Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
Note to view the schematic below, change your font to fixed Courier. I have a problem I am trying to work out on simple Op Amps gain, and I am having trouble trying to prove what the gain is. I know what the gain is supposed to be (see below), but I am stumped as to how to actually go about proving it. When I try to setup the Kirchoff node equations I get a really ugly polynomial. I can put the design into a spice deck and prove it, but I want to understand the design from an analytical point of view. Gain = 2*R2/R1 * (1 + R2/Rg)(V2-V1) (GAIN FOR THE OP AMP BELOW) Now looking at the above equation it is obvious if you eliminate resistor Rg, the equation becomes a simple differential amplifier gain, which I can easily solve and prove. However when you add the positive feedback from the output, you get a different Beta for the loop gain that is hard to figure out. Anybody want to take a stab at proving this? Nick ------------ | | V1---------R1-----------------------R2-------R2---| | | | | | ___ | | | | \ | | |--Vn| \ | | | \ Vout | Rg | |------------------ | |--Vp| / | | | _ / ----------- | | | | V2----------R1-----------------------R2-------R2---|GND |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "N" caprice24 at no spam yahoo dot com wrote in message ... | Hi, | Note to view the schematic below, change your font to fixed Courier. | | | I have a problem I am trying to work out on simple Op Amps gain, | and I am having trouble trying to prove what the gain is. | I know what the gain is supposed to be (see below), but | I am stumped as to how to actually go about proving it. When | I try to setup the Kirchoff node equations I get a really | ugly polynomial. | | I can put the design into a spice deck and prove it, but I want to | understand the design from an analytical point of view. | | Gain = 2*R2/R1 * (1 + R2/Rg)(V2-V1) (GAIN FOR THE OP AMP BELOW) | | Now looking at the above equation it is obvious if you | eliminate resistor Rg, the equation becomes a simple | differential amplifier gain, which I can easily solve and | prove. However when you add the positive feedback from | the output, you get a different Beta for the loop gain | that is hard to figure out. | | Anybody want to take a stab at proving this? | | Nick ------------ | | | | V1---------R1-----------------------R2-------R2---| | | | | | | | ___ | | | | | \ | | | |--Vn| \ | | | | \ Vout | Rg | | |------------------ | | |--Vp| / | | | | _ / ----------- | | | | | | | V2----------R1-----------------------R2-------R2---|GND | write the loop equations, apply the following op-amp tricks: 1) currents into the inputs Vn and Vp are zero because op-amps have very input impedance 2) Vn-Vp is zero because op-amps have very high gain and you will get your gain equation |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Paslode IM250A Cordless Finish Nailer, Stripped Treads Problem | Woodworking | |||
Strange GTAW Aluminum Problem | Metalworking | |||
Widespread problem with HP Omnibook XE3-GFs? | Electronics Repair | |||
Problem with room getting too hot from facing the south (even in late October) | Home Repair | |||
Toshiba vertical problem | Electronics Repair |