Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Electronic Schematics (alt.binaries.schematics.electronic) A place to show and share your electronics schematic drawings. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to sci.electronics.design,alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.cad
|
|||
|
|||
Net neutrality
Net neutrality...
http://hotair.com/archives/2011/06/0...outside-group/ ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food. |
#2
Posted to sci.electronics.design,alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.cad
|
|||
|
|||
Net neutrality
flipper wrote:
On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 08:47:52 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote: Net neutrality... http://hotair.com/archives/2011/06/0...outside-group/ ...Jim Thompson I often wonder just what the hell it is about "Congress shall make no law..." that socialists find so damn confusing. You fail to understand.._Congress_ is not making the laws, so therefore ANY law on ANY subject in ANY direction can be made (and will..). |
#3
Posted to sci.electronics.design,alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.cad
|
|||
|
|||
Net neutrality
flipper wrote:
On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 23:45:25 -0700, Robert Baer wrote: flipper wrote: On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 08:47:52 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote: Net neutrality... http://hotair.com/archives/2011/06/0...outside-group/ ...Jim Thompson I often wonder just what the hell it is about "Congress shall make no law..." that socialists find so damn confusing. You fail to understand.._Congress_ is not making the laws, so therefore ANY law on ANY subject in ANY direction can be made (and will..). I debated with myself about bringing up the sophist argument that 'regulation' by an 'agency' is not 'Congress making law' but opted for the plain and simple direct approach. To wit, calling a pig a duck doesn't make it a duck but even if one fell for that sophistry Congress still 'makes a law' in creating and 'authorizing' the offending agency so the 'simple and direct' approach, that "Congress shall make no law...," is still perfectly apropos. Logically speaking, you are 100% correct. BUT.. Politics seems to be as anti-logic as one can get.. |
#4
Posted to sci.electronics.design,alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,
|
|||
|
|||
Net neutrality
In article ,
Jim Thompson wrote: Net neutrality... http://hotair.com/archives/2011/06/0...lity-with-outs ide-group/ ...Jim Thompson An excellent argument if it was 1990. The only people in the US seeing a free market for Internet services are those that are still using dialup. -- I will not see posts from Google or e-mails from Yahoo because I must filter them as spam |
#5
Posted to sci.electronics.design,alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,
|
|||
|
|||
Net neutrality
In article ,
Jim Thompson wrote: Net neutrality... http://hotair.com/archives/2011/06/0...lity-with-outs ide-group/ ...Jim Thompson An excellent argument if it was 1990. The only people in the US seeing a free market for Internet services are those that are still using dialup. -- I will not see posts from Google or e-mails from Yahoo because I must filter them as spam |
#6
Posted to sci.electronics.design,alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Net neutrality
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:21:32 -0700, Kevin McMurtrie
wrote: In article , Jim Thompson wrote: Net neutrality... http://hotair.com/archives/2011/06/0...lity-with-outs ide-group/ ...Jim Thompson An excellent argument if it was 1990. The only people in the US seeing a free market for Internet services are those that are still using dialup. In some cities, you have a choise of wired DSL or cable or even microwave. But in lots of places, people have only one provider of reasonable-speed internet service. It's not unreasonable to demand that a franchised provider, like a phone or cable company, transport packets for a fee but not snoop their contents. John |
#7
Posted to sci.electronics.design,alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Net neutrality
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:21:32 -0700, Kevin McMurtrie
wrote: In article , Jim Thompson wrote: Net neutrality... http://hotair.com/archives/2011/06/0...lity-with-outs ide-group/ ...Jim Thompson An excellent argument if it was 1990. The only people in the US seeing a free market for Internet services are those that are still using dialup. In some cities, you have a choise of wired DSL or cable or even microwave. But in lots of places, people have only one provider of reasonable-speed internet service. It's not unreasonable to demand that a franchised provider, like a phone or cable company, transport packets for a fee but not snoop their contents. John |
#8
Posted to sci.electronics.design,alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Net neutrality
