I'm planning on storing 6000 gallons of fuel. I would like to bury the
tank. It's unknown how long the fuel will sit, without being used. Should
fuel stabilizer be used? Should I vent the tank so no condensation will
form?

TIA!

On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 22:12:50 -0500, "Tom J" wrote:

I'm planning on storing 6000 gallons of fuel. I would like to bury the
tank. It's unknown how long the fuel will sit, without being used. Should
fuel stabilizer be used? Should I vent the tank so no condensation will
form?

What kind of fuel? Where are you?

TIA!

On 1/19/14 9:12 PM, Tom J wrote:
I'm planning on storing 6000 gallons of fuel. I would like to bury the
tank. It's unknown how long the fuel will sit, without being used. Should
fuel stabilizer be used? Should I vent the tank so no condensation will
form?

TIA!


You might want to do some investigation he
http://tinyurl.com/6wxjbnf will take you to the United States
EPA site.

"Tom J" wrote:
I'm planning on storing 6000 gallons of fuel. I would like to bury the
tank. It's unknown how long the fuel will sit, without being used. Should
fuel stabilizer be used? Should I vent the tank so no condensation will
form?

TIA!

I smell a troll. If not, then I smell an environmental issue in the near
future.

Either way, that post stinks.

On 01/19/2014 09:48 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
"Tom J" wrote:
I'm planning on storing 6000 gallons of fuel. I would like to bury the
tank. It's unknown how long the fuel will sit, without being used. Should
fuel stabilizer be used? Should I vent the tank so no condensation will
form?

TIA!

I smell a troll. If not, then I smell an environmental issue in the near
future.

Either way, that post stinks.




Yes I'm sure he's a troll

philo wrote:
On 01/19/2014 09:48 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
"Tom J" wrote:
I'm planning on storing 6000 gallons of fuel. I would like to bury
the tank. It's unknown how long the fuel will sit, without being
used. Should fuel stabilizer be used? Should I vent the tank so
no condensation will form?

TIA!

I smell a troll. If not, then I smell an environmental issue in the
near future.

Either way, that post stinks.




Yes I'm sure he's a troll

A successful one at that!

"Tom J" wrote:
I'm planning on storing 6000 gallons of fuel. I would like to bury the
tank. It's unknown how long the fuel will sit, without being used. Should
fuel stabilizer be used? Should I vent the tank so no condensation will
form?

TIA!

What's your address ?

Greg

On 01/19/2014 10:52 PM, Bob F wrote:
philo wrote:
On 01/19/2014 09:48 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
"Tom J" wrote:
I'm planning on storing 6000 gallons of fuel. I would like to bury
the tank. It's unknown how long the fuel will sit, without being
used. Should fuel stabilizer be used? Should I vent the tank so
no condensation will form?

TIA!

I smell a troll. If not, then I smell an environmental issue in the
near future.

Either way, that post stinks.




Yes I'm sure he's a troll

A successful one at that!





Yes...but I knew at once he was a troll because no one ever keeps more
than 5000 gallons of gas in their underground back-yard tank.

On 1/19/2014 10:12 PM, Tom J wrote:
I'm planning on storing 6000 gallons of fuel. I would like to bury the
tank. It's unknown how long the fuel will sit, without being used. Should
fuel stabilizer be used? Should I vent the tank so no condensation will
form?

TIA!


I'm planning on buying 6000 meals. I would like to
have the food served. How long will the food last?

--
..
Christopher A. Young
Learn about Jesus
www.lds.org
..

On 1/20/14, 6:10 AM, philo wrote:
On 01/19/2014 10:52 PM, Bob F wrote:
philo wrote:
On 01/19/2014 09:48 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
"Tom J" wrote:
I'm planning on storing 6000 gallons of fuel. I would like to bury
the tank. It's unknown how long the fuel will sit, without being
used. Should fuel stabilizer be used? Should I vent the tank so
no condensation will form?

TIA!

I smell a troll. If not, then I smell an environmental issue in the
near future.

Either way, that post stinks.




Yes I'm sure he's a troll

A successful one at that!





Yes...but I knew at once he was a troll because no one ever keeps more
than 5000 gallons of gas in their underground back-yard tank.


Probably a "doomsday prepper", getting ready for the apocalypse.

Per Tom J:
I'm planning on storing 6000 gallons of fuel. I would like to bury the
tank. It's unknown how long the fuel will sit, without being used. Should
fuel stabilizer be used? Shou

This is a joke, right?
--
Pete Cresswell

On 1/20/2014 11:32 AM, Retired wrote:
On 1/20/14, 6:10 AM, philo wrote:

Yes...but I knew at once he was a troll because no one ever keeps more
than 5000 gallons of gas in their underground back-yard tank.


Probably a "doomsday prepper", getting ready for the apocalypse.

Just imagine. Five years after the collapse, and
he's still got fuel under ground. What are the
odds? Figure either marauding gangs of looters
or the government will have taken it away.

--
..
Christopher A. Young
Learn about Jesus
www.lds.org
..

On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 05:10:35 -0600, philo* wrote:

no one ever keeps more
than 5000 gallons of gas in their underground back-yard tank.

....what about Moonshine?

