Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.cars.maintenance,sci.electronics.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,589
Default Best solder free electrical connection

On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:07:07 +0100, geoff wrote:

In message ,
writes
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 18:13:58 +0100, (((°
wrote:

On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 16:45:08 +0100, zzzzzzzzzz
wrote:

On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 12:01:04 +0100, tony sayer wrote:

In article , Michael A.
Terrell scribeth thus

(((° wrote:

On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:26:53 +0100, wrote:

On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 14:46:34 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:


Dave wrote:

On 21/08/2010 03:59, Michael A. Terrell wrote:

geoff wrote:

That's a very good example of why most people with brains
left
Europe
for 'The new World'.

So how come Britain made a better nuclear bomb than the New
World? And
the New World wanted as much detail of our superior technology as
they
could get?


What superior technology? Lucas?
No "superior technology" has come out of GB since about 1950. - and
that may be stretchng it. There have been a few "good ideas" since

I might be wrong but I thought Concorde started flying after 1950.
Though then again the Septics didn't like the noise, or was it a
classic
case of "Not Invented Here" syndrome?


It was a fast plane, but a poor design.

Not that bad really as it was the first one..

They spent wads of money to
build and maintain them, then junked the entire fleet. It was noisy
and
very fuel inefficient. That forced the fares so high that they weren't
able to compete with better planes from multiple countries.

What other supersonic airliners are those then?...

Don't read well, do you? The 747 kicked its butt.

The 747 goes about 600 mph top whack.
Supersonic means greater than 768 mph so the 747 ain't a supersonic
airliner.

You might have a military plane faster but you haven't got a passenger
airliner faster.

The 747 (on a bad day) moves more passenger-miles per hour on less
than 1/4 the lbs of fuel per passenger mile than the concorde could
dream of on it's best day


You could say more or less the same comparing a ford fiesta and a rolls
royce


I think you'll find that a Rolls will move more passenger-miles per hour than
a Ford Fiesta. ;-)
  #2   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.cars.maintenance,sci.electronics.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,538
Default Best solder free electrical connection

On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:07:35 -0500, "
wrote:

On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:07:07 +0100, geoff wrote:

In message ,
writes
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 18:13:58 +0100, (((°
wrote:

On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 16:45:08 +0100, zzzzzzzzzz
wrote:

On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 12:01:04 +0100, tony sayer wrote:

In article , Michael A.
Terrell scribeth thus

(((° wrote:

On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:26:53 +0100, wrote:

On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 14:46:34 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:


Dave wrote:

On 21/08/2010 03:59, Michael A. Terrell wrote:

geoff wrote:

That's a very good example of why most people with brains
left
Europe
for 'The new World'.

So how come Britain made a better nuclear bomb than the New
World? And
the New World wanted as much detail of our superior technology as
they
could get?


What superior technology? Lucas?
No "superior technology" has come out of GB since about 1950. - and
that may be stretchng it. There have been a few "good ideas" since

I might be wrong but I thought Concorde started flying after 1950.
Though then again the Septics didn't like the noise, or was it a
classic
case of "Not Invented Here" syndrome?


It was a fast plane, but a poor design.

Not that bad really as it was the first one..

They spent wads of money to
build and maintain them, then junked the entire fleet. It was noisy
and
very fuel inefficient. That forced the fares so high that they weren't
able to compete with better planes from multiple countries.

What other supersonic airliners are those then?...

Don't read well, do you? The 747 kicked its butt.

The 747 goes about 600 mph top whack.
Supersonic means greater than 768 mph so the 747 ain't a supersonic
airliner.

You might have a military plane faster but you haven't got a passenger
airliner faster.
The 747 (on a bad day) moves more passenger-miles per hour on less
than 1/4 the lbs of fuel per passenger mile than the concorde could
dream of on it's best day


You could say more or less the same comparing a ford fiesta and a rolls
royce


I think you'll find that a Rolls will move more passenger-miles per hour than
a Ford Fiesta. ;-)

But more passenger miles per hour per GALLON? Perhaps, but i somehow
doubt it, having actually driven and fed both. . . . . .
  #3   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.cars.maintenance,sci.electronics.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,589
Default Best solder free electrical connection

On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:36:23 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:07:35 -0500, "
wrote:

On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:07:07 +0100, geoff wrote:

In message ,
writes
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 18:13:58 +0100, (((°
wrote:

On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 16:45:08 +0100,
zzzzzzzzzz
wrote:

On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 12:01:04 +0100, tony sayer wrote:

In article , Michael A.
Terrell scribeth thus

(((° wrote:

On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:26:53 +0100, wrote:

On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 14:46:34 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:


Dave wrote:

On 21/08/2010 03:59, Michael A. Terrell wrote:

geoff wrote:

That's a very good example of why most people with brains
left
Europe
for 'The new World'.

So how come Britain made a better nuclear bomb than the New
World? And
the New World wanted as much detail of our superior technology as
they
could get?


What superior technology? Lucas?
No "superior technology" has come out of GB since about 1950. - and
that may be stretchng it. There have been a few "good ideas" since

I might be wrong but I thought Concorde started flying after 1950.
Though then again the Septics didn't like the noise, or was it a
classic
case of "Not Invented Here" syndrome?


It was a fast plane, but a poor design.

Not that bad really as it was the first one..

They spent wads of money to
build and maintain them, then junked the entire fleet. It was noisy
and
very fuel inefficient. That forced the fares so high that they weren't
able to compete with better planes from multiple countries.

What other supersonic airliners are those then?...

Don't read well, do you? The 747 kicked its butt.

The 747 goes about 600 mph top whack.
Supersonic means greater than 768 mph so the 747 ain't a supersonic
airliner.

You might have a military plane faster but you haven't got a passenger
airliner faster.
The 747 (on a bad day) moves more passenger-miles per hour on less
than 1/4 the lbs of fuel per passenger mile than the concorde could
dream of on it's best day

You could say more or less the same comparing a ford fiesta and a rolls
royce


I think you'll find that a Rolls will move more passenger-miles per hour than
a Ford Fiesta. ;-)

But more passenger miles per hour per GALLON? Perhaps, but i somehow
doubt it, having actually driven and fed both. . . . . .


The point was that his analogy sucks.
  #4   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.cars.maintenance,sci.electronics.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,924
Default Best solder free electrical connection


" wrote:

On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:07:07 +0100, geoff ? wrote:

?In message ?,
writes
??On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 18:13:58 +0100, ??(((°? ?
??wrote:
??
???On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 16:45:08 +0100, zzzzzzzzzz
? wrote:
???
???? On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 12:01:04 +0100, tony sayer ? wrote:
????
????? In article ?, Michael A.
????? Terrell ? scribeth thus
??????
??????? ?(((°? wrote:
???????
??????? On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:26:53 +0100, ? wrote:
???????
??????? ? On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 14:46:34 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
??????? ? ? wrote:
??????? ?
??????? ??
??????? ?? Dave wrote:
??????? ???
??????? ??? On 21/08/2010 03:59, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
??????? ??? ?
??????? ??? ? geoff wrote:
??????? ???
??????? ??? ? That's a very good example of why most people with brains
??????? left
??????? ??? Europe
??????? ??? ? for 'The new World'.
??????? ???
??????? ??? So how come Britain made a better nuclear bomb than the New
??????? World? And
??????? ??? the New World wanted as much detail of our superior technology as
??????? they
??????? ??? could get?
??????? ??
??????? ??
??????? ?? What superior technology? Lucas?
??????? ? No "superior technology" has come out of GB since about 1950. - and
??????? ? that may be stretchng it. There have been a few "good ideas" since
???????
??????? I might be wrong but I thought Concorde started flying after 1950.
??????? Though then again the Septics didn't like the noise, or was it a
??????? classic
??????? case of "Not Invented Here" syndrome?
??????
??????
?????? It was a fast plane, but a poor design.
?????
????? Not that bad really as it was the first one..
?????
?????? They spent wads of money to
?????? build and maintain them, then junked the entire fleet. It was noisy
?????? and
?????? very fuel inefficient. That forced the fares so high that they weren't
?????? able to compete with better planes from multiple countries.
?????
????? What other supersonic airliners are those then?...
????
???? Don't read well, do you? The 747 kicked its butt.
???
???The 747 goes about 600 mph top whack.
???Supersonic means greater than 768 mph so the 747 ain't a supersonic
???airliner.
???
???You might have a military plane faster but you haven't got a passenger
???airliner faster.
?? The 747 (on a bad day) moves more passenger-miles per hour on less
??than 1/4 the lbs of fuel per passenger mile than the concorde could
??dream of on it's best day
?
?You could say more or less the same comparing a ford fiesta and a rolls
?royce

I think you'll find that a Rolls will move more passenger-miles per hour than
a Ford Fiesta. ;-)



Yet you can find both sitting on the side of the road, with steam
pouring out from under the hood.


--
Politicians should only get paid if the budget is balanced, and there is
enough left over to pay them.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best solder free electrical connection [email protected] UK diy 1 August 19th 10 04:44 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 DIYbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about DIY & home improvement"