| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of
Relativity Einsteins June 1905, paper is known as Special Theory of Relativity? The reference to this paper http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ In this paper Einstein stated two postulates and here we will discuss the second postulate. Part I Second postulate of Special Relativity as re-stated by Einstein (i) €œThe laws by which the states of physical systems undergo change are not affected, whether these changes of state be referred to the one or the other of two systems of co-ordinates in uniform translatory motion€?. It refer to that law of physics are the same, if two systems or observers are UNIFROM MOTION (zero acceleration). I t is well known that in this paper Einstein did not give any REFRENCE to the existing literature, which implies that all this postulate is his work . Part II Galileo is inventor of Second postulate of special Relativity. Galileo has given second postulate of Special Theory in his book Galileo Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems), Ref. Galileo, G. 1632, Dialogues concerning the two chief world systems, trans. S.Drake, 2nd edition 1967, University of California Press. For this book was published by Galileo in 1632 and was persecuted for this book. Galileo quoted an example in the Dialogue [14] , that if a ship is moving with uniform velocity then from motion of fish in bottle one can not judge that whether ship is moving with uniform velocity or at rest. Thus Galileo stated €œ the mechanical laws of physics are the same for every observer moving uniformly with constant speed in a straight line". It refer to that law of physics are the same, if two systems or observers are UNIFROM MOTION (zero acceleration). The Einstein has simply re-stated in 1905, the existing in the literature since 273 years. It is against ethics of research. Einstein should have given due credit to Galileo. Even at this time it I not too late to honour Galileo for basics of Special Theory of Relativity. Ref BOOK 100 Years of E=mc2 https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 (Book will be published in Dec. 2006, By NOVA Science, New York, USA) Even Pope John has pardoned Galileo in 1992 for the book, he was persecuted. https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 Second Post Which mathematical equation from Einsteins Sep. 1905 derivation predicts that when Light Energy is emitted, MASS OF BODY INCREASES? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Which mathematical equation from Einsteins Sep. 1905 derivation predicts that when Light Energy is emitted, MASS OF BODY INCREASES? BRIEF Einstein has speculated E= Δm c2 from L= Δm c2 in his Sep 1905 paper. This derivation ( under SPECIAL CONDITIONS) predicts that when Light Energy is emitted mass of body decreases. It is true. But the same derivation under general conditions ALSO predicts that when body emits light energy its mass must increase. It is inconsistent prediction from Einsteins derivation and contradiction of Law of Conservation of Matter or Energy. Einstein did not discuss this aspect in his work. This aspect is highlighted here. For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 ( book will be published in Dec 2006 , by NOVA Science in New York , USA) 1. What is Einsteins Sep 1905 paper in few words?. AJAY SHARMA : In this paper Einstein derived a relationship between Light energy emitted (L) and corresponding decrease in mass (Δm = Mb-Ma ) as L = ( Mb-Ma)c2 or Mb€“Ma = L/c2 From here Einstein speculated E=mc2 Practically, Einstein considered a body at rest emitting light energy. Einstein measured the magnitude of light energy in a moving system. And then he derived a relation between ENERGY EMITTED (L) and DECREASE IN MASS (Δm) of body. 2. Under which conditions Einstein derived this equation L = Δmc2 ? AJAY SHARMA: In Einsteins derivation , there are four variables i.e. (a) Number of light waves emitted by body (b) Magnitude of energy of light waves (c) Angles at which waves are emitted by body (d) Velocity of measuring system w.r.t. body emitting light energy. Einstein took SPECIAL CONDITIONS to derive L =mc2 and speculated from it E=mc2 (a) Einstein took , Just two light waves (b) Energy of light wave is equal (c) Waves are emitted in opposite directions (d) Velocity measuring system w.r.t body is in classical region. Thus under these conditions Einsteins derivation is OK. The result is When body emits light energy, its mass decreases i.e. L = ( Mb-Ma)c2 It is correct. 3. What about Law of Conservation of momentum? AJAY SHARMA : After emission of light energy body (i) May remain at rest. (ii) May tend to move (iii) May move apparently or visibly the law of conservation of momentum is always obeyed. The velocity of recoil can be calculated by applying equation, Initial Momentum = Final Momentum The velocity of recoil of gun is determined by this method. Einstein has considered first case ONLY. 4. Which is the mathematical equation obtained by Einstein in Sep 1905 paper which predict that When light energy is emitted, mass decreases? AJAY SHARMA: The final equation in this regard is Δm = L /c2 or Ma ( mass of body after emission) = Mb ( mass of body before emission) €“ L/c2 Thus mass of body decreases when light energy is emitted. Einstein has derived this equation under SPECIAL CONDITIONS by considering two light waves of equal energy( 0.5L each ) , emitted in opposite directions etc. 5. Which is mathematical equation which follows from Einsteins derivation and implies that when Light Energy is Emitted mass of body Increases? AJAY SHARMA There are numerous equations to this fact which follows from Einsteins Sep 1905 derivation and predict that when Light Energy is emitted, Mass of Body Increases. It is contradiction of LAW OF CONSERVATION OF MATTER OR ENERGY. One case is e.g. when body emits TWO LIGHT WAVES of energies 0.501L and 0.499L , emitted in OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS. Thus all conditions are same as that in Einsteins derivation except magnitude of Light energy (Einstein has taken energy equal to 0.5L each). Exactly repeating the calculation as done by Einstein in Sep 1905 paper we get Δ m = Mass of body before emission (Mb)€“Mass of body after emission (Ma) = €“ 0.004L/cv + L/c2 (16) or Ma = 0.004L/cv €“ L/c2 + Mb Thus Mass of body after emission of light energy (Ma) = Positive Quantity + Mass of body before emission. Hence mass Increases, when light energy is emitted. It is not CORRECT prediction FROM Einsteins derivation. Third Post Why Einsteins Sep 1905 derivation CONTRADICTS Law of Conservation of Matter? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Why Einsteins Sep 1905 derivation CONTRADICTS Law of Conservation of Matter ? Part I Reason for this incorrect deductions. The central equation in Einstein derivation is very complex . (i) The basic equation Einstein used is „“* = „“{1 €“ v cos φ/c } /ˆš[1 €“ v2 /c2] (1) „“* is light energy measured in moving in frame and „“ is energy measured in rest frame. Einstein has given eq.(1) in his June 1905 paper, known as Special Theory of Relativity and called eq.(1) as Doppler principle for any velocities whatever. Link for paper of Special Theory of Relativity http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ (ii) Thus there are many variables in derivation. (a) Number of light waves (b) Magnitude of energy of light waves (c) Angles at which waves are emitted (d) Velocity of measuring system w.r.t. body emitting light energy. Einstein took special conditions to derive L =mc2 or E=mc2 (a) Einstein took , Just two light waves (b) Energy of light wave is equal (c) Waves are emitted in opposite directions (d) Velocity measuring system w.r.t body is in classical region. Thus under these SPECIAL conditions Einsteins derivation is OK. The result is When body emits light energy , its mass decreases. Part III Experimentally law of inter conversion of mass energy holds good in all cases. Theoretically large number of cases is possible (Einstein €˜s derivation is valid under these conditions also). (p) Body may emit large number of waves (q) The waves may be emitted at different angles. (r) The waves may have different energies. (t) Velocity may be in relativistic region. THUS UNDER GEENRAL CONDITIONS EINTEINS SEP. 27 1905 DERIVATION DOES NOT WORK WELL. You have commented about sign CHANGE it follows from Einsteins derivation, hence it has limitation. If you think , I have INCORRECTLY induced it , let me know. Write down the correct equations for the readers. So Einsteins Sep 1905 derivation is true under special conditions only. This is the THEME of the paper. References -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If somebody disagree then one can write to Editor Physics Essays addressing the following issues. What is Einsteins Sep 1905 paper? What are conditions under which it is derived? What is Plancks observation regarding it? Under what conditions experimentally it holds good? Why Einstein did not generalize the same? How to generalize it under all conditions? What is Ajay Sharmas Interpretation? How Ajay Sharmas paper is different from Einsteins Sep 1905 paper. How Editors/referees who have published it are WRONG? How Ajay Sharmas interpretation is incorrect (if it)? What are the correct interpretations AND EQAUTIONS? My paper answers all above questions. It follows from Einsteins derivation under legitimate conditions,(in some cases) that when Light Energy is Emitted , mass of body INCREASES. It is incorrect deduction from Einsteins derivation. Part IV References. References of Einsteins work .. A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. .. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? Weblink is Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ PartII References of Ajay Sharmas work My work is available at A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222. €?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?. http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 International Conferences It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the world --------------------------------------few of them 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25 August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems ( Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53. 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 , 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol ) University of Warwick , ENGLAND 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD ENGLAND 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA , (2003) 585. 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow, (2004) 81 plus more -------------------------------------- Book 100 Years of E=mc2 For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 ( book will be published in Dec 2006 , by NOVA Science in New York , USA) AJAY SHARMA 5 NOV 2006 |
|
#2
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
Special Relative postulates that the speed of light will be the same to ALL
observers regardless of how fast they are going relative to the light source. I don't think Galileo even KNEW what the speed of light was other than being "very fast." |
|
#3
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006 08:41:40 -0500, "John Gilmer"
Gave us: Special Relative postulates that the speed of light will be the same to ALL observers regardless of how fast they are going relative to the light source. I don't think Galileo even KNEW what the speed of light was other than being "very fast." I doubt he even knew what light was made up of, much less its speed through space or various mediums. The word for today is: Photon. |
|
#4
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
John Gilmer wrote: Special Relative postulates that the speed of light will be the same to ALL observers regardless of how fast they are going relative to the light source. I don't think Galileo even KNEW what the speed of light was other than being "very fast." ---------------------------------------------------------------- There are two postulates of relativity. One is about speed of light is constant. The second one was given Galileo in in 1632 in his book , DIOLOGUE. NOW AFTER 273 in 1905 EINSTEIN QUOTED THE SAME IN his Special Theory of Relativity. Einstein did not acknowldge, Galileo's work and called it as his own invension. I mean Galileo must be given credit for the same. I have given the link below which discuss both the postulates. Thus should Galileo be given credit for doing pioneering work in the field of SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY. It is the basic question. See the references below. Existing reference http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity Einstein's references Title of Einstein's paper ( June 2006) , which is well known as SPECILA THEORY OF RELATIVITY Title of paper ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES. Print Reference Einstein, A. Annalen der Physik, 17 891-921 (1905). Web. Reference http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ The two postulates are quoted in section § 2. On the Relativity of Lengths and Times The following reflexions are based on the principle of relativity and on the principle of the constancy of the velocity of light. These two principles we define as follows:-- 1. The laws by which the states of physical systems undergo change are not affected, whether these changes of state be referred to the one or the other of two systems of co-ordinates in uniform translatory motion. Any ray of light moves in the ``stationary'' system of co-ordinates with the determined velocity c, whether the ray be emitted by a stationary or by a moving body. So whatever I have written is based upon these facts. Further references 100 Years of E=mc2 (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 AJAY SHARMA 5TH Nov 2006. |
|
#5
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
John Gilmer wrote: Special Relative postulates that the speed of light will be the same to ALL observers regardless of how fast they are going relative to the light source. I don't think Galileo even KNEW what the speed of light was other than being "very fast." --------------------------------------- There are two postulates of relativity. One is about speed of light is constant. The second one was given Galileo in in 1632 in his book , DIOLOGUE. NOW AFTER 273 in 1905 EINSTEIN QUOTED THE SAME IN his Special Theory of Relativity. Einstein did not acknowldge, Galileo's work and called it as his own invension. I mean Galileo must be given credit for the same. I have given the link below which discuss both the postulates. Thus should Galileo be given credit for doing pioneering work in the field of SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY. It is the basic question. See the references below. Existing reference http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity Einstein's references Title of Einstein's paper ( June 2006) , which is well known as SPECILA THEORY OF RELATIVITY Title of paper ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES. Print Reference Einstein, A. Annalen der Physik, 17 891-921 (1905). Web. Reference http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ The two postulates are quoted in section § 2. On the Relativity of Lengths and Times The following reflexions are based on the principle of relativity and on the principle of the constancy of the velocity of light. These two principles we define as follows:-- 1. The laws by which the states of physical systems undergo change are not affected, whether these changes of state be referred to the one or the other of two systems of co-ordinates in uniform translatory motion. Any ray of light moves in the ``stationary'' system of co-ordinates with the determined velocity c, whether the ray be emitted by a stationary or by a moving body. So whatever I have written is based upon these facts. Further references 100 Years of E=mc2 (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...?cPath=23_48_3... AJAY SHARMA 5TH Nov 2006. |
|
#6
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
On 4 Nov 2006 18:49:10 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity Geeze looser, I thought you said you'd go away since no one wants you around! Now you're back again... Since you claim to be a professional, why do you do this? All you are doing is spaming your book: For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 ( book will be published in Dec 2006 , by NOVA Science in New York , USA) AJAY SHARMA 5 NOV 2006 so I've taken the liberty to contact the publisher and complain loudly about your spam. Bugger off! |
|
#7
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate ofRelativity
AJAY SHARMA is very prolific. If there were only a
small amount of merit in his work, it would be a great boon to mankind. Unfortunately, I have not yet found anysuch merit. Bill |
|
#8
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
PeterD wrote: On 4 Nov 2006 18:49:10 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity Geeze looser, I thought you said you'd go away since no one wants you around! Now you're back again... Since you claim to be a professional, why do you do this? All you are doing is spaming your book: For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 ( book will be published in Dec 2006 , by NOVA Science in New York , USA) AJAY SHARMA 5 NOV 2006 so I've taken the liberty to contact the publisher and complain loudly about your spam. Bugger off! =================Ajay Sharma responds ==================== PeterD Part I It is revolutionary topic, modification/extension of the Einstein' Emc2. Such work has not been done in history of science yet. My topics are being read and inquired by members of Electronics group see previous writers , John Gilmer,and JoeBloe. I ALSO PERSONAL MAIL. Readers don't respond I will not post anywhere. E=mc2 is the basic equation used in all branches of physics directly and indirectly. That is the reason I post. Part II I quote all my work published JOURNALS and CONFERENCES. Likewise I quote my book. It is necessary to authenticate my work , which will otherwise look like fairy tale. Without the references, I cannot prove anything. I will be miunderstood that I have done nothing. So references have to be given. There is no other reason , for quoting the journals , conferences and book. These usenet , google groups are for discussions and communications. I AM GETTING LARGE FEEDBACK FROM VARIOUS CORNERS FOR THIS This is my view point , you have written to Publishers and I will wait for his response. Whatever is the response will be posted here , if publisher want. BYE Ajay Sharma 5 Nov. 2006 |
|
#9
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
Salmon Egg wrote: AJAY SHARMA is very prolific. If there were only a small amount of merit in his work, it would be a great boon to mankind. Unfortunately, I have not yet found anysuch merit. Bill ---------------------------------------- You can decide about it, after understanding. I have understood and hope it will be useful. Existing reference http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity Einstein's references Title of Einstein's paper ( June 2006) , which is well known as SPECILA THEORY OF RELATIVITY Title of paper ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES. Print Reference Einstein, A. Annalen der Physik, 17 891-921 (1905). Web. Reference http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ The two postulates are quoted in section § 2. On the Relativity of Lengths and Times The following reflexions are based on the principle of relativity and on the principle of the constancy of the velocity of light. These two principles we define as follows:-- 1. The laws by which the states of physical systems undergo change are not affected, whether these changes of state be referred to the one or the other of two systems of co-ordinates in uniform translatory motion. Any ray of light moves in the ``stationary'' system of co-ordinates with the determined velocity c, whether the ray be emitted by a stationary or by a moving body. So whatever I have written is based upon these facts. Further references 100 Years of E=mc2 (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 AJAY SHARMA 5TH Nov 2006. |
|
#10
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
PeterD wrote in
: so I've taken the liberty to contact the publisher and complain loudly about your spam. That won't do much good, it's a vanity publishing, paid for by the author, so the publisher just provides a service. Think of it as the equivalent of Florence Foster Jenkins, soprano. Look that up, I promise you, your time will NOT be wasted.  |
|
#11
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
On 5 Nov 2006 09:01:39 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote: (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 --- Are you paying to have the book published? -- JF |
|
#12
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
John Fields wrote: On 5 Nov 2006 09:01:39 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 --- Are you paying to have the book published? -- JF ------------------------------------------ Kindly see the answer ( complete ) here posted http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm AJAY SHARMA |
|
#13
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
On 6 Nov 2006 07:44:17 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote: John Fields wrote: On 5 Nov 2006 09:01:39 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 --- Are you paying to have the book published? -- JF ------------------------------------------ Kindly see the answer ( complete ) here posted http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm --- Why are you being devious? I asked you a straightforward question, "Are you paying to have the book published?" and I expect a straightforward answer, either: "Yes", or: "No". -- JF |
|
#14
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
On 6 Nov 2006 07:44:17 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote: John Fields wrote: On 5 Nov 2006 09:01:39 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 --- Are you paying to have the book published? -- JF ------------------------------------------ Kindly see the answer ( complete ) here posted http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm AJAY SHARMA That's not an answer to the poster's question! He asked: ARE YOU PAYING TO HAVE THE BOOK PUBLISHED? Answer it! Oh, I forgot, you are a trolling SPAMMER... You don't answer questions, do you? |
|
#15
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
Lostgallifreyan wrote in
: PeterD wrote in : so I've taken the liberty to contact the publisher and complain loudly about your spam. That won't do much good, it's a vanity publishing, paid for by the author, so the publisher just provides a service. Think of it as the equivalent of Florence Foster Jenkins, soprano. Look that up, I promise you, your time will NOT be wasted. I ought to correct this one of mine.. I can't be sure that my claim is right, so I withdraw it. had a look at Nova Publishers' site, and saw little to guide me, but there is a French Wikipedia page that was adequately translated via Google. It seems the editors accept submissions with little scrutiny, but I saw no indication as to who fronts up the money for a publication. Like other posters here, I call for a simple answer to this. If Ajay Sharma would answer the question directly, there'd be no speculation. There won't be any more from me anyway. |
|
#16
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
PeterD wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 07:44:17 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: John Fields wrote: On 5 Nov 2006 09:01:39 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 --- Are you paying to have the book published? -- JF ------------------------------------------ Kindly see the answer ( complete ) here posted http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm AJAY SHARMA That's not an answer to the poster's question! He asked: ARE YOU PAYING TO HAVE THE BOOK PUBLISHED? Answer it! Oh, I forgot, you are a trolling SPAMMER... You don't answer questions, do you? =============================================== See how many questions I have replied, http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm AJAY SHARMA |
|
#17
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