John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:21:32 -0700, Kevin McMurtrie Jim Thompson Net neutrality... http://hotair.com/archives/2011/06/0...lity-with-outs ide-group/ An excellent argument if it was 1990. The only people in the US seeing a free market for Internet services are those that are still using dialup. In some cities, you have a choise of wired DSL or cable or even microwave. But in lots of places, people have only one provider of reasonable-speed internet service. It's not unreasonable to demand that a franchised provider, like a phone or cable company, transport packets for a fee but not snoop their contents. Is there such a thing as a 2-way satellite link? Thanks, Rich |
#9
Posted to sci.electronics.design,alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Net neutrality
John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:21:32 -0700, Kevin McMurtrie Jim Thompson Net neutrality... http://hotair.com/archives/2011/06/0...lity-with-outs ide-group/ An excellent argument if it was 1990. The only people in the US seeing a free market for Internet services are those that are still using dialup. In some cities, you have a choise of wired DSL or cable or even microwave. But in lots of places, people have only one provider of reasonable-speed internet service. It's not unreasonable to demand that a franchised provider, like a phone or cable company, transport packets for a fee but not snoop their contents. Is there such a thing as a 2-way satellite link? Thanks, Rich |
#10
Posted to sci.electronics.design,alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Net neutrality
John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:21:32 -0700, Kevin McMurtrie wrote: In article , Jim Thompson wrote: Net neutrality... http://hotair.com/archives/2011/06/0...lity-with-outs ide-group/ ...Jim Thompson An excellent argument if it was 1990. The only people in the US seeing a free market for Internet services are those that are still using dialup. In some cities, you have a choise of wired DSL or cable or even microwave. But in lots of places, people have only one provider of reasonable-speed internet service. It's not unreasonable to demand that a franchised provider, like a phone or cable company, transport packets for a fee but not snoop their contents. John You must live in fantasy land--"not snoop their contents". The Feds are everywhere. |
#11
Posted to sci.electronics.design,alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Net neutrality
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:24:08 -0700, Robert Baer
wrote: John Larkin wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:21:32 -0700, Kevin McMurtrie wrote: In article , Jim Thompson wrote: Net neutrality... http://hotair.com/archives/2011/06/0...lity-with-outs ide-group/ ...Jim Thompson An excellent argument if it was 1990. The only people in the US seeing a free market for Internet services are those that are still using dialup. In some cities, you have a choise of wired DSL or cable or even microwave. But in lots of places, people have only one provider of reasonable-speed internet service. It's not unreasonable to demand that a franchised provider, like a phone or cable company, transport packets for a fee but not snoop their contents. John You must live in fantasy land--"not snoop their contents". The Feds are everywhere. Comcast shouldn't be "The Feds." They should ship stuff, like UPS, and not poke around inside, or charge more for Netflix packets than for their own. Do you WANT your ISP to selectively slow down packets based on their own self-interest? John |
#12
Posted to sci.electronics.design,alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Net neutrality
John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:24:08 -0700, Robert Baer wrote: John Larkin wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:21:32 -0700, Kevin McMurtrie wrote: In article , Jim Thompson wrote: Net neutrality... http://hotair.com/archives/2011/06/0...lity-with-outs ide-group/ ...Jim Thompson An excellent argument if it was 1990. The only people in the US seeing a free market for Internet services are those that are still using dialup. In some cities, you have a choise of wired DSL or cable or even microwave. But in lots of places, people have only one provider of reasonable-speed internet service. It's not unreasonable to demand that a franchised provider, like a phone or cable company, transport packets for a fee but not snoop their contents. John You must live in fantasy land--"not snoop their contents". The Feds are everywhere. Comcast shouldn't be "The Feds." They should ship stuff, like UPS, and not poke around inside, or charge more for Netflix packets than for their own. Do you WANT your ISP to selectively slow down packets based on their own self-interest? John Consult with the CIA etc about that... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT FCC loses key ruling on Internet `neutrality' | Home Repair | |||
Off Topic: Net Neutrality | Home Repair |