http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4a__tcfFug

On Sunday, January 29, 2012 1:33:55 AM UTC-7, harry wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4a__tcfFug

If I was an American I would definitely support Ron Paul.

On Jan 29, 2:30*pm, Roy wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2012 1:33:55 AM UTC-7, harry wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4a__tcfFug

If I was an American I would definitely support Ron Paul.

My thoughts exactly.

harry wrote:
On Jan 29, 2:30 pm, wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2012 1:33:55 AM UTC-7, harry wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4a__tcfFug

If I was an American I would definitely support Ron Paul.

My thoughts exactly.
Hi,
Ditto. He has something right between his ears.

Tony Hwang wrote:


harry wrote:
On Jan 29, 2:30 pm, wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2012 1:33:55 AM UTC-7, harry wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4a__tcfFug

If I was an American I would definitely support Ron Paul.

My thoughts exactly.
Hi,
Ditto. He has something right between his ears.
Hmm,
American foreign policy is like trying to teach how to use fork
instead of fingers or chop sticks.

On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:26:21 -0700, Tony Hwang
wrote:

American foreign policy is like trying to teach how to use fork
instead of fingers or chop sticks.

Some things just don't need changing, do they....

harry wrote:
On Jan 29, 2:30 pm, Roy wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2012 1:33:55 AM UTC-7, harry wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4a__tcfFug

If I was an American I would definitely support Ron Paul.

My thoughts exactly.

When the UK abrogated its role as world policeman after WWII, the US took
over the job. If not the US, then who? China? Russia? Somalia?

In 1960, South Korea had the same per-capita income as Uganda. Today, it
ranks 4th. Most believe the 50,000 troops we have in the contry have
deterred the North from further escapades.

In Europe, there has been a war, historically, about every fifteen minutes.
With 120,000 US troops in place, minor irritations haven't escalated into
general war in almost seven decades (the longest Europe has been at peace
since before the invention of moveable type (in China) ).

And why should the U.S. BE the world's policeman?

"Because we're here, lad. There's no one else. Just us. Now face the front
and mark your target when he comes. There's a good lad."

HeyBub wrote:
harry wrote:
On Jan 29, 2:30 pm, wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2012 1:33:55 AM UTC-7, harry wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4a__tcfFug

If I was an American I would definitely support Ron Paul.

My thoughts exactly.

When the UK abrogated its role as world policeman after WWII, the US took
over the job. If not the US, then who? China? Russia? Somalia?

In 1960, South Korea had the same per-capita income as Uganda. Today, it
ranks 4th. Most believe the 50,000 troops we have in the contry have
deterred the North from further escapades.

In Europe, there has been a war, historically, about every fifteen minutes.
With 120,000 US troops in place, minor irritations haven't escalated into
general war in almost seven decades (the longest Europe has been at peace
since before the invention of moveable type (in China) ).

And why should the U.S. BE the world's policeman?

"Because we're here, lad. There's no one else. Just us. Now face the front
and mark your target when he comes. There's a good lad."

If you want to talk anout it, you better know more anout the historical
truth first.

For one, Koreans did not want to divide their country after the WWII.
You, USA and USSR forced it upon them. Did you know that Roosevelt
wanted th share the secret of Nuke bomb with Russians? Churchill
objected to it. Why did you choke off gasoline supply for Gen. Patton's
tanks when he was advancing towards Russian border? Do you know who
really killed him?

Tony Hwang wrote:
HeyBub wrote:
harry wrote:
On Jan 29, 2:30 pm, wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2012 1:33:55 AM UTC-7, harry wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4a__tcfFug

If I was an American I would definitely support Ron Paul.

My thoughts exactly.

When the UK abrogated its role as world policeman after WWII, the US
took over the job. If not the US, then who? China? Russia? Somalia?

In 1960, South Korea had the same per-capita income as Uganda.
Today, it ranks 4th. Most believe the 50,000 troops we have in the
contry have deterred the North from further escapades.

In Europe, there has been a war, historically, about every fifteen
minutes. With 120,000 US troops in place, minor irritations haven't
escalated into general war in almost seven decades (the longest
Europe has been at peace since before the invention of moveable type
(in China) ). And why should the U.S. BE the world's policeman?

"Because we're here, lad. There's no one else. Just us. Now face the
front and mark your target when he comes. There's a good lad."

If you want to talk anout it, you better know more anout the
historical truth first.

For one, Koreans did not want to divide their country after the WWII.
You, USA and USSR forced it upon them. Did you know that Roosevelt
wanted th share the secret of Nuke bomb with Russians? Churchill
objected to it. Why did you choke off gasoline supply for Gen.
Patton's tanks when he was advancing towards Russian border? Do you
know who really killed him?

Historical truth is irrelevant to the subject at hand.

You raise some interesting issues about which I knew nothing. Similarily,
I'm in the dark about dark matter, whether Madonna still shaves her private
area, the recipe for Coca-Cola, where the American National Standard Orgasm
is kept, where a fire goes when it goes out, how high is up, and other
pressing issues.

Regrettably, my ignorance on these matters has nothing to do with whether
the U.S. is, or should be, the world's policeman.

"Tony Hwang" wrote in message
...


HeyBub wrote:
harry wrote:
On Jan 29, 2:30 pm, wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2012 1:33:55 AM UTC-7, harry wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4a__tcfFug

If I was an American I would definitely support Ron Paul.

My thoughts exactly.

When the UK abrogated its role as world policeman after WWII, the US took
over the job. If not the US, then who? China? Russia? Somalia?

In 1960, South Korea had the same per-capita income as Uganda. Today, it
ranks 4th. Most believe the 50,000 troops we have in the contry have
deterred the North from further escapades.

In Europe, there has been a war, historically, about every fifteen
minutes.
With 120,000 US troops in place, minor irritations haven't escalated into
general war in almost seven decades (the longest Europe has been at peace
since before the invention of moveable type (in China) ).

And why should the U.S. BE the world's policeman?

"Because we're here, lad. There's no one else. Just us. Now face the
front
and mark your target when he comes. There's a good lad."

If you want to talk anout it, you better know more anout the historical
truth first.

For one, Koreans did not want to divide their country after the WWII. You,
USA and USSR forced it upon them. Did you know that Roosevelt wanted th
share the secret of Nuke bomb with Russians? Churchill objected to it. Why
did you choke off gasoline supply for Gen. Patton's tanks when he was
advancing towards Russian border? Do you know who really killed him?

So you suggest that Korea should have been left to Russian or Chinese
Control ??
We can see how letting North Korea become another Soviet Heaven has worked
out for the people of North Korea

Rest of stupidities ignored

"harry" wrote in message
...
On Jan 29, 2:30 pm, Roy wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2012 1:33:55 AM UTC-7, harry wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4a__tcfFug

If I was an American I would definitely support Ron Paul.

My thoughts exactly.

But since you are not, and an idiot to boot, your opinion is moot.

On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 06:30:11 -0800 (PST), Roy wrote:

On Sunday, January 29, 2012 1:33:55 AM UTC-7, harry wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4a__tcfFug

If I was an American I would definitely support Ron Paul.

Since you aren't, STFU!

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 06:30:11 -0800 (PST), Roy wrote:

On Sunday, January 29, 2012 1:33:55 AM UTC-7, harry wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4a__tcfFug

If I was an American I would definitely support Ron Paul.

Since you aren't, STFU!

I second the motion.
It annoys me when aliens try to get involved in our domestic business.

On 1/29/2012 7:18 PM, Dick Keats wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 06:30:11 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Sunday, January 29, 2012 1:33:55 AM UTC-7, harry wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4a__tcfFug
If I was an American I would definitely support Ron Paul.
Since you aren't, STFU!
I second the motion.
It annoys me when aliens try to get involved in our domestic business.



Oh brother! The U.S. has it's nose up everybody's ass and this guy is
upset about someone with an opinion.

On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 19:18:26 -0600, "Dick Keats"
wrote:

wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 06:30:11 -0800 (PST), Roy wrote:

On Sunday, January 29, 2012 1:33:55 AM UTC-7, harry wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4a__tcfFug

If I was an American I would definitely support Ron Paul.

Since you aren't, STFU!

I second the motion.
It annoys me when aliens try to get involved in our domestic business.


Third the motion. Count 'em up and they are most likely progressive
socialist, Liberals, spend my money and take my cows away group of
people.

On 1/29/2012 8:35 PM, Oren wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 19:18:26 -0600, "Dick Keats"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 06:30:11 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Sunday, January 29, 2012 1:33:55 AM UTC-7, harry wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4a__tcfFug
If I was an American I would definitely support Ron Paul.
Since you aren't, STFU!
I second the motion.
It annoys me when aliens try to get involved in our domestic business.

Third the motion. Count 'em up and they are most likely progressive
socialist, Liberals, spend my money and take my cows away group of
people.

The only reason all of you want foreigners out of our politics is
because you have a bunch a buffoons running for POTUS and you're
embarrassed. As well you should be.

I'd have to guess, that plenty of people in other nations don't appreciate
the USA meddling in their affairs.

Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
..

If I was an American I would definitely support Ron Paul.

Since you aren't, STFU!

I second the motion.
It annoys me when aliens try to get involved in our domestic business.

On 1/29/2012 7:18 PM, Dick Keats wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 06:30:11 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Sunday, January 29, 2012 1:33:55 AM UTC-7, harry wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4a__tcfFug

If I was an American I would definitely support Ron Paul.

Since you aren't, STFU!

I second the motion.
It annoys me when aliens try to get involved in our domestic business.


Heck, I might go all al-Qaeda on them for messing with my country. ^_^

TDD

On Jan 30, 1:18*am, "Dick Keats" wrote:
wrote in message

...

On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 06:30:11 -0800 (PST), Roy wrote:

On Sunday, January 29, 2012 1:33:55 AM UTC-7, harry wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4a__tcfFug

If I was an American I would definitely support Ron Paul.

Since you aren't, STFU!

I second the motion.
It annoys me when aliens try to get involved in our domestic business.

Well you should leave the aliens alone. Stay at home. Make the world a
better place.

On Sunday, January 29, 2012 11:31:28 AM UTC-7, wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 06:30:11 -0800 (PST), Roy wrote:

On Sunday, January 29, 2012 1:33:55 AM UTC-7, harry wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4a__tcfFug

If I was an American I would definitely support Ron Paul.

Since you aren't, STFU!

Yes, you frickin' teabaggers would love to suppress ALL dissent...typical response from YOU.
==

On 1/29/2012 11:27 PM, Roy wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2012 11:31:28 AM UTC-7, wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 06:30:11 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Sunday, January 29, 2012 1:33:55 AM UTC-7, harry wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4a__tcfFug

If I was an American I would definitely support Ron Paul.

Since you aren't, STFU!

Yes, you frickin' teabaggers would love to suppress ALL dissent...typical response from YOU.
==

Why would those who practice the sexual perversion of tea-bagging want
to suppress anyone? I would think they would be quite liberal in their
lifestyle. ^_^

TDD

On Jan 30, 2:05*am, The Daring Dufas
wrote:
On 1/29/2012 11:27 PM, Roy wrote:

On Sunday, January 29, 2012 11:31:28 AM UTC-7, wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 06:30:11 -0800 (PST), *wrote:

On Sunday, January 29, 2012 1:33:55 AM UTC-7, harry wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4a__tcfFug

If I was an American I would definitely support Ron Paul.

Since you aren't, STFU!

Yes, you frickin' teabaggers would love to suppress ALL dissent...typical response from YOU.
==

Why would those who practice the sexual perversion of tea-bagging want
to suppress anyone? I would think they would be quite liberal in their
lifestyle. ^_^

TDD


Everybody knows it's the conservatives that have the most weird
perversions. That's why they are so interested in what's going on in
everyone else's bedrooms. But none of them ever admit it because they
don't want anyone looking in their own bedrooms.

-C-

harry wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4a__tcfFug

Yes.

Far too many Americans are either disengenuous about not knowing their
own recent history, or are totally ignorant (or un-critical) of the
consequences of their gov'ts foreign policy and military activities.