On 6 Nov 2006 17:30:15 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote: PeterD wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 07:44:17 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: John Fields wrote: On 5 Nov 2006 09:01:39 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 --- Are you paying to have the book published? -- JF ------------------------------------------ Kindly see the answer ( complete ) here posted http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm AJAY SHARMA That's not an answer to the poster's question! He asked: ARE YOU PAYING TO HAVE THE BOOK PUBLISHED? Answer it! Oh, I forgot, you are a trolling SPAMMER... You don't answer questions, do you? =============================================== See how many questions I have replied, http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm AJAY SHARMA All you are asking is that we re-read your trolling spam... AGAIN, DORK, ANSWER THE QUESTION: ARE YOU PAYING TO HAVE THE BOOK PUBLISHED? Answer it! Oh, I forgot, you are a trolling SPAMMER... You don't answer questions, do you? |
|
#18
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
On 6 Nov 2006 17:30:15 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote: PeterD wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 07:44:17 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: John Fields wrote: On 5 Nov 2006 09:01:39 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 --- Are you paying to have the book published? -- JF ------------------------------------------ Kindly see the answer ( complete ) here posted http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm AJAY SHARMA That's not an answer to the poster's question! He asked: ARE YOU PAYING TO HAVE THE BOOK PUBLISHED? Answer it! Oh, I forgot, you are a trolling SPAMMER... You don't answer questions, do you? =============================================== See how many questions I have replied, http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm --- If you can't understand a simple, straightforward question well enough to respond with a simple, straightforward answer, I doubt whether you can understand Einstein's work well enough to criticize it. -- JF |
|
#19
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
John Fields wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 17:30:15 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: PeterD wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 07:44:17 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: John Fields wrote: On 5 Nov 2006 09:01:39 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 --- Are you paying to have the book published? -- JF ------------------------------------------ Kindly see the answer ( complete ) here posted http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm AJAY SHARMA That's not an answer to the poster's question! He asked: ARE YOU PAYING TO HAVE THE BOOK PUBLISHED? Answer it! Oh, I forgot, you are a trolling SPAMMER... You don't answer questions, do you? =============================================== See how many questions I have replied, http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm --- If you can't understand a simple, straightforward question well enough to respond with a simple, straightforward answer, I doubt whether you can understand Einstein's work well enough to criticize it. -- JF ------------------------------ True , can you understand this, http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm |
|
#20
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
On 7 Nov 2006 06:50:47 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote: John Fields wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 17:30:15 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: PeterD wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 07:44:17 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: John Fields wrote: On 5 Nov 2006 09:01:39 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 --- Are you paying to have the book published? -- JF ------------------------------------------ Kindly see the answer ( complete ) here posted http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm AJAY SHARMA That's not an answer to the poster's question! He asked: ARE YOU PAYING TO HAVE THE BOOK PUBLISHED? Answer it! Oh, I forgot, you are a trolling SPAMMER... You don't answer questions, do you? =============================================== See how many questions I have replied, http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm --- If you can't understand a simple, straightforward question well enough to respond with a simple, straightforward answer, I doubt whether you can understand Einstein's work well enough to criticize it. -- JF ------------------------------ True , can you understand this, http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm --- I am interested in none of that. All I want is a simple "Yes" on "No" answer to the question: "Are you paying to have the book published?" -- JF |
|
#21
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
On 7 Nov 2006 06:50:47 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote: John Fields wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 17:30:15 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: PeterD wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 07:44:17 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: John Fields wrote: On 5 Nov 2006 09:01:39 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 --- Are you paying to have the book published? -- JF ------------------------------------------ Kindly see the answer ( complete ) here posted http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm AJAY SHARMA That's not an answer to the poster's question! He asked: ARE YOU PAYING TO HAVE THE BOOK PUBLISHED? Answer it! Oh, I forgot, you are a trolling SPAMMER... You don't answer questions, do you? =============================================== See how many questions I have replied, http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm --- If you can't understand a simple, straightforward question well enough to respond with a simple, straightforward answer, I doubt whether you can understand Einstein's work well enough to criticize it. -- JF ------------------------------ True , can you understand this, http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm Geeze, you're an idiot... OK, I guess I'll answer the question for you: yes you paid to have your book published... Right? |
|
#22
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 11:08:04 -0600, John Fields
wrote: On 7 Nov 2006 06:50:47 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: John Fields wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 17:30:15 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: PeterD wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 07:44:17 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: John Fields wrote: On 5 Nov 2006 09:01:39 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 --- Are you paying to have the book published? -- JF ------------------------------------------ Kindly see the answer ( complete ) here posted http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm AJAY SHARMA That's not an answer to the poster's question! He asked: ARE YOU PAYING TO HAVE THE BOOK PUBLISHED? Answer it! Oh, I forgot, you are a trolling SPAMMER... You don't answer questions, do you? =============================================== See how many questions I have replied, http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm --- If you can't understand a simple, straightforward question well enough to respond with a simple, straightforward answer, I doubt whether you can understand Einstein's work well enough to criticize it. -- JF ------------------------------ True , can you understand this, http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm --- I am interested in none of that. All I want is a simple "Yes" on "No" answer to the question: "Are you paying to have the book published?" John, He won't answer because he knows that as soon as he admits he paid to publish it he'll (in his limited mind) loose credibility. He's such a simple minded dolt that he thinks he has some credibility (can anything be further from the truth?) And, as a second thought he also knows that admitting he paid to publish it he'll be admitting to this long spam trail. The guy's a wacko, 100%. |
|
#23
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
PeterD wrote: On 7 Nov 2006 06:50:47 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: John Fields wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 17:30:15 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: PeterD wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 07:44:17 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: John Fields wrote: On 5 Nov 2006 09:01:39 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 --- Are you paying to have the book published? -- JF ------------------------------------------ Kindly see the answer ( complete ) here posted http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm AJAY SHARMA That's not an answer to the poster's question! He asked: ARE YOU PAYING TO HAVE THE BOOK PUBLISHED? Answer it! Oh, I forgot, you are a trolling SPAMMER... You don't answer questions, do you? =============================================== See how many questions I have replied, http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm --- If you can't understand a simple, straightforward question well enough to respond with a simple, straightforward answer, I doubt whether you can understand Einstein's work well enough to criticize it. -- JF ------------------------------ True , can you understand this, http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm Geeze, you're an idiot... OK, I guess I'll answer the question for you: yes you paid to have your book published... Right? =================== +++Idoit I also the language you USE. Idoit I try to be polite upto huge extent. I dont reply to odiots. Idoits NEVER UNDERSTAND. ++++ If you do then read, there os answer of every question. 100 Years of E=mc2 (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm 1. What is E=mc2? What is its importance? E=mc2 is the most wonderful and significant equation is physics. In 1945 the explosion of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were base upon this equation. According to this mass (m) can be converted to energy (E) and energy can be converted to mass. Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ 2. This equation is doing well since past 100 years then where is the inconsistency? The inconsistency lies in its mathematical derivation (a method to obtain a mathematical equation). In his 1905 paper Einstein did not derive it mathematically but in true sense speculated it. Einstein earlier derived L = mc2 (light energy mass conversion equation). Then Einstein speculated that what is true for light energy (L) the same is true for every energy (E). This speculation results in E=mc2, such a significant equation must be based upon a specific mathematical derivation and not on speculation. 3. Is Einsteins derivation of L =mc2 correct? The derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or true in special conditions only. Einstein took just handpicked parameters out of numerous possible, to obtain the equation. Einstein was aware of the reality so he left in midway after getting the desired result. If all valid values of parameters are taken, then results are contradictory in nature. 4. What are contradictory results? Some UNDISCUSSED predictions of Einsteins 29 Sep. 1905 derivation blatantly contradict Law of Conservation of Matter. I have scientifically confirmed the same. No limitation can be bigger than this in science. 5. Was E=mc2 or similar ideas existed before Einstein? Yes, E=mc2 existed before Einstein. An Italian Olinto de Pretto published E=mc2 in valid scientific journal Lettere ed Atti, Feb. 1904, two years before Einstein. But Pretto died in 1921, before its experimental confirmation in nuclear physics. 6. Einstein speculated E=mc2 from L=mc2. What is the problem here? Firstly derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or under special conditions only. For examples there are many variables in Einsteins derivation e.g. number of light waves emitted by body, magnitude of light energy, angle at which light energy is emitted and relative velocity v. Einstein just took handpicked values of variables. If general values of variables are taken then results are contradictory to experiments. Secondly Einstein originated E=mc2 on the basis of speculation only without any conceptual and mathematical basis. Basically Einstein replaced L by E in equation L=mc2 to get E=mc2. 