Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pressing beamfinder shows a beam, and I can adjust it, but I get
absolutely nothing without pressing beamfinder. This goes for the calibrator or another input signal (such as a 120V wall outlet.) Is this repairable? I am very mechanically inclined, but only mildly (very mildly) electronically inclined. Is there any hope for me? - Chris P. |
#2
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
crispy wrote in message
ps.com... Pressing beamfinder shows a beam, and I can adjust it, but I get absolutely nothing without pressing beamfinder. This goes for the calibrator or another input signal (such as a 120V wall outlet.) Is this repairable? I am very mechanically inclined, but only mildly (very mildly) electronically inclined. Is there any hope for me? - Chris P. The basic rule is , if you can get some sort of trace then scopes are usually repairable without a lot of spenduliks. Tektronix specific output packages for driving the CRO plates are a problem costwise, anyone produced any get-by, not necessarily full matching spec, hybrid near equivalents or details for hybriding? -- Diverse Devices, Southampton, England electronic hints and repair briefs , schematics/manuals list on http://home.graffiti.net/diverse:graffiti.net/ |
#3
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
N Cook wrote:
crispy wrote in message ps.com... Pressing beamfinder shows a beam, and I can adjust it, but I get absolutely nothing without pressing beamfinder. This goes for the calibrator or another input signal (such as a 120V wall outlet.) Is this repairable? I am very mechanically inclined, but only mildly (very mildly) electronically inclined. Is there any hope for me? - Chris P. The basic rule is , if you can get some sort of trace then scopes are usually repairable without a lot of spenduliks. Tektronix specific output packages for driving the CRO plates are a problem costwise, anyone produced any get-by, not necessarily full matching spec, hybrid near equivalents or details for hybriding? My 465 was repaired recently for what sounds like the same problem. It was some IC or other. Had to order it from some outfit in Canada and pay through the nose for the obsolete Tek part. Essentially it was intermittent at first, then no sweep at all. Mark Z. |
#4
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() My 465 was repaired recently for what sounds like the same problem. It was some IC or other. Had to order it from some outfit in Canada and pay through the nose for the obsolete Tek part. Essentially it was intermittent at first, then no sweep at all. Mark Z. Thanks Mark. Any idea which IC? Where in the scope? I'm actually considering tackling the repair myself, but I can't do it entirely on my own. - Chris P. |
#5
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mark D. Zacharias" wrote in
et: N Cook wrote: crispy wrote in message ps.com... Pressing beamfinder shows a beam, and I can adjust it, but I get absolutely nothing without pressing beamfinder. This goes for the calibrator or another input signal (such as a 120V wall outlet.) Is this repairable? I am very mechanically inclined, but only mildly (very mildly) electronically inclined. Is there any hope for me? - Chris P. The basic rule is , if you can get some sort of trace then scopes are usually repairable without a lot of spenduliks. Tektronix specific output packages for driving the CRO plates are a problem costwise, anyone produced any get-by, not necessarily full matching spec, hybrid near equivalents or details for hybriding? My 465 was repaired recently for what sounds like the same problem. It was some IC or other. Had to order it from some outfit in Canada and pay through the nose for the obsolete Tek part. Essentially it was intermittent at first, then no sweep at all. Mark Z. probably the sweep logic IC;155-0049-xx (-02 the last version) -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net |
#6
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"crispy" wrote in
ups.com: My 465 was repaired recently for what sounds like the same problem. It was some IC or other. Had to order it from some outfit in Canada and pay through the nose for the obsolete Tek part. Essentially it was intermittent at first, then no sweep at all. Cheaper to buy the part than buy a new scope. ;-) Mark Z. Thanks Mark. Any idea which IC? Where in the scope? I'm actually considering tackling the repair myself, but I can't do it entirely on my own. - Chris P. FIRST thing is to get a service manual.(if you don't already have one) the circuit description is *invaluable* in knowing how the circuits work. You may have a problem in the sweep unblanking circuit. (it's discrete,not IC) -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net |
#7
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 19, 1:57 pm, "crispy" wrote:
Pressing beamfinder shows a beam, and I can adjust it, but I get absolutely nothing without pressing beamfinder. Press the top "ch1" button on the left set of buttons then hold down the beamfinder-- then use the ch1 pos and horiz pos controls to center the dot on the screen. If the dot doenst move vertically, there's something bad in the vertical channel -- that's bad. if it doesnt move horizontally, then something is bad in the h or sweep circuits, also but not quite so bad. If you CAN center the dot, let go of the beam finder button. Then turn up the intensity-- you should be able to see the dot now unless something is wrong in the CRT circuits. The most common problem is thankfully, much simpler, a bad diode or capacitor in the power supply. Check the voltages on the bottom board. They're all labeled-- gnd, +5, +15, -15, -8, +55, +110 or thereabouts IIRC. This goes for the calibrator or another input signal (such as a 120V wall outlet.) Oh dear. Take extreme care-- you can blow out things real good by applying 120 volts to the inputs. Please use the calibrator output. |
#8
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 20, 9:00 am, "Ancient_Hacker" wrote:
On Mar 19, 1:57 pm, "crispy" wrote: Pressing beamfinder shows a beam, and I can adjust it, but I get absolutely nothing without pressing beamfinder. Press the top "ch1" button on the left set of buttons then hold down the beamfinder-- then use the ch1 pos and horiz pos controls to center the dot on the screen. If the dot doenst move vertically, there's something bad in the vertical channel -- that's bad. if it doesnt move horizontally, then something is bad in the h or sweep circuits, also but not quite so bad. If you CAN center the dot, let go of the beam finder button. Then turn up the intensity-- you should be able to see the dot now unless something is wrong in the CRT circuits. The most common problem is thankfully, much simpler, a bad diode or capacitor in the power supply. Check the voltages on the bottom board. They're all labeled-- gnd, +5, +15, -15, -8, +55, +110 or thereabouts IIRC. This goes for the calibrator or another input signal (such as a 120V wall outlet.) Oh dear. Take extreme care-- you can blow out things real good by applying 120 volts to the inputs. Please use the calibrator output. Well, I used a 10X probe for the wall outlet, and this was after trying the calibrator circuit with a 1X. (I think I _will_ stick with the calibrator output anyway.) The calibrator circuit shows a square wave and the wall outlet shows a sine wave, but only with the beamfinder pressed for both. With beamfinder pressed and no input signal, I get a line that is half the display width, but centered horizontally. (Should it be a dot?) I can move it vertically, but adjusting it horizontally also changes the length of the line (adjusting it left moves the right end of the line to the left, but the left end stays where it is.) These same type of adjustment results occur with an input, and the horizontal range of the the displayed wave is the same as for no input. This is all true for both channels. Oh, and I have the manual that came with the scope, and I followed the steps in there for initial settings to get a "normal display". |
#9
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"crispy" ) writes:
Well, I used a 10X probe for the wall outlet, and this was after trying the calibrator circuit with a 1X. (I think I _will_ stick with the calibrator output anyway.) The calibrator circuit shows a square wave and the wall outlet shows a sine wave, but only with the beamfinder pressed for both. With beamfinder pressed and no input signal, I get a line that is half the display width, but centered horizontally. (Should it be a dot?) I can move it vertically, but adjusting it horizontally also changes the length of the line (adjusting it left moves the right end of the line to the left, but the left end stays where it is.) These same type of adjustment results occur with an input, and the horizontal range of the the displayed wave is the same as for no input. This is all true for both channels. Oh, and I have the manual that came with the scope, and I followed the steps in there for initial settings to get a "normal display". The beamfinder is there in case the settings do put the trace off the screen. The beamfinder puts something on the screen, so you can manipulate the trace so it will be on screen without the beamfinder. The beamfinder in effect compresses things, so you will see a trace on screen, and the horizontal and vertical adjustments will have limited range. If you get a trace with the beamfinder, then there can't be much wrong with it. Indeed, given some other clues (ie you connect the probe to the AC line without realizing you could seriously damage something), it seems more likely you don't have something adjusted properly, or you anticipate operation different from how it is, and there's nothing wrong with the scope. YOu use the beamfinder to set the trace in the middle of the scope display. But, you won't see a trace after that with the beamfinder off unless you have an input signal (that is strong enough to trigger the sweep), or you have the trigger on the sweep set so it's not waiting for a trigger. Other things that might cause a "missing" trace is if you've got the sweep set so slow that you just haven't waited long enough, or have the sweep set so fast that the trace is pretty fine and you only really see it when there is a signal being displayed. Lots of people think their "scope doesn't work" because they simply aren't familiar with the controls. Not only do the fancier scopes have a lot of controls, making it easy to overlook something, but to some extent they interact, so if you don't have switch a set a certain way, then having switch b set a certain way will give you no results. At the very most, there is likely a problem in the positioning circuitry. ANd you can't solve something because someone posts something about their own problem, and then you jump at that solution. Until you can actually isolate the problem, you won't know what area needs to be looked at. You'd not be seeing any sort of trace if the deflection circuits weren't working. Michael |
#10
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks. I admit I'm a beginner with scopes, and I've been trying to
follow the manual for obtaining a basic normal display. The specs say the AC input voltage is way over the 120V outlet, and I figured the impedance of the scope inputs should keep the current down to a safe level... guess not? I'm in one of those situations where I don't have a known periodic signal except for a wall outlet. I bought this scope to do automotive diagnosis (oxygen sensors, fuel injectors, etc... NOT the high tension side of the ignition... I know...) Maybe I ought to just start using it that way. It doesn't make sense to me that beamfinder shows a trace but nothing shows up otherwise. If it shows up with beamfinder, it seems adjusting the scale controls (V/div and time scale) should at least show something from the calibrator. I couldn't seem to get anything from the calibrator even though there's something there when beamfinder is pressed (this goes for both channels.) I know, one person's issue isn't necessarily mine as well. Figuring that this scope is over 1/4 century old with countless numbers of them out there, I was wondering if possibly this is a known, common problem that has a known fix (assuming it is a problem to begin with.) Thanks for the input.... - Chris P. (hence, crispy!) |
#11
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 20 Mar 2007 15:46:16 GMT, Jim Yanik wrote:
"crispy" wrote in oups.com: My 465 was repaired recently for what sounds like the same problem. It was some IC or other. Had to order it from some outfit in Canada and pay through the nose for the obsolete Tek part. Essentially it was intermittent at first, then no sweep at all. Cheaper to buy the part than buy a new scope. ;-) Mark Z. Thanks Mark. Any idea which IC? Where in the scope? I'm actually considering tackling the repair myself, but I can't do it entirely on my own. - Chris P. FIRST thing is to get a service manual.(if you don't already have one) the circuit description is *invaluable* in knowing how the circuits work. You may have a problem in the sweep unblanking circuit. (it's discrete,not IC) And you can get one at: http://bama.sbc.edu/tektroni.htm (and a few other sites.) Also, BAMA is best accessed on 'off-hours' as there is a ten user limit on the server. It is also slow, so don't expect instant transfers. |
#12
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 20 Mar 2007 11:27:09 -0700, "crispy" wrote:
Thanks. I admit I'm a beginner with scopes, and I've been trying to follow the manual for obtaining a basic normal display. The specs say the AC input voltage is way over the 120V outlet, and I figured the impedance of the scope inputs should keep the current down to a safe level... guess not? I'm in one of those situations where I don't have a known periodic signal except for a wall outlet. I bought this scope to do automotive diagnosis (oxygen sensors, fuel injectors, etc... NOT the high tension side of the ignition... I know...) Maybe I ought to just start using it that way. It doesn't make sense to me that beamfinder shows a trace but nothing shows up otherwise. If it shows up with beamfinder, it seems adjusting the scale controls (V/div and time scale) should at least show something from the calibrator. I couldn't seem to get anything from the calibrator even though there's something there when beamfinder is pressed (this goes for both channels.) I know, one person's issue isn't necessarily mine as well. Figuring that this scope is over 1/4 century old with countless numbers of them out there, I was wondering if possibly this is a known, common problem that has a known fix (assuming it is a problem to begin with.) Thanks for the input.... - Chris P. (hence, crispy!) You're not in NH are you? |
#13
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() You're not in NH are you? Nope, Oregon. Here's a funny tidbit: my previous job (as of a week and half ago actually) was at a company that was started by two people who used to work for Tektronix (as I'm sure you know, Tek is out here in Oregon.) These two guys started an electronic pipe organ company (now Rodgers Instruments LLC), and I think Tek had something to do with helping them get started, but Tek didn't want to get into the business directly. Anyway, I won't have time for awhile to hook the scope to the car and try those measurements, so I'll have to get creative. I have an electronics "learning lab" I bought a year or two ago - it shouldn't be too difficult to setup some sort of an AC signal. |
#14
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 20 Mar 2007 16:08:06 -0700, "crispy" wrote:
You're not in NH are you? Nope, Oregon. Here's a funny tidbit: my previous job (as of a week and half ago actually) was at a company that was started by two people who used to work for Tektronix (as I'm sure you know, Tek is out here in Oregon.) These two guys started an electronic pipe organ company (now Rodgers Instruments LLC), and I think Tek had something to do with helping them get started, but Tek didn't want to get into the business directly. Anyway, I won't have time for awhile to hook the scope to the car and try those measurements, so I'll have to get creative. I have an electronics "learning lab" I bought a year or two ago - it shouldn't be too difficult to setup some sort of an AC signal. FOAF is named Crispy, wondered if you were him. If so I was going to suggest coming over and I'd work with you. Heck, you can come over if you want, I've three Tek scopes but it will be a *long* drive... You can easily guess where I am! I hope it is just a user error that is your problem... g |
#15
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
crispy wrote:
Pressing beamfinder shows a beam, and I can adjust it, but I get absolutely nothing without pressing beamfinder. This goes for the calibrator or another input signal (such as a 120V wall outlet.) Is this repairable? I am very mechanically inclined, but only mildly (very mildly) electronically inclined. Is there any hope for me? - Chris P. Back up and tell us the story. Did the scope work previously...while in your posession? Did you buy it broke? Did the seller tell you it worked? EBAY crap? I've heard stories where commercial dealers put all the bad subassemblies in one unit and sold it (using a different account) on ebay, "AS-IS, have no way to test it." If you've never seen it work, it's possible that you just don't know how to run it. There's a bewildering array of controls and switches. It's easily possible to put it into a state where you think it's not working. I'm too lazy to go into the attic to look at my 465, but there may be relevant switches on the rear panel. Probably also internal switches too. Depending on it's previous use, may have been set up in an unfamiliar mode. Another thing to check is if the knobs are put on correctly. Once wasted a bunch of time before I discovered a knob had been rotated and I wasn't in the mode I thought. Download the manual and do the performance verification procedure. It will tell you how to set every control and what to expect. FYI it's VERY much easier to fix a scope if you already have a scope. mike -- Return address is VALID! Bunch-O-Stuff Forsale He http://nm7u.tripod.com/homepage/sale.html |
#16
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Back up and tell us the story. Did the scope work previously...while in your posession? Did you buy it broke? Did the seller tell you it worked? EBAY crap? I've heard stories where commercial dealers put all the bad subassemblies in one unit and sold it (using a different account) on ebay, "AS-IS, have no way to test it." OK - Yes, I am ashamed, I bought it over eBay just a week or two ago. No, it wasn't tested, but it came with half a dozen probes and the original manual and I got it all for $100 so I gambled and took a chance. The A trigger slope knobs were bent a little and subsequently locked together. It didn't take much to straighten things out though and get them rotating freely again. Quick background on myself: I am a mechanical engineer, very hands on and mechanically inclined, only marginally so with electronics. Before I did anything with the scope, I read the manual and set everything the way the manual did to get what they call a "normal display". To get this display of course, it needs to be hooked up to a signal. I don't have one except for the wall outlet, and I didn't want to use it at first, so I jumped to the probe compensation section so I could use the calibrator. The only way I can get anything on the display is with beamfinder. With beamfinder pressed, I can adjust intensity, focus, vertical / horizontal, V/div, time scale, etc... This is all true for both Chan 1 and 2. I was looking for a good input, and thought that the wall outlet may be a bit much, so I looked at the specs in the back of the manual and they say input AC voltage limit is something way over 120V. Knowing that the impedence is also very high, I decided that pulling out the scope plug enough to probe the neutral prong would be safest, so I did that with nothing showing up. I did this with a 10X probe. I also used this probe in the compensation procedure first and know it works. As far I've learned so far a 10X probe scales down the amplitude of a signal by a factor of 10, and the light indicator on the V/div dial did switch to the higher setting as it's supposed to. I set the V/div and time scale nearest to what I thought should show 1 or 2 cycles of a full wave form. I tried both AC and DC. I adjusted the V/div and time scales to no avail. Pressing beamfinder shows a trace, although I couldn't get it to stop moving. I went back to probe compensation and saw the same results as before, again only with beamfinder pressed. It's the only scope I have, so I'm limited on diagnosing things. I will try other lower power signals, but I need to find or set some up. Thanks for all the help, Chris P. |
#17
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I adjusted the V/div and time scales to no avail.
Pressing beamfinder shows a trace, although I couldn't get it to stop moving. I went back to probe compensation and saw the same results as before, again only with beamfinder pressed. I would suspect a trigger issue. Is there a "Manual" setting for the trigger? Then a push-button to fire the trigger for one cycle of the input signal? Hook up a signal (there's a calibrate square-wave signal on the side of the scope's enclosure, isn't there? or am I thinking of another model...) and try the manual trigger. Good luck, -- John English |
#18
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"crispy" wrote in
oups.com: Back up and tell us the story. Did the scope work previously...while in your posession? Did you buy it broke? Did the seller tell you it worked? EBAY crap? I've heard stories where commercial dealers put all the bad subassemblies in one unit and sold it (using a different account) on ebay, "AS-IS, have no way to test it." OK - Yes, I am ashamed, I bought it over eBay just a week or two ago. No, it wasn't tested, but it came with half a dozen probes and the original manual and I got it all for $100 so I gambled and took a chance. The A trigger slope knobs were bent a little and subsequently locked together. It didn't take much to straighten things out though and get them rotating freely again. Quick background on myself: I am a mechanical engineer, very hands on and mechanically inclined, only marginally so with electronics. Before I did anything with the scope, I read the manual and set everything the way the manual did to get what they call a "normal display". To get this display of course, it needs to be hooked up to a signal. I don't have one except for the wall outlet, and I didn't want to use it at first, so I jumped to the probe compensation section so I could use the calibrator. The only way I can get anything on the display is with beamfinder. With beamfinder pressed, I can adjust intensity, focus, vertical / horizontal, V/div, time scale, etc... This is all true for both Chan 1 and 2. I was looking for a good input, and thought that the wall outlet may be a bit much, so I looked at the specs in the back of the manual and they say input AC voltage limit is something way over 120V. Knowing that the impedence is also very high, I decided that pulling out the scope plug enough to probe the neutral prong would be safest, so I did that with nothing showing up. I did this with a 10X probe. I also used this probe in the compensation procedure first and know it works. As far I've learned so far a 10X probe scales down the amplitude of a signal by a factor of 10, and the light indicator on the V/div dial did switch to the higher setting as it's supposed to. I set the V/div and time scale nearest to what I thought should show 1 or 2 cycles of a full wave form. I tried both AC and DC. I adjusted the V/div and time scales to no avail. Pressing beamfinder shows a trace, although I couldn't get it to stop moving. I went back to probe compensation and saw the same results as before, again only with beamfinder pressed. It's the only scope I have, so I'm limited on diagnosing things. I will try other lower power signals, but I need to find or set some up. Thanks for all the help, Chris P. my suggestion would be to find a nearby hobbyist or ham and work out some sort of deal to get it repaired. Or maybe a small,non-chain TV repair shop. DONT hook your scope up to the AC line,you can easily blow the front end or worse. There's no assurance your test outlet is wired right,and the scope may "float" and the case become electrically HOT. Touch it and get zapped,maybe fatally. It was common for "techs" to cut off the line plug's ground pin to "float" the scope,a very hazardous condition.Or they could have cut the ground wire internally,where you can't SEE that it's been cut,or wired diodes in series with the ground wire for "isolation". -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net |
#19
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"crispy" ) writes:
Before I did anything with the scope, I read the manual and set everything the way the manual did to get what they call a "normal display". To get this display of course, it needs to be hooked up to a signal. I don't have one except for the wall outlet, and I didn't want to use it at first, so I jumped to the probe compensation section so I could use the calibrator. The only way I can get anything on the display is with beamfinder. With beamfinder pressed, I can adjust intensity, focus, vertical / horizontal, V/div, time scale, etc... This is all true for both Chan 1 and 2. I was looking for a good input, and thought that the wall outlet may be a bit much, so I looked at the specs in the back of the manual and they say input AC voltage limit is something way over 120V. Knowing that the impedence is also very high, I decided that pulling out the scope plug enough to probe the neutral prong would be safest, so I did that with nothing showing up. The reason to not do this isn't because the AC line is too high in voltage. The reason is that when you put the ground on one wire of the AC line, and the probe on the other, you risk shorting the hot side of the line to ground through the scope's ground line. Blow a fuse if you're lucky, hurt something in your scope if you're not. I have a VTVM that I hooked up to an AC/DC tv set without giving it any thought, and the ground lead is not the original, having gotten real hot and melted the insulation when it shorted the AC line to ground. If you don't connect the ground line to the AC line, I'm not sure you'd really be seeing a proper signal. On the other hand, scopes are sensitive enough, and their input has high enough impedance, that merely touching the probe will provide a nice 60Hz (50Hz in some parts of the world), from stray pickup from the AC line. Michael |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
TEK 465 Scope - Power Supply Voltages | Electronics Repair | |||
Tek 465 trace brightness variation during sweep | Electronics Repair | |||
TEK-465 oscilloscope CH1 or 2 BNC | Electronics Repair | |||
Help please with Tek 465 problem | Electronics Repair | |||
Parts-box (Tek 465) Transformer - How to figure out ratings? | Electronics Repair |