Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
VT4xx or VT2xx emulators (was:Favorite VT440 for OS X, Linux, or legacy systems?)
wrote:
The specific client I am trying to replace does identify itself as VT440, which may be amusing to some. VT440 is obviously not as common as VT420 or VT220. Whether that's right or wrong or common or rare, so what. The section DEC Terminals at a Glance in "DEC Video Terminals" seems to indicate that VTx40 terminals can display ReGIS and sixel graphics. http://www.cs.utk.edu/~shuford/terminal/dec.html Part of the confusion is my fault. For quite some time, the "DEC Terminals" page at that URL has contained the following text: "The next generation consisted of the VT320, VT330, and VT340, while a further generation comprised the VT420 and VT440." Today I have changed it to omit the reference to the VT440 and have put a small note to correct the false impression. Among my collected terminal documents is one prepared by DEC as an internal specification of the VT510 model, which consists largely of a kind of checklist of DEC terminal models and features implemented in each one. Encoded in Postscript, this file resides he http://www.cs.utk.edu/~shuford/termi...n_checklist.ps While it contains entries for many DEC terminal types, including VT100, VT220, VT320, VT340, VT420, and the VT510, it contains no reference to anything called "VT440". An educated guess on what happened: it is likely that, when the VT420 was being specified and positioned to replace the text-only VT320, DEC decided that the design effort necessary to make a replacement for the graphics-capable VT340 was too great, given the market projections for sales of this hypothetical "VT440". So the existing VT340 model was retained in the catalog and sold alongside the VT420 until the VT525 took over as the graphics product. Peter Sichel might know the whole story, but he doesn't seem to read this newsgroup much anymore. (The VT330 was an interesting beast: if I recall correctly, it could display only text, but it could connect to two separate sessions at the same time, displaying one on the top of the screen and one on the bottom. There were two serial ports, but the device could also obey the patented "Terminal Device Session Management Protocol" to multiplex two sessions on one wire. Apparently the VT420 also implemented TDSMP, but the control sequences never appeared in the product documentation.) As to terminal emulators that can do graphics: I have never seen a freely available package capable of ReGIS. A few of the commercial products can/could do it, such as WRQ Reflection, SmarTerm 340, Rumba, DCS EM340, poly-STAR/GW, and KEAterm: http://www.cs.utk.edu/~shuford/termi...ators_news.txt The old MS-DOS Kermit by Joe Doupnik can do the more bit-map-like Sixel graphics, but (to my knowledge) Kermit-95 cannot. (But perhaps Frank will comment...) -- Prevent bovine juvenile deliquency: adopt a cow today. http://www.stonyfield.com/HaveACow/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In comp.terminals Richard S. Shuford wrote:
As to terminal emulators that can do graphics: I have never seen a freely available package capable of ReGIS. A few of the commercial products can/could do it, such as WRQ Reflection, SmarTerm 340, Rumba, DCS EM340, poly-STAR/GW, and KEAterm: Also (according to the documentation), dxterm (DEC term). I don't have a test for that, but thought it implied that dxterm would support soft fonts as well. But it doesn't (or else the test I wrote against a vt420 is too fragile to work with a second terminal ;-) -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 12:00:00 -0500, Richard S. Shuford wrote:
An educated guess [...] the existing VT340 model was retained in the catalog and sold alongside the VT420 until the VT525 took over as the graphics product. The VT525 isn't graphical. It's a very nice colour text terminal though, that just plugs straight into a VGA monitor. (The VT330 was an interesting beast: if I recall correctly, it could display only text The VT330 is the monochrome brother of the colour VT340. (I'd like a VT340, but I only have a VT330.) -- Paul Manx, a catalogue of online computer manuals: http://vt100.net/manx/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|