Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Muller is saying what?
Hmmm,
Now what? |
#2
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Muller is saying what?
Tony Hwang wrote:
Hmmm, Now what? It's sad. You roll a grenade into a newsgroup and everyone just sits there smoking their cigars. What's Usenet coming to? -- Doug |
#3
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Muller is saying what?
Douglas Johnson wrote:
Hmmm, Now what? It's sad. You roll a grenade into a newsgroup and everyone just sits there smoking their cigars. What's Usenet coming to? Is this the grenade? =================== In the Sydney Morning Herald on October 28, Eugene Robinson, a columnist with the Washington Post, reported the findings of the most comprehensive study of the Earth's temperature ever undertaken. The study had been conducted by the Professor of Physics at University of California, Berkeley, Richard Muller. His team had collated 1.6 billion temperature readings. Interestingly, Muller had begun his study as a climate change "sceptic", mocking Michael Mann's "hockey stick" graph; sympathetic to those responsible for hacking the University of East Anglia Climategate emails. The "denialists" were confident that Muller's study would produce results favourable to their cause. Muller even received a grant of $150,000 from the great sponsors of US denialism, the fossil fuel industry-based Koch brothers. As it turned out, however, the study confirmed earlier findings. Since the 1950s the Earth's temperature has indeed risen by about 1 degree Celsius. Muller argued in the Wall Street Journal: "When we began our study, we felt that sceptics had raised legitimate issues, and we didn't know what we'd find. Our results turned out to be close to those published by prior groups." He concluded: "You should not be a sceptic, at least not any longer." Of course these results were immediately contested. Muller was once a climate change sceptic. His new enemies are climate change denialists. Nothing illustrates the distinction between climate change scepticism and denialism more neatly than the differences that are presently opening up between Muller and his critics. ====================== http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/3611206.html |
#4
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Muller is saying what?
On Oct 31, 10:43*pm, Douglas Johnson wrote:
Tony Hwang wrote: Hmmm, Now what? It's sad. *You roll a grenade into a newsgroup and everyone just sits there smoking their cigars. Who's passing out cigars? I didn't get one. What's Usenet coming to? The end of the road. When this generation dies off it'll just be a Google archive. R |
#5
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Muller is saying what?
On 11/1/2011 1:15 AM, RicodJour wrote:
On Oct 31, 10:43 pm, Douglas wrote: Tony wrote: Hmmm, Now what? It's sad. You roll a grenade into a newsgroup and everyone just sits there smoking their cigars. Who's passing out cigars? I didn't get one. What's Usenet coming to? The end of the road. When this generation dies off it'll just be a Google archive. R When the archive stops getting hits, they will pull the plug. A virtual Library of Alexandria, and with nothing to burn for fuel, it'll just go Pfft. -- aem sends... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|