"Bob F" wrote:
philo wrote:
On 01/19/2014 09:48 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
"Tom J" wrote:
I'm planning on storing 6000 gallons of fuel. I would like to bury
the tank. It's unknown how long the fuel will sit, without being
used. Should fuel stabilizer be used? Should I vent the tank so
no condensation will form?

TIA!

I smell a troll. If not, then I smell an environmental issue in the
near future.

Either way, that post stinks.




Yes I'm sure he's a troll

A successful one at that!

No, it's not a successful troll. A successful troll is one that gets people
all riled up and arguing, etc. Discussing the fact that it's a troll and
making jokes about the content doesn't make it a successful troll.

Stolen without permission from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)

"In Internet slang, a troll (/ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows
discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people,[1] by
posting inflammatory,[2] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online
community (such as a forum, chat room, or blog), either accidentally[3][4]
or with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional
response[5] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion."

This post either a legit post by a clueless individual or an attempt at a
troll which no one has bit on. My suspicion that it's an attempt at a troll
is the lack of any details about the type of fuel, the type of tank, etc.
My hope is that no one takes him seriously and gets taken down to level
that makes it a successful troll.

Oh wait... Are we arguing about whether it's a successful troll or not?
Does that make it a successful troll? ;-)

On 01/20/2014 10:32 AM, Retired wrote:



Yes...but I knew at once he was a troll because no one ever keeps more
than 5000 gallons of gas in their underground back-yard tank.


Probably a "doomsday prepper", getting ready for the apocalypse.



Yep, when the bomb comes, that 6000 gallons of fuel will make you get it
all over with...a bit faster!

On 1/20/2014 1:10 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
Yes I'm sure he's a troll

A successful one at that!

No, it's not a successful troll. A successful troll is one that gets people
all riled up and arguing, etc. Discussing the fact that it's a troll and
making jokes about the content doesn't make it a successful troll.

Stolen without permission from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)

"In Internet slang, a troll (/ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows
discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people,[1] by
posting inflammatory,[2] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online
community (such as a forum, chat room, or blog), either accidentally[3][4]
or with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional
response[5] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion."

This post either a legit post by a clueless individual or an attempt at a
troll which no one has bit on. My suspicion that it's an attempt at a troll
is the lack of any details about the type of fuel, the type of tank, etc.
My hope is that no one takes him seriously and gets taken down to level
that makes it a successful troll.

Oh wait... Are we arguing about whether it's a successful troll or not?
Does that make it a successful troll? ;-)


Only a complete moronic dead brain would argue over
the definition of troll. It need FLAME to be
successful, but I'm far too stupid to know that.

--
..
Christopher A. Young
Learn about Jesus
www.lds.org
..

On Monday, January 20, 2014 7:31:56 AM UTC-5, Stormin Mormon wrote:
On 1/19/2014 10:12 PM, Tom J wrote:

I'm planning on storing 6000 gallons of fuel. I would like to bury the

tank. It's unknown how long the fuel will sit, without being used. Should

fuel stabilizer be used? Should I vent the tank so no condensation will

form?



TIA!





I'm planning on buying 6000 meals. I would like to

have the food served. How long will the food last?



--

.

Christopher A. Young

Learn about Jesus

www.lds.org

.

If you're having a party with 5,999 guests, it will last one evening.

Stormin Mormon wrote:
On 1/20/2014 1:10 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
Yes I'm sure he's a troll

A successful one at that!

No, it's not a successful troll. A successful troll is one that gets people
all riled up and arguing, etc. Discussing the fact that it's a troll and
making jokes about the content doesn't make it a successful troll.

Stolen without permission from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)

"In Internet slang, a troll (/ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows
discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people,[1] by
posting inflammatory,[2] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online
community (such as a forum, chat room, or blog), either accidentally[3][4]
or with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional
response[5] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion."

This post either a legit post by a clueless individual or an attempt at a
troll which no one has bit on. My suspicion that it's an attempt at a troll
is the lack of any details about the type of fuel, the type of tank, etc.
My hope is that no one takes him seriously and gets taken down to level
that makes it a successful troll.

Oh wait... Are we arguing about whether it's a successful troll or not?
Does that make it a successful troll? ;-)


Only a complete moronic dead brain would argue over
the definition of troll. It need FLAME to be
successful, but I'm far too stupid to know that.


"It need flame"

Is that English?

On 1/20/2014 5:08 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
Stormin Mormon wrote:

Only a complete moronic dead brain would argue over
the definition of troll. It need FLAME to be
successful, but I'm far too stupid to know that.


"It need flame"

Is that English?


Look you wise person, how many times do
I have to tell you that I'm a complete
idiot, before I finally understand?

--
..
Christopher A. Young
Learn about Jesus
www.lds.org
..

On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:59:06 -0500, Stormin Mormon
wrote:

On 1/20/2014 11:32 AM, Retired wrote:
On 1/20/14, 6:10 AM, philo wrote:

Yes...but I knew at once he was a troll because no one ever keeps more
than 5000 gallons of gas in their underground back-yard tank.


Probably a "doomsday prepper", getting ready for the apocalypse.

Just imagine. Five years after the collapse, and
he's still got fuel under ground. What are the
odds? Figure either marauding gangs of looters
or the government will have taken it away.

After the apocalypse, ya' never know when you're gonna need to get to
the 7-11 for a Slurpee.