people must contact Google and demand it to stop the CRAP bs postings

On 4/22/2008 12:47 PM ransley spake thus:

people must contact Google and demand it to stop the CRAP bs postings

Why "must" we? Do you think it would make the slightest difference if
*every* poster and lurker here emailed them about all the GG crap?


--
The best argument against democracy is a five-minute
conversation with the average voter.

- Attributed to Winston Churchill

On Apr 23, 12:28 am, Dave Balderstone
wrote:
In article m, David

Nebenzahl wrote:
On 4/22/2008 12:47 PM ransley spake thus:

people must contact Google and demand it to stop the CRAP bs postings

Why "must" we? Do you think it would make the slightest difference if
*every* poster and lurker here emailed them about all the GG crap?

It won't. The solution is to kill-file every post from Google.

That's one solution. Whether it is "the" solution is a matter of
opinion.

I use GG, and it works for me.

Help improve usenet. Kill-file Google Groups.http://improve-usenet.org/

"Even ignoring the spam issue for the sake of further discussion here,
most of the people who post to Usenet via the clunky Google Groups web
interface are lusers or lamers."

Argument from fallacy and ignorance, and as stupid a statement as ever
posted to the web: Choice of tool can not define the user, a person
may prefer to hammer nails rather than use an pneumatic nailer, and
the choice indicates only their preference, if that.

"Because of their use of a clunky Usenet web interface (and all Usenet
web interfaces suck -"

Matter of opinion, and completely irrelevant.

"Usenet wasn't designed for webification and does not need
webification),

Of course it wasn't initially designed for "webification", there
wasn't any web, but the fact is most obviously completely irrelevant.

"they have no idea what Usenet is, how it works, or how to use it
properly."

Spurious conclusions; purports knowledge the writer could not possibly
obtain, or that which is undefined, and still completely irrelevant,

"And, generally, they don't want to learn."

The conclusion requires at minimum a list of the names of ±25% of
Google Groups users.

The writer is obviously an idiot. Linking to an idiot doesn't suggest
genius.
-----

- gpsman