Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to misc.consumers.house,sci.engr.lighting,alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
incandescent light bulb phase-out in the U.S. (are flood bulbs exempt?)
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:01:38 -0700 (PDT), RickH
wrote: [snip] The vast energy and large supply chain of parts that goes into a CFL negates the savings. An incandescent has 5 parts. A CFL can have a hundred parts each of which needs a deep global supply chain, mining, and manufacturing of those complex electronic parts, not to mention the toxic phosphors, gasses and mercury. An incandescent has no toxic components and uses argon a harmless inert gas some glass, tungsten wire, aluminum, solder and brass. This story is much like the ethanol story, it takes more energy and pollutes more just to make the ethanol (a low btu fuel that gets fewer mpg to boot). But a farm lobby that keeps the boondoggle going in a few corn states. This is a nice story, but not true. You don't even have to rely on "experts" to tell you. You can figure it out all on your own. Energy costs money, and the cost of energy used to make all products is included in the price. It must be or the manufacturers of the components and the final product would go broke. If the energy used to make a CFL was more than the energy saved by that CFL, then the cost of the CFL could not be so much lower than the cost of the energy saved. You may counter that the cost of energy to the manufacturer is lower than the cost of energy to the homeowner. That is a fair comment. However, even if you assume that the factories that make the components for the CFL, and the CFL itself pay half the price per unit of energy than the homeowner does, the cost of the energy saved by one CFL far outweighs the retail price of the CFL. I agree that the Ethanol situation is far different. That is why Ethanol requires a subsidy to break even, while CFLs do not. Vic Roberts http://www.RobertsResearchInc.com http://www.cflfacts.com sci.engr.lighting Rogues Gallery http://www.langmuir.org To reply via e-mail: replace xyz with vdr in the Reply to: address or use e-mail address listed at the Web site. This information is provided for educational purposes only. It may not be used in any publication or posted on any Web site without written permission. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
incandescent light bulb phase-out in the U.S. (are flood bulbs exempt?) | Home Repair | |||
incandescent light bulb phase-out in the U.S. (are flood bulbs exempt?) | Home Repair | |||
incandescent light bulb phase-out in the U.S. (are flood bulbs exempt?) | Home Repair | |||
incandescent light bulb phase-out in the U.S. (are flood bulbs exempt?) | Home Repair |