On Sat, 12 Mar 2016 00:23:41 -0000, SeaNymph wrote:

On 3/11/2016 5:36 PM, Wally wrote:
On 03/11/2016 02:21 PM, 83LowRider wrote:
My point is that if and intruder comes into my home, it doesn't
matter if he is carrying a knife or a gun or a big stick. I have
the right to be armed against that intruder. The very act of him
coming into my home tells me he has some sort of malicious
intent. I want him in the hospital, or dead.

So maybe you have no family, maybe you live in a safe
little gated community... howz about you google 'store owner
shoots robber'. Ten million results. Same point as above.
HTH.


/ I get your point but there's also the gun accidents where some poor
kid goes to the store to get some Skittles and tea and gets gunned down
by some crazed gun-nut wanna-be-cop./

There is, obviously, a huge difference between law abiding gun owners
and criminals. By in large, the gun "problem" involves criminals.

No guns, no armed criminals.

--
Bikini e pareo, camicia di pizzo e shorts, top e gonna di crochet!

On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 3:04:03 PM UTC-4, Mr Macaw wrote:

No guns, no armed criminals.

What is your proposal for disarming our criminals? Shall
we take out an advertisement in the newspaper asking them
to present their guns at the police station?

How shall we prevent future illegal gun sales? Build
a wall around our country?

Cindy Hamilton

On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 19:03:47 -0000
"Mr Macaw" wrote:

On Sat, 12 Mar 2016 00:23:41 -0000, SeaNymph
wrote:

On 3/11/2016 5:36 PM, Wally wrote:
On 03/11/2016 02:21 PM, 83LowRider wrote:
My point is that if and intruder comes into my home, it doesn't
matter if he is carrying a knife or a gun or a big stick. I have
the right to be armed against that intruder. The very act of him
coming into my home tells me he has some sort of malicious
intent. I want him in the hospital, or dead.

So maybe you have no family, maybe you live in a safe
little gated community... howz about you google 'store owner
shoots robber'. Ten million results. Same point as above.
HTH.


/ I get your point but there's also the gun accidents where some
poor kid goes to the store to get some Skittles and tea and gets
gunned down by some crazed gun-nut wanna-be-cop./

There is, obviously, a huge difference between law abiding gun
owners and criminals. By in large, the gun "problem" involves
criminals.

No guns, no armed criminals.


UK has plenty of Well Armed Criminals.

On 3/16/2016 2:03 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Sat, 12 Mar 2016 00:23:41 -0000, SeaNymph
wrote:

On 3/11/2016 5:36 PM, Wally wrote:
On 03/11/2016 02:21 PM, 83LowRider wrote:
My point is that if and intruder comes into my home, it doesn't
matter if he is carrying a knife or a gun or a big stick. I have
the right to be armed against that intruder. The very act of him
coming into my home tells me he has some sort of malicious
intent. I want him in the hospital, or dead.

So maybe you have no family, maybe you live in a safe
little gated community... howz about you google 'store owner
shoots robber'. Ten million results. Same point as above.
HTH.


/ I get your point but there's also the gun accidents where some poor
kid goes to the store to get some Skittles and tea and gets gunned down
by some crazed gun-nut wanna-be-cop./

There is, obviously, a huge difference between law abiding gun owners
and criminals. By in large, the gun "problem" involves criminals.

No guns, no armed criminals.

Thanks for that nonsense Mr. Ostrich.

On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:03:42 -0500, SeaNymph
wrote:

No guns, no armed criminals.

Thanks for that nonsense Mr. Ostrich.

I'm changing that to Captain Ostrich. There.

On 3/16/2016 9:55 PM, Oren wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:03:42 -0500, SeaNymph
wrote:

No guns, no armed criminals.

Thanks for that nonsense Mr. Ostrich.

I'm changing that to Captain Ostrich. There.

That works. Honestly, I'm starting to think the guy is truly delusional.

SeaNymph Wrote in message:
On 3/16/2016 9:55 PM, Oren wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:03:42 -0500, SeaNymph
wrote:

No guns, no armed criminals.

Thanks for that nonsense Mr. Ostrich.

I'm changing that to Captain Ostrich. There.

That works. Honestly, I'm starting to think the guy is truly delusional.



Nah. Delusia was annexed by Sweden a thousand years ago.
--


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

On 3/17/2016 2:12 PM, Aardvark wrote:
SeaNymph Wrote in message:
On 3/16/2016 9:55 PM, Oren wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:03:42 -0500, SeaNymph
wrote:

No guns, no armed criminals.

Thanks for that nonsense Mr. Ostrich.

I'm changing that to Captain Ostrich. There.

That works. Honestly, I'm starting to think the guy is truly delusional.



Nah. Delusia was annexed by Sweden a thousand years ago.

Well, learn something new every day

On 17/03/2016 21:14, 83LowRider wrote:
Mr Macaw wrote:

/ I get your point but there's also the gun accidents where some
poor kid goes to the store to get some Skittles and tea and gets gunned
down by some crazed gun-nut wanna-be-cop./

There is, obviously, a huge difference between law abiding gun owners
and criminals. By in large, the gun "problem" involves criminals.

No guns, no armed criminals.

Fine. Let 3 thugs with bats come at you. You have a bat, they
have a bat. Now everyone is equally armed. Good luck with that.


Depends who bats first ;-)

--
Bod

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Mr Macaw wrote:

/ I get your point but there's also the gun accidents where some
poor kid goes to the store to get some Skittles and tea and gets gunned
down by some crazed gun-nut wanna-be-cop./

There is, obviously, a huge difference between law abiding gun owners
and criminals. By in large, the gun "problem" involves criminals.

No guns, no armed criminals.

Fine. Let 3 thugs with bats come at you. You have a bat, they
have a bat. Now everyone is equally armed. Good luck with that.

"83LowRider" Wrote in message:
Bod wrote:

Fine. Let 3 thugs with bats come at you. You have a bat, they
have a bat. Now everyone is equally armed. Good luck with that.


Depends who bats first ;-)

Who did bat first. Who is on first base already.




It was only a matter of time before some American brought up to
that girlish game of rounders.

--


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

Bod wrote:
On 17/03/2016 21:14, 83LowRider wrote:
Mr Macaw wrote:

/ I get your point but there's also the gun accidents where some
poor kid goes to the store to get some Skittles and tea and gets
gunned down by some crazed gun-nut wanna-be-cop./

There is, obviously, a huge difference between law abiding gun
owners and criminals. By in large, the gun "problem" involves
criminals.

No guns, no armed criminals.

Fine. Let 3 thugs with bats come at you. You have a bat, they
have a bat. Now everyone is equally armed. Good luck with that.


Depends who bats first ;-)

Bod wrote:

Fine. Let 3 thugs with bats come at you. You have a bat, they
have a bat. Now everyone is equally armed. Good luck with that.


Depends who bats first ;-)

Who did bat first. Who is on first base already.

On 17/03/2016 23:10, Aardvark wrote:
"83LowRider" Wrote in message:
Bod wrote:

Fine. Let 3 thugs with bats come at you. You have a bat, they
have a bat. Now everyone is equally armed. Good luck with that.


Depends who bats first ;-)

Who did bat first. Who is on first base already.




It was only a matter of time before some American brought up to
that girlish game of rounders.

Lol.

--
Bod

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Aardvark wrote:

Depends who bats first ;-)

Who did bat first. Who is on first base already.

It was only a matter of time before some American brought up to
that girlish game of rounders.

Go easy... Abbott & Costello are a national treasure!

On 18/03/2016 10:43, Aardvark wrote:
"83LowRider" Wrote in message:
Aardvark wrote:

Depends who bats first ;-)

Who did bat first. Who is on first base already.

It was only a matter of time before some American brought up to
that girlish game of rounders.

Go easy... Abbott & Costello are a national treasure!




Marginally funnier than the three stooges. And that ain't saying much.

Charlie Chaplin! all is forgiven :-)

--
Bod

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

"83LowRider" Wrote in message:
Aardvark wrote:

Depends who bats first ;-)

Who did bat first. Who is on first base already.

It was only a matter of time before some American brought up to
that girlish game of rounders.

Go easy... Abbott & Costello are a national treasure!




Marginally funnier than the three stooges. And that ain't saying much.

--


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:01:02 +0000, Bod wrote:

On 18/03/2016 10:43, Aardvark wrote:
"83LowRider" Wrote in message:
Aardvark wrote:

Depends who bats first ;-)

Who did bat first. Who is on first base already.

It was only a matter of time before some American brought up to that
girlish game of rounders.

Go easy... Abbott & Costello are a national treasure!




Marginally funnier than the three stooges. And that ain't saying much.

Charlie Chaplin! all is forgiven :-)

Chaplin was a comic genius.

On 18/03/2016 16:35, Aardvark wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:01:02 +0000, Bod wrote:

On 18/03/2016 10:43, Aardvark wrote:
"83LowRider" Wrote in message:
Aardvark wrote:

Depends who bats first ;-)

Who did bat first. Who is on first base already.

It was only a matter of time before some American brought up to that
girlish game of rounders.

Go easy... Abbott & Costello are a national treasure!




Marginally funnier than the three stooges. And that ain't saying much.

Charlie Chaplin! all is forgiven :-)

Chaplin was a comic genius.

Agr

--
Bod

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 18/03/2016 16:41, Bod wrote:
On 18/03/2016 16:35, Aardvark wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:01:02 +0000, Bod wrote:

On 18/03/2016 10:43, Aardvark wrote:
"83LowRider" Wrote in message:
Aardvark wrote:

Depends who bats first ;-)

Who did bat first. Who is on first base already.

It was only a matter of time before some American brought up to that
girlish game of rounders.

Go easy... Abbott & Costello are a national treasure!




Marginally funnier than the three stooges. And that ain't saying much.

Charlie Chaplin! all is forgiven :-)

Chaplin was a comic genius.

Agreed



--
Bod

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus