I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

Sounds like you had a blast of a time.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

Batman wrote:
Sounds like you had a blast of a time.

One way, probably the best way, to avoid similar future tragedies is to
provide free admission to holders of concealed handgun permits.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:04:04 -0400, Batman wrote:

Sounds like you had a blast of a time.

Not funny

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

HeyBub wrote:

Batman wrote:
Sounds like you had a blast of a time.

One way, probably the best way, to avoid similar future tragedies is to
provide free admission to holders of concealed handgun permits.

If it were free there wouldn't be room for paying customers. G

Good idea though, I can think of other businesses too that might offer a
nice discount (50%?) for CHL holders in exchange for free security.

Hell, just the sign alone advertising that fact would dissuade any
dip**** criminal.

I'm a little surprised a dozen CHL's were not in the theatre to fight
back, it is Colorado after all.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

"G. Morgan" wrote in message
...
HeyBub wrote:

Batman wrote:
Sounds like you had a blast of a time.

One way, probably the best way, to avoid similar future tragedies is to
provide free admission to holders of concealed handgun permits.

If it were free there wouldn't be room for paying customers. G

Good idea though, I can think of other businesses too that might offer a
nice discount (50%?) for CHL holders in exchange for free security.

Hell, just the sign alone advertising that fact would dissuade any
dip**** criminal.

I'm a little surprised a dozen CHL's were not in the theatre to fight
back, it is Colorado after all.

Considering that CHLs are 1-2% of the population, the odds of having
"dozens" of them in a cinema are quite small
PARTICULARLY if said cinema happens to be in a "progressive"
neighborhood
And Aurora appears to be far more blue than red politically

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 10:53:01 -0500, G. Morgan wrote:

HeyBub wrote:

Batman wrote:
Sounds like you had a blast of a time.

One way, probably the best way, to avoid similar future tragedies is to
provide free admission to holders of concealed handgun permits.

If it were free there wouldn't be room for paying customers. G

"First ten (armed) CHL holders receive free ammo." ;)

Good idea though, I can think of other businesses too that might offer a
nice discount (50%?) for CHL holders in exchange for free security.

Hell, just the sign alone advertising that fact would dissuade any
dip**** criminal.

It would raise the hackles of the lefties, though. I like it.

I'm a little surprised a dozen CHL's were not in the theatre to fight
back, it is Colorado after all.

Colorado isn't all that red.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

Some folks just can't resist taking shots at America. What a joker.

Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
..

"Doug" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:04:04 -0400, Batman wrote:

Sounds like you had a blast of a time.

Not funny

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

I agee. Sadly, the theaters, or maybe thier insurance, mandates a "no
firearms allowed" sign. Which is about as effective as laws against crime.
There were probably dozen or more CHL holders, whose guns were in the trunk
of the car, or back home.

Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
..

"G. Morgan" wrote in message
...

One way, probably the best way, to avoid similar future tragedies is to
provide free admission to holders of concealed handgun permits.

If it were free there wouldn't be room for paying customers. G

Good idea though, I can think of other businesses too that might offer a
nice discount (50%?) for CHL holders in exchange for free security.

Hell, just the sign alone advertising that fact would dissuade any
dip**** criminal.

I'm a little surprised a dozen CHL's were not in the theatre to fight
back, it is Colorado after all.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

Stormin Mormon wrote:

I agee. Sadly, the theaters, or maybe thier insurance, mandates a "no
firearms allowed" sign. Which is about as effective as laws against crime.
There were probably dozen or more CHL holders, whose guns were in the trunk
of the car, or back home.

Even if there were CHLs carrying in the theater, or even if the theater
was rife with uniformed police, there was no way to return fire in a
dark theater with smoke/teargas, and it seems the perpetrator was
wearing armor as well.

As for the perpetrator, a 24yo neuroscience doctoral candidate from San
Diego, that sure fits the stereotype of a conservative, republican,
racist, redneck, gun nut doesn't it?

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

Atila Iskander wrote:


"G. Morgan" wrote in message
...
HeyBub wrote:

Batman wrote:
Sounds like you had a blast of a time.

One way, probably the best way, to avoid similar future tragedies is to
provide free admission to holders of concealed handgun permits.

If it were free there wouldn't be room for paying customers. G

Good idea though, I can think of other businesses too that might offer a
nice discount (50%?) for CHL holders in exchange for free security.

Hell, just the sign alone advertising that fact would dissuade any
dip**** criminal.

I'm a little surprised a dozen CHL's were not in the theatre to fight
back, it is Colorado after all.

Considering that CHLs are 1-2% of the population, the odds of having
"dozens" of them in a cinema are quite small
PARTICULARLY if said cinema happens to be in a "progressive"
neighborhood
And Aurora appears to be far more blue than red politically



I just read that Cinemark has signs posted on their properties barring
CHL holders from carrying inside. In Texas we call it a 30.06 sign,
named cleverly after the TX criminal code number. Unless the sign is
right on the door and must be in big enough letters the 30.06 rule
applies. A normal "no guns" sign or a picture of a gun with a line
crossed through it does not mean squat for CHL holders. It *must* read
verbatim:

"Pursuant to Section 30.06, Penal Code (trespass by holder of license to
carry a concealed handgun), a person licensed under Subchapter H,
Chapter 411, Government Code (concealed handgun law), may not enter this
property with a concealed handgun";

or:

(B) a sign posted on the property that:

(i) includes the language described by
Paragraph (A) in both English and Spanish;

(ii) appears in contrasting colors with
block letters at least one inch in height; and

(iii) is displayed in a conspicuous manner
clearly visible to the public.



Whole thing:
http://law.onecle.com/texas/penal/30.06.00.html


Or... they can ask you to leave if they don't have a sign and see your
weapon and object. If you don't leave on the propertys owners demand
(or authorized personnel) you can be arrested under this statute. Goes
the same for private homes.

Then there is the list of places never to carry; schools, bars (51%
rule), public sporting events, court, and a few more I'm forgetting
off-hand.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

Pete C. wrote:
Stormin Mormon wrote:

I agee. Sadly, the theaters, or maybe thier insurance, mandates a
"no firearms allowed" sign. Which is about as effective as laws
against crime. There were probably dozen or more CHL holders, whose
guns were in the trunk of the car, or back home.

Even if there were CHLs carrying in the theater, or even if the
theater was rife with uniformed police, there was no way to return
fire in a dark theater with smoke/teargas, and it seems the
perpetrator was wearing armor as well.

As for the perpetrator, a 24yo neuroscience doctoral candidate from
San Diego, that sure fits the stereotype of a conservative,
republican, racist, redneck, gun nut doesn't it?

Can't exactly tell whether you're serious.

"The James Holmes for whom Breitbart News has obtained documentation is 25
years old (the suspect has been reported as 24 years old). He has links to
addresses in both Colorado and San Diego, where his mother has been reported
to be from, according to news reports. He was issued a traffic citation in
2011--his sole run-in with the law. The same is true for the suspect
arrested in connection with the shootings, according to reports. Update: Fox
News reports that the suspect has a California-issued social security
number, as does the man in the documents obtained by Breitbart News--a
significant correlation, assuming the sources are independent.

"Furthermore, the James Holmes for whom records were obtained by Breitbart
News registered as a Democrat on June 14, 2011. He registered from an
address in La Plata County, Colorado, and his status is listed as
'inactive.' "

The report goes on to say that due to some minor, almost insignificant,
discrepancies, it is impossible to tell with absolute certainty and proof
beyond rational doubt that the shooter was a Democrat.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...tered-Democrat

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

G. Morgan wrote:
HeyBub wrote:

Batman wrote:
Sounds like you had a blast of a time.

One way, probably the best way, to avoid similar future tragedies is
to provide free admission to holders of concealed handgun permits.

If it were free there wouldn't be room for paying customers. G

Good idea though, I can think of other businesses too that might
offer a nice discount (50%?) for CHL holders in exchange for free
security.

Hell, just the sign alone advertising that fact would dissuade any
dip**** criminal.

