Well why not? I've never heard of one but I haven't searched much.

"dean" wrote in message
oups.com...
Well why not? I've never heard of one but I haven't searched much.

Never heard of one either, but it would be a technical possibility. Replace
the gas burner with a wood burner.

"dean" wrote in message
oups.com...
Well why not? I've never heard of one but I haven't searched much.

You say why not. I say why?

Absorption units are made and used today. The bigger ones I have worked on
were Ammonia for the medium. Most techs and contractors tend to stay way
from absorbers. Keeping the fire at a constant state would not be a
challenge that I would care for.

Servel still makes RV refrigerators that run on Tri-fuel.
My first house in Phoenix had an absorber. It leaked and killed all of the
shrubs on that end of the house. Thank god our bedroom was on the other side
of the house. Out of all of the a/c contractors in the Valley, just 2 would
work on it in the beginning. When the techs retired no one would touch it.

dean wrote:

Well why not? I've never heard of one but I haven't searched much.

TROLL

"SQLit" wrote in message
...

"dean" wrote in message
oups.com...
Well why not? I've never heard of one but I haven't searched much.

You say why not. I say why?

Absorption units are made and used today. The bigger ones I have worked on
were Ammonia for the medium. Most techs and contractors tend to stay way
from absorbers. Keeping the fire at a constant state would not be a
challenge that I would care for.

How constant does it have to be? I've burned wood in wood burning stoves,
in smokers, and kept the temperature within 25 degrees each way over a
period of hours. Using a pelletized or ground wood mass and auger, it can
be held even closer. That, of course, needs electricity that may not be
available.

My guess is the market for wood fired AC is very small.

On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:02:15 -0700, "SQLit" wrote:


"dean" wrote in message
roups.com...
Well why not? I've never heard of one but I haven't searched much.

You say why not. I say why?

Absorption units are made and used today. The bigger ones I have worked on
were Ammonia for the medium. Most techs and contractors tend to stay way
from absorbers. Keeping the fire at a constant state would not be a
challenge that I would care for.


Use the wood to fuel a steam engine, and hook THAT to the compressor.

wrote in message ...
dean wrote:

Well why not? I've never heard of one but I haven't searched much.

TROLL

Why Troll? It could foster a discussion of technology that may be very
interesting.

My propane fired refrigerator is a POS. All I can say is that it is better
than nothing where electricity is not available. I would hate to see one
the size you have in mind.

"Edwin Pawlowski" wrote in message
news:dJfue.921$c97.686@trndny07...

"SQLit" wrote in message
...

"dean" wrote in message
oups.com...
Well why not? I've never heard of one but I haven't searched much.

You say why not. I say why?

Absorption units are made and used today. The bigger ones I have worked
on
were Ammonia for the medium. Most techs and contractors tend to stay
way
from absorbers. Keeping the fire at a constant state would not be a
challenge that I would care for.

How constant does it have to be? I've burned wood in wood burning stoves,
in smokers, and kept the temperature within 25 degrees each way over a
period of hours. Using a pelletized or ground wood mass and auger, it can
be held even closer. That, of course, needs electricity that may not be
available.

25 degrees is a big difference to a refrigeration cycle.

I am sure I could write a PLC program and automate the cycle for better
control than 25 degrees. The cost of the controls, sensors, and all of the
related wiring is just not worth the effort.