I have a well stocked test bench at home containing a range of analog,
digital and RF test equipment as I am sure most of you also do.

Well the question I have is how do you handle the calibration of your
equipment? What do you use for calibration standards for resistance,
voltage, current and frequency?

Links to recommended circuits, pictures and sources would be
appreciated.

Since this is a need for anyone who has test equipment, I hope to see
a good discussion on this subject.

Thanks

TMT

On 28 Feb 2007 18:27:45 -0800, "Too_Many_Tools"
Gave us:

I have a well stocked test bench at home containing a range of analog,
digital and RF test equipment as I am sure most of you also do.

Well the question I have is how do you handle the calibration of your
equipment? What do you use for calibration standards for resistance,
voltage, current and frequency?

Links to recommended circuits, pictures and sources would be
appreciated.

Since this is a need for anyone who has test equipment, I hope to see
a good discussion on this subject.


If you have used test gear, and you do not intend to PAY to have it
calibrated, you be best off leaving it all the **** ALONE!

On Feb 28, 9:50 pm, MassiveProng
wrote:

If you have used test gear, and you do not intend to PAY to have it
calibrated, you be best off leaving it all the **** ALONE!

As alone as you on a Friday night?

On 28 Feb 2007 19:23:41 -0800, Gave us:

On Feb 28, 9:50 pm, MassiveProng
wrote:

If you have used test gear, and you do not intend to PAY to have it
calibrated, you be best off leaving it all the **** ALONE!

As alone as you on a Friday night?


I think there is a fly buzzing around the room. Perhaps it's only
flatulence.

Of no consequence either way.

If you have used test gear, and you do not intend to PAY to have it
calibrated, you be best off leaving it all the **** ALONE!

LOL

You're a real ray of sunshine, aren't you?

Now go out and play in traffic while we adults talk about serious
stuff..

TMT






On Feb 28, 8:50 pm, MassiveProng
wrote:
On 28 Feb 2007 18:27:45 -0800, "Too_Many_Tools"
Gave us:

I have a well stocked test bench at home containing a range of analog,
digital and RF test equipment as I am sure most of you also do.

Well the question I have is how do you handle the calibration of your
equipment? What do you use for calibration standards for resistance,
voltage, current and frequency?

Links to recommended circuits, pictures and sources would be
appreciated.

Since this is a need for anyone who has test equipment, I hope to see
a good discussion on this subject.

If you have used test gear, and you do not intend to PAY to have it
calibrated, you be best off leaving it all the **** ALONE!

On Feb 28, 9:47 pm, "Too_Many_Tools" wrote:
If you have used test gear, and you do not intend to PAY to have it
calibrated, you be best off leaving it all the **** ALONE!

LOL

You're a real ray of sunshine, aren't you?

Now go out and play in traffic while we adults talk about serious
stuff..

TMT

On Feb 28, 8:50 pm, MassiveProng

wrote:
On 28 Feb 2007 18:27:45 -0800, "Too_Many_Tools"
Gave us:

I have a well stocked test bench at home containing a range of analog,
digital and RF test equipment as I am sure most of you also do.

Well the question I have is how do you handle the calibration of your
equipment? What do you use for calibration standards for resistance,
voltage, current and frequency?

Links to recommended circuits, pictures and sources would be
appreciated.

Since this is a need for anyone who has test equipment, I hope to see
a good discussion on this subject.

If you have used test gear, and you do not intend to PAY to have it
calibrated, you be best off leaving it all the **** ALONE!

I agree with Prong on this one. I've worked in repair and broadcast
for 35 years. Unless you have a compelling reason to change it, leave
it alone. Of course, this assumes it's good stuff to begin with like
Fluke and Tek.

The only time I altered a Fluke 8060 was an eBay purchase. When
testing some new boards, I was reading 4.998 on the 5 volt ref. Never
saw any boards that far off and then tried the other Fluke which was
as expected. The eBay meter got a little 'tweak' but that was very
unusual. BTW, the 5V ref on the boards was an ADI AD588 which is
almost good enough for the 8060. I would use it to cal a 3.5 digit
meter with no qualms.

GG

Glenn Gundlach wrote:
I agree with Prong on this one. I've worked in repair and broadcast
for 35 years. Unless you have a compelling reason to change it, leave
it alone. Of course, this assumes it's good stuff to begin with like
Fluke and Tek.

A few years ago I got stuck with the Telequipment scope, the last junk
available. It was sadly out of calibration. I whipped up a few voltage
dividers and took other stuff and spent an hour calibrating the vertical
channels and horizontal timebase. I got my work done. The head tech
wanted to know how, and I told him, and he hit the ceiling, ran to the
other room, grabbed the scope and sent it out for calibration.

He was strangely silent when the scope came back. When I asked him
outright about it, he didn't look up from his work when he mumbled
something about the vertical being 0.4% off reference.

Mission-critical? Send it out. Need for extreme precision? Send it out.
But if 2-5% is good enough and you've got some time and imagination,
you can get it awfully close to where you need it.

--
"...global warming is an apocalyptic faith whose preachers demand sacrifices
of others that they find far too painful for themselves."
-- Andrew Bolt, in Australia's Herald Sun

On 28 Feb 2007 21:47:49 -0800, "Too_Many_Tools"
Gave us:


If you have used test gear, and you do not intend to PAY to have it
calibrated, you be best off leaving it all the **** ALONE!

LOL

You're a real ray of sunshine, aren't you?

Now go out and play in traffic while we adults talk about serious
stuff..

TMT


Serious? Look, dumb****, if you are concerned with calibration,
then you should be concerned enough to do it right. Asking here the
way you did means that you are beyond your depth to start with.

If you are too stupid to take your device to a place where freshly
calibrated devices are, and check it against them, you are too stupid
to be attempting to do it with some patched up method in the home
without cal manuals from the makers of all those devices. Far too
stupid.

So **** you, pops.

You prove that numeric age does not an adult make. The traffic I
play in runs at 30GHz, so you are screwed with that presumption as
well. I had calibrated meters back in 1970, and knew more then than
you do know.

On Mar 1, 6:18 am, MassiveProng
wrote:
On 28 Feb 2007 21:47:49 -0800, "Too_Many_Tools"
Gave us:



If you have used test gear, and you do not intend to PAY to have it
calibrated, you be best off leaving it all the **** ALONE!

LOL

You're a real ray of sunshine, aren't you?

Now go out and play in traffic while we adults talk about serious
stuff..

TMT

Serious? Look, dumb****, if you are concerned with calibration,
then you should be concerned enough to do it right. Asking here the
way you did means that you are beyond your depth to start with.

If you are too stupid to take your device to a place where freshly
calibrated devices are, and check it against them, you are too stupid
to be attempting to do it with some patched up method in the home
without cal manuals from the makers of all those devices. Far too
stupid.

So **** you, pops.

You prove that numeric age does not an adult make. The traffic I
play in runs at 30GHz, so you are screwed with that presumption as
well. I had calibrated meters back in 1970, and knew more then than
you do know.

Damn...you back already? Well I guess the traffic was light today.

Well MiniPrick since you are here taking up bytes, why don't you prove
to us how really brilliant you are?

Why don't you rub both of your brain cells together and come up with a
setup that a home lab can use for general cal purposes? You ARE smart
enough to do that, aren't you? Don't disappoint all of us now....we
are waiting....so either put up or shut up "Genius".

And oh yeah....that's Mr. Dumb**** to you MiniPrick....now get to
work. LOL

TMT

On 1 Mar 2007 19:22:16 -0800, "Too_Many_Tools"
Gave us:

And oh yeah....that's Mr. Dumb****


You're an idiot. You're busted.

Proven beyond your depth.

You are too stupid to even know that if you DID make a cal source
device, you would have to get it calibrated to make it worth a ****.

There is no backwoods calibration of perfectly good gear. All there
is is some hillbilly ****tard like you ****ing up what was once
perfectly good gear by thinking you have one tenth the brains you need
to do such a chore correctly. You do not.

So **** off.

MassiveProng wrote:
On 28 Feb 2007 18:27:45 -0800, "Too_Many_Tools"
Gave us:

I have a well stocked test bench at home containing a range of
analog, digital and RF test equipment as I am sure most of you also
do.

Well the question I have is how do you handle the calibration of your
equipment? What do you use for calibration standards for resistance,
voltage, current and frequency?

Links to recommended circuits, pictures and sources would be
appreciated.

Since this is a need for anyone who has test equipment, I hope to see
a good discussion on this subject.


If you have used test gear, and you do not intend to PAY to have it
calibrated, you be best off leaving it all the **** ALONE!

You're amazing. You don't even know what equipment, qualifications or needs
he has, yet you're right there with THE answer. Lets take an example. I
have a 20 year old Hitachi scope as you know, the voltage cal is way off
(~20%) in a couple of ranges. Are you suggesting that I should drag it
across town, spend $200 and be without it for 2 weeks just to get it
adjusted by some obstinate, E-1 grade line tech, instead of using a brand
new DMM w .03% accuracy to tweak it myself? I'm quite sure that my Micronta
is up to the task to be honest.

If someone doesn't need traceable calibration, then why should they pay for
it? Especially if they have the resources to do it themselves. I'm
thinking of buying a cheap used Rb time base from e-bay so I can cal my old
Protek freq counter and adjust the timebase on my Hitachi scope, it's
certainly cheaper than having it done. Using a PIC driven by an ordinary
can xtal, and a quartz wris****ch of known accuracy, I was able to tweak the
xtal to within about 1-2ppm over the course of a week or two. Of course you
know that's impossible, don't you?

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 06:05:56 -0600, "Anthony Fremont"
Gave us:

You're amazing. You don't even know what equipment, qualifications or needs
he has, yet you're right there with THE answer. Lets take an example. I
have a 20 year old Hitachi scope as you know, the voltage cal is way off
(~20%) in a couple of ranges. Are you suggesting that I should drag it
across town, spend $200 and be without it for 2 weeks just to get it
adjusted by some obstinate, E-1 grade line tech, instead of using a brand
new DMM w .03% accuracy to tweak it myself? I'm quite sure that my Micronta
is up to the task to be honest.


You are to be disappointed. The scale dial on that scope is likely
fitted with resistors, and one of them has shifted, which shifts all
the dividers on the dial below it.

It is not a calibration issue. It is a repair issue.

So shove it up your ass, you E-1 grade dip****.

Your micronta? Bwuahahahahahah!

MassiveProng wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 06:05:56 -0600, "Anthony Fremont"
Gave us:

You're amazing. You don't even know what equipment, qualifications
or needs he has, yet you're right there with THE answer. Lets take
an example. I have a 20 year old Hitachi scope as you know, the
voltage cal is way off (~20%) in a couple of ranges. Are you
suggesting that I should drag it across town, spend $200 and be
without it for 2 weeks just to get it adjusted by some obstinate,
E-1 grade line tech, instead of using a brand new DMM w .03%
accuracy to tweak it myself? I'm quite sure that my Micronta is up
to the task to be honest.


You are to be disappointed. The scale dial on that scope is likely
fitted with resistors, and one of them has shifted, which shifts all
the dividers on the dial below it.

Given that the symptom is not as you describe, then I figure you are
probably wrong, again. If so, I imagine I can fix it.

It is not a calibration issue. It is a repair issue.

You just know it all don't you?

So shove it up your ass, you E-1 grade dip****.

Just had to get that anal jab in there, huh?

Your micronta? Bwuahahahahahah!

Since 3% accuracy is considered good in the scope world, I think it would do
fine.

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 06:43:01 -0600, "Anthony Fremont"
Gave us:

Since 3% accuracy is considered good in the scope world,

Huh?

I think it would do
fine.

Bwuahahahahahahaha! Hilarious!

Anthony Fremont wrote:

If someone doesn't need traceable calibration, then why should they pay
for
it? Especially if they have the resources to do it themselves. I'm
thinking of buying a cheap used Rb time base from e-bay so I can cal my
old Protek freq counter and adjust the timebase on my Hitachi scope, it's
certainly cheaper than having it done. Using a PIC driven by an ordinary
can xtal, and a quartz wris****ch of known accuracy, I was able to tweak
the
xtal to within about 1-2ppm over the course of a week or two. Of course
you know that's impossible, don't you?

I don't think the oscillator on a PIC would be good to 2ppm absolute
accuracy even with a very good xtal, unless you FIRST calibrate it against
something that has already been calibrated, therefore it doesn't get you
far. It will however be good enough to calibrate your scope since that
would only need 1% or so, and any old crystal should achieve that, even
with a fairly primitive oscillator. For frequency calibration, your best
bet is to receive an off-air standard, for example GPS or in many countries
there are low frequency standard transmissions (50kHz, 60kHz, 77.5kHz or
others, look up which ones are available in your country). It is quite
feasible to build your own receiver for these. These transmitters are
maintained to a higher accuracy than any piece of hardware that a hobbyist
could afford (e.g. 2 parts in 10^12).
http://www.npl.co.uk/time/msf/ctm001v05.pdf

Chris

Too_Many_Tools wrote:
I have a well stocked test bench at home containing a range of analog,
digital and RF test equipment as I am sure most of you also do.

Well the question I have is how do you handle the calibration of your
equipment? What do you use for calibration standards for resistance,
voltage, current and frequency?

Links to recommended circuits, pictures and sources would be
appreciated.

Since this is a need for anyone who has test equipment, I hope to see
a good discussion on this subject.

Thanks

TMT



What sort of equipment are you trying to calibrate? You can do a search
online for various voltage reference sources. Accurate frequency
reference can be picked up off the airwaves from transmitters such as
WWV. What methods you use depend on what the equipment is and how
accurate you need it to be.

"Too_Many_Tools" wrote in
s.com:

I have a well stocked test bench at home containing a range of analog,
digital and RF test equipment as I am sure most of you also do.

Well the question I have is how do you handle the calibration of your
equipment? What do you use for calibration standards for resistance,
voltage, current and frequency?

Links to recommended circuits, pictures and sources would be
appreciated.

Since this is a need for anyone who has test equipment, I hope to see
a good discussion on this subject.

Thanks

TMT


Wavetek and Fluke both make nice all-in-one calibrators for voltmeters and
scopes,they do V,I,R,timing and bandwidth checks.Not cheap,though.
There's plenty of older,used cal standards on the market,too.
Getting them certified may be a problem due to their age.

For F-counters,you need a WWV or GPS-based receiver.

high-end stuff,you send out to a lab.
(consider them your "primary standards")

A warning;calibration procedures of some TEK gear may be written to use
their recommended list of standards,and difficult or impossible to do fully
with substitutes.
Especially their video test gear.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net

In article m,
Too_Many_Tools wrote:
I have a well stocked test bench at home containing a range of analog,
digital and RF test equipment as I am sure most of you also do.

Well the question I have is how do you handle the calibration of your
equipment? What do you use for calibration standards for resistance,
voltage, current and frequency?

For frequency, you can use WWV. You need:
A short wave radio with an audio output.
Perhaps an audio filter tuned to about 1KHz.
A generator you wish to calibrate near the WWV frequency.
A frequency counter that is not too far off.

Procedu
Tune in WWV.
Put wire on generator and set it to WWV-1KHz
Listen for tone and move stuff around until it sounds good.
Feed tone into the filter.
Place the counter on the output of the filter.

The number on the counter is X Hz away from 1KHz when the generator is XHz
off from WWV-1KHz.



--
--
forging knowledge

Ken Smith wrote:
In article m,
Too_Many_Tools wrote:

I have a well stocked test bench at home containing a range of analog,
digital and RF test equipment as I am sure most of you also do.

Well the question I have is how do you handle the calibration of your
equipment? What do you use for calibration standards for resistance,
voltage, current and frequency?


For frequency, you can use WWV. You need:
A short wave radio with an audio output.
Perhaps an audio filter tuned to about 1KHz.
A generator you wish to calibrate near the WWV frequency.
A frequency counter that is not too far off.

Procedu
Tune in WWV.
Put wire on generator and set it to WWV-1KHz
Listen for tone and move stuff around until it sounds good.
Feed tone into the filter.
Place the counter on the output of the filter.

The number on the counter is X Hz away from 1KHz when the generator is XHz
off from WWV-1KHz.



This works if you only need about 1 part in a million. The movement of
the ionosphere makes wwv useless for real calibration. This was, of
course, wonderful when we had nothing else. It is far better to get
a gps standard (they are used on cell sites and show up on ebay) and
just use it for the timebase all the time. Alternately, use a Rb
source. They were also used in cell sites and are available easily.
They cannot move more than about a part in 100 million and they make
excellent time bases for frequency counters.

In article , doug doug@doug wrote:
Ken Smith wrote:
In article m,
Too_Many_Tools wrote:

I have a well stocked test bench at home containing a range of analog,
digital and RF test equipment as I am sure most of you also do.

Well the question I have is how do you handle the calibration of your
equipment? What do you use for calibration standards for resistance,
voltage, current and frequency?


For frequency, you can use WWV. You need:
A short wave radio with an audio output.
Perhaps an audio filter tuned to about 1KHz.
A generator you wish to calibrate near the WWV frequency.
A frequency counter that is not too far off.

Procedu
Tune in WWV.
Put wire on generator and set it to WWV-1KHz
Listen for tone and move stuff around until it sounds good.
Feed tone into the filter.
Place the counter on the output of the filter.

The number on the counter is X Hz away from 1KHz when the generator is XHz
off from WWV-1KHz.



This works if you only need about 1 part in a million.

One PPM is enough for almost all the test equipment you will find on
places like ebay.

You can do better if you average over longer periods.

[.....]
just use it for the timebase all the time. Alternately, use a Rb
source. They were also used in cell sites and are available easily.
They cannot move more than about a part in 100 million and they make
excellent time bases for frequency counters.

I thing someone messed up a decimal. You just made a Rb clock 100 times
worse that WWV.




--
--
forging knowledge

Ken Smith wrote:
In article , doug doug@doug wrote:

Ken Smith wrote:

In article m,
Too_Many_Tools wrote:


I have a well stocked test bench at home containing a range of analog,
digital and RF test equipment as I am sure most of you also do.

Well the question I have is how do you handle the calibration of your
equipment? What do you use for calibration standards for resistance,
voltage, current and frequency?


For frequency, you can use WWV. You need:
A short wave radio with an audio output.
Perhaps an audio filter tuned to about 1KHz.
A generator you wish to calibrate near the WWV frequency.
A frequency counter that is not too far off.

Procedu
Tune in WWV.
Put wire on generator and set it to WWV-1KHz
Listen for tone and move stuff around until it sounds good.
Feed tone into the filter.
Place the counter on the output of the filter.

The number on the counter is X Hz away from 1KHz when the generator is XHz
off from WWV-1KHz.




This works if you only need about 1 part in a million.


One PPM is enough for almost all the test equipment you will find on
places like ebay.

You can do better if you average over longer periods.

[.....]

just use it for the timebase all the time. Alternately, use a Rb
source. They were also used in cell sites and are available easily.
They cannot move more than about a part in 100 million and they make
excellent time bases for frequency counters.


I thing someone messed up a decimal. You just made a Rb clock 100 times
worse that WWV.



No. One part in 100 million (10^-8) is 100 times better than wwv
(10^-6). There is lots of excellent equipment on ebay that can take
advantage of this level of accuracy. The main point is that you do
not have to think about it very often. The low cost counters that have
uncompensated or poorly compensated timebases are basically useless for
any serious work. The other nice part about the high stability
references is that you can distribute it to all the synthesizers on your
bench and everything is coherent.
Of course it depends on what you do. For my ham work, one ppm is fine.
I do other work where the Rb source is not good enough.

In article , doug doug@doug wrote:
Ken Smith wrote:
In article , doug doug@doug wrote:

A mistake go read it if you want.

No. One part in 100 million (10^-8) is 100 times

Yes, I misread the statement.

[....]
uncompensated or poorly compensated timebases are basically useless for
any serious work.

That depends a lot on your definition of "serious". There are lots of
things where just being within 100PPM is more than good enough. RS232 is
ok up to 5% error. If the so called 60Hz in your motor home was actually
59.9Hz, I don't think you would mind.


The other nice part about the high stability
references is that you can distribute it to all the synthesizers on your
bench and everything is coherent.
Of course it depends on what you do. For my ham work, one ppm is fine.
I do other work where the Rb source is not good enough.

A lot of them have worse short term noise than a good OCXO.




--
--
forging knowledge

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 03:50:23 +0000 (UTC), (Ken
Smith) Gave us:

In article m,
Too_Many_Tools wrote:
I have a well stocked test bench at home containing a range of analog,
digital and RF test equipment as I am sure most of you also do.

Well the question I have is how do you handle the calibration of your
equipment? What do you use for calibration standards for resistance,
voltage, current and frequency?

For frequency, you can use WWV. You need:
A short wave radio with an audio output.
Perhaps an audio filter tuned to about 1KHz.
A generator you wish to calibrate near the WWV frequency.
A frequency counter that is not too far off.

Procedu
Tune in WWV.
Put wire on generator and set it to WWV-1KHz
Listen for tone and move stuff around until it sounds good.
Feed tone into the filter.
Place the counter on the output of the filter.

The number on the counter is X Hz away from 1KHz when the generator is XHz
off from WWV-1KHz.


Joe Kane's audio video set up discs on Laser Disc, and DVD, and now
HD DVD are the bee's knees for a lot of audio spectrum sine wave
tones.

DVD $20, Player $40 TV and Audio gear already owned.

Catching it off some transmission has to be far more inaccurate.
Short wave receiver worth having $100 plus. Then add in audio gear?

Catching you thinking old is better than new after your brow beating
of BAH... priceless.

Hehehe... just kidding...

In message , MassiveProng
writes
Joe Kane's audio video set up discs on Laser Disc, and DVD, and now
HD DVD are the bee's knees for a lot of audio spectrum sine wave
tones.

DVD $20, Player $40 TV and Audio gear already owned.
Aren't you reliant on the stability of the DVD player reference clock
for the stability of the test tones? I would suspect a GPS reference
would be considerably better. Of course, I could be wrong!

Catching it off some transmission has to be far more inaccurate.
Short wave receiver worth having $100 plus. Then add in audio gear?

Catching you thinking old is better than new after your brow beating
of BAH... priceless.

Hehehe... just kidding...

--
Clint Sharp

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 19:39:00 +0000, Clint Sharp
Gave us:

Aren't you reliant on the stability of the DVD player reference clock
for the stability of the test tones?

For audio? absolutely. It had nothing to do with the DVD player's
clock. There are several industry standard tones provided, and the
disc replaced hardware TV test generators for years.

It carries DTS and THX certified content.

That is the current reference standard for MPEG, if you know who
they are. That's good enough for me. I can verify the setup of my
FPD, and I can setup my stereo sicwith the audio diagnostic and
setup section.

I would suspect a GPS reference
would be considerably better. Of course, I could be wrong!

Hey, chucko! He didn't give a GPS source. You don't get to change
the scene, pal! A subsequent poster mentioned a GPS setup.

Go back and read.

In message , MassiveProng
writes
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 19:39:00 +0000, Clint Sharp
Gave us:

Aren't you reliant on the stability of the DVD player reference clock
for the stability of the test tones?

For audio? absolutely. It had nothing to do with the DVD player's
clock. There are several industry standard tones provided, and the
disc replaced hardware TV test generators for years.
So varying the reference clock of a DVD player doesn't affect the pitch
of any tones played back off a disk? OK. I wondered because it does on a
CD player.

It carries DTS and THX certified content.
K, so it's a good for setting up home theatre equipment at the very
least

That is the current reference standard for MPEG, if you know who
they are.
Not personally, but I may have heard of them in passing.
That's good enough for me. I can verify the setup of my
FPD,
FPD?
and I can setup my stereo sicwith the audio diagnostic and
setup section.


I would suspect a GPS reference
would be considerably better. Of course, I could be wrong!

Hey, chucko! He didn't give a GPS source. You don't get to change
the scene, pal!
Hey 'pal' I didn't try to change the scenario, I just speculated that a
GPS source would be better.
A subsequent poster mentioned a GPS setup.
Go back and read.
No need, I read that post, that's why I mentioned it. Turn down the
aggression a notch or two, I only asked a question and speculated that
there might be a better way.
--
Clint Sharp

MassiveProng wrote:

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 03:50:23 +0000 (UTC), (Ken
Smith) Gave us:


In article m,
Too_Many_Tools wrote:

I have a well stocked test bench at home containing a range of analog,
digital and RF test equipment as I am sure most of you also do.

Well the question I have is how do you handle the calibration of your
equipment? What do you use for calibration standards for resistance,
voltage, current and frequency?

For frequency, you can use WWV. You need:
A short wave radio with an audio output.
Perhaps an audio filter tuned to about 1KHz.
A generator you wish to calibrate near the WWV frequency.
A frequency counter that is not too far off.

Procedu
Tune in WWV.
Put wire on generator and set it to WWV-1KHz
Listen for tone and move stuff around until it sounds good.
Feed tone into the filter.
Place the counter on the output of the filter.

The number on the counter is X Hz away from 1KHz when the generator is XHz
off from WWV-1KHz.



Joe Kane's audio video set up discs on Laser Disc, and DVD, and now
HD DVD are the bee's knees for a lot of audio spectrum sine wave
tones.

DVD $20, Player $40 TV and Audio gear already owned.

Catching it off some transmission has to be far more inaccurate.
Short wave receiver worth having $100 plus. Then add in audio gear?

Catching you thinking old is better than new after your brow beating
of BAH... priceless.

Hehehe... just kidding...
"Bee's Knees"?? Was that before or after the "Cat's pajamas"?

Ken Smith wrote:

In article m,
Too_Many_Tools wrote:

I have a well stocked test bench at home containing a range of analog,
digital and RF test equipment as I am sure most of you also do.

Well the question I have is how do you handle the calibration of your
equipment? What do you use for calibration standards for resistance,
voltage, current and frequency?


For frequency, you can use WWV. You need:
A short wave radio with an audio output.
Perhaps an audio filter tuned to about 1KHz.
A generator you wish to calibrate near the WWV frequency.
A frequency counter that is not too far off.

Procedu
Tune in WWV.
Put wire on generator and set it to WWV-1KHz
Listen for tone and move stuff around until it sounds good.
Feed tone into the filter.
Place the counter on the output of the filter.

The number on the counter is X Hz away from 1KHz when the generator is XHz
off from WWV-1KHz.


I believe the color subcarrier in a color TV is phase locked to the
transmitted signal and, for network studio transmissions, is derived
from a cesium clock. From what I have read it is more accurate than WWV
and doesn't require extra equipment other than a TV displaying an image
with a studio source. Frequency is 3.579545 MHz.

--
bud--

Bud-- wrote:
I believe the color subcarrier in a color TV is phase locked to the
transmitted signal and, for network studio transmissions, is derived
from a cesium clock. From what I have read it is more accurate than WWV
and doesn't require extra equipment other than a TV displaying an image
with a studio source. Frequency is 3.579545 MHz.

I've seen that discussed elsewhere, and although it would take me a week
to find the particulars, (1) the frequency can be off as much as 10 Hz
by FCC standards, (2) from what I've read it's frequently off by more
than that, even on network feeds, (3) IIRC they don't even use the good
clocks on the networks any more, (4) NIST clocks are going to be a couple
of orders of magnitude better than the best a network would buy for the
purpose of meeting FCC regulations, (5) IIRC the frequency should
actually be 3,579,545.454545454545..... Hz, and (6) Doppler shift on
the incoming television signal could potentially cause the subcarrier
frequency to vary up and down.

--
"...global warming is an apocalyptic faith whose preachers demand sacrifices
of others that they find far too painful for themselves."
-- Andrew Bolt, in Australia's Herald Sun

On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 16:32:18 -0600, clifto Gave us:

Bud-- wrote:
I believe the color subcarrier in a color TV is phase locked to the
transmitted signal and, for network studio transmissions, is derived
from a cesium clock. From what I have read it is more accurate than WWV
and doesn't require extra equipment other than a TV displaying an image
with a studio source. Frequency is 3.579545 MHz.

I've seen that discussed elsewhere, and although it would take me a week
to find the particulars, (1) the frequency can be off as much as 10 Hz
by FCC standards, (2) from what I've read it's frequently off by more
than that, even on network feeds, (3) IIRC they don't even use the good
clocks on the networks any more, (4) NIST clocks are going to be a couple
of orders of magnitude better than the best a network would buy for the
purpose of meeting FCC regulations, (5) IIRC the frequency should
actually be 3,579,545.454545454545..... Hz, and (6) Doppler shift on
the incoming television signal could potentially cause the subcarrier
frequency to vary up and down.


So there!

Bud-- wrote:

Ken Smith wrote:

In article m,
Too_Many_Tools wrote:

I have a well stocked test bench at home containing a range of analog,
digital and RF test equipment as I am sure most of you also do.

Well the question I have is how do you handle the calibration of your
equipment? What do you use for calibration standards for resistance,
voltage, current and frequency?



For frequency, you can use WWV. You need:
A short wave radio with an audio output.
Perhaps an audio filter tuned to about 1KHz.
A generator you wish to calibrate near the WWV frequency.
A frequency counter that is not too far off.

Procedu
Tune in WWV.
Put wire on generator and set it to WWV-1KHz
Listen for tone and move stuff around until it sounds good.
Feed tone into the filter.
Place the counter on the output of the filter.

The number on the counter is X Hz away from 1KHz when the generator is
XHz off from WWV-1KHz.


I believe the color subcarrier in a color TV is phase locked to the
transmitted signal and, for network studio transmissions, is derived
from a cesium clock. From what I have read it is more accurate than WWV
and doesn't require extra equipment other than a TV displaying an image
with a studio source. Frequency is 3.579545 MHz.

--
bud--

Check.

"Too_Many_Tools" wrote in message
s.com...


** Groper alert !

I have a well stocked test bench at home containing a range of analog,
digital and RF test equipment as I am sure most of you also do.

Well the question I have is how do you handle the calibration of your
equipment? What do you use for calibration standards for resistance,
voltage, current and frequency?


** A few 0.1% precision resistors does the first job for DMMs.

A Natsemi " LH0070 " 10.000 volt ( +/- 0.02% ) voltage reference IC with
0.1 % resistor divider chain giving 1.000 & 0.1000 volts for the DC volts
ranges DMMs and scopes does the second.

For AC volts, a scope screen with internal graticule is used to establish
the p-p amplitude of a sine wave - then it can be used to check then AC
ranges DMMs etc - to a 1% accuracy.

A 12MHz crystal oscillator ( 11.99993 MHz @ 25C ) checks the DFM -
calibrated using an off air standard frequency transmission picked up on a
scanner.



........ Phil

On Mar 1, 12:27 pm, "Too_Many_Tools" wrote:
I have a well stocked test bench at home containing a range of analog,
digital and RF test equipment as I am sure most of you also do.

Well the question I have is how do you handle the calibration of your
equipment? What do you use for calibration standards for resistance,
voltage, current and frequency?

Links to recommended circuits, pictures and sources would be
appreciated.

Since this is a need for anyone who has test equipment, I hope to see
a good discussion on this subject.

If you've got that sort of gear at home then usually you have better
(and calibrated) gear at work as well, in which case most of us would
simply bring in our gear from home and spot check it against the good
gear.

In the absense of this gear, you can simply use precision components.
Voltage reference chips with 0.05% or better are cheap and readilly
available.
0.01% resistors are available too.

If you have multiple meters for example, you can also keep an eye on
them by comparison. Using any old component, if all three meters read
the same then you can be pretty confident they haven't drifted.

Checking scope horizontal timebases is easy with a crystal oscillator
and divider.

There are various methods for getting an accurate frequency standard,
but one of the newst methods is using a GPS derived reference. Second
hand Rubidium standards can also be had on eBay.

Generally though, good quality test gear does not drift out of spec,
so the need for regular calibration is minimal.

Dave

David L. Jones wrote:

On Mar 1, 12:27 pm, "Too_Many_Tools" wrote:

I have a well stocked test bench at home containing a range of analog,
digital and RF test equipment as I am sure most of you also do.

Well the question I have is how do you handle the calibration of your
equipment? What do you use for calibration standards for resistance,
voltage, current and frequency?

Links to recommended circuits, pictures and sources would be
appreciated.

Since this is a need for anyone who has test equipment, I hope to see
a good discussion on this subject.


If you've got that sort of gear at home then usually you have better
(and calibrated) gear at work as well, in which case most of us would
simply bring in our gear from home and spot check it against the good
gear.

In the absense of this gear, you can simply use precision components.
Voltage reference chips with 0.05% or better are cheap and readilly
available.
0.01% resistors are available too.

If you have multiple meters for example, you can also keep an eye on
them by comparison. Using any old component, if all three meters read
the same then you can be pretty confident they haven't drifted.

Checking scope horizontal timebases is easy with a crystal oscillator
and divider.

There are various methods for getting an accurate frequency standard,
but one of the newst methods is using a GPS derived reference. Second
hand Rubidium standards can also be had on eBay.

Generally though, good quality test gear does not drift out of spec,
so the need for regular calibration is minimal.

Dave

True, 0.01% resistors are available, *but* they are extremely
expensive (over $100 each) and they are made when and if the
manufacturer sees fit to do so.

On Mar 1, 5:09 pm, Robert Baer wrote:
David L. Jones wrote:
On Mar 1, 12:27 pm, "Too_Many_Tools" wrote:

I have a well stocked test bench at home containing a range of analog,
digital and RF test equipment as I am sure most of you also do.

Well the question I have is how do you handle the calibration of your
equipment? What do you use for calibration standards for resistance,
voltage, current and frequency?

Links to recommended circuits, pictures and sources would be
appreciated.

Since this is a need for anyone who has test equipment, I hope to see
a good discussion on this subject.

If you've got that sort of gear at home then usually you have better
(and calibrated) gear at work as well, in which case most of us would
simply bring in our gear from home and spot check it against the good
gear.

In the absense of this gear, you can simply use precision components.
Voltage reference chips with 0.05% or better are cheap and readilly
available.
0.01% resistors are available too.

If you have multiple meters for example, you can also keep an eye on
them by comparison. Using any old component, if all three meters read
the same then you can be pretty confident they haven't drifted.

Checking scope horizontal timebases is easy with a crystal oscillator
and divider.

There are various methods for getting an accurate frequency standard,
but one of the newst methods is using a GPS derived reference. Second
hand Rubidium standards can also be had on eBay.

Generally though, good quality test gear does not drift out of spec,
so the need for regular calibration is minimal.

Dave

True, 0.01% resistors are available, *but* they are extremely
expensive (over $100 each) and they are made when and if the
manufacturer sees fit to do so.

Not so.
RS Components have 0.01% resistors for AU$34.50 (US$26)
Farnell have 0.02% for as little as AU$20

Dave

On 28 Feb 2007 22:45:45 -0800 "David L. Jones" wrote
in Message id: .com:

On Mar 1, 5:09 pm, Robert Baer wrote:

[...]

True, 0.01% resistors are available, *but* they are extremely
expensive (over $100 each) and they are made when and if the
manufacturer sees fit to do so.

Not so.
RS Components have 0.01% resistors for AU$34.50 (US$26)
Farnell have 0.02% for as little as AU$20

You guys are paying *way* too much. We use Riedon .01% precision resistors
in our A/D products, and pay about 5 bucks apiece. Their site is down at
the moment, but even Digikey has .01% resistors for around the same price:
http://www.digikey.com/scripts/DkSea...S&Cat=34342147

On Mar 1, 9:20 pm, JW wrote:
On 28 Feb 2007 22:45:45 -0800 "David L. Jones" wrote
in Message id: .com:

On Mar 1, 5:09 pm, Robert Baer wrote:

[...]

True, 0.01% resistors are available, *but* they are extremely
expensive (over $100 each) and they are made when and if the
manufacturer sees fit to do so.

Not so.
RS Components have 0.01% resistors for AU$34.50 (US$26)
Farnell have 0.02% for as little as AU$20

You guys are paying *way* too much. We use Riedon .01% precision resistors
in our A/D products, and pay about 5 bucks apiece. Their site is down at
the moment, but even Digikey has .01% resistors for around the same price:http://www.digikey.com/scripts/DkSea...ria?Ref=3107&S...

It's not too much when you only want a couple, and you can have it
within the hour.

If you want volume and price matters, sure, you shop around.

Dave

JW wrote:

On 28 Feb 2007 22:45:45 -0800 "David L. Jones" wrote
in Message id: .com:


On Mar 1, 5:09 pm, Robert Baer wrote:


[...]


True, 0.01% resistors are available, *but* they are extremely
expensive (over $100 each) and they are made when and if the
manufacturer sees fit to do so.

Not so.
RS Components have 0.01% resistors for AU$34.50 (US$26)
Farnell have 0.02% for as little as AU$20


You guys are paying *way* too much. We use Riedon .01% precision resistors
in our A/D products, and pay about 5 bucks apiece. Their site is down at
the moment, but even Digikey has .01% resistors for around the same price:
http://www.digikey.com/scripts/DkSea...S&Cat=34342147
"Your search criteria has expired"
Furthermore a search on "34342147" (no quotes) gets zero matches.
A search on "3107" (no quotes) gets matches that are not better than 1%.
Strangely enough, a search on "precision resistors" (no quotes_ is as
bad.
Worse, a search for "resistors" and wading thru the various types
gets *at best* Chip Resistor-Thin Film(67311 items) with 0.02% as the
best or tolerance listed.
So......
Where are those mysterious 0.01% resistors???

David L. Jones wrote:
On Mar 1, 5:09 pm, Robert Baer wrote:

David L. Jones wrote:

On Mar 1, 12:27 pm, "Too_Many_Tools" wrote:

I have a well stocked test bench at home containing a range of analog,
digital and RF test equipment as I am sure most of you also do.

Well the question I have is how do you handle the calibration of your
equipment? What do you use for calibration standards for resistance,
voltage, current and frequency?

Links to recommended circuits, pictures and sources would be
appreciated.

Since this is a need for anyone who has test equipment, I hope to see
a good discussion on this subject.

If you've got that sort of gear at home then usually you have better
(and calibrated) gear at work as well, in which case most of us would
simply bring in our gear from home and spot check it against the good
gear.

In the absense of this gear, you can simply use precision components.
Voltage reference chips with 0.05% or better are cheap and readilly
available.
0.01% resistors are available too.

If you have multiple meters for example, you can also keep an eye on
them by comparison. Using any old component, if all three meters read
the same then you can be pretty confident they haven't drifted.

Checking scope horizontal timebases is easy with a crystal oscillator
and divider.

There are various methods for getting an accurate frequency standard,
but one of the newst methods is using a GPS derived reference. Second
hand Rubidium standards can also be had on eBay.

Generally though, good quality test gear does not drift out of spec,
so the need for regular calibration is minimal.

Dave

True, 0.01% resistors are available, *but* they are extremely
expensive (over $100 each) and they are made when and if the
manufacturer sees fit to do so.


Not so.
RS Components have 0.01% resistors for AU$34.50 (US$26)
Farnell have 0.02% for as little as AU$20

Dave

You guys outside the US ahve it soooo good!
Here in the US, it is like i mentioned.

On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 06:09:35 GMT, Robert Baer
Gave us:

David L. Jones wrote:

On Mar 1, 12:27 pm, "Too_Many_Tools" wrote:

I have a well stocked test bench at home containing a range of analog,
digital and RF test equipment as I am sure most of you also do.

Well the question I have is how do you handle the calibration of your
equipment? What do you use for calibration standards for resistance,
voltage, current and frequency?

Links to recommended circuits, pictures and sources would be
appreciated.

Since this is a need for anyone who has test equipment, I hope to see
a good discussion on this subject.


If you've got that sort of gear at home then usually you have better
(and calibrated) gear at work as well, in which case most of us would
simply bring in our gear from home and spot check it against the good
gear.

In the absense of this gear, you can simply use precision components.
Voltage reference chips with 0.05% or better are cheap and readilly
available.
0.01% resistors are available too.

If you have multiple meters for example, you can also keep an eye on
them by comparison. Using any old component, if all three meters read
the same then you can be pretty confident they haven't drifted.

Checking scope horizontal timebases is easy with a crystal oscillator
and divider.

There are various methods for getting an accurate frequency standard,
but one of the newst methods is using a GPS derived reference. Second
hand Rubidium standards can also be had on eBay.

Generally though, good quality test gear does not drift out of spec,
so the need for regular calibration is minimal.

Dave

True, 0.01% resistors are available, *but* they are extremely
expensive (over $100 each) and they are made when and if the
manufacturer sees fit to do so.


Or if the order is large enough.