7. Then how did you derive new equation, dE =Ac2dm (or DE = Ac2 DM )? I have derived new equation between mass-energy conservation by simple calculus method. In dE =Ac2dm, A is a co-efficient of proportionality like numerous others in science. It is dimensionless variable. Sharma June 2004 paper is available http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf 8. How do you compare these two equations? Firstly dE =Ac2dm is based upon a conceptual and mathematical derivation. On the other hand E=mc2 is a speculation, it is bitter truth. Secondly dE =Ac2dm is a general equation and E=mc2 is its special case. Energy emitted by new equation can be less, equal to or more than predicted by E=mc2. 9. How did you justify your equation experimentally? In Nuclear Physics there are some anomalous results which cannot be explained by E=mc2 . Like this there are some instances in astrophysics where my equation is extremely useful. 10. Is your work recognized by international scientific community? Yes, it is completely recognized, as published in peer review journals. 11 Have you got any recognition certificate from the scientific community? The only way to get scientific recognition is that to get the work published in peer review international journals and conferences. My research papers are either published in international journals from America, England and Canada or being published. I have got invitation from at least 55 International Conferences to present my work. I have presented my research in international conferences in USA, England, Germany, Taiwan Ukraine etc. I have invitation from France and Italy to present my work this year. [b]Still there ANYONE is welcome to COMMENT on the work in Physics Essays giving the facts e.g. What is Einsteins Sep 1905 paper ? What are conditions under which it is derived? Under what conditions experimentally it holds good? How to generalize it under all conditions? What is Ajay Sharmas Interpretation? How Ajay Sharmas paper is different from Einsteins Sep 1905 paper How Ajay Sharmas interpretation is incorrect (if it)? What are the correct interpretations? I HAVE ANSWERS TO ALL QUESTIONS. If Editor Physics Essays and his Editorial Board finds your interpretation and published the paper it is OK. All the references are given below for the purpose. There may be back door critics but none of the scientists have dared to write to scientific bodies or journals Editors , that Ajay Sharmas work is incorrectly published. 12. Can this work be introduced in Schools and colleges? Yes my wok is scientifically approved in journal in USA, CANADA and England. Hence it can be so done by any country. IT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF THE WORK. 13. How do you counter the opposition of the people which has come in you your way? Science is the international language. For this, I take seriously the logical conclusions of the critics. I completely ignore the irresponsible critics, as they dont exist. The critics when understand the things become my supporters. 14. What about your book, 100 Years of E=mc2? This book will be published in Dec. 2006 It will bring clear and unbiased picture of the facts. The contents of book are already approved by expert scientists after PEER REVIEW and published in international journals and conferences ..The book is meant for general public who is interested in basic science. This book will status as Newtons Principia or Galileos Dialogue have in science. Book Link : https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 Interviewer Rajesh Thakoor Email References of Einsteins work .. A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. .. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? Weblink is Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ PartII References of Ajay Sharmas work My work is available at A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222. €?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?. http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf For details 100 Years of E=mc2 https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 International Conferences It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the world --------------------------------------few of them 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25 August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems ( Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53. 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 , 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol ) University of Warwick , ENGLAND 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD ENGLAND 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA , (2003) 585. 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81 plus more -------------------------------------- Journals This paper €?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?. is published in journal Physics Essays , CANADA www.physicsessays.com The paper The past, present and future of E=mc2 will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts, USA. In parts it is published in various others journals. ---------------------- Book 100 Years of E=mc2 For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 0091 94183 09989, 0091 177 2804546 |
|
#24
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
In article , peter2
@hipson.net says... On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 11:08:04 -0600, John Fields wrote: On 7 Nov 2006 06:50:47 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: John Fields wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 17:30:15 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: PeterD wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 07:44:17 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: John Fields wrote: On 5 Nov 2006 09:01:39 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 --- Are you paying to have the book published? -- JF ------------------------------------------ Kindly see the answer ( complete ) here posted http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm AJAY SHARMA That's not an answer to the poster's question! He asked: ARE YOU PAYING TO HAVE THE BOOK PUBLISHED? Answer it! Oh, I forgot, you are a trolling SPAMMER... You don't answer questions, do you? =============================================== See how many questions I have replied, http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm --- If you can't understand a simple, straightforward question well enough to respond with a simple, straightforward answer, I doubt whether you can understand Einstein's work well enough to criticize it. -- JF ------------------------------ True , can you understand this, http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm --- I am interested in none of that. All I want is a simple "Yes" on "No" answer to the question: "Are you paying to have the book published?" John, He won't answer because he knows that as soon as he admits he paid to publish it he'll (in his limited mind) loose credibility. He's such a simple minded dolt that he thinks he has some credibility (can anything be further from the truth?) Of course. That's the whole point of trying to force him to admit the obvious. His refusal to answer is the only answer needed. And, as a second thought he also knows that admitting he paid to publish it he'll be admitting to this long spam trail. Sure. The guy's a wacko, 100%. When did you notice? ;-) -- Keith |
|
#25
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
krw wrote: In article , peter2 @hipson.net says... On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 11:08:04 -0600, John Fields wrote: On 7 Nov 2006 06:50:47 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: John Fields wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 17:30:15 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: PeterD wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 07:44:17 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: John Fields wrote: On 5 Nov 2006 09:01:39 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 --- Are you paying to have the book published? -- JF ------------------------------------------ Kindly see the answer ( complete ) here posted http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm AJAY SHARMA That's not an answer to the poster's question! He asked: ARE YOU PAYING TO HAVE THE BOOK PUBLISHED? Answer it! Oh, I forgot, you are a trolling SPAMMER... You don't answer questions, do you? =============================================== See how many questions I have replied, http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm --- If you can't understand a simple, straightforward question well enough to respond with a simple, straightforward answer, I doubt whether you can understand Einstein's work well enough to criticize it. -- JF ------------------------------ True , can you understand this, http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm --- I am interested in none of that. All I want is a simple "Yes" on "No" answer to the question: "Are you paying to have the book published?" John, He won't answer because he knows that as soon as he admits he paid to publish it he'll (in his limited mind) loose credibility. He's such a simple minded dolt that he thinks he has some credibility (can anything be further from the truth?) Of course. That's the whole point of trying to force him to admit the obvious. His refusal to answer is the only answer needed. And, as a second thought he also knows that admitting he paid to publish it he'll be admitting to this long spam trail. Sure. The guy's a wacko, 100%. When did you notice? ;-) -- Keith --------------------------- 100 Years of E=mc2 (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm 1. What is E=mc2? What is its importance? E=mc2 is the most wonderful and significant equation is physics. In 1945 the explosion of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were base upon this equation. According to this mass (m) can be converted to energy (E) and energy can be converted to mass. Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ 2. This equation is doing well since past 100 years then where is the inconsistency? The inconsistency lies in its mathematical derivation (a method to obtain a mathematical equation). In his 1905 paper Einstein did not derive it mathematically but in true sense speculated it. Einstein earlier derived L = mc2 (light energy mass conversion equation). Then Einstein speculated that what is true for light energy (L) the same is true for every energy (E). This speculation results in E=mc2, such a significant equation must be based upon a specific mathematical derivation and not on speculation. 3. Is Einsteins derivation of L =mc2 correct? The derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or true in special conditions only. Einstein took just handpicked parameters out of numerous possible, to obtain the equation. Einstein was aware of the reality so he left in midway after getting the desired result. If all valid values of parameters are taken, then results are contradictory in nature. 4. What are contradictory results? Some UNDISCUSSED predictions of Einsteins 29 Sep. 1905 derivation blatantly contradict Law of Conservation of Matter. I have scientifically confirmed the same. No limitation can be bigger than this in science. 5. Was E=mc2 or similar ideas existed before Einstein? Yes, E=mc2 existed before Einstein. An Italian Olinto de Pretto published E=mc2 in valid scientific journal Lettere ed Atti, Feb. 1904, two years before Einstein. But Pretto died in 1921, before its experimental confirmation in nuclear physics. 6. Einstein speculated E=mc2 from L=mc2. What is the problem here? Firstly derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or under special conditions only. For examples there are many variables in Einsteins derivation e.g. number of light waves emitted by body, magnitude of light energy, angle at which light energy is emitted and relative velocity v. Einstein just took handpicked values of variables. If general values of variables are taken then results are contradictory to experiments. Secondly Einstein originated E=mc2 on the basis of speculation only without any conceptual and mathematical basis. Basically Einstein replaced L by E in equation L=mc2 to get E=mc2. 7. Then how did you derive new equation, dE =Ac2dm (or DE = Ac2 DM )? I have derived new equation between mass-energy conservation by simple calculus method. In dE =Ac2dm, A is a co-efficient of proportionality like numerous others in science. It is dimensionless variable. Sharma June 2004 paper is available http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf 8. How do you compare these two equations? Firstly dE =Ac2dm is based upon a conceptual and mathematical derivation. On the other hand E=mc2 is a speculation, it is bitter truth. Secondly dE =Ac2dm is a general equation and E=mc2 is its special case. Energy emitted by new equation can be less, equal to or more than predicted by E=mc2. 9. How did you justify your equation experimentally? In Nuclear Physics there are some anomalous results which cannot be explained by E=mc2 . Like this there are some instances in astrophysics where my equation is extremely useful. 10. Is your work recognized by international scientific community? Yes, it is completely recognized, as published in peer review journals. 11 Have you got any recognition certificate from the scientific community? The only way to get scientific recognition is that to get the work published in peer review international journals and conferences. My research papers are either published in international journals from America, England and Canada or being published. I have got invitation from at least 55 International Conferences to present my work. I have presented my research in international conferences in USA, England, Germany, Taiwan Ukraine etc. I have invitation from France and Italy to present my work this year. [b]Still there ANYONE is welcome to COMMENT on the work in Physics Essays giving the facts e.g. What is Einsteins Sep 1905 paper ? What are conditions under which it is derived? Under what conditions experimentally it holds good? How to generalize it under all conditions? What is Ajay Sharmas Interpretation? How Ajay Sharmas paper is different from Einsteins Sep 1905 paper How Ajay Sharmas interpretation is incorrect (if it)? What are the correct interpretations? I HAVE ANSWERS TO ALL QUESTIONS. If Editor Physics Essays and his Editorial Board finds your interpretation and published the paper it is OK. All the references are given below for the purpose. There may be back door critics but none of the scientists have dared to write to scientific bodies or journals Editors , that Ajay Sharmas work is incorrectly published. 12. Can this work be introduced in Schools and colleges? Yes my wok is scientifically approved in journal in USA, CANADA and England. Hence it can be so done by any country. IT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF THE WORK. 13. How do you counter the opposition of the people which has come in you your way? Science is the international language. For this, I take seriously the logical conclusions of the critics. I completely ignore the irresponsible critics, as they dont exist. The critics when understand the things become my supporters. 14. What about your book, 100 Years of E=mc2? This book will be published in Dec. 2006 It will bring clear and unbiased picture of the facts. The contents of book are already approved by expert scientists after PEER REVIEW and published in international journals and conferences ..The book is meant for general public who is interested in basic science. This book will status as Newtons Principia or Galileos Dialogue have in science. Book Link : https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 Interviewer Rajesh Thakoor Email References of Einsteins work .. A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. .. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? Weblink is Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ PartII References of Ajay Sharmas work My work is available at A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222. €?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?. http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf For details 100 Years of E=mc2 https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 International Conferences It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the world --------------------------------------few of them 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25 August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems ( Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53. 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 , 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol ) University of Warwick , ENGLAND 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD ENGLAND 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA , (2003) 585. 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81 plus more -------------------------------------- Journals This paper €?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?. is published in journal Physics Essays , CANADA www.physicsessays.com The paper The past, present and future of E=mc2 will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts, USA. In parts it is published in various others journals. ---------------------- Book 100 Years of E=mc2 For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 0091 94183 09989, 0091 177 2804546 |
|
#26
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
On 6 Nov 2006 07:44:17 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" Gave
us: John Fields wrote: On 5 Nov 2006 09:01:39 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 --- Are you paying to have the book published? -- JF ------------------------------------------ Kindly see the answer ( complete ) here posted http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm AJAY SHARMA Hahaha... what a joke! ALL the references are authored by him. Tooting one's own horn, I think it is called. Problem is, the bat's turd is off key! |
|
#27
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
On 7 Nov 2006 06:50:47 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" Gave
us: True , can you understand this, Answer his ****ing question, you retarded spamtard! |
|
#28
Posted to alt.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
AJAY SHARMA wrote:
PeterD wrote: On 7 Nov 2006 06:50:47 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: John Fields wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 17:30:15 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: PeterD wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 07:44:17 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: John Fields wrote: On 5 Nov 2006 09:01:39 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) --- Are you paying to have the book published? -- JF ------------------------------------------ Kindly see the answer ( complete ) here posted AJAY SHARMA That's not an answer to the poster's question! He asked: ARE YOU PAYING TO HAVE THE BOOK PUBLISHED? Answer it! Oh, I forgot, you are a trolling SPAMMER... You don't answer questions, do you? =============================================== See how many questions I have replied, --- If you can't understand a simple, straightforward question well enough to respond with a simple, straightforward answer, I doubt whether you can understand Einstein's work well enough to criticize it. -- JF ------------------------------ True , can you understand this, Geeze, you're an idiot... OK, I guess I'll answer the question for you: yes you paid to have your book published... Right? =================== +++Idoit I also the language you USE. If you use the same language that others here use, how come you don't answer their question. Idoit I try to be polite upto huge extent. To ignore people is to be very impolite I dont reply to odiots. Idoits NEVER UNDERSTAND. ++++ So this explains why you don't reply, you don't understand, you idiot. If you do then read, there os answer of every question. Except the question that everyone here (except you, Ajay) wants answered:- ARE YOU PAYING TO HAVE THE BOOK PUBLISHED? Daniel -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
|
#29
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
JoeBloe wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 07:44:17 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" Gave us: John Fields wrote: On 5 Nov 2006 09:01:39 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 --- Are you paying to have the book published? -- JF ------------------------------------------ Kindly see the answer ( complete ) here posted http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm AJAY SHARMA Hahaha... what a joke! ALL the references are authored by him. Tooting one's own horn, I think it is called. Problem is, the bat's turd is off key! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 100 Years of E=mc2 (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm 1. What is E=mc2? What is its importance? E=mc2 is the most wonderful and significant equation is physics. In 1945 the explosion of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were base upon this equation. According to this mass (m) can be converted to energy (E) and energy can be converted to mass. Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ 2. This equation is doing well since past 100 years then where is the inconsistency? The inconsistency lies in its mathematical derivation (a method to obtain a mathematical equation). In his 1905 paper Einstein did not derive it mathematically but in true sense speculated it. Einstein earlier derived L = mc2 (light energy mass conversion equation). Then Einstein speculated that what is true for light energy (L) the same is true for every energy (E). This speculation results in E=mc2, such a significant equation must be based upon a specific mathematical derivation and not on speculation. 3. Is Einsteins derivation of L =mc2 correct? The derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or true in special conditions only. Einstein took just handpicked parameters out of numerous possible, to obtain the equation. Einstein was aware of the reality so he left in midway after getting the desired result. If all valid values of parameters are taken, then results are contradictory in nature. 4. What are contradictory results? Some UNDISCUSSED predictions of Einsteins 29 Sep. 1905 derivation blatantly contradict Law of Conservation of Matter. I have scientifically confirmed the same. No limitation can be bigger than this in science. 5. Was E=mc2 or similar ideas existed before Einstein? Yes, E=mc2 existed before Einstein. An Italian Olinto de Pretto published E=mc2 in valid scientific journal Lettere ed Atti, Feb. 1904, two years before Einstein. But Pretto died in 1921, before its experimental confirmation in nuclear physics. 6. Einstein speculated E=mc2 from L=mc2. What is the problem here? Firstly derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or under special conditions only. For examples there are many variables in Einsteins derivation e.g. number of light waves emitted by body, magnitude of light energy, angle at which light energy is emitted and relative velocity v. Einstein just took handpicked values of variables. If general values of variables are taken then results are contradictory to experiments. Secondly Einstein originated E=mc2 on the basis of speculation only without any conceptual and mathematical basis. Basically Einstein replaced L by E in equation L=mc2 to get E=mc2. 7. Then how did you derive new equation, dE =Ac2dm (or DE = Ac2 DM )? I have derived new equation between mass-energy conservation by simple calculus method. In dE =Ac2dm, A is a co-efficient of proportionality like numerous others in science. It is dimensionless variable. Sharma June 2004 paper is available http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf 8. How do you compare these two equations? Firstly dE =Ac2dm is based upon a conceptual and mathematical derivation. On the other hand E=mc2 is a speculation, it is bitter truth. Secondly dE =Ac2dm is a general equation and E=mc2 is its special case. Energy emitted by new equation can be less, equal to or more than predicted by E=mc2. 9. How did you justify your equation experimentally? In Nuclear Physics there are some anomalous results which cannot be explained by E=mc2 . Like this there are some instances in astrophysics where my equation is extremely useful. 10. Is your work recognized by international scientific community? Yes, it is completely recognized, as published in peer review journals. 11 Have you got any recognition certificate from the scientific community? The only way to get scientific recognition is that to get the work published in peer review international journals and conferences. My research papers are either published in international journals from America, England and Canada or being published. I have got invitation from at least 55 International Conferences to present my work. I have presented my research in international conferences in USA, England, Germany, Taiwan Ukraine etc. I have invitation from France and Italy to present my work this year. [b]Still there ANYONE is welcome to COMMENT on the work in Physics Essays giving the facts e.g. What is Einsteins Sep 1905 paper ? What are conditions under which it is derived? Under what conditions experimentally it holds good? How to generalize it under all conditions? What is Ajay Sharmas Interpretation? How Ajay Sharmas paper is different from Einsteins Sep 1905 paper How Ajay Sharmas interpretation is incorrect (if it)? What are the correct interpretations? I HAVE ANSWERS TO ALL QUESTIONS. If Editor Physics Essays and his Editorial Board finds your interpretation and published the paper it is OK. All the references are given below for the purpose. There may be back door critics but none of the scientists have dared to write to scientific bodies or journals Editors , that Ajay Sharmas work is incorrectly published. 12. Can this work be introduced in Schools and colleges? Yes my wok is scientifically approved in journal in USA, CANADA and England. Hence it can be so done by any country. IT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF THE WORK. 13. How do you counter the opposition of the people which has come in you your way? Science is the international language. For this, I take seriously the logical conclusions of the critics. I completely ignore the irresponsible critics, as they dont exist. The critics when understand the things become my supporters. 14. What about your book, 100 Years of E=mc2? This book will be published in Dec. 2006 It will bring clear and unbiased picture of the facts. The contents of book are already approved by expert scientists after PEER REVIEW and published in international journals and conferences ..The book is meant for general public who is interested in basic science. This book will status as Newtons Principia or Galileos Dialogue have in science. Book Link : https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 Interviewer Rajesh Thakoor Email References of Einsteins work .. A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. .. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? Weblink is Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ PartII References of Ajay Sharmas work My work is available at A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222. €?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?. http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf For details 100 Years of E=mc2 https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 International Conferences It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the world --------------------------------------few of them 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25 August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems ( Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53. 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 , 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol ) University of Warwick , ENGLAND 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD ENGLAND 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA , (2003) 585. 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81 plus more -------------------------------------- Journals This paper €?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?. is published in journal Physics Essays , CANADA www.physicsessays.com The paper The past, present and future of E=mc2 will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts, USA. In parts it is published in various others journals. ---------------------- Book 100 Years of E=mc2 For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 0091 94183 09989, 0091 177 2804546 |
|
#31
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
In article .com,
says... repetitive nonsense deleted ANSWER THE QUESTOIN! -- Keith |
|
#32
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
JoeBloe wrote: On 7 Nov 2006 06:50:47 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" Gave us: True , can you understand this, Answer his ****ing question, you retarded spamtard! ------------------------here is the answer, read carefully----------------------------------------- 100 Years of E=mc2 (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm 1. What is E=mc2? What is its importance? E=mc2 is the most wonderful and significant equation is physics. In 1945 the explosion of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were base upon this equation. According to this mass (m) can be converted to energy (E) and energy can be converted to mass. Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ 2. This equation is doing well since past 100 years then where is the inconsistency? The inconsistency lies in its mathematical derivation (a method to obtain a mathematical equation). In his 1905 paper Einstein did not derive it mathematically but in true sense speculated it. Einstein earlier derived L = mc2 (light energy mass conversion equation). Then Einstein speculated that what is true for light energy (L) the same is true for every energy (E). This speculation results in E=mc2, such a significant equation must be based upon a specific mathematical derivation and not on speculation. 3. Is Einsteins derivation of L =mc2 correct? The derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or true in special conditions only. Einstein took just handpicked parameters out of numerous possible, to obtain the equation. Einstein was aware of the reality so he left in midway after getting the desired result. If all valid values of parameters are taken, then results are contradictory in nature. 4. What are contradictory results? Some UNDISCUSSED predictions of Einsteins 29 Sep. 1905 derivation blatantly contradict Law of Conservation of Matter. I have scientifically confirmed the same. No limitation can be bigger than this in science. 5. Was E=mc2 or similar ideas existed before Einstein? Yes, E=mc2 existed before Einstein. An Italian Olinto de Pretto published E=mc2 in valid scientific journal Lettere ed Atti, Feb. 1904, two years before Einstein. But Pretto died in 1921, before its experimental confirmation in nuclear physics. 6. Einstein speculated E=mc2 from L=mc2. What is the problem here? Firstly derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or under special conditions only. For examples there are many variables in Einsteins derivation e.g. number of light waves emitted by body, magnitude of light energy, angle at which light energy is emitted and relative velocity v. Einstein just took handpicked values of variables. If general values of variables are taken then results are contradictory to experiments. Secondly Einstein originated E=mc2 on the basis of speculation only without any conceptual and mathematical basis. Basically Einstein replaced L by E in equation L=mc2 to get E=mc2. 7. Then how did you derive new equation, dE =Ac2dm (or DE = Ac2 DM )? I have derived new equation between mass-energy conservation by simple calculus method. In dE =Ac2dm, A is a co-efficient of proportionality like numerous others in science. It is dimensionless variable. Sharma June 2004 paper is available http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf 8. How do you compare these two equations? Firstly dE =Ac2dm is based upon a conceptual and mathematical derivation. On the other hand E=mc2 is a speculation, it is bitter truth. Secondly dE =Ac2dm is a general equation and E=mc2 is its special case. Energy emitted by new equation can be less, equal to or more than predicted by E=mc2. 9. How did you justify your equation experimentally? In Nuclear Physics there are some anomalous results which cannot be explained by E=mc2 . Like this there are some instances in astrophysics where my equation is extremely useful. 10. Is your work recognized by international scientific community? Yes, it is completely recognized, as published in peer review journals. 11 Have you got any recognition certificate from the scientific community? The only way to get scientific recognition is that to get the work published in peer review international journals and conferences. My research papers are either published in international journals from America, England and Canada or being published. I have got invitation from at least 55 International Conferences to present my work. I have presented my research in international conferences in USA, England, Germany, Taiwan Ukraine etc. I have invitation from France and Italy to present my work this year. [b]Still there ANYONE is welcome to COMMENT on the work in Physics Essays giving the facts e.g. What is Einsteins Sep 1905 paper ? What are conditions under which it is derived? Under what conditions experimentally it holds good? How to generalize it under all conditions? What is Ajay Sharmas Interpretation? How Ajay Sharmas paper is different from Einsteins Sep 1905 paper How Ajay Sharmas interpretation is incorrect (if it)? What are the correct interpretations? I HAVE ANSWERS TO ALL QUESTIONS. If Editor Physics Essays and his Editorial Board finds your interpretation and published the paper it is OK. All the references are given below for the purpose. There may be back door critics but none of the scientists have dared to write to scientific bodies or journals Editors , that Ajay Sharmas work is incorrectly published. 12. Can this work be introduced in Schools and colleges? Yes my wok is scientifically approved in journal in USA, CANADA and England. Hence it can be so done by any country. IT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF THE WORK. 13. How do you counter the opposition of the people which has come in you your way? Science is the international language. For this, I take seriously the logical conclusions of the critics. I completely ignore the irresponsible critics, as they dont exist. The critics when understand the things become my supporters. 14. What about your book, 100 Years of E=mc2? This book will be published in Dec. 2006 It will bring clear and unbiased picture of the facts. The contents of book are already approved by expert scientists after PEER REVIEW and published in international journals and conferences ..The book is meant for general public who is interested in basic science. This book will status as Newtons Principia or Galileos Dialogue have in science. Book Link : https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 Interviewer Rajesh Thakoor Email References of Einsteins work .. A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. .. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? Weblink is Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ PartII References of Ajay Sharmas work My work is available at A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222. €?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?. http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf For details 100 Years of E=mc2 https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 International Conferences It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the world --------------------------------------few of them 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25 August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems ( Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53. 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 , 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol ) University of Warwick , ENGLAND 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD ENGLAND 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA , (2003) 585. 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81 plus more -------------------------------------- Journals This paper €?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?. is published in journal Physics Essays , CANADA www.physicsessays.com The paper The past, present and future of E=mc2 will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts, USA. In parts it is published in various others journals. ---------------------- Book 100 Years of E=mc2 For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 0091 94183 09989, 0091 177 2804546 |
|
#33
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
On 7 Nov 2006 18:16:07 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote: PeterD wrote: On 7 Nov 2006 06:50:47 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: John Fields wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 17:30:15 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: PeterD wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 07:44:17 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: John Fields wrote: On 5 Nov 2006 09:01:39 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 --- Are you paying to have the book published? -- JF ------------------------------------------ Kindly see the answer ( complete ) here posted http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm AJAY SHARMA That's not an answer to the poster's question! He asked: ARE YOU PAYING TO HAVE THE BOOK PUBLISHED? Answer it! Oh, I forgot, you are a trolling SPAMMER... You don't answer questions, do you? =============================================== See how many questions I have replied, http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm --- If you can't understand a simple, straightforward question well enough to respond with a simple, straightforward answer, I doubt whether you can understand Einstein's work well enough to criticize it. -- JF ------------------------------ True , can you understand this, http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm Geeze, you're an idiot... OK, I guess I'll answer the question for you: yes you paid to have your book published... Right? =================== +++Idoit I also the language you USE. Idoit I try to be polite upto huge extent. I dont reply to odiots. Idoits NEVER UNDERSTAND. ++++ If you do then read, there os answer of every question. Tons of meaningless verbage from a self delusional man clipped, till the *answer* to my question! (see, I *was* right, he paid!) I asked "did you pay to publish your book" and Sharma said: Yes, And more meaningless talk snipped. And Sharma, thanks for *finally* clearing up that one! |
|
#34
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
PeterD wrote: On 7 Nov 2006 18:16:07 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: PeterD wrote: On 7 Nov 2006 06:50:47 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: John Fields wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 17:30:15 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: PeterD wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 07:44:17 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: John Fields wrote: On 5 Nov 2006 09:01:39 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 --- Are you paying to have the book published? -- JF ------------------------------------------ Kindly see the answer ( complete ) here posted http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm AJAY SHARMA That's not an answer to the poster's question! He asked: ARE YOU PAYING TO HAVE THE BOOK PUBLISHED? Answer it! Oh, I forgot, you are a trolling SPAMMER... You don't answer questions, do you? =============================================== See how many questions I have replied, http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm --- If you can't understand a simple, straightforward question well enough to respond with a simple, straightforward answer, I doubt whether you can understand Einstein's work well enough to criticize it. -- JF ------------------------------ True , can you understand this, http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm Geeze, you're an idiot... OK, I guess I'll answer the question for you: yes you paid to have your book published... Right? =================== +++Idoit I also the language you USE. Idoit I try to be polite upto huge extent. I dont reply to odiots. Idoits NEVER UNDERSTAND. ++++ If you do then read, there os answer of every question. Tons of meaningless verbage from a self delusional man clipped, till the *answer* to my question! (see, I *was* right, he paid!) I asked "did you pay to publish your book" and Sharma said: Yes, And more meaningless talk snipped. And Sharma, thanks for *finally* clearing up that one! === Peter, do know the manner how to ask information ?.============ Why you want to know this? If you have some of understanding the answer is here, Read , understand , everything is here. 100 Years of E=mc2 (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm 1. What is E=mc2? What is its importance? E=mc2 is the most wonderful and significant equation is physics. In 1945 the explosion of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were base upon this equation. According to this mass (m) can be converted to energy (E) and energy can be converted to mass. Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ 2. This equation is doing well since past 100 years then where is the inconsistency? The inconsistency lies in its mathematical derivation (a method to obtain a mathematical equation). In his 1905 paper Einstein did not derive it mathematically but in true sense speculated it. Einstein earlier derived L = mc2 (light energy mass conversion equation). Then Einstein speculated that what is true for light energy (L) the same is true for every energy (E). This speculation results in E=mc2, such a significant equation must be based upon a specific mathematical derivation and not on speculation. 3. Is Einsteins derivation of L =mc2 correct? The derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or true in special conditions only. Einstein took just handpicked parameters out of numerous possible, to obtain the equation. Einstein was aware of the reality so he left in midway after getting the desired result. If all valid values of parameters are taken, then results are contradictory in nature. 4. What are contradictory results? Some UNDISCUSSED predictions of Einsteins 29 Sep. 1905 derivation blatantly contradict Law of Conservation of Matter. I have scientifically confirmed the same. No limitation can be bigger than this in science. 5. Was E=mc2 or similar ideas existed before Einstein? Yes, E=mc2 existed before Einstein. An Italian Olinto de Pretto published E=mc2 in valid scientific journal Lettere ed Atti, Feb. 1904, two years before Einstein. But Pretto died in 1921, before its experimental confirmation in nuclear physics. 6. Einstein speculated E=mc2 from L=mc2. What is the problem here? Firstly derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or under special conditions only. For examples there are many variables in Einsteins derivation e.g. number of light waves emitted by body, magnitude of light energy, angle at which light energy is emitted and relative velocity v. Einstein just took handpicked values of variables. If general values of variables are taken then results are contradictory to experiments. Secondly Einstein originated E=mc2 on the basis of speculation only without any conceptual and mathematical basis. Basically Einstein replaced L by E in equation L=mc2 to get E=mc2. 7. Then how did you derive new equation, dE =Ac2dm (or DE = Ac2 DM )? I have derived new equation between mass-energy conservation by simple calculus method. In dE =Ac2dm, A is a co-efficient of proportionality like numerous others in science. It is dimensionless variable. Sharma June 2004 paper is available http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf 8. How do you compare these two equations? Firstly dE =Ac2dm is based upon a conceptual and mathematical derivation. On the other hand E=mc2 is a speculation, it is bitter truth. Secondly dE =Ac2dm is a general equation and E=mc2 is its special case. Energy emitted by new equation can be less, equal to or more than predicted by E=mc2. 9. How did you justify your equation experimentally? In Nuclear Physics there are some anomalous results which cannot be explained by E=mc2 . Like this there are some instances in astrophysics where my equation is extremely useful. 10. Is your work recognized by international scientific community? Yes, it is completely recognized, as published in peer review journals. 11 Have you got any recognition certificate from the scientific community? The only way to get scientific recognition is that to get the work published in peer review international journals and conferences. My research papers are either published in international journals from America, England and Canada or being published. I have got invitation from at least 55 International Conferences to present my work. I have presented my research in international conferences in USA, England, Germany, Taiwan Ukraine etc. I have invitation from France and Italy to present my work this year. [b]Still there ANYONE is welcome to COMMENT on the work in Physics Essays giving the facts e.g. What is Einsteins Sep 1905 paper ? What are conditions under which it is derived? Under what conditions experimentally it holds good? How to generalize it under all conditions? What is Ajay Sharmas Interpretation? How Ajay Sharmas paper is different from Einsteins Sep 1905 paper How Ajay Sharmas interpretation is incorrect (if it)? What are the correct interpretations? I HAVE ANSWERS TO ALL QUESTIONS. If Editor Physics Essays and his Editorial Board finds your interpretation and published the paper it is OK. All the references are given below for the purpose. There may be back door critics but none of the scientists have dared to write to scientific bodies or journals Editors , that Ajay Sharmas work is incorrectly published. 12. Can this work be introduced in Schools and colleges? Yes my wok is scientifically approved in journal in USA, CANADA and England. Hence it can be so done by any country. IT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF THE WORK. 13. How do you counter the opposition of the people which has come in you your way? Science is the international language. For this, I take seriously the logical conclusions of the critics. I completely ignore the irresponsible critics, as they dont exist. The critics when understand the things become my supporters. 14. What about your book, 100 Years of E=mc2? This book will be published in Dec. 2006 It will bring clear and unbiased picture of the facts. The contents of book are already approved by expert scientists after PEER REVIEW and published in international journals and conferences ..The book is meant for general public who is interested in basic science. This book will status as Newtons Principia or Galileos Dialogue have in science. Book Link : https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 Interviewer Rajesh Thakoor Email References of Einsteins work .. A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. .. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? Weblink is Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ PartII References of Ajay Sharmas work My work is available at A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222. €?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?. http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf For details 100 Years of E=mc2 https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 International Conferences It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the world --------------------------------------few of them 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25 August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems ( Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53. 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 , 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol ) University of Warwick , ENGLAND 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD ENGLAND 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA , (2003) 585. 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81 plus more -------------------------------------- Journals This paper €?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?. is published in journal Physics Essays , CANADA www.physicsessays.com The paper The past, present and future of E=mc2 will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts, USA. In parts it is published in various others journals. ---------------------- Book 100 Years of E=mc2 For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 0091 94183 09989, 0091 177 2804546 |
|
#35
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
On 8 Nov 2006 07:21:48 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote: PeterD wrote: On 7 Nov 2006 18:16:07 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: PeterD wrote: On 7 Nov 2006 06:50:47 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: John Fields wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 17:30:15 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: PeterD wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 07:44:17 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: John Fields wrote: On 5 Nov 2006 09:01:39 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 --- Are you paying to have the book published? -- JF ------------------------------------------ Kindly see the answer ( complete ) here posted http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm AJAY SHARMA That's not an answer to the poster's question! He asked: ARE YOU PAYING TO HAVE THE BOOK PUBLISHED? Answer it! Oh, I forgot, you are a trolling SPAMMER... You don't answer questions, do you? =============================================== See how many questions I have replied, http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm --- If you can't understand a simple, straightforward question well enough to respond with a simple, straightforward answer, I doubt whether you can understand Einstein's work well enough to criticize it. -- JF ------------------------------ True , can you understand this, http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm Geeze, you're an idiot... OK, I guess I'll answer the question for you: yes you paid to have your book published... Right? =================== +++Idoit I also the language you USE. Idoit I try to be polite upto huge extent. I dont reply to odiots. Idoits NEVER UNDERSTAND. ++++ If you do then read, there os answer of every question. Tons of meaningless verbage from a self delusional man clipped, till the *answer* to my question! (see, I *was* right, he paid!) I asked "did you pay to publish your book" and Sharma said: Yes, And more meaningless talk snipped. And Sharma, thanks for *finally* clearing up that one! === Peter, do know the manner how to ask information ?.============ Why you want to know this? I already have the information... (and notice, I always clip your trolling spam.) Why do I want to know? Just to comfirm you are as big a looser as you appear to be... We're talking a poll: is Sharma a total looser? Results to be published on the reply to his next troll/spam message. |
|
#36
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
AJAY SHARMA wrote:
SNIP Hey little man ! When did you step down from your tree ? Remember, you HAVE TO take 5 of the green pills and ABSOLUTELY DO NOT take 5 of the red ones :-) Btw., remember Einstein ? He was recognized for his work, many people did recognize him. He had no newsgroup that time, people simply recognized him for his ideas and work. And now no one recognizes you, little man ? You believe, spamming newsgroups will help ? Doubt it. Take the right pills and your brain farts will get better soon. Ludwig |
|
#37
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
On 7 Nov 2006 18:16:07 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote: PeterD wrote: On 7 Nov 2006 06:50:47 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: John Fields wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 17:30:15 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: PeterD wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 07:44:17 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: John Fields wrote: On 5 Nov 2006 09:01:39 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 --- Are you paying to have the book published? -- JF ------------------------------------------ Kindly see the answer ( complete ) here posted --- I'm confused. So far, I don't care anything about the technical aspects of what you're trying to push, since it sounds a lot like "Ajay Sharma 1, everyone else zero." I suppose it's possible that you might have found a chink in Einstein'a armor, much as he found in Newton's, but the fact remains that you refuse to disclose whether you paid to have your book published or not, so you're not being honest. Why? Are you ashamed to admit that no one would support your effort but yourself? There's no shame in that, as Ron Popeil has shown over and over again, so why are you so reluctant to admit that you're running your own show? -- JF |
|
#38
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
"AJAY SHARMA" wrote in message ups.com... JoeBloe wrote: On 7 Nov 2006 06:50:47 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" Gave us: True , can you understand this, Answer his ****ing question, you retarded spamtard! ------------------------here is the answer, read carefully----------------------------------------- You are not answering *his* question, you're posting the same drivel over and over. If you've been published in USA scientific journals (as you claim in your posts), can you tell us which journal and which issue it appears?? Put up some plausible credentials, or shut up. You're paying to have your own book published. You *LIE* about having been through peer reviews in respected scientific journals. You SPAM this same drivel to dozens of *UNRELATED* news groups. You're a pain the ass, spamming nut case. Go back in the corner and contemplate your navel while the nurse wipes away your drool. daestrom |
|
#39
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.lasers
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
PeterD wrote: On 8 Nov 2006 07:21:48 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: PeterD wrote: On 7 Nov 2006 18:16:07 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: PeterD wrote: On 7 Nov 2006 06:50:47 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: John Fields wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 17:30:15 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: PeterD wrote: On 6 Nov 2006 07:44:17 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: John Fields wrote: On 5 Nov 2006 09:01:39 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: (Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York, USA) https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 --- Are you paying to have the book published? -- JF ------------------------------------------ Kindly see the answer ( complete ) here posted http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm AJAY SHARMA That's not an answer to the poster's question! He asked: ARE YOU PAYING TO HAVE THE BOOK PUBLISHED? Answer it! Oh, I forgot, you are a trolling SPAMMER... You don't answer questions, do you? =============================================== See how many questions I have replied, http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm --- If you can't understand a simple, straightforward question well enough to respond with a simple, straightforward answer, I doubt whether you can understand Einstein's work well enough to criticize it. -- JF ------------------------------ True , can you understand this, http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm Geeze, you're an idiot... OK, I guess I'll answer the question for you: yes you paid to have your book published... Right? =================== +++Idoit I also the language you USE. Idoit I try to be polite upto huge extent. I dont reply to odiots. Idoits NEVER UNDERSTAND. ++++ If you do then read, there os answer of every question. Tons of meaningless verbage from a self delusional man clipped, till the *answer* to my question! (see, I *was* right, he paid!) I asked "did you pay to publish your book" and Sharma said: Yes, And more meaningless talk snipped. And Sharma, thanks for *finally* clearing up that one! === Peter, do know the manner how to ask information ?.============ Why you want to know this? I already have the information... (and notice, I always clip your trolling spam.) Why do I want to know? Just to comfirm you are as big a looser as you appear to be... We're talking a poll: is Sharma a total looser? Results to be published on the reply to his next troll/spam message. -------------------------------------------------- PeterD Part I http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm WHAT IS YOUR ADDRESS ? You could not raise a single scientific objection in many posts, so you call it spamming. It is not spamming, You call that thing spamming, WHICH YOU DONT LIKE.IT IS SPAMMING. You laugh or weep it is your sweet will. I know how deal with disgruntled people. I have interacted with people all over world regarding this work in past 24 years both personally and by mail IF INSTEIN IS MODIFIED THEN IT IS SPAMMING. Sue me for this ( about 100 Years of E=mc2) I will reply ? Call at 0091 177 94183 09989, I will give my address. Why are you worried WHO IS PAYING FOR BOOK ?. How are you concerned with this. This book is proposed to published in many languages. Come on scientific terms. Have you caliber to understand this. YOU ARE FREE TO CONTRADICT THE CONTENST IN INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS AND CONFERENCES. Part II http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm Ajay Sharma will reply the questions as long they raised on this GOOGLE FORUM. If you don't like then write to GOOGLE then stop my account. There is provision for this. I quote the references of all my papers published in international journals and conferences. I feel you are sensible enough, when a paper is published in journal , then IT IS PEER REVIEWED by expert in the field. So this work is published. Einstein's work has SERIOUS UNSEEN limitations, hence it published in conferences and journals all over the WORLD. Now let me know , what do you want ? Also mention you AFFILIATIONS completely here. So that I may take further step. Again further you want ( for spamming) Sue me for this ( about 100 Years of E=mc2) I will reply ? Call at 0091 177 94183 09989, I will give my address. AJAY SHARMA Nov. 9, 2006 http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm |
|
#40
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical
|
|||
|
|||
|
Galileo (NOT Einstein) is inventor of Second postulate of Relativity
We're talking a poll: is Sharma a total looser? Results to be published on the reply to his next troll/spam message. -------------------------------------------------- PeterD Part I You could not raise a single scientific objection in many posts, so you call it spamming. No, we are all just trying to find out who paid for this truly excellent work of logic to be published, so that we can thank that person. It is not spamming, You call that thing spamming, WHICH YOU DONT LIKE. Has anybody said they don't like it? IT IS SPAMMING. We know you are spamming! You laugh or weep it is your sweet will. I know how deal with disgruntled people. I have interacted with people all over world regarding this work in past 24 years both personally and by mail and you still don't know how to deal with people about it! Gee, you must be very slow! IF INSTEIN IS MODIFIED THEN IT IS SPAMMING. Who's INSTEIN?? Why are you worried WHO IS PAYING FOR BOOK ?. How are you concerned with this. We wish to see that he gets the praise he deserves! This book is proposed to published in many languages. How many have been sold? Has it made the New York Time Top 100 books, yet? Ajay Sharma will reply the questions as long they raised on this GOOGLE FORUM. So that's the problem! The reason Ajay is not answering these questions is because they're in a Google Newsgroup not a Google Forum! All is explained. If you don't like then write to GOOGLE then stop my account. There is provision for this. But we want the answer! (We all need a good laugh.) I quote the references of all my papers published in international journals and conferences. Good, but you cannot answer our question. I feel you are sensible enough, when a paper is published in journal , then IT IS PEER REVIEWED by expert in the field. I though papers were Peer Reviewed BEFORE they are published. So this work is published. Einstein's work has SERIOUS UNSEEN limitations, hence it published in conferences and journals all over the WORLD. Sorry, I cannot follow you here. Einstein's works are published all over the world BECAUSE it has limitations! Now let me know , what do you want ? We want you to answer the question "Are you paying to have the book published?". Also mention you AFFILIATIONS completely here. So that I may take further step. I've got no affiliations, so, please, take all the further steps you want. Daniel -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Linear Mode
