Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
I've got a Micronta that's getting weird on me. Thing must be
30 years old, but it always did what little I needed of it: - Checking automobile battery voltages - Checking various other batteries' voltages - Looking for shorts Can anybody recommend a replacement that doesn't cost an arm and a leg? I'm thinking hardware-store quality is going tb adequate, but don't know the ins and outs. -- PeteCresswell |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
Harbor Freight has a digital meter for $3 -- but I don't know how sturdy it
is. |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
On Feb 21, 2:16*pm, "(PeteCresswell)" wrote:
I've got a Micronta that's getting weird on me. * Thing must be 30 years old, but it always did what little I needed of it: - Checking automobile battery voltages - Checking various other batteries' voltages - Looking for shorts Can anybody recommend a replacement that doesn't cost an arm and a leg? I'm thinking hardware-store quality is going tb adequate, but don't know the ins and outs. -- PeteCresswell Try Harbor Freight. greg |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:16:53 -0500, "(PeteCresswell)"
wrote: I've got a Micronta that's getting weird on me. Thing must be 30 years old, but it always did what little I needed of it: - Checking automobile battery voltages - Checking various other batteries' voltages - Looking for shorts Can anybody recommend a replacement that doesn't cost an arm and a leg? I'm thinking hardware-store quality is going tb adequate, but don't know the ins and outs. The little US$27 (at Lowes) Extech model DM110 is a nice "tool bag" meter. Small, handles the basic functions, includes a case. Downside is no backlight and the leads are permanently attached. In general: Autoranging is nice but increases the time between probing something and getting a stable reading. Autoranging plus a "range hold" function is a nice compromise. Having a continuity beeper is handy for checking for shorts/opens without having to keep looking back at the meter. Backlighted displays are nice. Don't get too wrapped up in "counts"; the world is mostly three significant figures, so 0-1999 is okay for the vast majority of situations for a general-purpose meter. -- Rich Webb Norfolk, VA |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
On Feb 21, 1:27*pm, "William Sommerwerck"
wrote: Harbor Freight has a digital meter for $3 -- but I don't know how sturdy it is. I have it (among others)...it'll get you by. |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
(PeteCresswell) wrote:
I've got a Micronta that's getting weird on me. Thing must be 30 years old, but it always did what little I needed of it: - Checking automobile battery voltages - Checking various other batteries' voltages - Looking for shorts Can anybody recommend a replacement that doesn't cost an arm and a leg? I'm thinking hardware-store quality is going tb adequate, but don't know the ins and outs (picture mode)google accu tester 300000 hits. http://www.winparts.nl/534/werkplaat...ulader/0106747 The above link shows the one our local gasstation uses. |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
(PeteCresswell) wrote:
- Checking automobile battery voltages Make sure you turn on the headlights first. - Checking various other batteries' voltages Again, no-load voltages are mostly meaningless; make yourself a test load to get any useful readings. That the device that uses the batteries is still working properly is the best indicator of their suitability. There's a bi-monthly swap meet near me for computer stuff, etc. that has old voltmeters (analog too!). They are mostly returns that somebody blew the fuse in and returned. Watching a needle move *can* give useful information that a digital readout doesn't easily communicate. |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
William Sommerwerck wrote:
Harbor Freight has a digital meter for $3 -- but I don't know how sturdy it is. The unit itself is sturdy enough for occasional use (I keep one in the car and a couple near the workbench), but the leads are about the cheapest I have seen, especially the banana plugs. Still, for a couple of bucks they are good enough to have a few laying about for when you need an extra meter. Jon |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
On 2/21/2011 11:27 AM William Sommerwerck spake thus:
Harbor Freight has a digital meter for $3 -- but I don't know how sturdy it is. Plenty sturdy. The weak point of these meters (I've bought several of them) seems to be the leads, the wires of which pull out pretty easily. Other than that, they seem as good as any other hardware-store DMM. -- The phrase "jump the shark" itself jumped the shark about a decade ago. - Usenet |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
In article ,
(PeteCresswell) wrote: I've got a Micronta that's getting weird on me. Thing must be 30 years old, but it always did what little I needed of it: - Checking automobile battery voltages - Checking various other batteries' voltages - Looking for shorts Can anybody recommend a replacement that doesn't cost an arm and a leg? I'm thinking hardware-store quality is going tb adequate, but don't know the ins and outs. The very cheap ones sort of work ok. But pay a bit more - perhaps around $25 dollars from Ebay - and you can get quite a decent one. -- *Wedding dress for sale. Worn once by mistake.* Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
In article ,
Peabody wrote: There's a bi-monthly swap meet near me for computer stuff, etc. that has old voltmeters (analog too!). They are mostly returns that somebody blew the fuse in and returned. Watching a needle move *can* give useful information that a digital readout doesn't easily communicate. I agree. I use mine all the time, but the contacts inside are wearing out. Where would you find an inexpensive new analog meter? Do they even make them anymore? A half decent DVM will have a a bargraph to mimic a needle movement. -- *The statement below is true. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
Where would you find an inexpensive new analog
meter? Do they even make them anymore? Yes. Try MCM or any other large parts distributor. |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: In article , Peabody wrote: There's a bi-monthly swap meet near me for computer stuff, etc. that has old voltmeters (analog too!). They are mostly returns that somebody blew the fuse in and returned. Watching a needle move *can* give useful information that a digital readout doesn't easily communicate. I agree. I use mine all the time, but the contacts inside are wearing out. Where would you find an inexpensive new analog meter? Do they even make them anymore? A half decent DVM will have a a bargraph to mimic a needle movement. A decent DVM won't have a bargraph to annoy you. -- You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a band-aid on it, because it's Teflon coated. |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
A decent DVM won't have a bargraph to annoy you.
That must make my Fluke 87 indecent. |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
William Sommerwerck wrote: A decent DVM won't have a bargraph to annoy you. That must make my Fluke 87 indecent. I prefer a good bench meter, and always found meters with bargraphs to be very annoying. They don't have enough resolution for the work I need a DVM for. For some jobs I've had to use a 5&3/4 digit DVM. -- You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a band-aid on it, because it's Teflon coated. |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
On 2/25/2011 4:10 PM, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
I prefer a good bench meter, and always found meters with bargraphs to be very annoying. They don't have enough resolution for the work I need a DVM for. For some jobs I've had to use a 5&3/4 digit DVM. For a simple "Is it more or less?" Nothing beats a DC coupled scope. If you're tuning for a maximum (or minimum) you can easily see that out of the corner of your eye with out having to take your eyes off your fingers or the end of the tool you're adjusting things with. Jeff |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
A decent DVM won't have a bargraph to annoy you.
That must make my Fluke 87 indecent. I prefer a good bench meter, and always found meters with bargraphs to be very annoying. They don't have enough resolution for the work I need a DVM for. For some jobs I've had to use a 5&3/4 digit DVM. If you're working at a bench, it makes sense to use a meter that sits at eye level, rather than having to fiddle with what is basically a hand-held meter (such as my 87). Ad for the bar graph... I don't notice it unless I have a need for it. |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
In article ,
Michael A. Terrell wrote: I agree. I use mine all the time, but the contacts inside are wearing out. Where would you find an inexpensive new analog meter? Do they even make them anymore? A half decent DVM will have a a bargraph to mimic a needle movement. A decent DVM won't have a bargraph to annoy you. It's there to inform. Of course information may well annoy you. And I consider my Fluke quite decent. -- *I want it all and I want it delivered Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
Jeffrey Angus wrote: On 2/25/2011 4:10 PM, Michael A. Terrell wrote: I prefer a good bench meter, and always found meters with bargraphs to be very annoying. They don't have enough resolution for the work I need a DVM for. For some jobs I've had to use a 5&3/4 digit DVM. For a simple "Is it more or less?" Nothing beats a DC coupled scope. If you're tuning for a maximum (or minimum) you can easily see that out of the corner of your eye with out having to take your eyes off your fingers or the end of the tool you're adjusting things with. As long as you don't have to set something to an exact value. Too many years in TV Broadcast & Aerospace where you had to be able to set something to less than a 1 mV error at 15 V. :( -- You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a band-aid on