|
On Thu, 26 May 2005 01:05:38 GMT, "tom" wrote:
Richard's point, you son of a diseased omega dog's whore, is that there are no proper permissions for such a thing, and he's right. Furthermore, you're area of focus, and in fact your initiation of this foray into homosexual insult - related territory is evidence of your obvious raped-prison-bitch type syndrome. Clearly, you have been taken advantage of and you are going through the rest of your miserable life seeing hostile homosexuals in everything from skype cartoons to random text typos. If I took the time on this that you obviously do, there would be no typos and omitted words like 'of' for you to see evidence of nazis and homosexuality where there are none. What do you see in Rorshasch blots, diseased son-of-dog-whore? Fags, and oh so not nice NAZI-esque caricatures? Remember the start of all of this --- you're intellectually challenged drive-by comment, "Oh please, get rid of skype, they have not nice nazi cartoons, and they aren't nice, god help me, moan, snivel, whine." How deep does the snow have to get, before you get the drift --- I can make it as deep as the sky is high and hell is low, you poster child for the prohibition of the making of pornographic videos involving ovulating, fertile female humans and genetically challenged but fertile, mongrel canines that are terminally infested with lice, fleas, ticks, scabies, ascaris intestinal worms, tapeworms, mange, canine spongiform encephalitis, and whose rank in the pack is so low that their food intake is so miniscule that their ribs show even when ALL other members of the pack are hideously obese. I like beating you up like this, can we keep doing it? --- The only thing you're beating, cretin, is your meat. What you're angry about is that I caught you in that little post where you condoned illegal activity and you can't wriggle off the hook, so you let your homophobia run amuck and bring in your puerile braying in an attempt to try to take the heat off of yourself and put the focus on me. Fine. Everything you write is worthless trash and filth much like, I suspect, the story of your life. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer |
On Thu, 26 May 2005 04:32:38 GMT, "tom" wrote:
Additionaly, son of a diseased and starving-in-a-time-of-plenty, son of an omega dog's whore --- I would like to compliment you. You are multi-talented individual, congratulations! You are a poster child not only for the organization of those who would prohibit beastiality, but you are also a poster child for the organization of those who wish for more severe penalties to deter inbreeding, you son of a diseased omega dog's whore who was also the cheapest train station whore of all time --- making multiple videos of the worst of the unspeakable acts with diseased, omega dogs, for sums of money insufficient to purchase a single tobacco cigarette. Indeed, using the gene pool metaphor, your gene pool has not only dried up around the edges. No, your gene pool has become a dusty, circular region within which there are baked hard octagons of clay and deep, dry cracks --- that is the extent to which your gene pool has dried, not just dried around the edges. John, mongoloid idiots from isolated, religious, coal mining communities in northern Tennessee have more intellectual heft than you. --- Oh, my! You've certainly worked youself up into a frenzy of banality! Get it all off your chest, sweetie, and then have a good cry and you'll feel a lot better. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer |
Don't get me wrong --- I'm not saying you're not an effective flamer, or
anything. You're a good flamer (big, friendly smile), it's just that you could be even better if you're posts had a wider scope, greater variety and at least some intellectual depth --- even a lttle bit of intellectual depth would be really good. All you do repeat the same old, worn out, generic characterizations: -you're stupid -plainly stupid -you'r mother was stupid -your stupidity -orientation related -gone ballistic -uncontrolled frenzy -frenzy of banality -anger -you're angry And that's good (another big friendly smile), but SURELY your repetoire can't be THAT limited --- can it? -- 73 Tom VA7FAB Skype Name: va7fab_tom_in_vancouver |
On Fri, 27 May 2005 12:14:35 GMT, "tom" wrote:
