plumbing runs
I got a bathroom. I'm adding a second downstairs right below. I know the
ideal setup would have a source manifold and separate feed lines. Is there some kind of guide for the cheapskate ? Copper is currently used, although I still have to reroute existing pipes. Greg |
plumbing runs
gregz wrote:
I got a bathroom. I'm adding a second downstairs right below. I know the ideal setup would have a source manifold and separate feed lines. Is there some kind of guide for the cheapskate ? Copper is currently used, although I still have to reroute existing pipes. Greg Run from hot water tank 20-25 feet, and cold tap. Still going to use the 1/2 feed from regulator and hot water tank. Greg |
plumbing runs
On 03/09/2015 2:53 AM, gregz wrote:
wrote: I got a bathroom. I'm adding a second downstairs right below. ... .... Run from hot water tank 20-25 feet, and cold tap. Still going to use the 1/2 feed from regulator and hot water tank. .... I think you'll be sorely dissatisfied by the result if there's any possibility whatsoever the two are being used together. That line needs to go to 3/4"... -- |
plumbing runs
On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 10:05:22 AM UTC-4, dpb wrote:
On 03/09/2015 2:53 AM, gregz wrote: wrote: I got a bathroom. I'm adding a second downstairs right below. ... ... Run from hot water tank 20-25 feet, and cold tap. Still going to use the 1/2 feed from regulator and hot water tank. ... I think you'll be sorely dissatisfied by the result if there's any possibility whatsoever the two are being used together. That line needs to go to 3/4"... -- A big unstated factor is if the new bathroom is a full one, ie with shower or tub, or just a half bath. Half bath, 1/2" would be fine. |
plumbing runs
On 03/09/2015 9:30 AM, trader_4 wrote:
On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 10:05:22 AM UTC-4, dpb wrote: On 03/09/2015 2:53 AM, gregz wrote: wrote: I got a bathroom. I'm adding a second downstairs right below. ... ... Run from hot water tank 20-25 feet, and cold tap. Still going to use the 1/2 feed from regulator and hot water tank. ... I think you'll be sorely dissatisfied by the result if there's any possibility whatsoever the two are being used together. That line needs to go to 3/4"... -- A big unstated factor is if the new bathroom is a full one, ie with shower or tub, or just a half bath. Half bath, 1/2" would be fine. I'd say "marginal"... -- |
plumbing runs
On 2015-03-09 12:32 PM, dpb wrote:
On 03/09/2015 9:30 AM, trader_4 wrote: On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 10:05:22 AM UTC-4, dpb wrote: On 03/09/2015 2:53 AM, gregz wrote: wrote: I got a bathroom. I'm adding a second downstairs right below. ... ... Run from hot water tank 20-25 feet, and cold tap. Still going to use the 1/2 feed from regulator and hot water tank. ... I think you'll be sorely dissatisfied by the result if there's any possibility whatsoever the two are being used together. That line needs to go to 3/4"... -- A big unstated factor is if the new bathroom is a full one, ie with shower or tub, or just a half bath. Half bath, 1/2" would be fine. I'd say "marginal"... -- Agreed. Usually the purpose for a second bathroom is if the first one is in use. This negates that purpose. |
plumbing runs
On 03/09/2015 11:40 AM, Adam Kubias wrote:
On 2015-03-09 12:32 PM, dpb wrote: On 03/09/2015 9:30 AM, trader_4 wrote: On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 10:05:22 AM UTC-4, dpb wrote: On 03/09/2015 2:53 AM, gregz wrote: wrote: I got a bathroom. I'm adding a second downstairs right below. ... ... Run from hot water tank 20-25 feet, and cold tap. Still going to use the 1/2 feed from regulator and hot water tank. ... I think you'll be sorely dissatisfied by the result if there's any possibility whatsoever the two are being used together. That line needs to go to 3/4"... -- A big unstated factor is if the new bathroom is a full one, ie with shower or tub, or just a half bath. Half bath, 1/2" would be fine. I'd say "marginal"... -- Agreed. Usually the purpose for a second bathroom is if the first one is in use. This negates that purpose. Oh, it'll "work", just be annoying forever with slow-filling toilet, low pressure/flow at the sink, etc., any time there's demand in the other bath simultaneously. It's trivial to fix at the beginning but a lifetime of aggravation thereafter if don't. And for the "cheapskate" in the original post, the 1/2" there can be salvaged and re-purposed for the runs in the new bath after the reducing tee where it taps off the new main run. And, the 3/4" new run can be plastic with transition to copper if _that_ concerned about cost. -- |
plumbing runs
On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 12:33:04 PM UTC-4, dpb wrote:
On 03/09/2015 9:30 AM, trader_4 wrote: On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 10:05:22 AM UTC-4, dpb wrote: On 03/09/2015 2:53 AM, gregz wrote: wrote: I got a bathroom. I'm adding a second downstairs right below. ... ... Run from hot water tank 20-25 feet, and cold tap. Still going to use the 1/2 feed from regulator and hot water tank. ... I think you'll be sorely dissatisfied by the result if there's any possibility whatsoever the two are being used together. That line needs to go to 3/4"... -- A big unstated factor is if the new bathroom is a full one, ie with shower or tub, or just a half bath. Half bath, 1/2" would be fine. I'd say "marginal"... -- I don't see why it's marginal. I have a 1/2 bath plumbed with 1/2" copper, works perfectly. The tubing on the fixtures is down to just 3/8". What flow rate do you think you need at a sink and toilet? |
plumbing runs
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015 12:40:14 -0400, Adam Kubias
wrote: On 2015-03-09 12:32 PM, dpb wrote: On 03/09/2015 9:30 AM, trader_4 wrote: On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 10:05:22 AM UTC-4, dpb wrote: On 03/09/2015 2:53 AM, gregz wrote: wrote: I got a bathroom. I'm adding a second downstairs right below. ... ... Run from hot water tank 20-25 feet, and cold tap. Still going to use the 1/2 feed from regulator and hot water tank. ... I think you'll be sorely dissatisfied by the result if there's any possibility whatsoever the two are being used together. That line needs to go to 3/4"... -- A big unstated factor is if the new bathroom is a full one, ie with shower or tub, or just a half bath. Half bath, 1/2" would be fine. I'd say "marginal"... -- Agreed. Usually the purpose for a second bathroom is if the first one is in use. This negates that purpose. Unless they are on separate floors. You use the one that's closest and requires the fewest stairs to be climbed. |
plumbing runs
On 03/09/2015 12:55 PM, trader_4 wrote:
On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 12:33:04 PM UTC-4, dpb wrote: .... I'd say "marginal"... I don't see why it's marginal. I have a 1/2 bath plumbed with 1/2" copper, works perfectly. The tubing on the fixtures is down to just 3/8". What flow rate do you think you need at a sink and toilet? Bet it's not also on a main feed to a full bath _both_ of which are fed only by 1/2". The bath itself will be fine if the flow to it's main isn't restricted. How good/bad it will be will, of course, also depend on what the other bath actual configuration is, but I'd err on the side of larger rather than smaller unless given further details. It can't cost that much; he can even likely reuse virtually all the existing 1/2" anyway... -- |
plumbing runs
|
plumbing runs
On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 2:16:42 PM UTC-4, dpb wrote:
On 03/09/2015 12:55 PM, trader_4 wrote: On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 12:33:04 PM UTC-4, dpb wrote: ... I'd say "marginal"... I don't see why it's marginal. I have a 1/2 bath plumbed with 1/2" copper, works perfectly. The tubing on the fixtures is down to just 3/8". What flow rate do you think you need at a sink and toilet? Bet it's not also on a main feed to a full bath _both_ of which are fed only by 1/2". Well of course not, but I don't see any evidence that the OP is proposing sharing that new line either. In my house, the half bath uses 1/2" pipe that taps off the 3/4" line that serves the master bath. MB has two sinks, toilet, shower and tub. At the other end of the house, I have a long run, at least 25ft, that uses 1/2". It feeds the kitchen sink, dishwasher, utility sink, the washer and a hose bibb. No problems there either. The other full bath, upstairs, uses 3/4" It all works fine. The bath itself will be fine if the flow to it's main isn't restricted. How good/bad it will be will, of course, also depend on what the other bath actual configuration is, but I'd err on the side of larger rather than smaller unless given further details. It can't cost that much; he can even likely reuse virtually all the existing 1/2" anyway... -- I don't know where the reusing is coming from. All I saw was that he's putting in a new bath in the basement. |
plumbing runs
On 03/09/2015 1:32 PM, trader_4 wrote:
.... I don't know where the reusing is coming from. All I saw was that he's putting in a new bath in the basement. His second posting (followup to his own first) says "Still going to use the 1/2 feed from regulator and hot water tank." Seems pretty clear to me his plan was to simply tap onto the existing 1/2" feed for the second by cutting in a tee. I'm saying run new 3/4" to that point and reducing tee there; can reuse that 1/2" run he replaces of whatever length out of the 20-ft it happens to be. He didn't say about the cold supply but same idea applies. -- |