I'm a little surprised a dozen CHL's were not in the theatre to fight
back, it is Colorado after all.

Back in '95, when Texas passed its concealed carry law, the legal eagle from
the Texas Restaurant Association advised against posting ANY sign, whether
for or against, concealed carry. His reasonings were thus:

* If a restaurant prohibits concealed carry, the presumption can be that the
restaurant will take responsibility for its patrons safety. If something
nasty does happen, a permit holder who left his weapon in the car will have
a sustainable action against the restaurant for failure to perform an
implied duty.
* If the restaurant puts up a sign encouraging permit holders and a permit
holder someday takes vigorous objection to finding snot on his lettuce, the
other diners will immediately sue the restaurant for creating a deadly
nuisance.

Best to remain silent on the subject, the lawyer concluded.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

On Friday, July 20, 2012 10:49:59 AM UTC-5, Doug wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:04:04 -0400, Batman > wrote:

>Sounds like you had a blast of a time.

Not funny

What is amazing to me is your post (this post) is well down on the list and you are the first to take exception to the cruel, thoughtless tone of the OP.

Perhaps our society is sicker than I thought. And I mean US and Canadian society.

RonB

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:49:02 -0500, G. Morgan
wrote:

I just read that Cinemark has signs posted on their properties barring
CHL holders from carrying inside.

Costco has no signs posted, but hide the prohibition of guns in the
"agreement". I don't shop there.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 10:49:59 -0500, "Doug"
wrote:

Sounds like you had a blast of a time.

Not funny

Guess who wrote that.

Three guesses and the first two don't count.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:22:25 -0500, "Pete C."
wrote:

As for the perpetrator, a 24yo neuroscience doctoral candidate from San
Diego, that sure fits the stereotype of a conservative, republican,
racist, redneck, gun nut doesn't it?

Gun control originates from democrats, has been forever and still
continues to this day. Talk about racist -- denying blacks of guns.

Look it up!

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

A good CHL, knowing s/he is going to a dark place, carries a high intensity
flash light.

As to the profile, it doesn't matter what the facts are, the socialists and
fascists will call for more laws to disarm those who are not violent.

Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
..

"Pete C." wrote in message
.com...

Stormin Mormon wrote:

I agee. Sadly, the theaters, or maybe thier insurance, mandates a "no
firearms allowed" sign. Which is about as effective as laws against crime.
There were probably dozen or more CHL holders, whose guns were in the
trunk
of the car, or back home.

Even if there were CHLs carrying in the theater, or even if the theater
was rife with uniformed police, there was no way to return fire in a
dark theater with smoke/teargas, and it seems the perpetrator was
wearing armor as well.

As for the perpetrator, a 24yo neuroscience doctoral candidate from San
Diego, that sure fits the stereotype of a conservative, republican,
racist, redneck, gun nut doesn't it?

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

Isn't it amazing, that the crazy, evil violent guy didn't choose to shoot up
a gun show? He chose a place with hundreds of unarmed people.

Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
..

"G. Morgan" wrote in message

I just read that Cinemark has signs posted on their properties barring
CHL holders from carrying inside. In Texas we call it a 30.06 sign,
named cleverly after the TX criminal code number. Unless the sign is
right on the door and must be in big enough letters the 30.06 rule
applies. A normal "no guns" sign or a picture of a gun with a line
crossed through it does not mean squat for CHL holders. It *must* read
verbatim:

"Pursuant to Section 30.06, Penal Code (trespass by holder of license to
carry a concealed handgun), a person licensed under Subchapter H,
Chapter 411, Government Code (concealed handgun law), may not enter this
property with a concealed handgun";

or:

(B) a sign posted on the property that:

(i) includes the language described by
Paragraph (A) in both English and Spanish;

(ii) appears in contrasting colors with
block letters at least one inch in height; and

(iii) is displayed in a conspicuous manner
clearly visible to the public.



Whole thing:
http://law.onecle.com/texas/penal/30.06.00.html


Or... they can ask you to leave if they don't have a sign and see your
weapon and object. If you don't leave on the propertys owners demand
(or authorized personnel) you can be arrested under this statute. Goes
the same for private homes.

