JT - photo.
 

JT - photo.
 

On 3/18/2012 5:40 PM, Ian Field wrote:

I'm not going to laugh at his physical appearance.
My concern is his mental decline. He has lost his ability
to have a level headed conversation. When you call him on it,
his comeback is but "Johnny started it" That somehow got stuck
in his memory and he can't shake it.
It's sad time.
Mikek

JT - photo.
 

On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:46:02 -0500, amdx wrote:

On 3/18/2012 5:40 PM, Ian Field wrote:

I'm not going to laugh at his physical appearance.
My concern is his mental decline. He has lost his ability
to have a level headed conversation. When you call him on it,
his comeback is but "Johnny started it" That somehow got stuck
in his memory and he can't shake it.
It's sad time.
Mikek

Virtually anytime I post, JL interjects some narcissistic denigration.
JL started it, I _have_ finished it.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.

JT - photo.
 

"amdx" wrote in message
...
On 3/18/2012 5:40 PM, Ian Field wrote:

I'm not going to laugh at his physical appearance.
My concern is his mental decline. He has lost his ability
to have a level headed conversation. When you call him on it,
his comeback is but "Johnny started it" That somehow got stuck
in his memory and he can't shake it.
It's sad time.
Mikek


Who knows? - Maybe someone else did start it!

He just *NEVER* lets it go.

JT - photo.
 

On 3/19/2012 2:03 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:46:02 -0500, wrote:

On 3/18/2012 5:40 PM, Ian Field wrote:

I'm not going to laugh at his physical appearance.
My concern is his mental decline. He has lost his ability
to have a level headed conversation. When you call him on it,
his comeback is but "Johnny started it" That somehow got stuck
in his memory and he can't shake it.
It's sad time.
Mikek

Virtually anytime I post, JL interjects some narcissistic denigration.
JL started it, I _have_ finished it.

...Jim Thompson

I haven't noticed, could it be you are being overly sensitive?

"I _have_ finished it."
Can I take from that you are going to be the bigger man and let all
the petty back and forth fall away? ie. just ignore what you perceive as
a slight to your abilities.

Mikek

JT - photo.
 

"amdx" wrote in message
...
On 3/19/2012 2:03 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:46:02 -0500, wrote:

On 3/18/2012 5:40 PM, Ian Field wrote:

I'm not going to laugh at his physical appearance.
My concern is his mental decline. He has lost his ability
to have a level headed conversation. When you call him on it,
his comeback is but "Johnny started it" That somehow got stuck
in his memory and he can't shake it.
It's sad time.
Mikek

Virtually anytime I post, JL interjects some narcissistic denigration.
JL started it, I _have_ finished it.

...Jim Thompson

I haven't noticed, could it be you are being overly sensitive?

"I _have_ finished it."
Can I take from that you are going to be the bigger man and let all the
petty back and forth fall away? ie. just ignore what you perceive as
a slight to your abilities.

Mikek


Its some years old feud that he probably can't even remember what its
about - but he still won't let it go!

JT - photo.
 

Ian Field wrote:

Who knows? - Maybe someone else did start it!

He just *NEVER* lets it go.


You never 'let go', as well.


--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense.

JT - photo.
 

Ian Field wrote:


That's your grade school photo.


--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense.

JT - photo.
 

On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:40:11 -0000, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"amdx" wrote in message
.. .
On 3/19/2012 2:03 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:46:02 -0500, wrote:

On 3/18/2012 5:40 PM, Ian Field wrote:

I'm not going to laugh at his physical appearance.
My concern is his mental decline. He has lost his ability
to have a level headed conversation. When you call him on it,
his comeback is but "Johnny started it" That somehow got stuck
in his memory and he can't shake it.
It's sad time.
Mikek

Virtually anytime I post, JL interjects some narcissistic denigration.
JL started it, I _have_ finished it.

...Jim Thompson

I haven't noticed, could it be you are being overly sensitive?

"I _have_ finished it."
Can I take from that you are going to be the bigger man and let all the
petty back and forth fall away? ie. just ignore what you perceive as
a slight to your abilities.

Mikek


Its some years old feud that he probably can't even remember what its
about - but he still won't let it go!


My "feud" with JT began when I made fun of a goofy "scientific
breakthrough" press release from MIT, with no reference to JT. His
alma mater is apparently sacred to him, and he took it as a personal
insult. He responded by saying obscene and obviously untrue things
about my wife.

I then called him an asshole, which I think remains an accurate
assessment.


--

John Larkin, President Highland Technology Inc
www.highlandtechnology.com jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com

Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom timing and laser controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer
Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators

JT - photo.
 

On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 07:59:31 -0500, amdx
wrote:

On 3/19/2012 2:03 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:46:02 -0500, wrote:

On 3/18/2012 5:40 PM, Ian Field wrote:

I'm not going to laugh at his physical appearance.
My concern is his mental decline. He has lost his ability
to have a level headed conversation. When you call him on it,
his comeback is but "Johnny started it" That somehow got stuck
in his memory and he can't shake it.
It's sad time.
Mikek

Virtually anytime I post, JL interjects some narcissistic denigration.
JL started it, I _have_ finished it.

...Jim Thompson

I haven't noticed, could it be you are being overly sensitive?

"I _have_ finished it."
Can I take from that you are going to be the bigger man and let all
the petty back and forth fall away? ie. just ignore what you perceive as
a slight to your abilities.

Mikek

It's real easy to be a punk when you hide behind a pseudonym.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.

JT - photo.
 

"John Larkin" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:40:11 -0000, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"amdx" wrote in message
. ..
On 3/19/2012 2:03 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:46:02 -0500, wrote:

On 3/18/2012 5:40 PM, Ian Field wrote:

I'm not going to laugh at his physical appearance.
My concern is his mental decline. He has lost his ability
to have a level headed conversation. When you call him on it,
his comeback is but "Johnny started it" That somehow got stuck
in his memory and he can't shake it.
It's sad time.
Mikek

Virtually anytime I post, JL interjects some narcissistic denigration.
JL started it, I _have_ finished it.

...Jim Thompson

I haven't noticed, could it be you are being overly sensitive?

"I _have_ finished it."
Can I take from that you are going to be the bigger man and let all
the
petty back and forth fall away? ie. just ignore what you perceive as
a slight to your abilities.

Mikek


Its some years old feud that he probably can't even remember what its
about - but he still won't let it go!


My "feud" with JT began when I made fun of a goofy "scientific
breakthrough" press release from MIT, with no reference to JT. His
alma mater is apparently sacred to him, and he took it as a personal
insult. He responded by saying obscene and obviously untrue things
about my wife.

I then called him an asshole, which I think remains an accurate
assessment.


I have to put my hand up to having been a little more cheeky than I could
get away with - but the bloke has *SERIOUSLY* no sense of humour!

JT - photo.
 

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
...

Ian Field wrote:

Who knows? - Maybe someone else did start it!

He just *NEVER* lets it go.


You never 'let go', as well.

My long term memory is pretty good, but things I'm not frequently reminded
of are easily pushed aside by more important things.

Pretty much everytime I visit this group JT is slagging someone off!

Sometimes I feel he should be the object of pity, sometimes I feel he
deserves all the aggro he gets - and maybe I should chip in too.

JT - photo.
 

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
...

Ian Field wrote:


That's your grade school photo.


More like my arse after I've sat in the hot tub too long.

JT - photo.
 

On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 18:33:39 -0000, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"John Larkin" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:40:11 -0000, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"amdx" wrote in message
.. .
On 3/19/2012 2:03 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:46:02 -0500, wrote:

On 3/18/2012 5:40 PM, Ian Field wrote:

I'm not going to laugh at his physical appearance.
My concern is his mental decline. He has lost his ability
to have a level headed conversation. When you call him on it,
his comeback is but "Johnny started it" That somehow got stuck
in his memory and he can't shake it.
It's sad time.
Mikek

Virtually anytime I post, JL interjects some narcissistic denigration.
JL started it, I _have_ finished it.

...Jim Thompson

I haven't noticed, could it be you are being overly sensitive?

"I _have_ finished it."
Can I take from that you are going to be the bigger man and let all
the
petty back and forth fall away? ie. just ignore what you perceive as
a slight to your abilities.

Mikek


Its some years old feud that he probably can't even remember what its
about - but he still won't let it go!


My "feud" with JT began when I made fun of a goofy "scientific
breakthrough" press release from MIT, with no reference to JT. His
alma mater is apparently sacred to him, and he took it as a personal
insult. He responded by saying obscene and obviously untrue things
about my wife.

I then called him an asshole, which I think remains an accurate
assessment.


I have to put my hand up to having been a little more cheeky than I could
get away with - but the bloke has *SERIOUSLY* no sense of humour!


He puts a smilie after almost every sentence, to indicate that *he*
finds himself to be funny.


--

John Larkin, President
Highland Technology, Inc

jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com

Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom laser controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME thermocouple, LVDT, synchro acquisition and simulation

JT - photo.
 

On 3/20/2012 10:55 AM, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 07:59:31 -0500,
wrote:

On 3/19/2012 2:03 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:46:02 -0500, wrote:

On 3/18/2012 5:40 PM, Ian Field wrote:

I'm not going to laugh at his physical appearance.
My concern is his mental decline. He has lost his ability
to have a level headed conversation. When you call him on it,
his comeback is but "Johnny started it" That somehow got stuck
in his memory and he can't shake it.
It's sad time.
Mikek

Virtually anytime I post, JL interjects some narcissistic denigration.
JL started it, I _have_ finished it.

...Jim Thompson

I haven't noticed, could it be you are being overly sensitive?

"I _have_ finished it."
Can I take from that you are going to be the bigger man and let all
the petty back and forth fall away? ie. just ignore what you perceive as
a slight to your abilities.

Mikek

It's real easy to be a punk when you hide behind a pseudonym.

...Jim Thompson

If you really want to find me, you have way more intelligence than is
required. I think I have even sent you an email or two.
Mikek

JT - photo.
 

On 3/20/2012 1:51 PM, Ian Field wrote:
"Michael A. wrote in message
...

Ian Field wrote:

Who knows? - Maybe someone else did start it!

He just *NEVER* lets it go.


You never 'let go', as well.

My long term memory is pretty good, but things I'm not frequently reminded
of are easily pushed aside by more important things.

Pretty much everytime I visit this group JT is slagging someone off!

Sometimes I feel he should be the object of pity, sometimes I feel he
deserves all the aggro he gets - and maybe I should chip in too.


I do feel pity, at one time he was my favorite poster on the group
(blush).
But he has a personality change and no longer as enjoyable.
Jim, have you had a medical checkup lately?
You might ask your wife if she has seen a change.
Mikek

JT - photo.
 

"amdx" wrote in message
...
On 3/20/2012 1:51 PM, Ian Field wrote:
"Michael A. wrote in message
...

Ian Field wrote:

Who knows? - Maybe someone else did start it!

He just *NEVER* lets it go.


You never 'let go', as well.

My long term memory is pretty good, but things I'm not frequently
reminded
of are easily pushed aside by more important things.

Pretty much everytime I visit this group JT is slagging someone off!

Sometimes I feel he should be the object of pity, sometimes I feel he
deserves all the aggro he gets - and maybe I should chip in too.


I do feel pity, at one time he was my favorite poster on the group
(blush).
But he has a personality change and no longer as enjoyable.
Jim, have you had a medical checkup lately?
You might ask your wife if she has seen a change.
Mikek


The thing that most makes him difficult to take seriously anymore is his
steadily increasing loonatic fringe right-wing extremist rants.

JT - photo.
 

On 3/20/2012 5:34 PM, Ian Field wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 3/20/2012 1:51 PM, Ian Field wrote:
"Michael A. wrote in message
...

Ian Field wrote:

Who knows? - Maybe someone else did start it!

He just *NEVER* lets it go.


You never 'let go', as well.

My long term memory is pretty good, but things I'm not frequently
reminded
of are easily pushed aside by more important things.

Pretty much everytime I visit this group JT is slagging someone off!

Sometimes I feel he should be the object of pity, sometimes I feel he
deserves all the aggro he gets - and maybe I should chip in too.


I do feel pity, at one time he was my favorite poster on the group
(blush).
But he has a personality change and no longer as enjoyable.
Jim, have you had a medical checkup lately?
You might ask your wife if she has seen a change.
Mikek


The thing that most makes him difficult to take seriously anymore is his
steadily increasing loonatic fringe right-wing extremist rants.


Whoa! Now you have gone a bit to far. Leave my buddy Jim alone. :-)
Mikek

JT - photo.
 

Ian Field wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
...

Ian Field wrote:

Who knows? - Maybe someone else did start it!

He just *NEVER* lets it go.


You never 'let go', as well.

My long term memory is pretty good, but things I'm not frequently reminded
of are easily pushed aside by more important things.

Pretty much everytime I visit this group JT is slagging someone off!

Sometimes I feel he should be the object of pity, sometimes I feel he
deserves all the aggro he gets - and maybe I should chip in too.


From what I've seen over the years, you like to stir things up .


--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense.

JT - photo.
 

On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:52:29 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:40:11 -0000, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"amdx" wrote in message
. ..
On 3/19/2012 2:03 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:46:02 -0500, wrote:

On 3/18/2012 5:40 PM, Ian Field wrote:

I'm not going to laugh at his physical appearance.
My concern is his mental decline. He has lost his ability
to have a level headed conversation. When you call him on it,
his comeback is but "Johnny started it" That somehow got stuck
in his memory and he can't shake it.
It's sad time.
Mikek

Virtually anytime I post, JL interjects some narcissistic denigration.
JL started it, I _have_ finished it.

...Jim Thompson

I haven't noticed, could it be you are being overly sensitive?

"I _have_ finished it."
Can I take from that you are going to be the bigger man and let all the
petty back and forth fall away? ie. just ignore what you perceive as
a slight to your abilities.

Mikek


Its some years old feud that he probably can't even remember what its
about - but he still won't let it go!


My "feud" with JT began when I made fun of a goofy "scientific
breakthrough" press release from MIT, with no reference to JT. His
alma mater is apparently sacred to him, and he took it as a personal
insult. He responded by saying obscene and obviously untrue things
about my wife.

I then called him an asshole, which I think remains an accurate
assessment.

---
PKB?

Knowing why he responded the way he did, had you then replied that you
meant him no slight with your first post, a lot of ugliness might have
been averted.

--
JF

JT - photo.
 

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 05:50:49 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:52:29 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:40:11 -0000, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"amdx" wrote in message
.. .
On 3/19/2012 2:03 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:46:02 -0500, wrote:

On 3/18/2012 5:40 PM, Ian Field wrote:

I'm not going to laugh at his physical appearance.
My concern is his mental decline. He has lost his ability
to have a level headed conversation. When you call him on it,
his comeback is but "Johnny started it" That somehow got stuck
in his memory and he can't shake it.
It's sad time.
Mikek

Virtually anytime I post, JL interjects some narcissistic denigration.
JL started it, I _have_ finished it.

...Jim Thompson

I haven't noticed, could it be you are being overly sensitive?

"I _have_ finished it."
Can I take from that you are going to be the bigger man and let all the
petty back and forth fall away? ie. just ignore what you perceive as
a slight to your abilities.

Mikek


Its some years old feud that he probably can't even remember what its
about - but he still won't let it go!


My "feud" with JT began when I made fun of a goofy "scientific
breakthrough" press release from MIT, with no reference to JT. His
alma mater is apparently sacred to him, and he took it as a personal
insult. He responded by saying obscene and obviously untrue things
about my wife.

I then called him an asshole, which I think remains an accurate
assessment.

---
PKB?

Knowing why he responded the way he did, had you then replied that you
meant him no slight with your first post, a lot of ugliness might have
been averted.

After he insulted my wife, you suggest that I should have apologized
to him?

You are both sick assholes, which is why you two are so attached to
one another. Enjoy.


--

John Larkin, President Highland Technology Inc
www.highlandtechnology.com jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com

Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom timing and laser controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer
Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators

JT - photo.
 

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
...

Ian Field wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
...

Ian Field wrote:

Who knows? - Maybe someone else did start it!

He just *NEVER* lets it go.


You never 'let go', as well.

My long term memory is pretty good, but things I'm not frequently
reminded
of are easily pushed aside by more important things.

Pretty much everytime I visit this group JT is slagging someone off!

Sometimes I feel he should be the object of pity, sometimes I feel he
deserves all the aggro he gets - and maybe I should chip in too.


From what I've seen over the years, you like to stir things up .


Sometimes I can't resist winding up loonies like Philthy - JT just fell
within the homing envelope.

JT - photo.
 

John Fields wrote:

Knowing why he responded the way he did, had you then replied that you
meant him no slight with your first post, a lot of ugliness might have
been averted.

You insult somebody's college, then he insults your wife, and then you're
supposed to explain you didn't mean it? You can't be serious.


--

Reply in group, but if emailing add one more
zero, and remove the last word.

JT - photo.
 

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:37:15 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
wrote:


John Fields wrote:

Knowing why he responded the way he did, had you then replied that you
meant him no slight with your first post, a lot of ugliness might have
been averted.

You insult somebody's college, then he insults your wife, and then you're
supposed to explain you didn't mean it? You can't be serious.

That's his version of logic. Erratic hairballs.


--

John Larkin, President
Highland Technology, Inc

jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com

Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom laser controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME thermocouple, LVDT, synchro acquisition and simulation

JT - photo.
 

"John Larkin" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:37:15 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
wrote:


John Fields wrote:

Knowing why he responded the way he did, had you then replied that you
meant him no slight with your first post, a lot of ugliness might have
been averted.

You insult somebody's college, then he insults your wife, and then you're
supposed to explain you didn't mean it? You can't be serious.

That's his version of logic. Erratic hairballs.


I was wondering what his college did to him in the hazing phase?!

JT - photo.
 

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:37:15 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
wrote:


John Fields wrote:

Knowing why he responded the way he did, had you then replied that you
meant him no slight with your first post, a lot of ugliness might have
been averted.

You insult somebody's college, then he insults your wife, and then you're
supposed to explain you didn't mean it? You can't be serious.

I posted the actual sequence of events. It didn't quite happen in the
sequence or topics that Larkin relates. Not that you would be
surprised that Larkin prevaricates.

The following post link incidentally includes a synopsis of the _true_
sequence of events...

Newsgroups:
sci.electronics.design,alt.binaries.schematics.ele ctronic,sci.electronics.cad
Subject: Abate Holding Your Breath...Thompson's Design
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:24:08 -0700
Message-ID:

I'll not comment further.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.

JT - photo.
 

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:37:15 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
wrote:


John Fields wrote:

Knowing why he responded the way he did, had you then replied that you
meant him no slight with your first post, a lot of ugliness might have
been averted.

You insult somebody's college, then he insults your wife, and then you're
supposed to explain you didn't mean it? You can't be serious.

---
Sure, why not?

Larkin said he was only fooling around, so if Jim took it wrong and
flamed back hard, Larkin could easily have defused the situation - at
very little cost to himself - by explaining that he was only fooling
around.

If he wanted to, that is, but that's not how he works.

What he likes to do is snidely push people's buttons in the hope that
they'll respond in anger and then, once he's created a situation which
is no longer tenable, for him, he ducks out and later on tries to use
responses which were posted in anger against the posters who opposed
him.

Just another control freak at work.

--
JF

JT - photo.
 

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:56:12 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:37:15 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
wrote:


John Fields wrote:

Knowing why he responded the way he did, had you then replied that you
meant him no slight with your first post, a lot of ugliness might have
been averted.

You insult somebody's college, then he insults your wife, and then you're
supposed to explain you didn't mean it? You can't be serious.

---
Sure, why not?

Larkin said he was only fooling around, so if Jim took it wrong and
flamed back hard, Larkin could easily have defused the situation - at
very little cost to himself - by explaining that he was only fooling
around.

If he wanted to, that is, but that's not how he works.

What he likes to do is snidely push people's buttons in the hope that
they'll respond in anger and then, once he's created a situation which
is no longer tenable, for him, he ducks out and later on tries to use
responses which were posted in anger against the posters who opposed
him.

Just another control freak at work.

Definitely a freak.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.

JT - photo.
 

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:23:36 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:37:15 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
wrote:


John Fields wrote:

Knowing why he responded the way he did, had you then replied that you
meant him no slight with your first post, a lot of ugliness might have
been averted.

You insult somebody's college, then he insults your wife, and then you're
supposed to explain you didn't mean it? You can't be serious.

That's his version of logic. Erratic hairballs.

---
"Peace at any price but my having to take responsibility for my
errors"

John Larkin, 11 December 2012

More on the "hairball" soon.

Stay tuned!

--
JF

JT - photo.
 

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:47:08 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:37:15 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
wrote:


John Fields wrote:

Knowing why he responded the way he did, had you then replied that you
meant him no slight with your first post, a lot of ugliness might have
been averted.

You insult somebody's college, then he insults your wife, and then you're
supposed to explain you didn't mean it? You can't be serious.

I posted the actual sequence of events. It didn't quite happen in the
sequence or topics that Larkin relates. Not that you would be
surprised that Larkin prevaricates.

The following post link incidentally includes a synopsis of the _true_
sequence of events...


Hey, you are supposed to be killfiling me, and anyone who responds to
me.

Still can't get that to work?


Newsgroups:
sci.electronics.design,alt.binaries.schematics.el ectronic,sci.electronics.cad
Subject: Abate Holding Your Breath...Thompson's Design
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:24:08 -0700
Message-ID:

I'll not comment further.

...Jim Thompson

More lies!



--

John Larkin, President
Highland Technology, Inc

jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com

Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom laser controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME thermocouple, LVDT, synchro acquisition and simulation

JT - photo.
 

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:51:49 -0000, "Ian Field"
wrote:

Sometimes I can't resist winding up loonies like Philthy - JT just fell
within the homing envelope.

---
If you think Phil is loony, then you don't have enough time in grade
here, or technical expertise, to be thinking of yourself as a judge.

Besides, if you really thought that Phil was a loon, instead of
extending a helping hand, why would you want to wind him up and cause
him unwarranted pain and a greater retreat into loonness?

Perhaps to assuage your own sense of inadequacy by trying to bring
your betters down to your level?

Homing envelope?

As far as your vendetta against JT goes, here you are with a dead shop
which you can't even use to verify data you've begged for and, yet
again, choose to besmirch those whom you don't/can't understand.


--
JF

JT - photo.
 

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:56:12 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:37:15 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
wrote:


John Fields wrote:

Knowing why he responded the way he did, had you then replied that you
meant him no slight with your first post, a lot of ugliness might have
been averted.

You insult somebody's college, then he insults your wife, and then you're
supposed to explain you didn't mean it? You can't be serious.

---
Sure, why not?

Larkin said he was only fooling around, so if Jim took it wrong and
flamed back hard, Larkin could easily have defused the situation - at
very little cost to himself - by explaining that he was only fooling
around.

I wasn't fooling around. I was commenting on the huge numbers of
press-release scientific-breakthrough cures-cancer types of idiotic
press releases that MIT generates. That never amount to anything.

This sort of thing, over and over:

http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/1...n-every-gadget



--

John Larkin, President
Highland Technology, Inc

jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com

Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom laser controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME thermocouple, LVDT, synchro acquisition and simulation

JT - photo.
 

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:53:54 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:56:12 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:37:15 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
wrote:


John Fields wrote:

Knowing why he responded the way he did, had you then replied that you
meant him no slight with your first post, a lot of ugliness might have
been averted.

You insult somebody's college, then he insults your wife, and then you're
supposed to explain you didn't mean it? You can't be serious.

---
Sure, why not?

Larkin said he was only fooling around, so if Jim took it wrong and
flamed back hard, Larkin could easily have defused the situation - at
very little cost to himself - by explaining that he was only fooling
around.

I wasn't fooling around. I was commenting on the huge numbers of
press-release scientific-breakthrough cures-cancer types of idiotic
press releases that MIT generates. That never amount to anything.

This sort of thing, over and over:

http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/1...n-every-gadget

---
Your: "My "feud" with JT began when I made fun of a goofy "scientific
breakthrough" press release from MIT, with no reference to JT. His
alma mater is apparently sacred to him, and he took it as a personal
insult. He responded by saying obscene and obviously untrue things
about my wife."

doesn't explain why, if you knew of Jim's affection for MIT and that
he'd take the insult personally, you didn't couch your post in a tone
more conducive to criticizing rationally instead of belittling by
making fun of.

But, then, that's just you; a control freak always stirring the pot
with snide little insults in order to get attention.

--
JF

JT - photo.
 

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:35:28 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 05:50:49 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:52:29 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:40:11 -0000, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"amdx" wrote in message
. ..
On 3/19/2012 2:03 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:46:02 -0500, wrote:

On 3/18/2012 5:40 PM, Ian Field wrote:

I'm not going to laugh at his physical appearance.
My concern is his mental decline. He has lost his ability
to have a level headed conversation. When you call him on it,
his comeback is but "Johnny started it" That somehow got stuck
in his memory and he can't shake it.
It's sad time.
Mikek

Virtually anytime I post, JL interjects some narcissistic denigration.
JL started it, I _have_ finished it.

...Jim Thompson

I haven't noticed, could it be you are being overly sensitive?

"I _have_ finished it."
Can I take from that you are going to be the bigger man and let all the
petty back and forth fall away? ie. just ignore what you perceive as
a slight to your abilities.

Mikek


Its some years old feud that he probably can't even remember what its
about - but he still won't let it go!


My "feud" with JT began when I made fun of a goofy "scientific
breakthrough" press release from MIT, with no reference to JT. His
alma mater is apparently sacred to him, and he took it as a personal
insult. He responded by saying obscene and obviously untrue things
about my wife.

I then called him an asshole, which I think remains an accurate
assessment.

---
PKB?

Knowing why he responded the way he did, had you then replied that you
meant him no slight with your first post, a lot of ugliness might have
been averted.

After he insulted my wife, you suggest that I should have apologized
to him?

---
Yes, of course, had your aim been merely to criticize MIT.

However, I suspect your intent was a little darker in that you knew
Jim would take umbrage at your remarks, allowing you to remain in the
limelight all that much longer.
---

You are both sick assholes, which is why you two are so attached to
one another. Enjoy.

---
Larkin's enemies, +1

Fields' enemies, -1

Enjoy.

--
JF

JT - photo.
 

On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 03:32:29 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:35:28 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 05:50:49 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:52:29 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:40:11 -0000, "Ian Field"
wrote:


"amdx" wrote in message
...
On 3/19/2012 2:03 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:46:02 -0500, wrote:

On 3/18/2012 5:40 PM, Ian Field wrote:

I'm not going to laugh at his physical appearance.
My concern is his mental decline. He has lost his ability
to have a level headed conversation. When you call him on it,
his comeback is but "Johnny started it" That somehow got stuck
in his memory and he can't shake it.
It's sad time.
Mikek

Virtually anytime I post, JL interjects some narcissistic denigration.
JL started it, I _have_ finished it.

...Jim Thompson

I haven't noticed, could it be you are being overly sensitive?

"I _have_ finished it."
Can I take from that you are going to be the bigger man and let all the
petty back and forth fall away? ie. just ignore what you perceive as
a slight to your abilities.

Mikek


Its some years old feud that he probably can't even remember what its
about - but he still won't let it go!


My "feud" with JT began when I made fun of a goofy "scientific
breakthrough" press release from MIT, with no reference to JT. His
alma mater is apparently sacred to him, and he took it as a personal
insult. He responded by saying obscene and obviously untrue things
about my wife.

I then called him an asshole, which I think remains an accurate
assessment.

---
PKB?

Knowing why he responded the way he did, had you then replied that you
meant him no slight with your first post, a lot of ugliness might have
been averted.

After he insulted my wife, you suggest that I should have apologized
to him?

---
Yes, of course, had your aim been merely to criticize MIT.

However, I suspect your intent was a little darker in that you knew
Jim would take umbrage at your remarks, allowing you to remain in the
limelight all that much longer.
---

You are both sick assholes, which is why you two are so attached to
one another. Enjoy.

---
Larkin's enemies, +1

Fields' enemies, -1

Enjoy.

I assume that you are going to assist him in assaulting me, as he has
threatened to do.

Artificial hips befo 1

Artificial hips after: 4





--

John Larkin, President Highland Technology Inc
www.highlandtechnology.com jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com

Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom timing and laser controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer
Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators

JT - photo.
 

On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 03:05:20 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:53:54 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:56:12 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:37:15 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
wrote:


John Fields wrote:

Knowing why he responded the way he did, had you then replied that you
meant him no slight with your first post, a lot of ugliness might have
been averted.

You insult somebody's college, then he insults your wife, and then you're
supposed to explain you didn't mean it? You can't be serious.

---
Sure, why not?

Larkin said he was only fooling around, so if Jim took it wrong and
flamed back hard, Larkin could easily have defused the situation - at
very little cost to himself - by explaining that he was only fooling
around.

I wasn't fooling around. I was commenting on the huge numbers of
press-release scientific-breakthrough cures-cancer types of idiotic
press releases that MIT generates. That never amount to anything.

This sort of thing, over and over:

http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/1...n-every-gadget

---
Your: "My "feud" with JT began when I made fun of a goofy "scientific
breakthrough" press release from MIT, with no reference to JT. His
alma mater is apparently sacred to him, and he took it as a personal
insult. He responded by saying obscene and obviously untrue things
about my wife."

doesn't explain why, if you knew of Jim's affection for MIT and that
he'd take the insult personally, you didn't couch your post in a tone
more conducive to criticizing rationally instead of belittling by
making fun of.

If he is proud of these silly MIT press releases, he is indeed getting
senile.


--

John Larkin, President Highland Technology Inc
www.highlandtechnology.com jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com

Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom timing and laser controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer
Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators

JT - photo.
 

John Fields wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:37:15 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
wrote:

You insult somebody's college, then he insults your wife, and then
you're supposed to explain you didn't mean it? You can't be
serious.

---
Sure, why not?

Jesus!

You can't be serious.

You must really be married to your school.


--

Reply in group, but if emailing add one more
zero, and remove the last word.

JT - photo.
 

John Fields wrote:
---
Your: "My "feud" with JT began when I made fun of a goofy "scientific
breakthrough" press release from MIT, with no reference to JT. His
alma mater is apparently sacred to him, and he took it as a personal
insult. He responded by saying obscene and obviously untrue things
about my wife."

doesn't explain why, if you knew of Jim's affection for MIT and that
he'd take the insult personally, you didn't couch your post in a tone
more conducive to criticizing rationally instead of belittling by
making fun of.

I don't know why, but I guess you don't see what incredible sensitivity for
the school this requires. And I can't understand how anyone could assume
that anyone would be less sensitive about their wife than their school.

Calling someone a pimp for his future wife is orders of magnitude more
serious.

When Genome made a despicable comment about Jim's late son, Jim simply
replied that Genome would get no more assistance from him.

So the difference is obviously that this built up over a longer time, and
therefore it's not just because of isolated comments.

But the pimp remark stands out from the rest.


--

Reply in group, but if emailing add one more
zero, and remove the last word.

JT - photo.
 

Jim Thompson wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:37:15 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
wrote:


John Fields wrote:

Knowing why he responded the way he did, had you then replied
that you meant him no slight with your first post, a lot of
ugliness might have been averted.

You insult somebody's college, then he insults your wife, and then
you're supposed to explain you didn't mean it? You can't be
serious.

I posted the actual sequence of events. It didn't quite happen in the
sequence or topics that Larkin relates. Not that you would be
surprised that Larkin prevaricates.

The following post link incidentally includes a synopsis of the _true_
sequence of events...

Newsgroups:
sci.electronics.design,alt.binaries.schematics.ele ctronic,sci.electronics.cad
Subject: Abate Holding Your Breath...Thompson's Design
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:24:08 -0700
Message-ID:

There is something missing from that chronology, but what is there is more
offensive than criticizing a press release.

Press releases come from the PR department, so he didn't even criticize MIT
but it's PR machine. Unbelievable.


--

Reply in group, but if emailing add one more
zero, and remove the last word.

JT - photo.
 

On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:39:57 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
wrote:


John Fields wrote:
---
Your: "My "feud" with JT began when I made fun of a goofy "scientific
breakthrough" press release from MIT, with no reference to JT. His
alma mater is apparently sacred to him, and he took it as a personal
insult. He responded by saying obscene and obviously untrue things
about my wife."

doesn't explain why, if you knew of Jim's affection for MIT and that
he'd take the insult personally, you didn't couch your post in a tone
more conducive to criticizing rationally instead of belittling by
making fun of.

I don't know why, but I guess you don't see what incredible sensitivity for
the school this requires. And I can't understand how anyone could assume
that anyone would be less sensitive about their wife than their school.

Calling someone a pimp for his future wife is orders of magnitude more
serious.

When Genome made a despicable comment about Jim's late son, Jim simply
replied that Genome would get no more assistance from him.

So the difference is obviously that this built up over a longer time, and
therefore it's not just because of isolated comments.

But the pimp remark stands out from the rest.

Did you read...

Newsgroups: alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
Subject: JT - photo.
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:47:08 -0700
Message-ID:

The infamous PITA exaggerates (can't use his name or I lose even my
own posts :-)

I have a whole directory of everything I _ever_ said here about BU.
_Fair_ people might want to read all that. But I'll not hold my
breath.

The infamous PITA will eventually stop posting about me, because I
won't see and be annoyed by his posts. Then he'll find someone else
to denigrate and lie about.

Maybe he'll choose Tom Del Rosso :-}

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.