plumbing runs
On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 2:45:02 PM UTC-4, dpb wrote:
On 03/09/2015 1:32 PM, trader_4 wrote: ... I don't know where the reusing is coming from. All I saw was that he's putting in a new bath in the basement. His second posting (followup to his own first) says "Still going to use the 1/2 feed from regulator and hot water tank." Seems pretty clear to me his plan was to simply tap onto the existing 1/2" feed for the second by cutting in a tee. I'm saying run new 3/4" to that point and reducing tee there; can reuse that 1/2" run he replaces of whatever length out of the 20-ft it happens to be. He didn't say about the cold supply but same idea applies. -- OK, I'm with you now. I agree if it's all 1/2" cold and hot water to supply the whole house, then I'd do 3/4" for the portion that will serve everything up to where the new bath will split off. |
plumbing runs
On 03/09/2015 2:10 PM, trader_4 wrote:
On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 2:45:02 PM UTC-4, dpb wrote: On 03/09/2015 1:32 PM, trader_4 wrote: ... I don't know where the reusing is coming from. All I saw was that he's putting in a new bath in the basement. His second posting (followup to his own first) says "Still going to use the 1/2 feed from regulator and hot water tank." Seems pretty clear to me his plan was to simply tap onto the existing 1/2" feed for the second by cutting in a tee. I'm saying run new 3/4" to that point and reducing tee there; can reuse that 1/2" run he replaces of whatever length out of the 20-ft it happens to be. He didn't say about the cold supply but same idea applies. OK, I'm with you now. I agree if it's all 1/2" cold and hot water to supply the whole house, then I'd do 3/4" for the portion that will serve everything up to where the new bath will split off. Precisely. And, as I reread his posting I'm guessing the idea was to tap into the cold comes from the point after the regulator and the hot from the existing run so it's very possible both H&C are affected. Either way, the correct way that can't cost much actual cash outlay will be to make it 3/4" to the split-off and will be "garonteed" to be adequate whereas other may/may not, depending... Because, as you note, unless there's another water heater it's got the kitchen as well to supply besides the bath. It would have been marginal w/ a dishwasher now methinks altho again there's more we don't know than what we do... -- |
plumbing runs
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015 13:16:21 -0500, dpb wrote:
On 03/09/2015 12:55 PM, trader_4 wrote: On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 12:33:04 PM UTC-4, dpb wrote: ... I'd say "marginal"... I don't see why it's marginal. I have a 1/2 bath plumbed with 1/2" copper, works perfectly. The tubing on the fixtures is down to just 3/8". What flow rate do you think you need at a sink and toilet? Bet it's not also on a main feed to a full bath _both_ of which are fed only by 1/2". If it's like my house it IS. 1/2 bath on main floor, full bath upstairs AND the kitchen, all on one half inch line. Laundry too. 3/4 inch from the meter to the softener, 1/2 inch from the softener to the water heater and to the cold water feeds.. Cold hard water to the toilets and one tap in kitchen, cold soft water to kitchen and both bath sinks, and tub. Cold hard water to outside hose bib. Sum total of water supply lines in the house. The bath itself will be fine if the flow to it's main isn't restricted. How good/bad it will be will, of course, also depend on what the other bath actual configuration is, but I'd err on the side of larger rather than smaller unless given further details. It can't cost that much; he can even likely reuse virtually all the existing 1/2" anyway... |
plumbing runs
|
plumbing runs
dpb wrote:
On 03/09/2015 2:53 AM, gregz wrote: wrote: I got a bathroom. I'm adding a second downstairs right below. ... ... Run from hot water tank 20-25 feet, and cold tap. Still going to use the 1/2 feed from regulator and hot water tank. ... I think you'll be sorely dissatisfied by the result if there's any possibility whatsoever the two are being used together. That line needs to go to 3/4"... -- Second full bathroom. The use of both would be very occasional. I'll have to think about this a while and look things over. Things do slow down when any two things are being operated. The house I grew up in didn't have any fancy piping. I never really noticed a huge problem. The regulator might be a factor too. I know air compressors regulators limit flow if undersized. Greg |
plumbing runs
On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 at 5:30:59 AM UTC-4, Gz wrote:
dpb wrote: On 03/09/2015 2:53 AM, gregz wrote: wrote: I got a bathroom. I'm adding a second downstairs right below. ... ... Run from hot water tank 20-25 feet, and cold tap. Still going to use the 1/2 feed from regulator and hot water tank. ... I think you'll be sorely dissatisfied by the result if there's any possibility whatsoever the two are being used together. That line needs to go to 3/4"... -- Second full bathroom. The use of both would be very occasional. I'll have to think about this a while and look things over. Things do slow down when any two things are being operated. The house I grew up in didn't have any fancy piping. I never really noticed a huge problem. The regulator might be a factor too. I know air compressors regulators limit flow if undersized. Greg its always best to do a job right the first time, than do a half way job then be forced to do it again. redos cost tons more....... I woud run PEX lines directly from the meter, and upgrade around te hot water tank to mimize issues down the road. even at resale time many years from now a smart home inspector could catch the issue costig you big bucks, and perhaps even a home sale...... |
plumbing runs
On 3/9/2015 12:40 PM, Adam Kubias wrote:
On 2015-03-09 12:32 PM, dpb wrote: A big unstated factor is if the new bathroom is a full one, ie with shower or tub, or just a half bath. Half bath, 1/2" would be fine. I'd say "marginal"... -- Agreed. Usually the purpose for a second bathroom is if the first one is in use. This negates that purpose. We can't use the word negates, it's racist. Second WC might be used if you're on the other floor when nature calls. Oh, no, that's racist. Offensive to people of flower. "Well, officer, flower power people are usually pacifist, but this guy walked up and called me a nature to my face!" Is this offense getting a bit out of the realm of reasonable? - .. Christopher A. Young learn more about Jesus .. www.lds.org .. .. |
plumbing runs
On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 at 5:30:59 AM UTC-4, Gz wrote:
dpb wrote: On 03/09/2015 2:53 AM, gregz wrote: wrote: I got a bathroom. I'm adding a second downstairs right below. ... ... Run from hot water tank 20-25 feet, and cold tap. Still going to use the 1/2 feed from regulator and hot water tank. ... I think you'll be sorely dissatisfied by the result if there's any possibility whatsoever the two are being used together. That line needs to go to 3/4"... -- Second full bathroom. The use of both would be very occasional. I'll have to think about this a while and look things over. Things do slow down when any two things are being operated. The house I grew up in didn't have any fancy piping. I never really noticed a huge problem. The regulator might be a factor too. I know air compressors regulators limit flow if undersized. Greg If you have 1/2" pipe serving the whole house, I'd bet that the regulator isn't the limiting factor. I've never seen one with 1/2" fittings and they typically size the fittings to accomodate the capacity of the device. Around here, typically you have 1" pipe coming in from the street, 3/4" pipe serving major/multiple points of use in the house, 1/2" branch offs for half baths, kitchen, laundry room, etc. It seemed there was agreement here that if you do have 1/2" going everywhere, then the safest option is to replace it with 3/4" leaving the regulator, then one branch off to the new bath with either 1/2 or 3/4 and the other branch gets connected to the existing rest of the house. If the rest of the house heads over towards the new bath anyway, then just replace that section with 3/4". That gives you 3/4" most of the way to the new bath and leaves the rest of the house mostly better off too. |
plumbing runs
On 03/09/2015 11:28 PM, gregz wrote:
.... Second full bathroom. The use of both would be very occasional. I'll have to think about this a while and look things over. Things do slow down when any two things are being operated. The house I grew up in didn't have any fancy piping. I never really noticed a huge problem. The regulator might be a factor too. I know air compressors regulators limit flow if undersized. "HUGE?" is in the eye of the beholder, often. :) If it's "the way it always was" then don't have any reason to think otherwise. I certainly wouldn't classify a 3/4" feed run to the reducing tee supply run "fancy piping"; it's pretty much a standard technique. In particular, however, as noted before in the sidebar conversations, if this is the main feed and there's also DW (or may be in the future) or simply for resale value it can't hurt and surely can't be either very complicated to do or add much additional expense over the other to incorporate. -- |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter