude. you just got after me for leaving them. i take it you're not in a happy relationship You are correct about one thing, reading comprehension is certainly a challenge for some in this group..... well then reading the article is a good first step for you. don't get all cry baby on me now. look im sorry, pls block me Block you? You don't really understand Usenet do you? |
2.5 mil and still counting
On 12/2/2016 10:30 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:27:04 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: On 12/2/2016 10:15 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:04:08 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: Again, no citation. Was the above from the editorial page of the KKK Crusader newspaper? sheet dude. you just got after me for leaving them. i take it you're not in a happy relationship You are correct about one thing, reading comprehension is certainly a challenge for some in this group..... well then reading the article is a good first step for you. don't get all cry baby on me now. look im sorry, pls block me Block you? You don't really understand Usenet do you? no do you need a link for that? |
2.5 mil and still counting
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:19:17 -0600, Muggles
wrote: On 12/2/2016 7:59 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 06:57:20 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: http://time.com/4587158/clinton-lead...million-votes/ ouch! Even if she ends up with a 10 million vote margin, it will not make one bit of difference beyond illustrating that Trump does not have overwhelming national popular support. It means that Trump had support from a majority of states since he won the EC. Yes, when the Electoral College votes, odds are that he will take a majority of those votes. However, Trump cannot truthfully claim a national popular mandate of individual citizens. Fortunately for Trump, the only reason he needs a national popular mandate is to assuage his fragile ego. |
2.5 mil and still counting
On 12/2/2016 9:52 AM, Taxpayer wrote:
On 12/2/2016 10:26 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: Everything I have seen so far indicates that Clinton voters, in general, had attained higher levels of education and were more affluent than Trump voters. Bull****! Clinton voters are more effluent than Trump voters. The typical Clinton voter is: - on public assistance, maybe even committing disability fraud - unaware of birth control - has ~6 illegitimate kids from different sperm donors - unemployed and too stupid to do anything useful - unable to use a turn signal when appropriate - can't navigate a traffic circle - has never paid federal income tax word -- https://nodaplsolidarity.org/about/ |
2.5 mil and still counting
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:34:25 -0600, #NoDAPL
wrote: On 12/2/2016 10:30 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:27:04 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: On 12/2/2016 10:15 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:04:08 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: Again, no citation. Was the above from the editorial page of the KKK Crusader newspaper? sheet dude. you just got after me for leaving them. i take it you're not in a happy relationship You are correct about one thing, reading comprehension is certainly a challenge for some in this group..... well then reading the article is a good first step for you. don't get all cry baby on me now. look im sorry, pls block me Block you? You don't really understand Usenet do you? no do you need a link for that? You replied to a simple question with a direct answer, that is an anomaly for you. Not sure how a citation could enhance your answer, so no, I don't need a link. |
2.5 mil and still counting
On 12/2/2016 10:42 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:34:25 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: On 12/2/2016 10:30 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:27:04 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: On 12/2/2016 10:15 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:04:08 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: Again, no citation. Was the above from the editorial page of the KKK Crusader newspaper? sheet dude. you just got after me for leaving them. i take it you're not in a happy relationship You are correct about one thing, reading comprehension is certainly a challenge for some in this group..... well then reading the article is a good first step for you. don't get all cry baby on me now. look im sorry, pls block me Block you? You don't really understand Usenet do you? no do you need a link for that? You replied to a simple question with a direct answer, that is an anomaly for you. Not sure how a citation could enhance your answer, so no, I don't need a link. I'll tell you what normy. I'll be back when she hits 3 mill. I think you guys need a break. Stay Cool Dude. -- https://nodaplsolidarity.org/about/ |
2.5 mil and still counting
On 12/2/2016 10:40 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:19:17 -0600, Muggles wrote: On 12/2/2016 7:59 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 06:57:20 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: http://time.com/4587158/clinton-lead...million-votes/ ouch! Even if she ends up with a 10 million vote margin, it will not make one bit of difference beyond illustrating that Trump does not have overwhelming national popular support. It means that Trump had support from a majority of states since he won the EC. Yes, when the Electoral College votes, odds are that he will take a majority of those votes. However, Trump cannot truthfully claim a national popular mandate of individual citizens. Fortunately for Trump, the only reason he needs a national popular mandate is to assuage his fragile ego. Tell me of a man who doesn't have a fragile ego? LOL That's a non-issue, I'm thinking. OTOH, if becoming president require the popular vote every candidate would run their campaigns differently, but since winning that particular race depends on winning the EC, that's the only result that means anything. -- Maggie |
2.5 mil and still counting
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:28:27 -0600, Muggles
wrote: On 12/2/2016 10:04 AM, #NoDAPL wrote: On 12/2/2016 9:58 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:52:44 -0500, Taxpayer wrote: On 12/2/2016 10:26 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: Everything I have seen so far indicates that Clinton voters, in general, had attained higher levels of education and were more affluent than Trump voters. Bull****! Clinton voters are more effluent than Trump voters. The typical Clinton voter is: - on public assistance, maybe even committing disability fraud - unaware of birth control - has ~6 illegitimate kids from different sperm donors - unemployed and too stupid to do anything useful - unable to use a turn signal when appropriate - can't navigate a traffic circle - has never paid federal income tax Again, no citation. Was the above from the editorial page of the KKK Crusader newspaper? sheet dude. you just got after me for leaving them. i take it you're not in a happy relationship HAHAAHAH!!! STOP! My side is hurting from laughing!! Someone still has a case of severe swamp ass, poor Muggles. |