Then there is the list of places never to carry; schools, bars (51%
rule), public sporting events, court, and a few more I'm forgetting
off-hand.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

Sick....? Who's sick?

This whole nation is really sick...!

There's no dialog to consider. When a sick person obtains weapons and
there is no stopping them who is going to be the protectorate of the
peeps? YOU? Your neighbor? The Cops?...NO! Nobody has a chance against
these secret weidos.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

Stormin Mormon wrote:

I agee. Sadly, the theaters, or maybe thier insurance, mandates a "no
firearms allowed" sign. Which is about as effective as laws against crime.
There were probably dozen or more CHL holders, whose guns were in the trunk
of the car, or back home.

Oh ****, I never thought about them. I hope no one had to bear that
remorse.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

Stormin Mormon wrote:

A good CHL, knowing s/he is going to a dark place, carries a high intensity
flash light.

And a gas mask? And a ladder to get up high enough to target the
perpetrator over the herds of people trying to escape? And what about
the herds of people trampling the CHL (or Cop)? Face it, it was a
relatively hopeless situation, a theater is essentially fish in a
barrel, and if the perpetrator didn't have a gun and instead lobbed
firebombs or rammed the theater with a stolen semi the results would be
about the same casualty wise.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

"G. Morgan" wrote in message
...
Stormin Mormon wrote:

I agee. Sadly, the theaters, or maybe thier insurance, mandates a "no
firearms allowed" sign. Which is about as effective as laws against crime.
There were probably dozen or more CHL holders, whose guns were in the
trunk
of the car, or back home.

Oh ****, I never thought about them. I hope no one had to bear that
remorse.


Something like that hapened years ago in a Texas restrurant. A woman left
her handgun in her car and had to watch as a gunman killed her mon and dad.
I think the law was changed with her help.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

Chris, your top-posting and trimming is now misquoting *me*. Would you
at least leave the attributions intact please?

You made it look like I wrote this:
"One way, probably the best way, to avoid similar future tragedies is to
provide free admission to holders of concealed handgun permits. "

When it should have been attributed to HeyBub.

[S.M. reply snipped]

See?


"G. Morgan" wrote in message
...

One way, probably the best way, to avoid similar future tragedies is to
provide free admission to holders of concealed handgun permits.

If it were free there wouldn't be room for paying customers. G

Good idea though, I can think of other businesses too that might offer a
nice discount (50%?) for CHL holders in exchange for free security.

Hell, just the sign alone advertising that fact would dissuade any
dip**** criminal.

I'm a little surprised a dozen CHL's were not in the theatre to fight
back, it is Colorado after all.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

Actually, about two million times a year, law abiding US citizens protect
themselves from violence, using personally owned fire arms. The answer is to
reduce the laws on the law abiding.

Like when Gabrielle Gifford was shot. A law abiding citizen heard the shots,
and ran to see what was going on. Sadly, he arrived after the shooting. No
one at the meeting was armed. Except the criminal, of course.

Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
..

"Papa Pat" wrote in message
...

Sick....? Who's sick?

This whole nation is really sick...!

There's no dialog to consider. When a sick person obtains weapons and
there is no stopping them who is going to be the protectorate of the
peeps? YOU? Your neighbor? The Cops?...NO! Nobody has a chance against
these secret weidos.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

Would be hard to bear, knowing that you could have reduced the death toll.
If only you'd had your handgun with you. You'd be just one more movie goer,
running for the exit, or hiding under the seat.

Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
..

"G. Morgan" wrote in message
...
Stormin Mormon wrote:

I agee. Sadly, the theaters, or maybe thier insurance, mandates a "no
firearms allowed" sign. Which is about as effective as laws against crime.
There were probably dozen or more CHL holders, whose guns were in the trunk
of the car, or back home.

Oh ****, I never thought about them. I hope no one had to bear that
remorse.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

Oren wrote:

On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:49:02 -0500, G. Morgan
wrote:

I just read that Cinemark has signs posted on their properties barring
CHL holders from carrying inside.