Don't get me wrong --- I'm not saying you're not an effective flamer, or anything. You're a good flamer (big, friendly smile), it's just that you could be even better if you're posts had a wider scope, greater variety and at least some intellectual depth --- even a lttle bit of intellectual depth would be really good. --- So far it's been my experience that you haven't the ability to recognize subtlety, or intellectual depth greater than a few nanometers, in that you haven't responded to it. Such being the case, I generally tend to respond to your posts with language and logic that I'm sure you'll understand; about fourth grade English and thinking. So far, it seems to be working. Mostly. I do notice, however, that this time you've coupled a left-handed compliment with an authoritarian position of feigned superiority and inflammatory "advice". Somewhat better than your previous trash but, still, a transparent attempt at adequacy. --- All you do repeat the same old, worn out, generic characterizations: -you're stupid -plainly stupid -you'r mother was stupid -your stupidity -orientation related -gone ballistic -uncontrolled frenzy -frenzy of banality -anger -you're angry --- See, that's part of what I'm getting at. You don't seem to be able to differentiate between 'your' and 'you're', (or even to use the apostrophe properly, since there is no such word as 'you'r') even though I've taken the time and trouble to explain the difference between them to you. That indicates either an inability to retain information or a pig-headed refusal to accept correction and prove it by using the newly-acquired knowledge or, I suspect, both. BTW, I thought "frenzy of banality" was rather good as well as being original and something you, in particular could relate to, since it presented an accurate visual of the zitterbewegung of your presentation and the importance of its content. --- And that's good (another big friendly smile), but SURELY your repetoire can't be THAT limited --- can it? --- As far as _you_ can tell, such seems to be the case. A Limerick for you: There was a young boy from Vancouver who thought, "I'm a shaker and mover!" but found he'd been bound, by a poet he found, who left him no room to maneuver. And a Haiku for you too: Can you say "stoopid"? "VA7FAB" seems to fill the bill And a parting shot: The question is "Why take the time?" Since spark for this verse is divine, and getting it all into rhyme, is just casting pearls before swine. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer |
------------------------
.... that's part of what I'm getting at. You don't seem to be able to differentiate between 'your' and 'you're', (or even to use the apostrophe properly, since there is no such word as 'you'r') even though I've taken the time and trouble to explain the difference between them to you. ----------------------- More mediocre characterizations of inability --- based on the result of a lackadaisical attitude about leaving in typos stemming from the use of a small keyboard with large fingers --- I just can't be bothered to clean-em up like you anally retentive son of diseased, omega dog's whore, feel driven to. Look on the bright side, it gives you fodder with which to visualize things that are non-existent but vital to your distorted, unstable weltenshaung. For instance, you can continue harping on your cognitive distortion that material like " 'you'r' " derives from of a lack of command of the language on my part, not an inadvertent key-press --- stuff like that. ----------------------- -you're stupid -plainly stupid -you'r mother was stupid -your stupidity -orientation related -gone ballistic -uncontrolled frenzy -frenzy of banality -anger -you're angry --- See, that's part of what I'm getting at. You don't seem to be able to differentiate between 'your' and 'you're', (or even to use the apostrophe properly, since there is no such word as 'you'r') ----------------------- I would point out that the examples of the characterizations that you're citing as evidence of my lack of command of the language are quotes from your own posts, I just couldn't be bothered with the standard formatting and quotation marks because I'm not trying to impress you (huge guffaw). But I don't point that stuff out because it could so easily collapse your fragile, unstable delusional architecture. Oh, and what the hell kind of Haiku format is that? Where's the seasonal reference? But, you're trying --- little Johnny. In addition to the same old shabby characterizations, there's a little poetry and some german --- good boy! And your foreign word dropping behaviour should be encouraged --- maybe one day when you're a grown up, li'l Johhny, you'll actually be able to speak another language. --------------------- And that's good (another big friendly smile), but SURELY your repetoire can't be THAT limited --- can it? --- As far as _you_ can tell, such seems to be the case. --------------------- Clearly, within the 'cloud-cuckoo-land' (ask a german) of your delusional architecture, any negative perceptions about you are solely the result of the perceivers inabilty to see the truth --- your imaginary 'truth'. A 'truth' that I suspect your present alter spends a lot of time and energy convincing itself is real --- a task that I just don't have the heart to add to. Psychologicaly abusing the feeble-minded isn't my bag. Referring to your calibre of material as 'pearls' is a reach, I do however, take pride in being swinish --- but only to certain ppl, and hopefully I am good and swinish to you (as you've said I am --- thankyou), given my efforts to be. Nothing would please me more than the thought of you --- aghast, cringing and recoiling from an onslaught of menacing, man-eating, tusked boars. Remember the Hannibal scene where the porkers make a meal of the wheelchair-bound, child rapo villian? I'm a tusked, alpha boar who gets the first bites of the tasty tender bits, and you're my immobilized, quadraplegic dinner. Hold still, stop wiggling your head around so much while I'm chewing your nose and ears off --- it's impolite to wiggle like that whilst being eaten by one so much igher up on the food chain. So, even though you get a failing grade --- you're trying. Please keep it up, although I suspect you have already reached the limits of your creativity. Maybe you could try some exotic metaphors or smt --- good luck! -- 73 Tom VA7FAB Skype Name: va7fab_tom_in_vancouver |
On Fri, 27 May 2005 21:27:39 GMT, "tom" wrote:
------------------------ ... that's part of what I'm getting at. You don't seem to be able to differentiate between 'your' and 'you're', (or even to use the apostrophe properly, since there is no such word as 'you'r') even though I've taken the time and trouble to explain the difference between them to you. ----------------------- More mediocre characterizations of inability --- based on the result of a lackadaisical attitude about leaving in typos stemming from the use of a small keyboard with large fingers --- I just can't be bothered to clean-em up like you anally retentive son of diseased, omega dog's whore, feel driven to. Look on the bright side, it gives you fodder with which to visualize things that are non-existent but vital to your distorted, unstable weltenshaung. For instance, you can continue harping on your cognitive distortion that material like " 'you'r' " derives from of a lack of command of the language on my part, not an inadvertent key-press --- stuff like that. --- Carelessness is the sign of an undisciplined mind, and a poor craftsman blames his tools. --- ----------------------- -you're stupid -plainly stupid -you'r mother was stupid -your stupidity -orientation related -gone ballistic -uncontrolled frenzy -frenzy of banality -anger -you're angry --- See, that's part of what I'm getting at. You don't seem to be able to differentiate between 'your' and 'you're', (or even to use the apostrophe properly, since there is no such word as 'you'r') ----------------------- I would point out that the examples of the characterizations that you're citing as evidence of my lack of command of the language are quotes from your own posts, I just couldn't be bothered with the standard formatting and quotation marks because I'm not trying to impress you (huge guffaw). --- If that's your intent, be assured that it's working. --- But I don't point that stuff out because it could so easily collapse your fragile, unstable delusional architecture. Oh, and what the hell kind of Haiku format is that? Where's the seasonal reference? --- Seasonal reference need not be included; it's five syllables in the first line, seven in the second, and five in the third, --- But, you're trying --- little Johnny. In addition to the same old shabby characterizations, there's a little poetry and some german --- good boy! And your foreign word dropping behaviour should be encouraged --- maybe one day when you're a grown up, li'l Johhny, you'll actually be able to speak another language. --- Perhaps one day, if you apply yourself, you'll be able to speak _this_ one. --- --------------------- And that's good (another big friendly smile), but SURELY your repetoire can't be THAT limited --- can it? --- As far as _you_ can tell, such seems to be the case. --------------------- Clearly, within the 'cloud-cuckoo-land' (ask a german) of your delusional architecture, any negative perceptions about you are solely the result of the perceivers inabilty to see the truth --- your imaginary 'truth'. A 'truth' that I suspect your present alter spends a lot of time and energy convincing itself is real --- a task that I just don't have the heart to add to. Psychologicaly abusing the feeble-minded isn't my bag. --- What's _really_ clear is that in that fog-bound bog you call your mind any attemp to enlighten you is met with fear and a further retreat into the swamp. --- Referring to your calibre of material as 'pearls' is a reach, I do however, take pride in being swinish --- but only to certain ppl, and hopefully I am good and swinish to you (as you've said I am --- thankyou), given my efforts to be. Nothing would please me more than the thought of you --- aghast, cringing and recoiling from an onslaught of menacing, man-eating, tusked boars. Remember the Hannibal scene where the porkers make a meal of the wheelchair-bound, child rapo villian? I'm a tusked, alpha boar who gets the first bites of the tasty tender bits, and you're my immobilized, quadraplegic dinner. Hold still, stop wiggling your head around so much while I'm chewing your nose and ears off --- it's impolite to wiggle like that whilst being eaten by one so much igher up on the food chain. --- Yes, I see. You envision yourself an eater of carrion. A threat to poor, helpless, wheelchair-bound, near-dead who are pushed into your pigpen. Something to aspire to, I suppose, if you're as low on the food chain as you profess to be. --- So, even though you get a failing grade --- you're trying. Please keep it up, although I suspect you have already reached the limits of your creativity. Maybe you could try some exotic metaphors or smt --- good luck! --- Try cleaning up your spelling. It's not 'boar' it's 'bore'. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer |
Oh, it, 'interesting ..." that I'm using a metap[hor in which I am eating
carrion --- yes, but only insofar as you are cast in the role of not-quite-yet-deceased carrion. Carry on, carrion. -- 73 Tom VA7FAB Skype Name: va7fab_tom_in_vancouver |
On Sat, 28 May 2005 22:34:26 GMT, "tom" wrote:
Oh, it, 'interesting ..." that I'm using a metap[hor in which I am eating carrion --- yes, but only insofar as you are cast in the role of not-quite-yet-deceased carrion. Carry on, carrion. --- Your need to to cast people into roles in a fantasy world where you can exercise dominion over them speaks volumes about your insecurity and your inability to function properly in the real world. Your entire posting history on this group is replete with examples of your pretense at having achieved a station which will always be beyond your grasp. I suggest that you might be happier if you learn to say "D'ya want fries with that?" and use that phrase to rise to the endeavor to which you seem most suited. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer |
"Entire posting history ..." --- really, you're sense of self worth is so
invested in this, that you've actually been scanning old posts of mine? Get a life, you son of a beastiality offending, train-station whore. -- 73 Tom VA7FAB Skype Name: va7fab_tom_in_vancouver |
On Sun, 29 May 2005 03:56:27 GMT, "tom" wrote:
"Entire posting history ..." --- really, you're sense of self worth is so invested in this, that you've actually been scanning old posts of mine? --- Yes, of course. It's just due diligence, something like trying to find out how big the dog is that's been whining at you in the dark. In your case, from the information you've volunteered so far it seems you're not so much a dog as a cross between a peccary and a chihuahua. --- Get a life, you son of a beastiality offending, train-station whore. LOL, back to that, huh? And here I thought it was _you_ that was clamoring for maturity and intellectuality. Turns out there's quite a gulf between what you say and what you do, huh? -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer |
On Sun, 29 May 2005 07:31:39 -0500, John Fields
wrote: On Sun, 29 May 2005 03:56:27 GMT, "tom" wrote: "Entire posting history ..." --- really, you're sense of self worth is so invested in this, that you've actually been scanning old posts of mine? --- Yes, of course. It's just due diligence, something like trying to find out how big the dog is that's been whining at you in the dark. In your case, from the information you've volunteered so far it seems you're not so much a dog as a cross between a peccary and a chihuahua. --- Get a life, you son of a beastiality offending, train-station whore. LOL, back to that, huh? And here I thought it was _you_ that was clamoring for maturity and intellectuality. Turns out there's quite a gulf between what you say and what you do, huh? --- Actually, "a cross between a sow and a chihuahua" would have reflected your lineage much more closely, wouldn't you agree? -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer |
To you, I deliberately flout the standards of usenet decency --- obscenely
and provocatively excreting a top-posted nonsensical bit-sequence. A bit-sequence serving no purpose whatsoever other than to exacerbate your clearly apoplectic state. -- 73 Tom VA7FAB Skype Name: va7fab_tom_in_vancouver |
On Sun, 29 May 2005 20:54:31 GMT, "tom" wrote:
To you, I deliberately flout the standards of usenet decency --- obscenely and provocatively excreting a top-posted nonsensical bit-sequence. A bit-sequence serving no purpose whatsoever other than to exacerbate your clearly apoplectic state. --- She yells and screams and stamps her feet, then when she goes down in defeat pretends she's calm and quite discreet, and planned it all, with words replete with hackneyed prose and little more than "Nyah, nyah, nyah, your Mom's a whore! And then to try to up her score She likens herself to a boar. A tusker who knows naught of fear, who's stylish and without a peer, but you can't make, you know, my dear, a silk purse from a fat sow's ear. And so you'll go from day to day pretending that you've much to say, yet in the end, after the fray, You'll find all you can do is bray. Yawnnnnn.... -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer |
Just one question --- how long did it take you to write that?
-- 73 Tom VA7FAB Skype Name: va7fab_tom_in_vancouver |
On Sun, 29 May 2005 20:54:31 +0000, tom wrote:
To you, I deliberately flout the standards of usenet decency --- obscenely and provocatively excreting a top-posted nonsensical bit-sequence. A bit-sequence serving no purpose whatsoever other than to exacerbate your clearly apoplectic state. To whom? Everybody? Then take your execrable little sensibilities and back off in your own jack yard. Thanks, Rich |
No, Rich --- only to the behaviour of this other individual --- John Fields.
Fields himself is ashamed of his execrable (yes, that is a good word, isn't it?) behaviour as evidenced by his recent spate of self-cancellations. Particularly noteworthy is the fact that Fields waited till activity in this thread had all but ceased before cancelling the first post he made here, the one that started the ball rolling, the outrageous, off-topic, drive-by comment that he now regrets so profoundly and is justifiably so deeply ashamed of. -- Tom H Echolink node 246781 Vancouver, BC Canada |
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 08:51:17 GMT, "amatuer_tabalnac"
wrote: No, Rich --- only to the behaviour of this other individual --- John Fields. Fields himself is ashamed of his execrable (yes, that is a good word, isn't it?) behaviour as evidenced by his recent spate of self-cancellations. Particularly noteworthy is the fact that Fields waited till activity in this thread had all but ceased before cancelling the first post he made here, the one that started the ball rolling, the outrageous, off-topic, drive-by comment that he now regrets so profoundly and is justifiably so deeply ashamed of. --- Is this what you're raging on about, loon? ----------------------------------------------------------------- QUOTE On Fri, 13 May 2005 23:18:08 GMT, "tom" wrote: I just bought a multimeter that has a transistor test socket for hfe testing. My PNP transistors it says are 180 or so, and that sounds right, assuming it's some kind of 'gain' measurement. But all of NPN transistors it says have values of 1 or 2, or in case, 3. I'm sure I'm putting the right pins in the right holes, I still have the pinout diagrams that came with the transistors, so there's no mistake there, and the holes are clearly marked on the multimeter... When I check the NPN ones that the hfe tester says have an hfe value of 1 or 2, they all have normally biased junctions when tested with the old 'pretend its a diode' method. So I dont know what to make of this. Can anyone give me some advice on this? 73 Tom VA7FAB Skype Name: va7fab_tom_in_vancouver --- Yes. Blow off Skype. Look at their cartoons, particularly the ones which suggest that death is an appropriate solution for disagreement with their philosophy. Just another bunch of nazis END QUOTE ------------------------------------------------------------------- I've cancelled nothing, dumbass, so if you no longer have access to the article the problem's on your end. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer |
whine, snivel, moan --- yeah, right. The post self-cancelled when it woke
up one day and realized how stupid it was, they can do that, you know. |
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 19:49:53 GMT, "amatuer_tabalnac"
wrote: whine, snivel, moan --- yeah, right. The post self-cancelled when it woke up one day and realized how stupid it was, they can do that, you know. --- I'll be waiting for the day you wake up and suddenly disappear, then. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer |
multimeter that has a transistor test socket for hfe testing
John Fields wrote in
: On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 19:49:53 GMT, "amatuer_tabalnac" wrote: whine, snivel, moan --- yeah, right. The post self-cancelled when it woke up one day and realized how stupid it was, they can do that, you know. --- I'll be waiting for the day you wake up and suddenly disappear, then. Gee.....I was just browsing for some interesting circut designs and it seem like it is mostly morons arguing with each other here! Why don't you guys just e-mail your insults to each other and leave the group for what it was intended. |
multimeter that has a transistor test socket for hfe testing
On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 09:02:16 GMT, Pat Kennedy
wrote: John Fields wrote in : On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 19:49:53 GMT, "amatuer_tabalnac" wrote: whine, snivel, moan --- yeah, right. The post self-cancelled when it woke up one day and realized how stupid it was, they can do that, you know. --- I'll be waiting for the day you wake up and suddenly disappear, then. Gee.....I was just browsing for some interesting circut designs and it seem like it is mostly morons arguing with each other here! --- Not to mention the cretins whore ply to nearly year-old posts. --- Why don't you guys just e-mail your insults to each other and leave the group for what it was intended. --- We all use the group the way we want to, and one of those uses is flaming each other in public, which is ever so much more fun than doing it privately. You just did it by not emailing me with your "moron" flame, you hypocrite, so who are you to pass judgement? -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:59 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter