They spent wads of money to
build and maintain them, then junked the entire fleet. It was noisy
and
very fuel inefficient. That forced the fares so high that they
weren't
able to compete with better planes from multiple countries.

What other supersonic airliners are those then?...

Don't read well, do you? The 747 kicked its butt.

The 747 goes about 600 mph top whack.
Supersonic means greater than 768 mph so the 747 ain't a supersonic
airliner.

I guess that answered my question (you don't read well).

The Concorde was not successful.

It was .. for what it did...


Well under a fraction of one percent isn't sucessful. It's nothing
but ego bloat.

Built here anyone;?..


How's your space agency doing? How do they like the US built
communications systems that i built?

We weren't big enough among other things to afford a space programme
which is no shame....
--
Tony Sayer

tony sayer wrote:

We weren't big enough among other things to afford a space programme
which is no shame....


Yet you criticize those who did.

In article , Michael A.
Terrell scribeth thus

tony sayer wrote:

We weren't big enough among other things to afford a space programme
which is no shame....


Yet you criticize those who did.

And where was there criticism?..
--
Tony Sayer