Costco has no signs posted, but hide the prohibition of guns in the
"agreement". I don't shop there.

In Texas they have to post it, or it's fair game.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

Stormin Mormon wrote:

Isn't it amazing, that the crazy, evil violent guy didn't choose to shoot up
a gun show? He chose a place with hundreds of unarmed people.

what a ****ing asshole. At least he didn't shoot himself, now he gets
to pay.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

Ralph Mowery wrote:


"G. Morgan" wrote in message
...
Stormin Mormon wrote:

I agee. Sadly, the theaters, or maybe thier insurance, mandates a "no
firearms allowed" sign. Which is about as effective as laws against crime.
There were probably dozen or more CHL holders, whose guns were in the
trunk
of the car, or back home.

Oh ****, I never thought about them. I hope no one had to bear that
remorse.


Something like that hapened years ago in a Texas restrurant. A woman left
her handgun in her car and had to watch as a gunman killed her mon and dad.
I think the law was changed with her help.

That's awful.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

Stormin Mormon wrote:

Would be hard to bear, knowing that you could have reduced the death toll.
If only you'd had your handgun with you. You'd be just one more movie goer,
running for the exit, or hiding under the seat.

It would be.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

HeyBub wrote:

G. Morgan wrote:
HeyBub wrote:

Batman wrote:
Sounds like you had a blast of a time.

One way, probably the best way, to avoid similar future tragedies is
to provide free admission to holders of concealed handgun permits.

If it were free there wouldn't be room for paying customers. G

Good idea though, I can think of other businesses too that might
offer a nice discount (50%?) for CHL holders in exchange for free
security.

Hell, just the sign alone advertising that fact would dissuade any
dip**** criminal.

I'm a little surprised a dozen CHL's were not in the theatre to fight
back, it is Colorado after all.

Back in '95, when Texas passed its concealed carry law, the legal eagle from
the Texas Restaurant Association advised against posting ANY sign, whether
for or against, concealed carry. His reasonings were thus:

* If a restaurant prohibits concealed carry, the presumption can be that the
restaurant will take responsibility for its patrons safety. If something
nasty does happen, a permit holder who left his weapon in the car will have
a sustainable action against the restaurant for failure to perform an
implied duty.
* If the restaurant puts up a sign encouraging permit holders and a permit
holder someday takes vigorous objection to finding snot on his lettuce, the
other diners will immediately sue the restaurant for creating a deadly
nuisance.

Best to remain silent on the subject, the lawyer concluded.

Probably so.

This banker does not agree, he say's bring 'em in!
http://www.kens5.com/news/Texas-bank...103920673.html

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

RonB wrote:

On Friday, July 20, 2012 10:49:59 AM UTC-5, Doug wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:04:04 -0400, Batman > wrote:

>Sounds like you had a blast of a time.

Not funny

What is amazing to me is your post (this post) is well down on the list and you are the first to take exception to the cruel, thoughtless tone of the OP.

Perhaps our society is sicker than I thought. And I mean US and Canadian society.

It's not that for me. If I think too much about it I'll get ****ed off
and depressed. I'm still trying to absorb what happened. I can't watch
the CNN hours on end seeing the footage.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

Stormin Mormon wrote:

Actually, about two million times a year, law abiding US citizens protect
themselves from violence, using personally owned fire arms. The answer is to
reduce the laws on the law abiding.

Do you have a link for that Chris? I really need to show it to someone.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 17:38:48 -0500, G. Morgan
wrote:

Chris, your top-posting and trimming is now misquoting *me*. Would you
at least leave the attributions intact please?

You made it look like I wrote this:
"One way, probably the best way, to avoid similar future tragedies is to
provide free admission to holders of concealed handgun permits. "

When it should have been attributed to HeyBub.

[S.M. reply snipped]

See?

This guy _knows_ all this. He has been told about it by me and others
here. It confounds the chronology of the thread. Like reading a thread
from bottom to top vs top to bottom. With facts snipped out.

He has to *make* sure his religion is on his sleeve, not caring about
what you or others think. AS long as his sig is on TOP. He was told
how to put his sig at the bottom and offered help to do so.

