![]() |
make your posting readable
I have to ask you "were have you started to read this message"
AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE ****** So why the **** do bottom posting ******s want you to spend time scrolling down a page of crap looking for were the new message starts ? because they are thick, OK you might ask, why not remove the old message so the new message appears at the top of the page, well that is one option, I only include it so anyone who comes in half way down the thread can work out what is go on, how often does that happen, Not very often, Get a life, stop wanking, stop bottom posting. Top posting saves time, as more intelligent people seem to understand. |
make your posting readable
Frank wrote:
I have to ask you "were have you started to read this message" AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE ****** Please re-write the above in English ("were have you started...??) So why the **** do bottom posting ******s want you to spend time scrolling down a page of crap looking for were the new message starts ? Because that is the way conversation occurs. I like to read the question *BEFORE* the answer, not after it. |
make your posting readable
Frank wrote:
I have to ask you "were have you started to read this message" AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE ****** Nice troll, but: "Posting at the top because that's where the cursor happened to be is like ****ting in your pants because that's where your asshole happened to be." Bye bye now! |
make your posting readable
"kaboom" wrote in message ... Frank wrote: I have to ask you "were have you started to read this message" AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE ****** Nice troll, but: "Posting at the top because that's where the cursor happened to be is like ****ting in your pants because that's where your asshole happened to be." Got a good laugh from that! However, I am flexible enough to deal with top posts, interspersed posts (my favorite), or bottom posts. I guess these kinds of controversies distract us from the serious problems that we all face. |
make your posting readable
In article , (known to some as
Frank) scribed... I have to ask you "were have you started to read this message" AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE ****** childish and rude rant snipped It is obvious that you are new to the Internet in general, Usenet in particular, and that you really need to get out more and tune those social skills. Usenet has been around since at least the late 70's, and has very well-established rules of the road, which were established for excellent reasons. These two sites do a great job of explaining why top-posting on Usenet is a Bad Thing. http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/gey_chr0.htm http://www.html-faq.com/etiquette/?toppost With that out of the way... *PLONK!* -- Dr. Anton T. Squeegee, Director, Dutch Surrealist Plumbing Institute (Known to some as Bruce Lane, KC7GR) http://www.bluefeathertech.com -- kyrrin a/t bluefeathertech d-o=t calm "Salvadore Dali's computer has surreal ports..." |
make your posting readable
The point is that in a threaded news reader, you have ALREADY read
the question. Why do you need to read it again (and again)? For an example, look at the thread called "Power Amp Repair" from 2/3/2007. As you read succeeding messages, all you see after a while is repeated text -- the same thing repeated over and over, redundantly, again and again and again -- unless you go to the trouble of scrolling down to try to pick out whatever line of new advice has been added to the preceeding 300 lines of repeated text. In other words, bottom-posting without significant editing and trimming just makes it much harder to follow the thread in the first place. Unless you're completely obsessive about how you read things, or have such a short attention span that you immediately forget what you just read, bottom-posting makes no sense at all. Since it takes a lot of extra time to switch from frame to frame and scroll down, I usually ignore messages that don't show something new in the first frame. UCLAN wrote: Frank wrote: I have to ask you "were have you started to read this message" AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE ****** Please re-write the above in English ("were have you started...??) So why the **** do bottom posting ******s want you to spend time scrolling down a page of crap looking for were the new message starts ? Because that is the way conversation occurs. I like to read the question *BEFORE* the answer, not after it. |
make your posting readable
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 07:45:45 +1300 "Frank" wrote in Message
id: : This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0061_01C74830.7AA34920 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have to ask you "were have you started to read this message" AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE ****** So why the **** do bottom posting ******s want you to spend time = scrolling down a page of crap looking for were the new message starts ? because = they are thick, OK you might ask, why not remove the old message so the new message appears at the top of the page, well that is one option, I only include it so anyone who comes in half way down the thread can work out = what is go on, how often does that happen, Not very often, Get a life, stop wanking, stop bottom posting. Top posting saves time, = as more intelligent people seem to understand. ------=_NextPart_000_0061_01C74830.7AA34920 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" HTMLHEAD META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1" META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=3DGENERATOR STYLE/STYLE /HEAD BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff DIVFONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS" DIVI have to ask you "were have you started to read this = message"BRFONT=20 color=3D#ff0000AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE ******/FONTBRBRSo why the = **** do=20 bottom posting ******s want you to spend time scrollingBRdown a page = of crap=20 looking for were the new message starts ? because theyBRare thick, OK = you=20 might ask, why not remove the old message so the newBRmessage appears = at the=20 top of the page, well that is one option, I onlyBRinclude it so anyone = who=20 comes in half way down the thread can work out whatBRis go on, how = often does=20 that happen, Not very often,BRBRGet a life, stop wanking, stop = bottom=20 posting. Top posting saves time, asBRmore intelligent people seem to=20 understand./DIV/FONT/DIV/BODY/HTML ------=_NextPart_000_0061_01C74830.7AA34920-- I have to say that the irony of this is quite amusing. You might try turning off HTML before making a fool of yourself again. |
make your posting readable
But doesn't YOUR posting prove his point? Look how much effort it
is to read your bottom-posted addition to all this unnecessary repeated "context". JW wrote: On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 07:45:45 +1300 "Frank" wrote in Message id: : This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0061_01C74830.7AA34920 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have to ask you "were have you started to read this message" AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE ****** So why the **** do bottom posting ******s want you to spend time = scrolling down a page of crap looking for were the new message starts ? because = they are thick, OK you might ask, why not remove the old message so the new message appears at the top of the page, well that is one option, I only include it so anyone who comes in half way down the thread can work out = what is go on, how often does that happen, Not very often, Get a life, stop wanking, stop bottom posting. Top posting saves time, = as more intelligent people seem to understand. ------=_NextPart_000_0061_01C74830.7AA34920 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" HTMLHEAD META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1" META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=3DGENERATOR STYLE/STYLE /HEAD BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff DIVFONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS" DIVI have to ask you "were have you started to read this = message"BRFONT=20 color=3D#ff0000AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE ******/FONTBRBRSo why the = **** do=20 bottom posting ******s want you to spend time scrollingBRdown a page = of crap=20 looking for were the new message starts ? because theyBRare thick, OK = you=20 might ask, why not remove the old message so the newBRmessage appears = at the=20 top of the page, well that is one option, I onlyBRinclude it so anyone = who=20 comes in half way down the thread can work out whatBRis go on, how = often does=20 that happen, Not very often,BRBRGet a life, stop wanking, stop = bottom=20 posting. Top posting saves time, asBRmore intelligent people seem to=20 understand./DIV/FONT/DIV/BODY/HTML ------=_NextPart_000_0061_01C74830.7AA34920-- I have to say that the irony of this is quite amusing. You might try turning off HTML before making a fool of yourself again. |
make your posting readable
Mike Berger wrote:
But doesn't YOUR posting prove his point? Look how much effort it is to read your bottom-posted addition to all this unnecessary repeated "context". *His* posting makes NO sense unless one FIRST tries to read all of the HTML garbage that he quoted. The quoting was FAR from "unnecessary." |
make your posting readable
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 09:57:11 -0600 Mike Berger wrote in
Message id: : But doesn't YOUR posting prove his point? Look how much effort it is to read your bottom-posted addition to all this unnecessary repeated "context". Actually, I was making a point that had nothing to do with his incoherent HTML babblings. Bottom posting combined with selective editing and in-line quoting is the proper way to respond to a (normal) post, and always had been until Microsoft's Outhouse Express came along. And with it, all the clueless morons who had been kept away until that point. People read from top to bottom, not bottom to top. JW wrote: On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 07:45:45 +1300 "Frank" wrote in Message id: : This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0061_01C74830.7AA34920 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have to ask you "were have you started to read this message" AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE ****** So why the **** do bottom posting ******s want you to spend time = scrolling down a page of crap looking for were the new message starts ? because = they are thick, OK you might ask, why not remove the old message so the new message appears at the top of the page, well that is one option, I only include it so anyone who comes in half way down the thread can work out = what is go on, how often does that happen, Not very often, Get a life, stop wanking, stop bottom posting. Top posting saves time, = as more intelligent people seem to understand. ------=_NextPart_000_0061_01C74830.7AA34920 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" HTMLHEAD META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1" META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=3DGENERATOR STYLE/STYLE /HEAD BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff DIVFONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS" DIVI have to ask you "were have you started to read this = message"BRFONT=20 color=3D#ff0000AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE ******/FONTBRBRSo why the = **** do=20 bottom posting ******s want you to spend time scrollingBRdown a page = of crap=20 looking for were the new message starts ? because theyBRare thick, OK = you=20 might ask, why not remove the old message so the newBRmessage appears = at the=20 top of the page, well that is one option, I onlyBRinclude it so anyone = who=20 comes in half way down the thread can work out whatBRis go on, how = often does=20 that happen, Not very often,BRBRGet a life, stop wanking, stop = bottom=20 posting. Top posting saves time, asBRmore intelligent people seem to=20 understand./DIV/FONT/DIV/BODY/HTML ------=_NextPart_000_0061_01C74830.7AA34920-- I have to say that the irony of this is quite amusing. You might try turning off HTML before making a fool of yourself again. |
make your posting readable
Exactly. So you want to put the NEW material at the top.
You've already read everything else. When you put a book down, and then pick it up again, do you start at the very beginning of the book, or resume with the material you haven't read yet? JW wrote: People read from top to bottom, not bottom to top. |
make your posting readable
One other consideration. I used to do most of my newsgroup reading on
my PDA (Diamond Mako). Because of the limited amount of memory in the PDA, the newsreader only downloaded about 30-40 lines of text per posting. Normally not a problem, but when the replies included a lot of text from previous posts, I was never able to read what the bottom- posters added to the discussion. It became quite frustrating at times. |
make your posting readable
Mike Berger wrote:
Exactly. So you want to put the NEW material at the top. You've already read everything else. Bull****. If you really think that the quote is unnecessary, why do you include it at the bottom? Why don't you remove it? I AGREE that most quoted text is unnecessary, then it must be REMOVED, not included in wrong place. Do you know what is the purpose of quote? It's that there is usually many many such questions/claims in the thread, that could have similar answers/replies. Thus, the purpose of quote is to POINT that which of the questions/claims is the reply directed for. If you read your own message (if you hadn't written it), you would see, that it was IMPOSSIBLE to know that to which claim you are refferring when you said "exactly". So that meant that triple scrolling was necessary, for seeing it and then your reply. Without seeing your quote, it can be considered that your reply "exactly" referred to "Nice troll" in another message. If quote was unnecessary, it wouldn't have invented, or at least not be still in use. -- Top-posting not supported. |
make your posting readable
Paul wrote:
One other consideration. I used to do most of my newsgroup reading on my PDA (Diamond Mako). Because of the limited amount of memory in the PDA, the newsreader only downloaded about 30-40 lines of text per posting. Normally not a problem, but when the replies included a lot of text from previous posts, I was never able to read what the bottom- posters added to the discussion. It became quite frustrating at times. So, you want everyone on Usenet to do things your way so you can use a cheap piece of crap? -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
make your posting readable
Michael A. Terrell kirjoitti:
So, you want everyone on Usenet to do things your way so you can use a cheap piece of crap? And moreover, top-posting doesn't help even in that case. When only necessary part of quote is included, bottom-posting shouldn't cause problem even with that cheap piece of crap :) And necessary is necessary. I think that triple scrolling (to see the necessary quote first and then the reply) 'd be far more difficult with such PDA. -- Top-posting not supported. |
make your posting readable
Simoc wrote:
Michael A. Terrell kirjoitti: So, you want everyone on Usenet to do things your way so you can use a cheap piece of crap? And moreover, top-posting doesn't help even in that case. When only necessary part of quote is included, bottom-posting shouldn't cause problem even with that cheap piece of crap :) And necessary is necessary. I think that triple scrolling (to see the necessary quote first and then the reply) 'd be far more difficult with such PDA. -- Top-posting not supported. Some people go WAY out of their way to do things wrong. A few years ago, it was using video games to access the net, then bitching that everyone should make sure their content could be accessed by their cobbled together junk. :( -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:47 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter