Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to misc.consumers.house,sci.engr.lighting,alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21
Default incandescent light bulb phase-out in the U.S. (are flood bulbs exempt?)

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:01:38 -0700 (PDT), RickH
wrote:

[snip]

The vast energy and large supply chain of parts that goes into a CFL
negates the savings. An incandescent has 5 parts. A CFL can have a
hundred parts each of which needs a deep global supply chain, mining,
and manufacturing of those complex electronic parts, not to mention
the toxic phosphors, gasses and mercury. An incandescent has no toxic
components and uses argon a harmless inert gas some glass, tungsten
wire, aluminum, solder and brass. This story is much like the ethanol
story, it takes more energy and pollutes more just to make the ethanol
(a low btu fuel that gets fewer mpg to boot). But a farm lobby that
keeps the boondoggle going in a few corn states.


This is a nice story, but not true. You don't even have to rely on
"experts" to tell you. You can figure it out all on your own.

Energy costs money, and the cost of energy used to make all products
is included in the price. It must be or the manufacturers of the
components and the final product would go broke.

If the energy used to make a CFL was more than the energy saved by
that CFL, then the cost of the CFL could not be so much lower than the
cost of the energy saved.

You may counter that the cost of energy to the manufacturer is lower
than the cost of energy to the homeowner. That is a fair comment.
However, even if you assume that the factories that make the
components for the CFL, and the CFL itself pay half the price per unit
of energy than the homeowner does, the cost of the energy saved by one
CFL far outweighs the retail price of the CFL.

I agree that the Ethanol situation is far different. That is why
Ethanol requires a subsidy to break even, while CFLs do not.

Vic Roberts
http://www.RobertsResearchInc.com
http://www.cflfacts.com
sci.engr.lighting Rogues Gallery http://www.langmuir.org
To reply via e-mail:
replace xyz with vdr in the Reply to: address
or use e-mail address listed at the Web site.

This information is provided for educational purposes only.
It may not be used in any publication or posted on any Web
site without written permission.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
incandescent light bulb phase-out in the U.S. (are flood bulbs exempt?) [email protected] Home Repair 6 September 19th 11 01:06 AM
incandescent light bulb phase-out in the U.S. (are flood bulbs exempt?) Victor Roberts[_2_] Home Repair 18 September 18th 11 03:20 AM
incandescent light bulb phase-out in the U.S. (are flood bulbs exempt?) Victor Roberts[_2_] Home Repair 2 September 17th 11 12:17 AM
incandescent light bulb phase-out in the U.S. (are flood bulbs exempt?) Victor Roberts[_2_] Home Repair 0 September 15th 11 04:08 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 DIYbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about DIY & home improvement"