I only see him (think "Sanders" / '"Sandroid') when people reply to
him. The guy is selfish with no consideration to others. We have
asked him politely to fix it.

He does as he wishes, so FARK him, I say. He won't see this at first
posting.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 18:36:40 -0400, "Ralph Mowery"
wrote:

Oh ****, I never thought about them. I hope no one had to bear that
remorse.


Something like that hapened years ago in a Texas restrurant. A woman left
her handgun in her car and had to watch as a gunman killed her mon and dad.
I think the law was changed with her help.

It did happen. What a tragedy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luby's_massacre

Gun free zone victim list.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luby's_massacre#Victims

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

You be hopeless. I'm going to keep having confidence in good citizens with
privately owned weapons.

Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
..

"Pete C." wrote in message
.com...

Stormin Mormon wrote:

A good CHL, knowing s/he is going to a dark place, carries a high
intensity
flash light.

And a gas mask? And a ladder to get up high enough to target the
perpetrator over the herds of people trying to escape? And what about
the herds of people trampling the CHL (or Cop)? Face it, it was a
relatively hopeless situation, a theater is essentially fish in a
barrel, and if the perpetrator didn't have a gun and instead lobbed
firebombs or rammed the theater with a stolen semi the results would be
about the same casualty wise.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

Luby's restaurant, in Killeen tx.

Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
..

"Ralph Mowery" wrote in message
m...

Something like that hapened years ago in a Texas restrurant. A woman left
her handgun in her car and had to watch as a gunman killed her mon and dad.
I think the law was changed with her help.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

I went back and looked. Hebe Bub's text was indented with chicken scratches.
Below, you can see the double indents, that's not your text.

Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
..

"G. Morgan" wrote in message
...
Chris, your top-posting and trimming is now misquoting *me*. Would you
at least leave the attributions intact please?

You made it look like I wrote this:
"One way, probably the best way, to avoid similar future tragedies is to
provide free admission to holders of concealed handgun permits. "

When it should have been attributed to HeyBub.

[S.M. reply snipped]

See?


"G. Morgan" wrote in message
...

One way, probably the best way, to avoid similar future tragedies is to
provide free admission to holders of concealed handgun permits.

If it were free there wouldn't be room for paying customers. G

Good idea though, I can think of other businesses too that might offer a
nice discount (50%?) for CHL holders in exchange for free security.

Hell, just the sign alone advertising that fact would dissuade any
dip**** criminal.

I'm a little surprised a dozen CHL's were not in the theatre to fight
back, it is Colorado after all.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

"fair game" means that law abiding citizens can carry legal private
property?

Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
..

"G. Morgan" wrote in message
...
I just read that Cinemark has signs posted on their properties barring
CHL holders from carrying inside.

Costco has no signs posted, but hide the prohibition of guns in the
"agreement". I don't shop there.

In Texas they have to post it, or it's fair game.

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

"Stormin Mormon" wrote:
Isn't it amazing, that the crazy, evil violent guy didn't choose to shoot up
a gun show? He chose a place with hundreds of unarmed people.



There was a shooting here in Pittsburgh not long ago. Guy walks in hospital
starts shooting. A mental hospital. I don't think the guy even went there,
turns out he took drug or drugs to tame his illness. He was not talking his
drug like he was suppose to. This sort of thing happens all the time.
Nobody monitors them.

It was suppose to be a big day in Pittsburgh since much of the movie was
shot here. Remorseful and sunken feelings.

Greg

I heard you guys had a party in Aurora Colorado last night...
 

http://www.guncite.com/gun_control_gcdguse.html
http://civilliberty.about.com/od/gun...-Deterrent.htm
In your favorite search engine, type "US guns for self defense" and it comes
right up.

Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
..

"G. Morgan" wrote in message
...
Stormin Mormon wrote:

Actually, about two million times a year, law abiding US citizens protect
themselves from violence, using personally owned fire arms. The answer is
to
reduce the laws on the law abiding.

Do you have a link for that Chris? I really need to show it to someone.