xkcd does it better.

Tim

P.S. Awesome, my filter even caught your latest idiotic nym. You're getting
really bad at this!

--
Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk.
Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms

"Jupiter Jaq" wrote in message
...

In message , Tim Williams
writes
xkcd does it better.

Tim

P.S. Awesome, my filter even caught your latest idiotic nym. You're getting
really bad at this!

A 'real' scientist WOULD do it again, but using something like the
proverbial bargepole to activate the lever. If there was no zap, he
would then try it again for a third time, taking hold of the lever like
he did the first time. If there was still no zap, he would then write a
scientific paper containing lots of mathematical formulae, analysing the
reasons why the sequence of events took place the way they did. Like
most scientific papers, no one would read it.
--
Ian

On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 06:49:10 -0500, "Tim Williams"
wrote:

xkcd does it better.

Tim

P.S. Awesome, my filter even caught your latest idiotic nym. You're getting
really bad at this!

As has been stated already. I am not making any attempt to foil any
retarded twit's filter.

If I were, your filter would not do a damned thing for you.

Only totally retarded twits have filter problems. Most of you basic
retarded twits manage fine, except for the part where you think you know
what is going on in other posters' heads.

On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:17:03 +0100, Ian Jackson
wrote:

In message , Tim Williams
writes
xkcd does it better.

Tim

P.S. Awesome, my filter even caught your latest idiotic nym. You're getting
really bad at this!

A 'real' scientist WOULD do it again, but using something like the
proverbial bargepole to activate the lever. If there was no zap, he
would then try it again for a third time, taking hold of the lever like
he did the first time. If there was still no zap, he would then write a
scientific paper containing lots of mathematical formulae, analysing the
reasons why the sequence of events took place the way they did. Like
most scientific papers, no one would read it.


Sounds like the legislative process, except they are too stupid to
outline everything first.

Ian Jackson writes:
A 'real' scientist WOULD do it again, but using something like the
proverbial bargepole to activate the lever.

I've been that scientist!

At a hotel once, the emergency off switch for the pool's hot tub had a
ground fault, and my friend got a shock trying to turn it back on (it
had got bumped, and shut off the pool). So, I checked it again a
"safer" way (fling finger tips across it so no chance of grabbing or
staying there). Yup, shock. Call the manager. *He* wasn't as smart.
He though we were kidding, so he dunked his hand in the water, went to
the switch, and just grabbed it.

If he had been wearing his sign, we could have stopped him.

On 23 Jul 2009 10:50:27 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:


Ian Jackson writes:
A 'real' scientist WOULD do it again, but using something like the
proverbial bargepole to activate the lever.

I've been that scientist!

At a hotel once, the emergency off switch for the pool's hot tub had a
ground fault, and my friend got a shock trying to turn it back on (it
had got bumped, and shut off the pool). So, I checked it again a
"safer" way (fling finger tips across it so no chance of grabbing or
staying there). Yup, shock. Call the manager. *He* wasn't as smart.
He though we were kidding, so he dunked his hand in the water, went to
the switch, and just grabbed it.

If he had been wearing his sign, we could have stopped him.

Sno-o-o-ort ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine Sometimes I even put it in the food