it, because it's Teflon coated. |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: In article , Michael A. Terrell wrote: I agree. I use mine all the time, but the contacts inside are wearing out. Where would you find an inexpensive new analog meter? Do they even make them anymore? A half decent DVM will have a a bargraph to mimic a needle movement. A decent DVM won't have a bargraph to annoy you. It's there to inform. Of course information may well annoy you. And I consider my Fluke quite decent. When you're at a bench with over 30 pieces of test equipment, including four or more identical DVMs the bargraph is just more visual noise. -- You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a band-aid on it, because it's Teflon coated. |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
On 2/25/2011 9:19 PM, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Jeffrey Angus wrote: On 2/25/2011 4:10 PM, Michael A. Terrell wrote: I prefer a good bench meter, and always found meters with bargraphs to be very annoying. They don't have enough resolution for the work I need a DVM for. For some jobs I've had to use a 5&3/4 digit DVM. For a simple "Is it more or less?" Nothing beats a DC coupled scope. If you're tuning for a maximum (or minimum) you can easily see that out of the corner of your eye with out having to take your eyes off your fingers or the end of the tool you're adjusting things with. As long as you don't have to set something to an exact value. Too many years in TV Broadcast& Aerospace where you had to be able to set something to less than a 1 mV error at 15 V. :( Well, that's what the FLuke bench DMMs are for. ;-) Jeff |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
Jeffrey Angus wrote: On 2/25/2011 9:19 PM, Michael A. Terrell wrote: Jeffrey Angus wrote: On 2/25/2011 4:10 PM, Michael A. Terrell wrote: I prefer a good bench meter, and always found meters with bargraphs to be very annoying. They don't have enough resolution for the work I need a DVM for. For some jobs I've had to use a 5&3/4 digit DVM. For a simple "Is it more or less?" Nothing beats a DC coupled scope. If you're tuning for a maximum (or minimum) you can easily see that out of the corner of your eye with out having to take your eyes off your fingers or the end of the tool you're adjusting things with. As long as you don't have to set something to an exact value. Too many years in TV Broadcast& Aerospace where you had to be able to set something to less than a 1 mV error at 15 V. :( Well, that's what the Fluke bench DMMs are for. ;-) Actually some were HP 5+3/4 digit with IEEE-488 interface to verify calibration. -- You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a band-aid on it, because it's Teflon coated. |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
In article ,
Michael A. Terrell wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: In article , Michael A. Terrell wrote: I agree. I use mine all the time, but the contacts inside are wearing out. Where would you find an inexpensive new analog meter? Do they even make them anymore? A half decent DVM will have a a bargraph to mimic a needle movement. A decent DVM won't have a bargraph to annoy you. It's there to inform. Of course information may well annoy you. And I consider my Fluke quite decent. When you're at a bench with over 30 pieces of test equipment, including four or more identical DVMs the bargraph is just more visual noise. Thought the question was about the spec for a basic DVM? As regards a bargraph being 'visual noise' that's the whole point. It draws your attention to the direction and rate of change. If you're using '30 pieces of test equipment' at once, you can't possibly read them all accurately at any one point in time - so a bargraph sounds to me even more useful here. -- *The statement above is false Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
This discussion reminds me of the article on digital voltmeters in
"Electronics World" about 50 years ago. Back then, they were huge, taking up (if I recall correctly) a 3U or 4U space. The meter they described was a Non-Linear Systems model. Its ADC was electromechanical, (!) using a relay-controlled voltage divider on a highly-accurate voltage source to create successively closer approximations to the input voltage. There were no commercial LED displays, of course, so the results were displayed using incandescent lamps to side-illuminate numbers cut into polycarbonate blocks! (I don't know why NLS didn't use Nixie tubes.) |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: In article , Michael A. Terrell wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: In article , Michael A. Terrell wrote: I agree. I use mine all the time, but the contacts inside are wearing out. Where would you find an inexpensive new analog meter? Do they even make them anymore? A half decent DVM will have a a bargraph to mimic a needle movement. A decent DVM won't have a bargraph to annoy you. It's there to inform. Of course information may well annoy you. And I consider my Fluke quite decent. When you're at