2.5 mil and still counting
On 12/2/2016 10:52 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:28:27 -0600, Muggles wrote: On 12/2/2016 10:04 AM, #NoDAPL wrote: On 12/2/2016 9:58 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:52:44 -0500, Taxpayer wrote: On 12/2/2016 10:26 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: Everything I have seen so far indicates that Clinton voters, in general, had attained higher levels of education and were more affluent than Trump voters. Bull****! Clinton voters are more effluent than Trump voters. The typical Clinton voter is: - on public assistance, maybe even committing disability fraud - unaware of birth control - has ~6 illegitimate kids from different sperm donors - unemployed and too stupid to do anything useful - unable to use a turn signal when appropriate - can't navigate a traffic circle - has never paid federal income tax Again, no citation. Was the above from the editorial page of the KKK Crusader newspaper? sheet dude. you just got after me for leaving them. i take it you're not in a happy relationship HAHAAHAH!!! STOP! My side is hurting from laughing!! Someone still has a case of severe swamp ass, poor Muggles. Oh come on! You 2 are funny. -- Maggie |
2.5 mil and still counting
Taxpayer expressed precisely :
On 12/2/2016 10:26 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: Everything I have seen so far indicates that Clinton voters, in general, had attained higher levels of education and were more affluent than Trump voters. Bull****! Clinton voters are more effluent than Trump voters. LOL! |
2.5 mil and still counting
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:58:17 -0600, Muggles
wrote: On 12/2/2016 10:52 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:28:27 -0600, Muggles wrote: On 12/2/2016 10:04 AM, #NoDAPL wrote: On 12/2/2016 9:58 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:52:44 -0500, Taxpayer wrote: On 12/2/2016 10:26 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: Everything I have seen so far indicates that Clinton voters, in general, had attained higher levels of education and were more affluent than Trump voters. Bull****! Clinton voters are more effluent than Trump voters. The typical Clinton voter is: - on public assistance, maybe even committing disability fraud - unaware of birth control - has ~6 illegitimate kids from different sperm donors - unemployed and too stupid to do anything useful - unable to use a turn signal when appropriate - can't navigate a traffic circle - has never paid federal income tax Again, no citation. Was the above from the editorial page of the KKK Crusader newspaper? sheet dude. you just got after me for leaving them. i take it you're not in a happy relationship HAHAAHAH!!! STOP! My side is hurting from laughing!! Someone still has a case of severe swamp ass, poor Muggles. Oh come on! You 2 are funny. Let's see, how would Trump respond? I know: I'm a funny guy, I have the world's best sense of humor, in fact, I am the funniest man in the history of the planet. No one is funnier than me, I know more about comedy then all the comedians who have ever lived..... Yeah, you should like that reply. |
2.5 mil and still counting
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:46:04 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote:
On 12/2/2016 10:42 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:34:25 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: On 12/2/2016 10:30 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:27:04 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: On 12/2/2016 10:15 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:04:08 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote: Again, no citation. Was the above from the editorial page of the KKK Crusader newspaper? sheet dude. you just got after me for leaving them. i take it you're not in a happy relationship You are correct about one thing, reading comprehension is certainly a challenge for some in this group..... well then reading the article is a good first step for you. don't get all cry baby on me now. look im sorry, pls block me Block you? You don't really understand Usenet do you? no do you need a link for that? You replied to a simple question with a direct answer, that is an anomaly for you. Not sure how a citation could enhance your answer, so no, I don't need a link. I'll tell you what normy. I'll be back when she hits 3 mill. I think you guys need a break. Stay Cool Dude. I don't know about everyone else but I for one will really miss all the DAPL propaganda..... |
2.5 mil and still counting
On 12/2/2016 11:02 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:58:17 -0600, Muggles wrote: On 12/2/2016 10:52 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:28:27 -0600, Muggles wrote: On 12/2/2016 10:04 AM, #NoDAPL wrote: On 12/2/2016 9:58 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:52:44 -0500, Taxpayer wrote: On 12/2/2016 10:26 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote: Everything I have seen so far indicates that Clinton voters, in general, had attained higher levels of education and were more affluent than Trump voters. Bull****! Clinton voters are more effluent than Trump voters. The typical Clinton voter is: - on public assistance, maybe even committing disability fraud - unaware of birth control - has ~6 illegitimate kids from different sperm donors - unemployed and too stupid to do anything useful - unable to use a turn signal when appropriate - can't navigate a traffic circle - has never paid federal income tax Again, no citation. Was the above from the editorial page of the KKK Crusader newspaper? sheet dude. you just got after me for leaving them. i take it you're not in a happy relationship HAHAAHAH!!! STOP! My side is hurting from laughing!! Someone still has a case of severe swamp ass, poor Muggles. Oh come on! You 2 are funny. Let's see, how would Trump respond? I know: I'm a funny guy, I have the world's best sense of humor, in fact, I am the funniest man in the history of the planet. No one is funnier than me, I know more about comedy then all the comedians who have ever lived..... Yeah, you should like that reply. Hey, I can't help it if you 2 are funny! -- Maggie |
2.5 mil and still counting
On 12/2/16 7:57 AM, #NoDAPL wrote:
http://time.com/4587158/clinton-lead...million-votes/ ouch! Maybe so but most of those "votes" are fraudulent and should be null and void as they are from dead people, illegal aliens, and felons -- Never slap a man who's chewing tobacco. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter