Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm back to my original Power Inverter, which is a small 300W peak, 125W
continuous unit, probably made in the 1980s. It's gotten lots of use and was always reliable. A while ago, it started acting weird and occasionally would not produce 120VAC output. At that same time, the red light (LED) would light up, which means it's not working properly. I've had it apart several times recently, and it will always start working again after I mess with it, but that dont always last long. I have ordered a new inverter, but until that comes, I have been using this old one, and found something interesting. I've been leaving the case open on it, and when it fails to work, all I have to do is hit the large electrolytic cap, with the handle of a screwdriver, and it usually works again. I have carefully checked all solder joints on the board, and even resoldered a few that looked questionable. This cap is surely soldered properly. This makes me wonder if somehow the leads are loose inside the cap itself. Is that possible? This cap is the biggest one on the board, near the 12V inputs. It's 100uf, 200v. It's fairly large for a modern cap. I plan to replace it, but I dont have one on hand and will have to order it. Even after I get my new inverter, I would like to repair this old standby inverter that was always very reliable, and has a simple circuit without a lot of bling and dont have one of those dreaded annoying buzzers inside. |
#2
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Three things:
a) Modern caps do not have 'wires inside'. The do have connection(s) between the foil and the connecting wires that can go flaky - but those are all-or-nothing situations. b) The buzzer comes on when the input voltage approaches, then drops below the trigger voltage for the inverter. So, if your battery voltage drops below whatever that is - first inverter will buzz, then AC-out will stop. \ c) So it appears that you may have tossed that other inverter because you mistook the buzz for an inverter problem, not a battery problem. It also appears that you do not understand the concept of 'system'. An inverter is one half of a system, the other half being the battery. Both need to be in good condition for the entire *System* to operate properly. Now, some inverters will drain a battery dead before stopping. And, it appears that your 300 watt unit is such a beast. Accordingly, you are sulphating your battery killing sooner rather than later. Even a Marine-grade deep-discharge battery does not want to go below 50% of charge on a repeated basis, 70% being better. Now, comes the math: Amps is amps. Watts is watts. Volts is volts. Broadly speaking - volts x amps = watts. 120 watts = 1 amp at 120V 120 watts = 10 amps at 12V. One (1) amp for one (1) hour is one AMP-HOUR. The reality of battery performance vs. CCA. We are ignoring inverter losses - anywhere from 10% to 30% in the universe you inhabit. The typical car battery is somewhere between 24 and 60 AH, some very fancy marine-deep-discharge batteries can be about 120 AH. That is from fully charged to *dead*. Meaning that you do not want to run for more than half that time in reality.. If you are running at 120 watts, you are using ten (10) amps per hour (ignoring losses). In 1.2 hours you will be at 50% (24AH battery) assuming you started with a peak-charged battery in good condition. In two hours you will have caused irreparable damage to a 24AH battery. Yes, it will still work after a fashion - but never again at peak and never again at full charge. For a 60 AH battery, you get a whole three (3) hours before damage sets in. Enjoy! Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA |
#3
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 04:40:07 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote: a) Modern caps do not have 'wires inside'. The do have connection(s) between the foil and the connecting wires that can go flaky - but those are all-or-nothin g situations. That tells me how the caps are connected internally, and although it's "all or nothing", I do wonder if jiggling it (tapping it) can make that connection make or break contact? This inverter is very simple, and I'm pretty confident I can fix it. I'll start by replacing that cap. If that dont do it, I may resolder every connection at least on that end of the board. This simple inverter does not completely shut down when the battery voltage gets low. Instead it keeps shutting offn and on, till the battery gets so low that it shuts off completely. It did leave me stranded once, when it started to go off and on, in my car, when my battery was weak to start with. The car would not start. Fortunately a friend lived 2 blocks away, so I walked to his house and had him come and jump my car. b) The buzzer comes on when the input voltage approaches, then drops below the trigger voltage for the inverter. So, if your battery voltage drops below wh atever that is - first inverter will buzz, then AC-out will stop. \ The battery used to test that other inverter was purchased 2 months ago, and was just charged, reading 14+ volts on my digital multimeter. Although I could not find a schematic, I did find an owners manual for that one. The red LED on that one does different things. Low battery makes the red LED light up solid and the buzzer makes a steady sound. What I am getting is flashing red, and beeping on-off alarm sound. The manual says that means the LOAD is too large. The load I was using was 80W (AC). Far from too large. It was working until I shut off this switch on the load. (ODD). Then that inverter went into that error mode and has remained that way ever since, even with no load. According to web articles, this is a common problem with this model. The circuit in this thing is very complex, and without a schematic, near impossible to trace. So, I think it belongs in my scrap box. |
#4
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rather than the cap leads being broken internally, I would suspect that they are broken in the holes of the PC board. Try a quick re-solder first. If it behaves the same, just replace them.
Dan |
#5
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, October 18, 2017 at 3:33:01 PM UTC-4, wrote:
Note the interpolations. Again, your conception of things is massively flawed. That tells me how the caps are connected internally, and although it's "all or nothing", I do wonder if jiggling it (tapping it) can make that connection make or break contact? This inverter is very simple, and I'm pretty confident I can fix it. I'll start by replacing that cap. If that dont do it, I may resolder every connection at least on that end of the board. Yes. A start. This simple inverter does not completely shut down when the battery voltage gets low. Instead it keeps shutting offn and on, till the battery gets so low that it shuts off completely. It did leave me stranded once, when it started to go off and on, in my car, when my battery was weak to start with. The car would not start. Fortunately a friend lived 2 blocks away, so I walked to his house and had him come and jump my car. The one is not directly related to the other. b) The buzzer comes on when the input voltage approaches, then drops below the trigger voltage for the inverter. So, if your battery voltage drops below wh atever that is - first inverter will buzz, then AC-out will stop. \ The battery used to test that other inverter was purchased 2 months ago, and was just charged, reading 14+ volts on my digital multimeter. 14V measures the availability of a chemical reaction. If all six cells have unconsumed electrolyte, you will get 14V (13.6). But that voltage will sag to as low as 8V (from six cells) under load. This is where the flaw in your understanding lies. Although I could not find a schematic, I did find an owners manual for that one. The red LED on that one does different things. Low battery makes the red LED light up solid and the buzzer makes a steady sound. What I am getting is flashing red, and beeping on-off alarm sound. The manual says that means the LOAD is too large. The load I was using was 80W (AC). No. The load *size* is a function of the input voltage *UNDER LOAD*. If you can do (for round figures) 120 watts (10 A @ 12 V) of AC load at full battery charge, your maximum load at say.... 8V will be about 75 watts. And that is assuming that the battery has a steady-state capacity of 10A @ 8V. It will not. So, your alarms will trigger. Further, if your load is a motor - the starting surge will be up to 3X the steady state load. Far from too large. It was working until I shut off this switch on the load. (ODD). Then that inverter went into that error mode and has remained that way ever since, even with no load. According to web articles, this is a common problem with this model. The circuit in this thing is very complex, and without a schematic, near impossible to trace. So, I think it belongs in my scrap box. Most inverters, even cheap ones, will re-set if fed from a properly charged battery at full voltage and THIS DOES NOT MEAN from a battery feeding from the alternator at full voltage. The wave-form from an automotive alternator is chopped DC - there are no "smoothing caps". Inverters do not respond well to chopped DC. Nor do most alternators have the capacity to both run a car, run an inverter, and also charge a battery. Those would be highly specialized devices - our VW camper had such an alternator-and-inverter system, as well as a 200 AH deep-cycle marine battery as a second back-up to the regular battery in the engine compartment. https://www.topmaq.co.nz/wp-content/...AVBA1580_a.jpg One of these will tell you about your battery. A standard VOM will not. Not even my Fluke. Again, you need to understand the entirety of your *SYSTEM* and what each piece of information means. So far, you have proven that you do not understand even the most basic concepts. Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA |
#7
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One more thing to add - even a "new" battery can be irreparably damaged by even a few excessive discharge cycles. Two cycles to below 40% on a standard car battery - and it is toast. I am sure you did not purchase the $200 option (the correct battery for our VW was over $300. And worth every penny.
Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA |
#8
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, October 18, 2017 at 6:14:37 PM UTC-4, Foxs Mercantile wrote:
On 10/18/2017 3:29 PM, wrote: Again, you need to understand the entirety of your*SYSTEM* and what each piece of information means. So far, you have proven that you do not understand even the most basic concepts. Pearls, swine. LOL! John Wolcott, CT |
#11
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 13:29:24 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote: Again, you need to understand the entirety of your *SYSTEM* and what each piece of information means. So far, you have proven that you do not underst and even the most basic concepts. At least I'm not an arrogant **** like you, who replies to people asking serious questions and trying to learn things by attacking them...... But it's obvious that you think you are the almighty God in the electronics forums and YOUR words will always be the last words, becuase your ego is so low that you can only feel good about yourself by demeaning others. PLONK |
#12
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, October 19, 2017 at 3:45:10 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 13:29:24 -0700 (PDT), " wrote: Again, you need to understand the entirety of your *SYSTEM* and what each piece of information means. So far, you have proven that you do not underst and even the most basic concepts. At least I'm not an arrogant **** like you, who replies to people asking serious questions and trying to learn things by attacking them...... But it's obvious that you think you are the almighty God in the electronics forums and YOUR words will always be the last words, becuase your ego is so low that you can only feel good about yourself by demeaning others. PLONK Heheeheh,... you're like Phil sans knowledge... |
#13
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/19/2017 2:45 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 13:29:24 -0700 (PDT), " wrote: Again, you need to understand the entirety of your *SYSTEM* and what each piece of information means. So far, you have proven that you do not underst and even the most basic concepts. [ Sniveling snipped ] PLONK Do you even have any idea what "Plonk" means? -- Jeff-1.0 wa6fwi http://www.foxsmercantile.com |
#14
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, October 19, 2017 at 3:45:10 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 13:29:24 -0700 (PDT), " wrote: Again, you need to understand the entirety of your *SYSTEM* and what each piece of information means. So far, you have proven that you do not underst and even the most basic concepts. At least I'm not an arrogant **** like you, who replies to people asking serious questions and trying to learn things by attacking them...... But it's obvious that you think you are the almighty God in the electronics forums and YOUR words will always be the last words, becuase your ego is so low that you can only feel good about yourself by demeaning others. PLONK If you were trying to learn anything - you would have been way ahead of this issue - but, no, you are looking for someone to confirm your warped view of reality. Learning is the furthest thing from your goal. You will note that your first pass at any given question usually gets a straightforward answer. It is when you display invincible ignorance that things go off the rails. Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA |
#15
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, October 18, 2017 at 12:39:58 AM UTC-7, wrote:
I'm back to my original Power Inverter... and found something interesting. I've been leaving the case open on it, and when it fails to work, all I have to do is hit the large electrolytic cap, with the handle of a screwdriver, and it usually works again. Internals of an aluminum electrolytic capacitor are foil, and thin foil can sometimes break. The rapping on the can, however, puts stress mainly on a printed wiring board, NOT on internal foils. Look carefully, for cracks or bad solder joints, at or near the pressure-sensitive fault you've located. Sometimes, fluxing and reheating all the solder joints is easier than getting a good (lens or microscope is helpful) look at them, but also look for cracks in the circuit board material, or nearby components. Tapping with an insulated probe (chopsticks work fine) will sometimes locate an invisible fault. It could be almost any component, of course. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Lots of 500: 50V 22uF Electrolytic Capacitors :: $ 27 SHIPPED | Electronics | |||
FS: Lots of 500: 50V 22uF Electrolytic Capacitors :: $ 27 SHIPPED | Electronics Repair | |||
Identifying non-electrolytic capacitors? | Electronics Repair | |||
Problems using ESR Meter testing Motherboard Electrolytic Capacitors | Electronics Repair | |||
FA. New electrolytic capacitors 143mfd 220vac | Metalworking |