a bench with over 30 pieces of test equipment, including four or more identical DVMs the bargraph is just more visual noise. Thought the question was about the spec for a basic DVM? As regards a bargraph being 'visual noise' that's the whole point. It draws your attention to the direction and rate of change. If you're using '30 pieces of test equipment' at once, you can't possibly read them all accurately at any one point in time - so a bargraph sounds to me even more useful here. Maybe, if you want to be distracted. I was testing modules in $20,000 to $80,000 (US) telemetry receiving systems. The 'Video Combiner' module compared the linear 0-5V AGC buss in two receivers, and was allowed an error of under 1.5 mV. I wouldn't use any meter with one on my bench, but some techs wanted them even though they were useless. They also clutter their benches with piles of other useless crap. Tell me of ANY bargraph that will give useful indication when the change is in millivolts, where the voltage being measured is 5 to 15 volts. The bargraph would be 2 volts per division. The bargraph driver is noisy enough that the display is unstable at the boundaries, and some are used with an overlap to reduce flicker. it does this by dithering the reference voltage. -- You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a band-aid on it, because it's Teflon coated. |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
William Sommerwerck wrote: This discussion reminds me of the article on digital voltmeters in "Electronics World" about 50 years ago. Back then, they were huge, taking up (if I recall correctly) a 3U or 4U space. The meter they described was a Non-Linear Systems model. Its ADC was electromechanical, (!) using a relay-controlled voltage divider on a highly-accurate voltage source to create successively closer approximations to the input voltage. There were no commercial LED displays, of course, so the results were displayed using incandescent lamps to side-illuminate numbers cut into polycarbonate blocks! (I don't know why NLS didn't use Nixie tubes.) HP made a voltmeter plugin for their 5245L frequency counter. That was mid '60s vintage. -- You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a band-aid on it, because it's Teflon coated. |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
Tell me of ANY bargraph that will give useful indication
when the change is in millivolts, where the voltage being measured is 5 to 15 volts. The bargraph would be 2 volts per division. I think it's rather finer than that. (My Fluke 87 has 51 points.) But no one (that I know of) makes a DVM with that can display millivolt changes when the input is hundreds of millivolts. The purpose of the bargraph is to give the tech an easily interpreted indication of which way the measurement is tending, without having to "interpret" the numbers. And it responds much more quickly than the display can settle. I have little need for the bargraph display. But it adds little to the cost of the meter, and it's there when I do. |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
There were no commercial LED displays, of course, so the
results were displayed using incandescent lamps to side- illuminate numbers cut into polycarbonate blocks! (I don't know why NLS didn't use Nixie tubes.) HP made a voltmeter plugin for their 5245L frequency counter. That was mid '60s vintage. Interesting. I had an SWTP modular unit, though that was a lot later. The NLS appeared earlier, I believe. George Kay (as in Kaypro) is given credit for the first digital voltmeter. |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message m... "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: In article , Peabody wrote: There's a bi-monthly swap meet near me for computer stuff, etc. that has old voltmeters (analog too!). They are mostly returns that somebody blew the fuse in and returned. Watching a needle move *can* give useful information that a digital readout doesn't easily communicate. I agree. I use mine all the time, but the contacts inside are wearing out. Where would you find an inexpensive new analog meter? Do they even make them anymore? A half decent DVM will have a a bargraph to mimic a needle movement. A decent DVM won't have a bargraph to annoy you. -- You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a band-aid on it, because it's Teflon coated. Fluke meters have a bar graph and I find it usefull. |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
Shaun wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message m... "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: In article , Peabody wrote: There's a bi-monthly swap meet near me for computer stuff, etc. that has old voltmeters (analog too!). They are mostly returns that somebody blew the fuse in and returned. Watching a needle move *can* give useful information that a digital readout doesn't easily communicate. I agree. I use mine all the time, but the contacts inside are wearing out. Where would you find an inexpensive new analog meter? Do they even make them anymore? A half decent DVM will have a a bargraph to mimic a needle movement. A decent DVM won't have a bargraph to annoy you. -- You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a band-aid on it, because it's Teflon coated. Fluke meters have a bar graph and I find it usefull. God for you. I never have. BTW, it's spelled useful, with one 'l'. -- You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a band-aid on it, because it's Teflon coated. |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
William Sommerwerck wrote: Tell me of ANY bargraph that will give useful indication when the change is in millivolts, where the voltage being measured is 5 to 15 volts. The bargraph would be 2 volts per division. I think it's rather finer than that. (My Fluke 87 has 51 points.) But no one (that I know of) makes a DVM with that can display millivolt changes when the input is hundreds of millivolts. The purpose of the bargraph is to give the tech an easily interpreted indication of which way the measurement is tending, without having to "interpret" the numbers. And it responds much more quickly than the display can settle. I have little need for the bargraph display. But it adds little to the cost of the meter, and it's there when I do. I used meters like a Boonton 9200, a Fluke 8920A and several 4.5 digit or better general purpose DVMs. The signal generators and frequency counters were all connected to the in house 10 MHz frequency standard and we had an in house metrology lab. -- You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a band-aid on it, because it's Teflon coated. |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message m... Shaun wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message m... "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: In article , Peabody wrote: There's a bi-monthly swap meet near me for computer stuff, etc. that has old voltmeters (analog too!). They are mostly returns that somebody blew the fuse in and returned. Watching a needle move *can* give useful information that a digital readout doesn't easily communicate. I agree. I use mine all the time, but the contacts inside are wearing out. Where would you find an inexpensive new analog meter? Do they even make them anymore? A half decent DVM will have a a bargraph to mimic a needle movement. A decent DVM won't have a bargraph to annoy you. -- You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a band-aid on it, because it's Teflon coated. Fluke meters have a bar graph and I find it usefull. God for you. I never have. BTW, it's spelled useful, with one 'l'. And Good is spelled with two "O"s |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
Shaun wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" ? wrote in message m... ? ? Shaun wrote: ?? ?? "Michael A. Terrell" ? wrote in message ?? m... ?? ? ?? ? "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: ?? ?? ?? ?? In article ?, ?? ?? Peabody ? wrote: ?? ?? ? ? There's a bi-monthly swap meet near me for computer ?? ?? ? ? stuff, etc. that has old voltmeters (analog too!). They ?? ?? ? ? are mostly returns that somebody blew the fuse in and ?? ?? ? ? returned. Watching a needle move *can* give useful ?? ?? ? ? information that a digital readout doesn't easily ?? ?? ? ? communicate. ?? ?? ?? ?? ? I agree. I use mine all the time, but the contacts inside ?? ?? ? are wearing out. Where would you find an inexpensive new ?? ?? ? analog meter? Do they even make them anymore? ?? ?? ?? ?? A half decent DVM will have a a bargraph to mimic a needle movement. ?? ? ?? ? ?? ? A decent DVM won't have a bargraph to annoy you. ?? ? ?? ? ?? ? -- ?? ? You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a band-aid on it, because it's ?? ? Teflon coated. ?? ? ?? ?? Fluke meters have a bar graph and I find it usefull. ? ? ? God for you. I never have. BTW, it's spelled useful, with one 'l'. And Good is spelled with two "O"s I never claim to be perfect. -- You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a Band-Aid™ on it, because it's Teflon coated. |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
In article ,
Michael A. Terrell wrote: I never claim to be perfect. Just as well. ;-) -- *If a thing is worth doing, wouldn't it have been done already? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: In article ?, Michael A. Terrell ? wrote: ? I never claim to be perfect. Just as well. ;-) When someone claims to be perfect, I ask to see the nail holes. -- You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a Band-Aid™ on it, because it's Teflon coated. |
Looking For Usable Multimeter - Cheap
On 2/28/2011 11:51 AM Michael A. Terrell spake thus:
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: In article ?, Michael A. Terrell ? wrote: ? I never claim to be perfect. Just as well. ;-) When someone claims to be perfect, I ask to see the nail holes. Ha! Your one-line responses are generally annoying, but this one's a zinger! -- The phrase "jump the shark" itself jumped the shark about a decade ago. - Usenet |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter