Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
rca 31
I may agree with you but this guy is doing his own home repair.
Everyone is telling this guy that don`t even know what a horizontal output is or even knows where it`s located at to go ahead and change caps in the smp`s. All you guys are doing by telling him these things is going to make his set even more worse than it is. It is much easier for him without making other damage to his set is to just change these couple little parts by the HOT and that should cure his problem. Once he starts in the powersupply and makes a mistake it will be hard to trck down what had happened. So I would suggest if you all want him to start working on the smp`s is to take the set in to his nearest repairshop and have them fix it before the set ends up being trashed. We all know how much of a pain that these 169 chassis are to fix. So I would suggest this guy to take this set to the repairshop to have it done before he finds he`s got himself into more problems by listening to all you guys telling him to work somewheres that could cause him more problems and end up costing him more money in the long run. Leonard Caillouetwrote: It may have nothing to do with his problem, but any tech who works on the ctc169 chassis should know that these caps are a problem waiting to happen and if they test high in ESR should be changed. It would be poor service not to give the set a thorough evaluation before suggesting a fix. If he does not have the equipment to test them, he should at least change the two caps on the smps controller IC, which are the source of more failures on these sets than any other. Some shops don't look for potential problems waiting to happen. We feel that a complete estimate includes checking the stuff that tend to cause other problems. Leonard "tvguy" wrote in message . .. I have been doing electronics for the last 30 years. I have not seen where the smps had caused his type of problem Unless there was something I have missed reading in his post. I still would say we need to know what was wrong with this flyback first before we start saying other things worng with his set. We need to know why he had put goop on it. This maybe his only cause of his problem at this point. [/quote:b2554bd4e1] |
#2
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
rca 31
CTC169 A Pain to fix.!!!!..I dont think so.
You have to know what your doing. "tvguy" wrote in message ... I may agree with you but this guy is doing his own home repair. Everyone is telling this guy that don`t even know what a horizontal output is or even knows where it`s located at to go ahead and change caps in the smp`s. All you guys are doing by telling him these things is going to make his set even more worse than it is. It is much easier for him without making other damage to his set is to just change these couple little parts by the HOT and that should cure his problem. Once he starts in the powersupply and makes a mistake it will be hard to trck down what had happened. So I would suggest if you all want him to start working on the smp`s is to take the set in to his nearest repairshop and have them fix it before the set ends up being trashed. We all know how much of a pain that these 169 chassis are to fix. So I would suggest this guy to take this set to the repairshop to have it done before he finds he`s got himself into more problems by listening to all you guys telling him to work somewheres that could cause him more problems and end up costing him more money in the long run. Leonard Caillouetwrote: It may have nothing to do with his problem, but any tech who works on the ctc169 chassis should know that these caps are a problem waiting to happen and if they test high in ESR should be changed. It would be poor service not to give the set a thorough evaluation before suggesting a fix. If he does not have the equipment to test them, he should at least change the two caps on the smps controller IC, which are the source of more failures on these sets than any other. Some shops don't look for potential problems waiting to happen. We feel that a complete estimate includes checking the stuff that tend to cause other problems. Leonard "tvguy" wrote in message . .. I have been doing electronics for the last 30 years. I have not seen where the smps had caused his type of problem Unless there was something I have missed reading in his post. I still would say we need to know what was wrong with this flyback first before we start saying other things worng with his set. We need to know why he had put goop on it. This maybe his only cause of his problem at this point. [/quote:b2554bd4e1] |
#3
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
rca 31
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:36:35 -0500, "kip" wrote:
CTC169 A Pain to fix.!!!!..I dont think so. You have to know what your doing. Guys, I love xxx169 chassis for CRT & projector, real money maker and reliable to repair. Yes, replace all 4 caps in power supply, pincushion (bowed picture) problem tend to be two parts (C4402 box cap & CR4402 diode marked on circuit board as C402 & CR402, don't forget the tiny ferrite bead when putting new diode back in), if small transistor off the pincushion coil is bad, replace it as well (2N2222 works as a sub). I know about those melted chocolate (used to be a rubber feet domes). Eeeewww! Tercious stuff to clean. Cheers, Wizard |
#4
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
rca 31
Yep Wizard Money Makers for sure...He ! He ! I like em
kip "Jason D." wrote in message ... On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:36:35 -0500, "kip" wrote: CTC169 A Pain to fix.!!!!..I dont think so. You have to know what your doing. Guys, I love xxx169 chassis for CRT & projector, real money maker and reliable to repair. Yes, replace all 4 caps in power supply, pincushion (bowed picture) problem tend to be two parts (C4402 box cap & CR4402 diode marked on circuit board as C402 & CR402, don't forget the tiny ferrite bead when putting new diode back in), if small transistor off the pincushion coil is bad, replace it as well (2N2222 works as a sub). I know about those melted chocolate (used to be a rubber feet domes). Eeeewww! Tercious stuff to clean. Cheers, Wizard |
#5
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
rca 31
tvguy wrote: I may agree with you but this guy is doing his own home repair. Everyone is telling this guy that don`t even know what a horizontal output is or even knows where it`s located at to go ahead and change caps in the smp`s. The 169's smps will cause overvoltage to the HV\Sweep circuits, and any quality repair must include addressing these problems. Good technicians know this. Most of the people who responded to the OP are professionals. Either fix it right, or don't fix it. tvguy wrote: We all know how much of a pain that these 169 chassis are to fix. The 169??? No harder to repair than any other premium chassis. This is an excellent design that runs perfectly when properly repaired. We still sell these used (both DV and PTV) and they all get a full 1 year warranty. They never come back. John |
#6
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
rca 31
I think they are generally easy to fix if you cover all the common stuff.
Sure, you get a dog every now and then, but in what sets do you not? Easy fixes, mostly, and tons of tips in several places online and in the various databases. If you think these are tough to fix you have not learned much in your thirty years. Leonard "tvguy" wrote in message ... We all know how much of a pain that these 169 chassis are to fix. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|