Have you noticed¸?
 

Have you noticed?

Larkin is always wrong. Study every one of his statements for
sensibility... score = ZERO :-}

He can't even get a passing score in sci.electronics.basics

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| San Tan Valley, AZ 85142 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.

Have you noticed¸?
 

On 5/4/2014 6:50 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
Have you noticed?

Larkin is always wrong. Study every one of his statements for
sensibility... score = ZERO :-}

He can't even get a passing score in sci.electronics.basics

...Jim Thompson

Is that really necessary?
To me that sounds like a statement the old man down the street
would make about his neighbors. We try to give him a break because he's
febble minded and isn't quite normal.
Mikek

Have you noticed¸?
 

On Sun, 04 May 2014 16:50:19 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

Have you noticed?

Larkin is always wrong. Study every one of his statements for
sensibility... score = ZERO :-}

He can't even get a passing score in sci.electronics.basics

...Jim Thompson

What I noticed is that you are quite wrong about the LM339 thing.

Your tactic is to be wrong and declare victory. That doesn't impress anybody
except maybe JF.


--

John Larkin Highland Technology Inc
www.highlandtechnology.com jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com

Precision electronic instrumentation

Have you noticed¸?
 

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 04 May 2014 16:50:19 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

Have you noticed?

Larkin is always wrong. Study every one of his statements for
sensibility... score = ZERO :-}

He can't even get a passing score in sci.electronics.basics

...Jim Thompson

What I noticed is that you are quite wrong about the LM339 thing.

Your tactic is to be wrong and declare victory. That doesn't impress anybody
except maybe JF.

Yeah, well that does not take much!

Jamie

Have you noticed¸?
 

On Sun, 4 May 2014 22:15:49 -0400, "Maynard A. Philbrook Jr."
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 04 May 2014 16:50:19 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

Have you noticed?

Larkin is always wrong. Study every one of his statements for
sensibility... score = ZERO :-}

He can't even get a passing score in sci.electronics.basics

...Jim Thompson

What I noticed is that you are quite wrong about the LM339 thing.

Your tactic is to be wrong and declare victory. That doesn't impress anybody
except maybe JF.

Yeah, well that does not take much!

---
True; not much at all.

Sadly, you leave me underwhelmed.

Have you noticed¸?
 

On Sun, 04 May 2014 19:01:34 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Sun, 04 May 2014 16:50:19 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

Have you noticed?

Larkin is always wrong. Study every one of his statements for
sensibility... score = ZERO :-}

He can't even get a passing score in sci.electronics.basics

...Jim Thompson

What I noticed is that you are quite wrong about the LM339 thing.

Your tactic is to be wrong and declare victory. That doesn't impress anybody
except maybe JF.

---
Wow! I must have done something right for you to get your tit caught
in the wringer like that.

In any case, your tactic is to be wrong and bury the evidence, which
doesn't impress _anyone_.

Have you noticed¸?
 

On Mon, 05 May 2014 06:08:23 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Sun, 04 May 2014 19:01:34 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Sun, 04 May 2014 16:50:19 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

Have you noticed?

Larkin is always wrong. Study every one of his statements for
sensibility... score = ZERO :-}

He can't even get a passing score in sci.electronics.basics

...Jim Thompson

What I noticed is that you are quite wrong about the LM339 thing.

Your tactic is to be wrong and declare victory. That doesn't impress anybody
except maybe JF.

---
Wow! I must have done something right for you to get your tit caught
in the wringer like that.

In any case, your tactic is to be wrong and bury the evidence, which
doesn't impress _anyone_.

The LM339 hazard is real.


--

John Larkin Highland Technology Inc
www.highlandtechnology.com jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com

Precision electronic instrumentation

Have you noticed¸?
 

On Mon, 05 May 2014 07:12:14 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Mon, 05 May 2014 06:08:23 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Sun, 04 May 2014 19:01:34 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Sun, 04 May 2014 16:50:19 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

Have you noticed?

Larkin is always wrong. Study every one of his statements for
sensibility... score = ZERO :-}

He can't even get a passing score in sci.electronics.basics

...Jim Thompson

What I noticed is that you are quite wrong about the LM339 thing.

Your tactic is to be wrong and declare victory. That doesn't impress anybody
except maybe JF.

---
Wow! I must have done something right for you to get your tit caught
in the wringer like that.

In any case, your tactic is to be wrong and bury the evidence, which
doesn't impress _anyone_.

The LM339 hazard is real.

---
A drop in the bucket.

I don't think so